It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.We, the truly rational, tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The self appointed masters, when they're in absolute power, simply don't care. The fact of the matter is that the only crime to those who value power is simple disobedience. To perceive and think as a proper rational person is fundamentally toxic to the masters. And reason must be suppressed by any means necessary. We the living believe in justice. The masters on the other hand, don't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they're firmly seated on top.
-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist
Tuesday, April 09, 2019
A Quote
Monday, April 08, 2019
A Fact
Reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what their
intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real world
and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as some
of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore the
facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to error,
to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster. The
liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives)
openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then
proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they're totally unfit to do
so.
Sunday, April 07, 2019
Another History Lesson
Here's a quote:
"We demand the abolition of the mercenary army and the foundation of a people's army." That sounds like something The Democratic Party would agree with.
I want to watch the DUmmies, the KOSsacks, and the members of Antifa pop arteries when they find out who really wrote it. (Tee hee hee.)
- We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens.Guess which well known socialist party had all that in its platform?
- The abolition of incomes unearned by work.
- The breaking of the slavery of interest
- Personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
- We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).
- We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
- We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.
- We demand the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation
- The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education. The aim of the school must be to give the pupil, beginning with the first sign of intelligence, a grasp of the nation of the State (through the study of civic affairs).
- The State must ensure that the nation's health standards are raised by protecting mothers and infants, by prohibiting child labor.
- We demand the abolition of the mercenary army and the foundation of a people's army.
- The publishing of papers which are not conducive to the national welfare must be forbidden.
- Our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.
- To put the whole of this program into effect, we demand the creation of a strong central state power
"We demand the abolition of the mercenary army and the foundation of a people's army." That sounds like something The Democratic Party would agree with.
I want to watch the DUmmies, the KOSsacks, and the members of Antifa pop arteries when they find out who really wrote it. (Tee hee hee.)
Saturday, April 06, 2019
History Lesson
What most people don’t realize is that The Matrix is really a remake of the 1969 East German film Wirklichkeit ist eine Illusion, also lassen Sie uns sprechen Rätsel, Eintragfaden-Polizei und Tanzkampf
(”Reality is an Illusion, so Let Us Speak Riddles, Shoot Police and
Dancefight”). This film was made in response to the large number of
philosophically obscure European films released in 1968 and the East
German communists didn’t want to be left in the dust by their Western
opposite numbers (It’s the RED pill for a reason).
Unfortunately the East German censors were either not “read in” on the project or they didn’t care and they refused to approve of its release and the film was placed into storage until the fall of the East German communist government in 1989. After a very short limited release a number of VHS copies of the film made it to Los Angeles and the rest is history.
Unfortunately the East German censors were either not “read in” on the project or they didn’t care and they refused to approve of its release and the film was placed into storage until the fall of the East German communist government in 1989. After a very short limited release a number of VHS copies of the film made it to Los Angeles and the rest is history.
Friday, April 05, 2019
Suggestion
Those who deny the validity of our Constitution should hanged with piano wire. Yes, I know the Constitution forbids "cruel and unusual punishment." But these assholes deny the validity of our Constitution. So why not?
Thursday, April 04, 2019
Wednesday, April 03, 2019
Thought For The Day
Having a Democrat whine about someone else engaged in the sexual abuse
of others, being corrupt, or having a dictatorial lust for power, is
like Larry Flynt complaining about someone else being obscene.
Tuesday, April 02, 2019
Question
Why do Leftists have such a problem with tyrannicide?
We must take into account the fact that the Left's ideal of society is one where the State controls all aspects of human life and where the refusal to submit to the will of the State is a punishable offense. Punishments which include the penalty of death.
In short, the Left seeks to establish a state of tyranny.
This may explain why they have a problem with those who practice tyrannicide.
We must take into account the fact that the Left's ideal of society is one where the State controls all aspects of human life and where the refusal to submit to the will of the State is a punishable offense. Punishments which include the penalty of death.
In short, the Left seeks to establish a state of tyranny.
This may explain why they have a problem with those who practice tyrannicide.
Monday, April 01, 2019
Fact
Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot died peacefully instead of properly at the end of a rope. Socialism was the most toxic ideology promoted in the previous century, there's no excuse to push it.
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Saturday, March 30, 2019
A Fact Of Reality
To a rational person Hubbard was a piece of excrement, and that's an insult to excrement.
Friday, March 29, 2019
Thought For The Day
Corruption notwithstanding, the worst of those who who follow Hillary do so out of a belief in their own infallibility. A
large part of this feeling of infallibility comes from their adherence
to what they feel to be a inerrant or infallible holy text. My fear is, given my own reading of history, is that ending of this mess will involve a machine gun and a really long ditch.
Thursday, March 28, 2019
A Blast From The Past
Let's talk about Socialism.
We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you'll pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What shouldn't be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you'll pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It shouldn't be a surprise to us that they're treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you'll pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal and perfect description of a slave labor economic system.
It's invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It's the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gee, gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.
Perhaps we should start treating them as such. Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you'll pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What shouldn't be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you'll pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It shouldn't be a surprise to us that they're treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you'll pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal and perfect description of a slave labor economic system.
It's invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It's the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gee, gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.
Perhaps we should start treating them as such. Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Quote Of The Day
"Fascism can cause blunt head trauma and/or violent death. Keep fascism away from children and pets."
-- A banned poster in Wisconsin
-- A banned poster in Wisconsin
Monday, March 25, 2019
Question
Was I influenced by Adolf Hitler?
Perhaps. When I was stationed at Fort Benning I saw a document signed by him in the Infantry Museum. I subsequently changed my signature.
Perhaps. When I was stationed at Fort Benning I saw a document signed by him in the Infantry Museum. I subsequently changed my signature.
Sunday, March 24, 2019
A Question And A Prediction
Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez die peacefully instead of properly at the end of a rope?
Yes, I'm afraid so..
Yes, I'm afraid so..
Changes
The terrestrial biosphere is a dynamic environment within a dynamic universe. The demand for power to stop climate change is pure nonsense.
Saturday, March 23, 2019
Book Review
Here's a repost of a very important book review originally published in THE RESISTER. If you haven't read it, you should.
BOOK REVIEW
-----------
The Ominous Parallels--The End of Freedom in America. Leonard Peikoff. New York: NAL Penguin, Inc., 1982. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 83-60247. ix + 316 pages plus references and index.. Soft cover $10.00.
Reviewed by Red Barchetta
This book asks: "What caused Nazi Germany?" Unlike lesser attempts to explain that blood bath, The Ominous Parallels answers: "The same philosophies that are prevalent in the United States of America." Dr. Peikoff argues convincingly that in both countries the intellectual, educational and political leadership share, explicitly or implicitly, the same core ideologies. These ideologies submit that reality is subjective--a malleable illusion; emotions are the proper guide to human action--especially the emotions of race and the tribe, which cannot be understood by outsiders; self-sacrifice for the sake of others should usurp a man's own desires--and the state must take any necessary action to ensure that sacrifice. These ideologies demand that "individual selfishness" does not obstruct the path of "the public interest."
From Part One, Chapter One: " 'To be a socialist,' says Goebbels, 'is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole.' By this definition, the Nazis practiced what they preached. They practiced it at home and then abroad. No one can claim that they did not sacrifice enough individuals."
The underlying theme in The Ominous Parallels is how philosophy shapes cultures, and reading this book, it is difficult to escape a feeling of hopeless dread; of being caught in racing floodwaters and swept madly toward a destruction you are helpless to prevent. Given the theme of this nation's descent into fascism, and Dr. Peikoff's uncompromising method of proving it, that is the proper effect.
The conclusion of The Ominous Parallels is not that we are helplessly destined to go to the same lengths down the same road as Germany. The conclusion is that it is time for us to choose whether or not we will; that if we fail to consciously decide, the decision will be made for us. Contrary to the bleating of irrationalists then or now, it is only a coherent philosophy of reason and individual rights which will give us the means to choose not to become our own slaughterhouse.
Dr. Peikoff shows that such a philosophy is not prevalent in the United States because, although this nation was unique in being founded on philosophic ideals (rather than arbitrary land-grabs and tribal warfare), it was ultimately lacking a coherent detailed formulation of those ideals, as well as the Aristotelian philosophers to create one. Independence from Europe was only won physically--not ideologically. "The land of poets and philosophers was brought down by its poets and philosophers," says Peikoff. The resulting bowel movement of docile Nazi sheep who obeyed their Fuhrer because they obeyed their philosophers could indeed be us, for their philosophers--their pragmatists and Kants, their Hegels and Marxes--are ours
by adoption.
We do have one trump card, "...the philosophical breach between the American people and the intellectuals." In Germany, the intellectuals and the people were united in ideology, feeling at home in their country and with each other. This, says Peikoff, is not yet the case in America. Peikoff's book will help to keep it that way.
Friday, March 22, 2019
Thought For The Day
We should recall that Comrade Stalin was embalmed and displayed next to Lenin for eight years.
Apparently so everyone in the Soviet Union could be assured that he was in fact dead.
Apparently so everyone in the Soviet Union could be assured that he was in fact dead.
Thursday, March 21, 2019
A Proposal
I would amend the constitution as follows:
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
A Truth
Once
force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then
the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left.
Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society
then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those
same rules. Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of
civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you. It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.
What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?
It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds him or her self staring at the muzzle of an assault rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put him or her self there. And the truth isn't a leftist strong point.
What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?
It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds him or her self staring at the muzzle of an assault rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put him or her self there. And the truth isn't a leftist strong point.
Tuesday, March 19, 2019
Rant of the Day
The fact of the matter is that the self-described "Peace Activist"
does not act out of conscience but out of a fraudulent desire to pose as
a morally superior being without any regard for the millions of
innocents that they condemn to death and servitude. A "Peace Activist"
is a willing accessory to the acts of mass slavery and mass murders
committed by the various adherents of toxic ideologies such as Socialism
and Islam. And killing a "Peace Activist" is not an act of murder, it
is in effect the putting down of a diseased animal which is a
demonstrated hazard to innocent Human Life.
Monday, March 18, 2019
A Speech From An Unpublished Novel
The speech is from the tenth chapter of Reset.
“If there’s a common myth I want to bury it’s the notion that Fascism is a right ring doctrine. So what’s a Fascist? Check your own beliefs, do you want power over another person? If the answer is no, you will never be a Fascist or any other brand of totalitarian. When someone wants power over another person, they’re a Fascist or other brand of totalitarian. As that idiot Mussolini said, everything must be within the state, and nothing outside of it. And criticism of the State was a crime under the doctrine of Fascism. This is why the Fascist or totalitarian State always fails. In reality someone who believes they’re infallible will always fail. According to Josef Stalin his definition of Fascists included Leon Trotsky, a lifelong Marxist with being the founder and original commander of the Soviet Army, and like himself a henchman of Vladimir Lenin. Any who opposed Comrade Stalin, or his version of Communism, was by his definition a Fascist. The actual purpose of the Berlin Wall was to prevent the communist slaves from escaping but the East German Communist official name of the wall is the ‘Anti-fascist Protective Barrier.’”
“If there’s a common myth I want to bury it’s the notion that Fascism is a right ring doctrine. So what’s a Fascist? Check your own beliefs, do you want power over another person? If the answer is no, you will never be a Fascist or any other brand of totalitarian. When someone wants power over another person, they’re a Fascist or other brand of totalitarian. As that idiot Mussolini said, everything must be within the state, and nothing outside of it. And criticism of the State was a crime under the doctrine of Fascism. This is why the Fascist or totalitarian State always fails. In reality someone who believes they’re infallible will always fail. According to Josef Stalin his definition of Fascists included Leon Trotsky, a lifelong Marxist with being the founder and original commander of the Soviet Army, and like himself a henchman of Vladimir Lenin. Any who opposed Comrade Stalin, or his version of Communism, was by his definition a Fascist. The actual purpose of the Berlin Wall was to prevent the communist slaves from escaping but the East German Communist official name of the wall is the ‘Anti-fascist Protective Barrier.’”
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Thought For The Day
If history has taught us anything it's that those who imagine
themselves to be infallible will fail. And those who imagine themselves
incapable of evil will do evil. But try to tell that to a supporter of Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.
Saturday, March 16, 2019
Questions
How many people (apart from members of the KKK) that the NRA killed?
None.
How many people have Marxists murdered?
Over 3000 a day on average a day during the Cold War.
None.
How many people have Marxists murdered?
Over 3000 a day on average a day during the Cold War.
Friday, March 15, 2019
Prediction
The Greatest Generation is dying off and the lessons of history are being forgotten. The past is being forgotten and there will be more mass murder and mass graves from coast to coast in The United States.
Update 1240:
I forgot. Somebody important was assassinated today in 44 BC.
Update 1240:
I forgot. Somebody important was assassinated today in 44 BC.
Thursday, March 14, 2019
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Question
The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the
means it is brought about. The case in this point is that the
disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates
of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this. In their view
reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder
of citizens who own guns is morally correct.
But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.
The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A state
that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and
devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by
deadly force,and those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead, and there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead, and there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Getting In Touch With Their Inner Che.
Here's a clue for all you self-styled "progressives."
YOU LOST.
In spite of the bribes offered, the lies told, the assaults on persons and property, and the other nonsense that your side pulled, you lost the presidential election.
Get over it.
We refuse to be a living prop in your ideological fantasies. We refuse to bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we refuse to embark on the path that ultimately leads to the anonymous ditch outside of town.
This isn't Russia in 1917. We know about the ultimate results of your ideological fantasy and will not go down that path without a fight.
So go home, grow up, and get a life.
And I have special message for all those schissekopfen who feel that its cool to wear a Che Guevara shirt in public: Che was the inhuman piece of excrement that Comrade Castro put in charge of "liquidating enemies of the people", which in reality meant shooting anyone with property to steal or who otherwise had a mind or conscience of their own.
In short, Che Guevara was a bloody communist mass murderer. Wearing a Che shirt in a free nation is as disgusting as wearing a Heinrich Himmler shirt in Tel Aviv.
And wearing a Che shirt says that you are no better than a bloody murderer.
The only reason that you aren't beaten to a bloody pulp and hanged from a convenient tree or lamp post is that we are better than you and the murderer that you call a hero.
YOU LOST.
In spite of the bribes offered, the lies told, the assaults on persons and property, and the other nonsense that your side pulled, you lost the presidential election.
Get over it.
We refuse to be a living prop in your ideological fantasies. We refuse to bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we refuse to embark on the path that ultimately leads to the anonymous ditch outside of town.
This isn't Russia in 1917. We know about the ultimate results of your ideological fantasy and will not go down that path without a fight.
So go home, grow up, and get a life.
And I have special message for all those schissekopfen who feel that its cool to wear a Che Guevara shirt in public: Che was the inhuman piece of excrement that Comrade Castro put in charge of "liquidating enemies of the people", which in reality meant shooting anyone with property to steal or who otherwise had a mind or conscience of their own.
In short, Che Guevara was a bloody communist mass murderer. Wearing a Che shirt in a free nation is as disgusting as wearing a Heinrich Himmler shirt in Tel Aviv.
And wearing a Che shirt says that you are no better than a bloody murderer.
The only reason that you aren't beaten to a bloody pulp and hanged from a convenient tree or lamp post is that we are better than you and the murderer that you call a hero.
Monday, March 11, 2019
Sunday, March 10, 2019
Thoughts For The Day
Here's a thousand words why I will never vote for The Democratic Party.
There's a right way to with deal someone like Koresh and it wasn't followed.
A basic premise of Collectivism is that all people need a leader to think for them and to collectively direct their lives. In the Collectivist view the Russians needed a big brother or father figure such as Stalin, the Chinese needed a Mao, the Koreans (not just in the north) needed the Kim Dynasty. And we in the United States absolutely require the guidance of The Big Zero or Hillary.
(Of course any sympathies the Left ever had for fellow socialists like the Austrian Corporal or the Loud Mouthed Italian fellow have been quietly dropped down the memory hole.)
This is, of course, a total fantasy.
The Shepherd Fantasy appears to be a psychological device that Collectivists use to evade knowledge of, or to mentally blank out, the fact that they are not really useful members of a human society but are truly nothing more than a bunch of parasites and outright predators who are feeding off their betters.
As Ayn Rand once pointed out, they need us. We on the other hand, have absolutely no use for them.
So why won’t the Collectivists get out of the way of those of us who live in the Real World?
Because they know that sooner or later, we will properly identify them for what they are, and that we will eventually turn our guns upon them.
There's a right way to with deal someone like Koresh and it wasn't followed.
A basic premise of Collectivism is that all people need a leader to think for them and to collectively direct their lives. In the Collectivist view the Russians needed a big brother or father figure such as Stalin, the Chinese needed a Mao, the Koreans (not just in the north) needed the Kim Dynasty. And we in the United States absolutely require the guidance of The Big Zero or Hillary.
(Of course any sympathies the Left ever had for fellow socialists like the Austrian Corporal or the Loud Mouthed Italian fellow have been quietly dropped down the memory hole.)
This is, of course, a total fantasy.
The Shepherd Fantasy appears to be a psychological device that Collectivists use to evade knowledge of, or to mentally blank out, the fact that they are not really useful members of a human society but are truly nothing more than a bunch of parasites and outright predators who are feeding off their betters.
As Ayn Rand once pointed out, they need us. We on the other hand, have absolutely no use for them.
So why won’t the Collectivists get out of the way of those of us who live in the Real World?
Because they know that sooner or later, we will properly identify them for what they are, and that we will eventually turn our guns upon them.
Saturday, March 09, 2019
Question Of The Day
Why did The Holocaust happen?
Because most of the perpetrators of The Holocaust believed they were good people doing good acts.
Because most of the perpetrators of The Holocaust believed they were good people doing good acts.
Friday, March 08, 2019
Thursday, March 07, 2019
Wednesday, March 06, 2019
Tuesday, March 05, 2019
Why Is There Hate?
Or at least one cause of the hatred. The Left in its fundamental form is a group of essentially parasitic
beings that wish to demolish the present consent-based American
social-economic structure and replace it with a coercion-based political
order that they regard as morally superior. Unfortunately for us the
Left's ideal version of America strongly resembles a Überkonzentrationlager with themselves as the commandants and overseers. Anyone who stands in
the way of the Left in their quest to subjugate the American republic --
policeman, citizen soldier, or President Trump -- is rhetorically blasted
as being the vilest of monsters while those who have consistently
demonstrated their hatred of American liberty, such as Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, are worshiped as though they were the enactors of the divine will.
Monday, March 04, 2019
Hatred
There are those who pose as Progressives that have declared that criticism of Islam is an expression of hatred.
Really?
No--this is hatred.
Nearly 3000 people were murdered as an act of hated against Humanity.
Why?
For Muslims there is no why. There is only the will of the false god Allah as dropped from the mouth of the false Prophet Mohamed. And it was only in the Twentieth Century that we would see anyone who equaled that level of depravity.
Really?
No--this is hatred.
Nearly 3000 people were murdered as an act of hated against Humanity.
Why?
For Muslims there is no why. There is only the will of the false god Allah as dropped from the mouth of the false Prophet Mohamed. And it was only in the Twentieth Century that we would see anyone who equaled that level of depravity.
Sunday, March 03, 2019
Saturday, March 02, 2019
Friday, March 01, 2019
Thursday, February 28, 2019
A Definition
A Democratic Socialist is still a Socialist and thus is still an Enemy of Mankind.
Those who value power will never take the word "no" for an answer, ever.
Those who value power will never take the word "no" for an answer, ever.
Wednesday, February 27, 2019
A Reminder
"To send men to the firing squad Judicial proof is unnecessary. These
procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution and a
revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure
hate."
--Che Guevara, Marxist Murderer
Those who dehumanize them themselves cannot claim protection under a human right. Killing a Marxist is no more an act of murder than putting down a rabid dog or eliminating any other hazard to Human Life.
If the Democratic Party wants a Civil War they'll get one, up the ass.
--Che Guevara, Marxist Murderer
Those who dehumanize them themselves cannot claim protection under a human right. Killing a Marxist is no more an act of murder than putting down a rabid dog or eliminating any other hazard to Human Life.
If the Democratic Party wants a Civil War they'll get one, up the ass.
Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Monday, February 25, 2019
Sunday, February 24, 2019
A Question And An Answer
Why is there evil in the world?
There's an answer and you may not like it.
Many perpetrators of evil acts really believe they're the good guys.
Many perpetrators of The Holocaust really believed they were good people doing good acts.
Many members of the Democratic Party really believe they're the good guys.
There's an answer and you may not like it.
Many perpetrators of evil acts really believe they're the good guys.
Many perpetrators of The Holocaust really believed they were good people doing good acts.
Many members of the Democratic Party really believe they're the good guys.
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Friday, February 22, 2019
A Message For Democrats
Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi are cynical con artists who are using you, but you don’t have to be a victim, and all you have to do is walk away from the Democratic Party while you still can.
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Questions
Should Barrack Obama be identified as an Enemy of Mankind?
Yes.
Should Barrack Obama be put to death?
Yes.
Yes.
Should Barrack Obama be put to death?
Yes.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Monday, February 18, 2019
Thought For The Day
Socialism was the most toxic ideology of the last century. There's no excuse for advocating it.
Sunday, February 17, 2019
Saturday, February 16, 2019
Thought For The Day
Actor Tom Cruise has been quoted as saying that calling one's self a Scientologist is a privilege, he may have said that calling one's self a National Socialist is a privilege.
Friday, February 15, 2019
Thursday, February 14, 2019
Facts
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" and those who are in
favor of banning firearms are Enemies of Mankind and should be treated
in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. There's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Question
Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?
My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.
There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:
Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value. The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.
Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government. Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.
My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.
There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:
Amendment IFirst, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value. The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.
Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government. Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.
Tuesday, February 12, 2019
History
The lack of admission of Hitler to the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts wasn't the first mistake made by an art school. And until he onset of Operation Barbarossa the Soviet Union under Comrade Stalin was an Axis power.
Monday, February 11, 2019
Suggestion
Perhaps we should treat the Democratic Party as the Enemies of Mankind they actually are/
Sunday, February 10, 2019
Questions
Is Alexandia Ocasio-Cortez- an Enemy of Mankind and should she treated as such?
Yes.
Should Moses be treated as the genocidal piece of trash that he was?
Yes.
Yes.
Should Moses be treated as the genocidal piece of trash that he was?
Yes.
Saturday, February 09, 2019
A Prediction
The mass murder of American citizens will be carried out by ordinary people and not great monsters. Normal people will do foul acts when they are ordered to and evil people never twirl mustaches.
Friday, February 08, 2019
A Suggestion
All anyone needs to do is to walk away from the Democratic Party and their path of death.
Thursday, February 07, 2019
Wednesday, February 06, 2019
A Prediction
Those who carried out The Holocaust believed they were victims fighting evil. Those who will carry out the next great mass murder will believe themselves to be victims fighting evil.
Tuesday, February 05, 2019
Monday, February 04, 2019
Sunday, February 03, 2019
Saturday, February 02, 2019
Friday, February 01, 2019
Thought For The Day
In a discussion thread on terrorism on Little Green Footballs I once made a
suggestion concerning the treatment of captured terrorists. I said:
"How about making them listen to Barbara Streisand and Yoko Ono?"
Not everyone agreed with me. They said:
"Even for terrorists, that's inhumane!"
"The Pentagon's ethical war robots will not allow that to happen."
"Well, that'd break me, for sure. I'd have to swallow my tounge or cut my wrists with my teeth or something (anything) to make the horrible noise go away."
"Barbara is one thing, but Yoko? Good God, man..."
"Good God, man. I do have my limits to cruelty."
Civilized people can disagree, right?
"How about making them listen to Barbara Streisand and Yoko Ono?"
Not everyone agreed with me. They said:
"Even for terrorists, that's inhumane!"
"The Pentagon's ethical war robots will not allow that to happen."
"Well, that'd break me, for sure. I'd have to swallow my tounge or cut my wrists with my teeth or something (anything) to make the horrible noise go away."
"Barbara is one thing, but Yoko? Good God, man..."
"Good God, man. I do have my limits to cruelty."
Civilized people can disagree, right?
Thursday, January 31, 2019
Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Monday, January 28, 2019
Sunday, January 27, 2019
Thought Of The Day
When a modern Republican quotes a old school Democrat (like Harry S. Truman or John F. Kennedy) then something is seriously wrong.
Saturday, January 26, 2019
Friday, January 25, 2019
Thought For The Day
Once a week I have to take The Quarry bus to Cub Foods to buy groceries and I feel like the one Jewish guy in a bunch of Nazis.
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Heil Hillary!
The Democratic Party program of higher taxes on the productive to buy off the lazy and higher
regulations on business to buy off the jealous was known in the old country as zwangwirtshaft, a social-enconomic policy that was initiated by Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck under the Kaiserreich and brought to its ultimate fruition in the Fuhererreich by the NSDAP and its glorious leader Adolf Hitler. Just for fun try to compare the platform (if you can find a copy) of
the Democratic Party with the twenty-five point program of the National
Socialist German Workers Party. The Democratic program is essentially
totalitarian socialism without the Ubermensch fantasy and the leather fetish. But then the Democratic Party is really nothing more than a gang of despots, traitors, thieves, and murderers.
Need I say more?
Need I say more?
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Pop Quiz
A dilemma:
When I used to write for The Resister I wrotea feature called the "Moral Decision Game," in which the would-be patriot insurrectionist had to deal with an anticipated moral problem. The situation that I presented in the proposal (published as MDG#0) for the feature involved unarmed pro-socialist demonstrators blocking a choke point. (When I showed MDG#0 to my landlady she asked me how she was supposed to clean the blood and gunk off of the tank treads.)
My answer to anyone who would claim that shooting the assailant in the problem presented by the editors of Human Events is a violation of the right to life of the assailant is that the right to life is the right to live a human life. the life of a rationial and productive individual. It is not a right to behave as a subhuman animal. A right is a concept and as such can only apply to those who understand (or in the case of children, can be expected to learn) the concepts and adhere to them. Those who choose to act like animals have surrendered any claim to any human right.
Originally posted on Dec 8, 2003The conservative answer to the dilemma is stated in a single word. The liberal on the other hand wouldn't live long enough to complete the train of what we'll politely refer to as thought.
Question: You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges. You are carrying a Glock .45 and you are an expert shot.
You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family. What do you do?
When I used to write for The Resister I wrotea feature called the "Moral Decision Game," in which the would-be patriot insurrectionist had to deal with an anticipated moral problem. The situation that I presented in the proposal (published as MDG#0) for the feature involved unarmed pro-socialist demonstrators blocking a choke point. (When I showed MDG#0 to my landlady she asked me how she was supposed to clean the blood and gunk off of the tank treads.)
My answer to anyone who would claim that shooting the assailant in the problem presented by the editors of Human Events is a violation of the right to life of the assailant is that the right to life is the right to live a human life. the life of a rationial and productive individual. It is not a right to behave as a subhuman animal. A right is a concept and as such can only apply to those who understand (or in the case of children, can be expected to learn) the concepts and adhere to them. Those who choose to act like animals have surrendered any claim to any human right.
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
What IS The Problem With That Lot?
The one thing that the willfully depraved are loathe to do is to
acknowledge the fact that there are people who are in fact better in
some respect than they are. To make such an acknowledgement is to issue
an indictment of themselves and their own actions. The willfully depraved will murder individuals or even exterminate
entire nations before they will recognize the truth about themselves.
Monday, January 21, 2019
Thought For The Day
Those who proudly served Nicaraguan coffee when the country was under communist rule (when the coffee was grown by slave labor) seriously believed themselves to be superior people, so do the members of the Klan, the members of the NSDAP, and the members of Anti-fa.
Sunday, January 20, 2019
Saturday, January 19, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
Thursday, January 17, 2019
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Thought For The Day
What part of National Socialist German Workers Party (the English name) does The Left not understand?
Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that
the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would
really like to bury, it is the myth
that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and
those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing
parties.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars. To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high. If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail. And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil. But try to tell that to a supporter of Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars. To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high. If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail. And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil. But try to tell that to a supporter of Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.
(Image by Mark Urbin)
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
A Fact Of Reality
If the July 20th plot to kill Hitler worked there wouldn't be a Ardenennes Offensive (The Battle of the Bulge for Americans), the remainder of the Wehrmacht would have retreated behind the Rhine, and what remains of Germany would have nuked.
Monday, January 14, 2019
Thought Of The Day
The film Battlefield Earth is so bad I can't even watch negative reviews of it on You Tube.
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Friday, January 11, 2019
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Question
Should David Miscavige be treated as Enemy of Mankind that he actually is?
Yes, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.
Yes, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.
Wednesday, January 09, 2019
Wakeup Call
The doctrine of Islam denies that Human Life is the basic value of a real moral code. Why then should a true Muslim NOT
murder anyone at whim? The true Muslim has no real moral values. The
true Muslim is promised entry into the eternal whorehouse of Allah and
supply of eternal victims to placate his most base carnal desires.
From an Agnostic view: Rational men have identified God as the first and foremost of rational beings. From this position rational men seek to join God in his community and to this tries to identify the means of doing so. This the basis of the Western Monotheist Tradition. (WMT)
Furthermore in the WMT each man is responsible for and in control of his own life. He must by his own thoughts and actions follow the correct path to enter the Community of God. Attempts by some rulers to enforce a vision of "righteousness" upon his subjects runs counter to reality and are doomed to failure.
In many Polytheist traditions Man is deemed to be the property of one or more deities. Man exists solely to serve the deities and may be used or even killed in accordance to the doctrine of the religion. Man is not held to comply with real laws enacted to protect the life and property of other persons. Man must instead obey the commandments of the deities who claim ownership over him.
Into this cognitive environment the false prophet Mohammed inserted the doctrine of Islam. Islam was a theological fraud created to recruit a mob of criminals to enforce his will upon the vast sea of victims.
Mohammed recycled a pagan deity as his substitute for the god as identified in the WMT. To recruit the criminals required to commit his greater crimes Mohammed promised his followers the eternal gratification of the basest sensual desires. Here the real criminal acts are elevated to the moral position of right.
As a result where the doctrine of Islam rules there is savagery and enforced poverty in the place of the social peace and prosperity of the civilized nations.
Because the doctrine of Islam fully denies the Rights of Man and the laws enacted to protect those rights those who practice this false faith have no place in any civilization. And in fact have no place in existence.
From an Agnostic view: Rational men have identified God as the first and foremost of rational beings. From this position rational men seek to join God in his community and to this tries to identify the means of doing so. This the basis of the Western Monotheist Tradition. (WMT)
Furthermore in the WMT each man is responsible for and in control of his own life. He must by his own thoughts and actions follow the correct path to enter the Community of God. Attempts by some rulers to enforce a vision of "righteousness" upon his subjects runs counter to reality and are doomed to failure.
In many Polytheist traditions Man is deemed to be the property of one or more deities. Man exists solely to serve the deities and may be used or even killed in accordance to the doctrine of the religion. Man is not held to comply with real laws enacted to protect the life and property of other persons. Man must instead obey the commandments of the deities who claim ownership over him.
Into this cognitive environment the false prophet Mohammed inserted the doctrine of Islam. Islam was a theological fraud created to recruit a mob of criminals to enforce his will upon the vast sea of victims.
Mohammed recycled a pagan deity as his substitute for the god as identified in the WMT. To recruit the criminals required to commit his greater crimes Mohammed promised his followers the eternal gratification of the basest sensual desires. Here the real criminal acts are elevated to the moral position of right.
As a result where the doctrine of Islam rules there is savagery and enforced poverty in the place of the social peace and prosperity of the civilized nations.
Because the doctrine of Islam fully denies the Rights of Man and the laws enacted to protect those rights those who practice this false faith have no place in any civilization. And in fact have no place in existence.
Tuesday, January 08, 2019
Questions
Are Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi Enemies of Mankind?
Yes.
Should they be treated as such?
Yes, they should be hanged from the neck until dead, in the Nuremberg style.
How many American high school students can do this?
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" and those who are in favor of banning firearms are Enemies of Mankind and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. There's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Yes.
Should they be treated as such?
Yes, they should be hanged from the neck until dead, in the Nuremberg style.
How many American high school students can do this?
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" and those who are in favor of banning firearms are Enemies of Mankind and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. There's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, January 07, 2019
A Quote
"Somewhere out there is about thirty feet of rope and a lampost with Charlie Shumer's name on them."
--Someone
--Someone
Sunday, January 06, 2019
Question Of The Day
How can I hate something I believe doesn't exists? (For the record I'm an Objectivist.)
Saturday, January 05, 2019
A Historical Fact
Vlad Tepes got the nasty reputation for simply imitating what he saw Ottoman Muslims were already doing to Christian men who fell into their hands.
Friday, January 04, 2019
Coffee
I once went to Cedar Cultural Center for a concert. There was a sign saying that proudly served Nicaraguan coffee. Never mind the fact (at the time) it was grown by slave labor.
Thursday, January 03, 2019
Wednesday, January 02, 2019
Tuesday, January 01, 2019
Party Like It's 1859
If the Republican party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational
citizens will have no choice but to start a new party if we want to
peacefully make changes and restore a rational system of government. Is it time to start a new political party?
Yes.
The Western Monotheist Tradition and Socialism will be on the trash heap of history. Do rational people have to follow the followers of Hillary Clinton,Bernie Sanders, and Conservatism?
No.
Yes.
The Western Monotheist Tradition and Socialism will be on the trash heap of history. Do rational people have to follow the followers of Hillary Clinton,Bernie Sanders, and Conservatism?
No.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









