Suggestion

Those who deny the validity of our Constitution should hanged with piano wire.  Yes, I know the Constitution forbids "cruel and unusual punishment."  But these assholes deny the validity of our Constitution.  So why not?

Questions

Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?

My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.

There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

First, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.

Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value.  The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.

Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government.  Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.

Reality

We need another civil war, it's time to wipe out the Enemies Of Humanity that the Democrats have become.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

A Proposal

I now propose the following amendment to the United States Constitution:

The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed.  To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense. 


What are your questions on this proposal?

A Crime In Maryland

A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context.

Ayn Rand

The Right to Life, which is to live as a rational person in full command of your own life, is the fundamental right.  From this comes the right of self defense and also from this comes the Right to Keep and Bear Arms as recognized in the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.

To restate clearly the Constitution of the United States does not grant rights to anyone.  The Constitution only recognizes the preexisting rights of all people.  And The Constitution does this without exception for citizen or legal resident.

But the Federal Government and several state governments are in clear violation of The Constitution.  And they are in specific and deliberate violation of the Second Amendment.

A clear case in point was when a resident of the State of Florida was pulled over by Transportation Authority Police of the State of Maryland lawfully driving on an Interstate Highway.

At first the family vehicle was followed by an unmarked patrol car for ten minutes.  All while the officer ignored actual speed limit violators who rushed by.  After the car was pulled over the driver waited another ten minutes before he was ordered to exit his vehicle and treated as a known felon.

The victim was asked where the pistol he registered as a CCW permit holder was.

The victim answered that the pistol was in a safe at his home in Florida.  The so-called cop declare that the victim was lying.  The so-called police, with three backup cars, then proceeded to perform a search of the vehicle.

After a two hour search no weapon was found.

After all this the victim said:

And he wants to put me in jail. He wants to put me in jail. For no reason. He wants to take my wife and children away and put me in jail. In America, how does such a thing happen? ... And after all that, he didn’t even write me a ticket.

So what happened?

On the surface this appeared to be an example of common thug behavior.  In thus case the thugs with badges saw an apparently easy victim and pounced on him like a mindless predatory animal.   The fact that the victim was a CCW permit holder is included in his Florida DMV record.  With this information the thugs pounced.  This action was a clear sign of contempt for a constitutionally recognized right.

But this is not the only issue.  Even without the infliction of a physical injury or an outright murder this act was also identical to the behavior of the uniformed thugs of the NSDAP.  The original Nazi Brownshirts.  Here the armed citizen is equated to the Jew. The information in the Florida DMV database served as the functional equivalent of the Yellow Star of David.  As it was before in Germany this act was clearly depraved and beyond excuse.  The so-called police officers and their supervisors must be fired without any benefits.

So how would I deal with such a situation as the President?

Existing legislation on the Federal level is absolutely void.  Such legislation will not be enforced pending formal repeal.  The refusal by any member of Congress to repeal such legislation will be deemed an act of resignation from that body.

Furthermore all state and subordinate legislation in violation of the Second Amendment will be void.  All attempts to continue enforcement of said acts shall be treated as federal felonies.  And all deaths resulting from such continued enforcement shall be treated as capital crimes.

If we have to fight a civil war to enforce the Second Amendment then we will do so.

Any questions? 

The Definition Of Courage

Combat veteran and police officer Aaron Weiss speaking for the repeal of the New York State "SAFE Act."

There are clearly better citizens in our nation who clearly deserve to serve in the Congress and the state legislatures than the criminal trash sitting in those places right now.

Thought For The Day

The first time I heard the term “dickhead” was during infantry basic training at Fort Benning. At the time I identified it as a distinctly Army term for a distinctly Army phenomena. An example of a dickhead is Lieutenant Colonel Robert Bateman, someone who clearly does not understand the United States Constitution and his role and limitations as a commissioned officer.

In an opinion piece published in Esquire [LINK HERE] he clearly demonstrates his ignorance of the proper meaning of the Second Amendment and declares his willingness to obey orders to murder American Citizens:

We will pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers.

Really?

No.

What Bateman as a REMF* academic who has failed to understand is that the Second Amendment is not about sporting use or even self defense against violent criminals. The Second Amendment is an integral component of the Bill of Rights, which in turn clearly defines the relationship between the People of the United States and the Federal Government. The People are the political authority of the nation. And the Federal Government serves The People.**

A very fundamental failure on the part of Bateman is his apparent belief that his subordinates will simply follow orders without thought. The fact is that American soldiers do think. And they do act on the facts of reality they have identified. Alvin York and Audie Murphy did not receive the Medal of Honor for simply following orders. Both men identified the actions that were necessary on the field of battle and carried them out.

If Bateman, a socialist in our uniform, were to issue the order the real soldiers will identify him as a traitor and murderer and air him out.

I prefer one round in the head in the old Soviet style for that sort of action.



*. Rear Echelon Mother Fucker. Another distinctly military term.

**. Or we could say that The People rule and the government drools.

Moron Monday

The National Football League in their infinite wisdom has decided to ban this advertisment from being aired during the next Super Bowl:

Now I have to admit that I'm not a fan of the game of football, and that I stopped watching the Super Bowl after the Minnesota Vikings lost it for the fourth time.

I can't boycott the game but but this is clear grounds for everyone else to boycott.

UPDATE 1905 CST:

An old friend wrote:  "It has gotten to the point where I can't even see what is objectionable in these ads."

That's because we are still rational people.  The NFL appears to be influenced by the Marxist version of the concept of sympathetic magic.  That the instrument causes the action instead the person who decides to use it.