Thursday, August 31, 2017

Another Good Question

What's it like to not have a Human soul?

Another Question

Why am I an atheist?

A real God would have vaporized the false prophets Mohammed and L. Ron Hubbard the moment they opened their mouths.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Comment On Islam

The absolute first thing taught at infantry basic training during the Cold War was that the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero. On the face of it I saw this as the response to any attempt to explain a failure to learn a necessary skill. But this idea also applies to the moral nightmare we were facing during with the Communists enemy and their excuses for their crimes. Even if the usual Marxist credibility issues did not apply to the position of the White House, we need to remember that there are still millions of Muslims who still believe they are following the Allah given order to murder those who have chosen to live a rational life. Some of them still have money and organizational skills to apply to the problem of murdering infidels like you and me.

As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted Islam was not practiced on the American continent. The nation’s first interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.

It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.

As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.

The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah’s eternal whorehouse.  In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. But the doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.

Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I now propose an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

An obvious question is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?

A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.

A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the actual rights of the people. In declaring “man made” laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes — including rape, robbery, and murder — that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.

This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Another Quote

"The fifth commandment: Thou shalt not kill, is no commandment of God but a Jewish invention."

-- Eugen Stähle, National Socialist

I came across this quote while doing research on Action T4, the program of exterminating the the mentally disabled carried out by the National Socialist state.  The fact is the idea of a single God- -and with him a single moral law that applies to all men without exception--came from Judaism.   The above quoted statement--as with all things in National Socialism--is clearly wrong.

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Another Good Question

Is Free Speech an example of Hate Speech?

Only if you hate the truth.

Hanging an authoritarian (Hitler, Stalin, Hillary) is no more an act of murder than killing another murderer, and killing a member of Antifa is more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist or a Soviet Communist.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

A Good Question.

Does Hillary Clinton think of anyone but herself?

Monday, August 21, 2017

And Another Fact Of Reality

If a Democrat wants to find a Fascist, all he has to do is look in a mirror.

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Another Hard Truth

The difference between an Anti-fa (a self described antifascist) and a Nazi (National Socialist) is a can of ZYKLON-B.

Another Message For The Hard Left

I’ll start with a quote:

“We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.”

– V.I. Lenin, 1923

My friend Mark Urbin has been kind enough to report a tweet from an outright nihilist:

“Most of the time when I encounter a cis man who has opinions that I strongly disagree with or just a shit person in general I thing about having visceral and rough sex with them.  I feel the need to assert my dominance of men with flawed opinions sexually.”

The author of this expression of hatred then describes in obscene terms the process of sexually torturing and murdering the victim.  Apart from the physical sense of the word how could this being be described as Human?

So what is this “cis” prefix that has popped up recently in the mental droppings of the other side?

It apparently refers to the concept of “Cisgender” which appears to be a new academic label for someone who identifies themselves as the gender of their birth.  It is a slur for someone who practices the virtue of rationality and is a claim of mental and moral superiority over sane men. [1]

When a rational man [2] encounters a statement that is wrong, he could put forth a counter argument.  Or on seeing the statement as totally insane he could simply dismiss it.  But when encountering a disagreement the nihilist expresses the desire to torture and murder the rational man.


The predator culture has existed from the stone age.  Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive member’s of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force.  The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator.  Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it--even to the open use of deadly force.

Some predator have created an academic culture that is now opposed to rational thought.  Falsehoods are now treated facts and truths are held to be untrue.  And if a failing grade is not sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.

So what is to be done?  How do we respond to the insanity?

If we were to respond to the predators as Stalin did to those who rightfully refused or were unable to obey him their academic and urban centers would be reduced to piles of smoking rubble and there would be mass graves from coast to coast.

It would be Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.

So when do we get Biblical on them?

1.  Insanity is not limited to gender identity.  A former friend who had the sex change operation once said to me that he was voting for Barack Obama because the candidate would restore The Constitution.  This was at a time when Obama’s contempt for The Constitution and The Rule of Law was well known.  And he was also upset at a joke that referred to Obama supporters as a cult.  It was on driving past the local Obama campaign headquarters this I called it the Obamatology Org.  This joke referred to the Scientology practice of calling the local site an Org.

2.  I’m using the male inclusive mode of speech here, I will not submit to academic Newspeak and the use of so-called gender neutral pronouns.

Saturday, August 19, 2017

A Message To The Hard Left

If you are being treated as a Fascist (Hanged) it's because you are acting like a Fascist.

Friday, August 18, 2017

A Fact Of Hard Reality

The followers of Karl Marx have murdered four times more people than the followers of Adolf Hitler but college students still follow Marx.


Why don't we hang Hillary Clinton as an Enemy Of Humanity and be done with it?

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Another Fact Of Reality

If you (I'm speaking to Democrats, right now) continue to act like enemies of Mankind then you will be treated as enemies of Mankind and hanged from the neck until dead.

Sunday, August 13, 2017

A Fact Of Relity

Newspeak has become the dominant dialect of the academic and media establishment.  In Newspeak those who uphold, defend and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives. In the political context the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.  For example in Newspeak the belief that all lives matter regardless of race is held as being racist.  A function of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality. Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors. Since clarity of thought which is the correct identification of the facts of reality is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is impossible would be completely lethal.  Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the practitioners of Newspeak  from the educational and media establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Some More Hard Truths

1. President Kennedy was murdered by a Communist.

2. The Hard Left always lies.

3. If a Hard Leftist wants to find a Fascist then all one has to do is look in a mirror.

4. We quote President Kennedy because he insisted on being right.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Fact Of Reality

A self-styled progressive substitutes the words conservative or gun owner for Nazi.

Wednesday, August 09, 2017

Tuesday, August 08, 2017


Why don't we just erase North Korea from the face of The Earth and be done with it?

Monday, August 07, 2017

Another Perspective

On theoretical grounds I think all religions have exactly the same standard of proof underpinning them. Everyone thinks their holy writings are the holy writings and believes with equal passion that their god is the god.  But we don’t live on theoretically grounds, we live in reality. And in reality anyone who insists all religions are equally dangerous or blameworthy is, if I may be so blunt, out of their fucking mind.  Christians don’t marry children. Jews don’t blow up mosques. Buddhists don’t declare jihad. There is one religion widely practiced today that is uniquely unable to coexist peacefully with other religions (or even with other strains of the same religion).  Get with the program, all religions are not created equal, and a Judeo-Christian nation makes me a hell of a lot less nervous than an Islamic one.

Saturday, August 05, 2017


Imagine for a moment that President Trump has been assassinated.  Do you seriously believe that there would be NO political changes as a result?  There will be political change, and it will be carried out over the dead bodies of everyone who wanted the president dead, including you if necessary.

Friday, August 04, 2017

A Message To The Hard Left

Hillary Clinton, and those who persist in following her, are without any question Enemies Of Humanity, and they must be put to death as soon as possible.

Thursday, August 03, 2017


Those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the political context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.