A Reminder

It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.

-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist

We on the Right tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we won't put an innocent person to death.  The Left, when it's in absolute power simply doesn't care.  We on the Right believe in justice.  The Left on the other hand doesn't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.

 

Thoughts Of The Day

Conscience and Liberal are two words that don't go together. 

Before one can say, "this is wrong, I won't do it", one has to say "I".  Conscience is the expression of the ego in the moral realm.  To make a moral judgment and to act on it are basically selfish acts.  It's the self that sees through its own eyes and acts on its own knowledge of right and wrong.  You couldn't be selfish if you can't live with yourself.  Rational Selfishness as defined and advocated by Ayn Rand was limited to acts which benefited one's self but caused no harm or inflicted a cost on another person.  The narcissist, especially in the political realm, isn't concerned with the injuries and burdens inflicted on other people.  In fact, the more destructive the consequences of obedience to those who obey the narcissist, the better.  Human sacrifice with beating hearts cut out and victims flayed alive, that's great. Millions worked to death in slave labor camps in Siberia, as far as the narcissist is concerned that's better.  In order for me to say, "I, Leslie Bates, do solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America..." I have to say "I".  That was my ego speaking when I took the oath of enlistment.

When anyone calls me, a Caucasian American gun owner, a murderer I take it seriously.  When someone denies my very humanity I take it very seriously.  Dehumanization of a specific population is historically a necessary step preceding the act of mass murder.  Am I paranoid?  Perhaps I am.  But I would rather be a live paranoid than a dead victim.

 

Thoughts For The Day

The disarmament of The People only benefits the criminals.  It benefits those within The State by intent.  And it benefits those outside of apparatus of The State by accident.  The claim that members of the public will be protected by their own disarmament is an absolute lie.  And disarming the citizens of the nation is clearly an act of treason.

I'm known as a supporter of the Republican Party, but I also criticize it.

There's nothing quite as intolerant and closed mined as a “tolerant and open minded liberal.”

Revolutions happen because the rulers do something stupid.

Some people don't understand Conservatism.

Some Facts Of Reality

1. I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.  Apart from those creatures who sexually molest children, I think there's no one more depraved or despicable than a politically active pacifist.

2.  A Socialist is someone who's dumb enough to complain about the fact that food's cheap and plentiful.

3.  Progressive is newspeak for someone who believes in the paleolithic ideal of beating up and killing people and taking their stuff.

4. I still wonder how folks on the Left manage to get out of bed in the morning (or early afternoon) without seriously hurting themselves.

5.  There's no point in debating a leftist on individual issues because their overall epistemological methodology for all effects and purposes reverses the relationship between reality and fantasy. This leads to their well documented habit of systematically reversing good and evil.  And while there are many grounds for complaint on the part of the Right. (the refusal to prosecute the participants in the Waco Massacre)  And it is no suprise that a leftist would openly label someone who opposed them as "sub-human."  Members of the Left, like many pre-literate barbarians before them, are essentially moral and material parasites. They must reject the society of consent and seek power over those who can perform the work that sustains their lives. This drives them to see other persons as either tools they can use to further their own goals, or as organic waste to be disposed of.  So when a leftist declares someone to be "sub-human", that is in practice a precursor to the murder of that person.  The mass graves that are constantly being dug up in nations where the Left has obtained unrestrained power serve as the irrefutable proof of this fact.  So when I see a leftist bumper sticker on a car, the first thought that comes to my mind is "murderer."  If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite GOD-LIKE patience with the behavior of the Left.  Leftists can publically assault those who won't submit to them, destroy property, and even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanized themselves.

6.  Why do I feel like I'm tied up and gagged in the back seat of a car driven by someone who insists on driving on the wrong side of the road and who responds to the appearance of oncoming traffic by denying that it exists and stomping on the accelerator pedal?

7. The science of aviation works because those who practice it actually made the effort to discover and apply the relevant facts of reality to their endeavor.  The aviation mishaps that do occur are usually the result of someone not paying attention to the relevant facts.  Parasite mentalities as a general rule see themselves as superior beings and other people, the productive population, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of.  Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings isn't an act of murder, in their minds it's simply the disposal of hominid garbage.  In practical terms a Communist is a mortal enemy of human kind and killing a Communist can be no more wrongful than putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.

8. President Kennedy was murdered by a Communist.

9. The Hard Left always lies.

10. If a Hard Leftist wants to find a Statist then all one has to do is look in a mirror.

11. Conservatives quote President Kennedy because he insisted on being right.

12.  Hillary Clinton wants to know why she lost the election?  It's because we the voters remember more than Pepperidge Farm remembers.

13. There's a proper term for those who deny your Right of Life, they're properly called mortal enemies.

14. To say that a Liberal is stupid is like saying that water is wet.

15. If there is one thing that power tripping looters hate, it's being held accountable.

16. The version of God in Pascal's wager is seen by the person making the wager as an idiot. 

17. I'm clearly not afraid of a figment of a goat herders imagination.

18.  Progressives have set the world standard for stupidity since November of 1917. 

19.  To those value power above all, no act in the pursuit of power is too depraved.

A Fact Of Reality

The bad guys NEVER understand that they're the bad guys.

Reality

A falsehood is still a falsehood.

This message brought to you by the NATO phonetic letters Foxtrot and Uniform.

A Fact

Reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what their intentions or ideology.  Instead of objectively observing the real world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster.  The liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they're totally unfit to do so.

Suggestion

Never pretend to be an expert on an area that you're in fact ignorant of, like this guy.

Question Of The Day

Do I want to be ruled by idiots?

No.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

My Theory

Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their "livestock" by force. Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

That's my theory, anyway.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

Question Of The Day

(Image brought to us by Mark Urbin.)

Should Rosie O'Donnell and other Liberals be treated as the Enemies of Humanity that they are?

Yes.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control." those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

A Fact Of Reality

GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT in the New York Times wrote that a large part of the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other appurtenances of "actually existing socialism." We Americans (the neo-barbarians of the Hard Left excepted) prefer real courts and the other attributes of an actually existing civilization.  Mr. Wheatcroft also dug up an interesting statement by English author Evelyn Waugh: Of course, the Americans are cowards ... They are almost all the descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear of military service.

To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards.  The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up.  AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.

There, I feel better now.

Free Tommy Robinson

The Facts Of Reality

The Democratic Party have an idea it is to replace the society of social and economic consent that we live in with the social and economic primacy of the parasites over the productive. Or as their primary philosophical source (and founding trustifarian) put it, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And as there is no limit to the needs of the parasite masters there will be no limit on the burdens imposed on the productive slaves.  Poison is poison no matter how much grape flavoring one adds to it. They cannot avoid knowing that their ideal society is toxic to us and thus have no effective choice but to attack the opposition on trivial issues in order to head off a public examination of their basic ideological premises.  Political ideology is basically a means of giving the appearance of positive virtue to actions that are morally intolerable to the victims.

A Reminder

I'll start with a quote:

It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.

-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist

We, the truly rational, tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The self appointed masters, when they are in absolute power, simply don't care.  The fact of the matter is that the only crime to those who value power is simple disobedience. To perceive and think as a proper rational person is fundamentally toxic to the masters. And reason must be suppressed by any means necessary.  We the living believe in justice. The masters on the other hand, don't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.

A Truth

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left. Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.  It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.

What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?

It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds himself staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put himself there.

The Truth About Elitism

What is an Elitist?

An elitist is one who uses human beings.  By this definition Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hillary Clinton are elitists.

The election as president of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump was a rejection of the American People of the elites.  The rejection of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump was an act of the elites.  Anti-fa and Black Lives Matter are being used by the elites but they don't know it.

An elitist is also one who lets in the barbarians.  Letting in the barbarians is an act of treason to the citizens and the soldiers who protect them but isn’t an act of betrayal to an elitist who gains power.

So what do we do to them?

Let's Get Biblical

start with a quote:

“We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.”

– V.I. Lenin, 1923

My friend Mark Urbin has been kind enough to report a tweet from an outright nihilist:

“Most of the time when I encounter a cis man who has opinions that I strongly disagree with or just a shit person in general I thing about having visceral and rough sex with them.  I feel the need to assert my dominance of men with flawed opinions sexually.”

The author of this expression of hatred then describes in obscene terms the process of sexually torturing and murdering the victim.

Apart from the physical sense of the word how could this being be described as Human?

So what is this “cis” prefix that has popped up recently in the mental droppings of the other side?  It apparently refers to the concept of “Cisgender” which appears to be a new academic label for someone who identifies their self as the gender of their birth.  It is a slur for someone who practices the virtue of rationality and is a claim of mental and moral superiority over sane men. [1]

When a rational man [2] encounters a statement that is wrong with he could put forth a counter argument.  Or on seeing the statement as totally insane he could simply dismiss it.  But when encountering a disagreement the nihilist expresses the desire to torture and murder the rational man.  Why?  The predator culture has existed from the stone age.  Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive members of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force.  The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator.  Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it--even to the open use of deadly force.

Some predators have created an academic culture that is now opposed to rational thought.  Falsehoods are now treated facts and truths are held to be untrue.  And if a failing grade is not sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.  So what is to be done?  How do we respond to the insanity?  If we were to respond to the predators as Stalin did to those who rightfully refused or were unable to obey him their academic and urban centers would be reduced to piles of smoking rubble and there would be mass graves from coast to coast.

It would be Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.  So when do we get Biblical on them?

1.  Insanity is not limited to gender identity.  A former friend who had the sex change operation once said to me that he was voting for Barack Obama because the candidate would restore The Constitution.  This was at a time when Obama’s contempt for The Constitution and The Rule of Law was well known.  And he was also upset at a joke that referred to Obama supporters as a cult.  It was on driving past the local Obama campaign headquarters this I called it the Obamatology Org.  This joke referred to the Scientology practice of calling the local site an Org.

2.  I’m using the male inclusive mode of speech here, I will not submit to academic Newspeak and the use of so-called gender neutral pronouns.

Disturbance

This is a disturbing thought.

Has anyone else noticed that Charles Schumer is the literal embodiment of the subject of anti-Semitic propaganda? That POS has deceived and used the Jewish voters of New York to gain power and those same voters will be left holding the bag when it is time to hold him accountable for his crimes. We know that Schumer is fully responsible for his acts, but not everyone will be properly enlightened and innocent (or at least ignorant) people will be wrongly punished. This is clearly wrong.

A Fact About George Orwell

The novel 1984 was written as a warning to all of us.  Not as an instruction manual for the Democratic Party or members of Anti-fa.   Control over everything and everyone productive must be a Democrats or a member of Anti-fa wet dream.

And here's a quote about George Orwell:

The progressive left really doesn’t like the concept of Free Speech.  They want to make any speech they disagree with illegal.  They use Orwell’s 1984 as a training manual, instead of the warning it was meant to be.

-- Mark Urbin

Things I've Said About Peace Activism

Here's a number of things I've said on the subject of peace activism:

If there is one thing I have certainly noticed, it is that pacifists in general have no objection to enjoying the benefits of civilization but are unwilling to take the measures necessary to defend it from foreign and domestic barbarians. Such as the National Socialists, the Soviet Socialists, and the home grown socialists of the Democratic Party. Contrary to their general delusion of virtue, pacifists are in effect, moral and political parasites upon civilized society.

Peace in the real world is simply the absence of those -- such as the socialists -- who seek to deprive you, I, and our fellow citizens of our own Life, Liberty, and Property. Real peace can only be achieved by the physical isolation or outright elimination of those who seek to subjugate, plunder and murder us. This can only be done through the use of physical force. In short, true peace can only be achieved only through the possession of superior firepower and the moral will to use it.

The narcissistic trash that makes up the membership of the so-called peace movement simply do not care whether you and your children live, or die, or suffer under the yoke of an unwashed barbarian. They plaster their cars with bumper sticker, carry signs, bang on drums, throw Frisbees, and perform other useless rituals so that they can feel good about themselves and show the world how morally superior they are. Never mind that they openly deny the fundamental fact which is the foundation of all valid moral law, that Human Life -- life as a rational being in control of one's own life -- is the standard of all moral values, and that those who would damage or destroy Human Life must be removed from human society and if necessary be destroyed. The adherents of pacifism have so inverted their own mental processes that they look upon the perpetrators of mass slavery and mass murder as good and those who take up arms to defend the society of consent as the most depraved evil.

Now there are some folks, who regard themselves as morally superior beings, who question why the other bastard has to die. The answer of course is that the other bastard is attempting to impose his will, or the will of his leader, upon you by force. It is the act of coercion by force that makes what General Patton called the other bastard an enemy. Peace is simply the absence of enemies. But there are some folks, who pretend to be morally superior beings, who would have us believe that "peace" could be achieved by submission to the will of the other bastard. In reality this is not peace, it is slavery. There are some well meaning people, some of whom that I respect, who believe that there are times that one cannot have both peace and freedom at the same time. I have to disagree. Liberty is simply the condition of existence in which the person is free to live his own life in accordance with his own rational judgment. This does of course require the absence of some other bastard who is attempting to impose his will upon the person by force. In practical terms real peace and real freedom are inseparable. I will go further is saying that to a civilized person, peace, freedom, and security, are simply three words that can be used to describe the identical condition, the absence of another bastard imposing his will upon the civilized person. Contrary to what those who describe themselves as peace activists would have us believe, and as General Patton has ably demonstrated, the path to real peace invariably takes us over the real dead bodies of those other bastards who insist on violently imposing their will upon us. Unfortunately this process is by no means a safe one. Let us take this day to remember those who died on the path to real peace.

A rational study of the real world would show that a real state of Peace is effectively indistinguishable from a state of Liberty and a state of Security. Peace, Liberty, and Security are simply three words that a rational person uses to describe the same condition, the rightful ability to live one's own life without coercive interference by others. A rational study of actual history would show that the state of peace for the citizens of a free nation is the result of the violent elimination of the would be conquerors and their pet quislings. If we rationally examine those who constitute the membership of the so-called Peace Movement we find that virtually every one of them is an open advocate of the coercive subjugation of the productive members of the Human Race. The occasional exception being a self-blinded fool who isn't paying attention to what they're ideologically in bed with. In short, a "peace activist" and the "peace movement" are in fact enemies of Peace.

Peace is only an affirmative value to those who live in the condition of liberty, that is being rightfully in charge of one's self and able to set the goals for one's own life. Peace cannot be a value to the subjects of a totalitarian socialist state. To the victim of such a state -- the ordinary worker who is bullied by a commissar, the inmate of a slave labor camp, or the occupant of a darkened cell awaiting murder at the hands of the local chekists -- war, either an internal uprising against the socialist masters, or an invasion by an army of liberation, is in fact the positive value.

I stand by what I said.