Question

Has Alyssa Milano looked in a mirror and seen the totalitarian bitch looking back at her?

Totalitarian Filth

Jail is for the working class. shooting is for totalitarian filth.  Some totalitarian filth is disposed of here.

Fun With Friday

I will start by thanking my friend Mark Urbin for posting this on his Tumblr site:

While Socialism appears on the face of it to be an economic doctrine it is in fact an excuse for a series of political actions--the acquisition and exercise of power.

The fundamental value of what we call the Progressive Movement is Power.  The very first member of the of what we now call that movement was the stone age hunter-gatherer who saw others working the land with their primitive tools and decided to compel them to feed him.  Their sole original idea was to enslave the productive and every thought they had since that time was simply an excuse for the use of Power.

The fact is that if a Socialist had a conscience they wouldn't be a Socialist.

Editorial

In an Associated Press story it was reported that:

Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday night that excessive partisanship flowing through the nation's political system is causing the U.S. to march "backwards instead of forward" and pointed to fall elections as a sign of how the country might tackle problems.

Let’s take apart this pathetic bit of whining.

The goal of those who style themselves as Progressives is simply to obtain absolute power over everything and everyone. No restraint has ever been shown by any of the partisans of “Progress” from Robspierre to the present day. As a result our world is littered with the mass graves of those who were murdered in the name of Progress.

The fact is the concept of “Progress” is no more than an excuse for the unrestrained exercise of absolute power. So what is this “partisanship” that this self appointed master to whining about? It is simply the fact that those condemned to be the slaves will not submit to the self-appointed masters. In the ideal form of the state their whim reigns supreme and those who stand in opposition and disobedience are to be permanently silenced. Thus the mass graves that litter our world.

In this state the Masters are no different than a pack of predatory animals.

So what is to done with them?

In actual ethics the proper way to respond to a predatory animal is to kill it. The Masters are essentially a pack of predatory animals, and thus the proper response to their actions is simply to kill them.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Just A Reminder

Remember, the enforcement of "gun control" requires the use of deadly force on innocent people.  Of course the advocates and enforcers will claim that the victims are the criminals.

No, in fact the advocates and enforcers are the criminals.  They are the ones who are unleashing deadly force on those who have caused no real harm to anyone. 

The advocates and enforcers of "gun control" are in fact the murderers.  And they should be treated as such.

I personally favor one round in the head in the old Soviet style.

Return Of The Moron

In the concept of DOUBLETHINK as identified by George Orwell the person holds two completely opposite concepts as being true at the same time and in the same respect.

An individual I responded to in a previous post spoke again.

Here's the original post.

Here's the response to his response.

The damned fool spoke again, thus verifying his foolishness.

Me again. So basically, you're just really, really, really stupid.

That's not a question, but a statement of fact.

And you still don't understand what the 1st amendment means, nor what hypocrisy is. Bravo, sir, bravo. You just keep wearing that ignorance like a badge of honor

I will admit that my brain was damaged as the result of a serious illness but I still practice rational thought. Let's start with the charge of ignorance of the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging freedom of speech,or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That is the actual First Amendment of the United States Constitution.  As a declared candidate for the office of President of the United States I have to know this.  Or at least keep a copy of the document within arms reach when possible.

Now look at my initial statement concerning the Duck Dynasty mess.  I clearly did not call for the violation of the First Amendment.   What I did call for was that the owners of A&E should identify those allegedly speaking for the Homosexual Collective as hostiles and treat them as such.

And the best way to do this is to simply ignore their whining.

As for the charges of hypocrisy and ignorance, there is no proof given and thus no need to answer the charges.

Reality is real.  No statement to the contrary can ever change it.

Reply To Previous Statement

Some nameless person attempted to leave a piece of non-thought in response to my statement on the Duck Dynasty controversy:

"Phil Robertson, as with all persons, has the moral obligation to see things as they are, to exercise judgement, and to speak on such matters as necessary. The attack on Phil Roberson is an attack on all Americans. Phil is simply the first target."

This was the dumbest part of your blog. Do you really lack the self awareness to see how hypocritical that is? You will make a perfect Republican candidate.

Really?

The Republican Party has already rejected our nation as a whole.  Why should they accept me as a candidate for any office?  They wouldn't.  But the anonymous moron wouldn't understand that at all.  That would require actual thought on his, her, or it's part

And hypocrisy?  Come off it!

Based on what I read of the anonymous responder I have clearly identified him/her/it as a self-styled Progressive.  As a rule they see the subjects of their whim as mindless morons.  When their victims speak up the Progressives do not respond rationally but are the first to actively silence the voice of dissent.

Hypocrisy is the pretense of governing in the name of The People while ruling in ignorance of their actual will.

In other words Totalitarianism as usual.

.