On Leftism

The fact of the matter is that Leftists see people as something to be used.  If a person is unusable why keep them alive?  In a truly free society the truly generous would step in to help.  In the nightmare of Socialism, where all resources are under the control of the state only the rulers and those who can be used matter.  Every single Leftist is a firm believer in the use others theory.  The idea of the inalienable right of life is completely alien to them.  

We need to face the fact that the present day Left like the barbarians who plagued civilization before them are essentially parasites.  Control of the productive population is essential for their survival and well being.  Compulsion is inherently necessary to the parasite manner of existence.  Those who resisted had to be killed as an object lesson for others.  The Left barbarians not only need material support they also need spiritual support as well.  They need to feel that their victims are not only submitting to them today but will do so tomorrow as well.  Barbarian chieftains and tribal witch doctors demanded degrading and often dangerous acts of worship from their subjects, up to and including human sacrifice, in order to assure themselves that they'll still have a roof over their heads and food to eat the next day.  Those who refused to obey were assaulted or killed.  In the meeting places of the Left the demand is for unquestioned agreement without regard to the actual facts of reality.  Leftists are the first to demand censorship lest they be identified as frauds and subsequently bounced out of their comfortable fantasy worlds no longer insulated from a real world that demands real thought and real labor.  The Left being dependent upon others for their sustenance must stand in opposition to the society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion.  Because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.

The Left abhors the thought of being judged by their character because they have none.  What's present is the black hole of their lust for power.  A desire for control over every aspect of our lives that distorts or destroys everything that comes within their influence.  The positive side is that if we don't drop below their moral event horizon we can escape from their influence.  But we'll be damaged as a result.

On Barbarism

Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Worker's Party are the crazy relatives that the present day Left goes to great effort to avoid talking about.  The pragmatic brand of Socialist (as opposed to the doctrinaire Marxist) will strike the pose that will have the most appeal in the target audience's minds.  Thus in Germany where the army was traditionally held in the highest esteem the NSDAP assumed in public the form of a substitute army (ersatzarmee) with a mass of clean cut men in spiffy uniforms marching about in disciplined formations.  In the United States, where the standing military was traditionally looked upon with suspicion if not ridicule the Left rejected the militarist paradigm.  Unfortunately they assumed the form of what decent people came to call dirty stinking hippies, a mob of unwashed savages attired in cast off or otherwise ridiculous clothing who moved about in a sloppy mass.  The American Left in its manifestation as the Anti-war Movement had in effect taken on the modern form of a barbarian horde.  But given that Socialism is essentially barbarian brigandage in modernistic makeup why should we be surprised?

Observation

One thing I notice on the Left side of the political isle is the denial of Reality.

Crazy Relatives

Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Worker's Party are the crazy relatives that the present day Left goes to great effort to avoid talking about.  The pragmatic brand of socialist (as opposed to the doctrinaire Marxist) will strike the pose that will have the most appeal in the target audience's minds. Thus in Germany, where the army was traditionally held in the highest esteem, the NSDAP assumed in public the form of a substitute army (ersatzarmee) with a mass of clean-cut men in spiffy uniforms marching about in disciplined formations. In the United States, where the standing military was traditionally looked upon with suspicion if not ridicule, the Left rejected the militarist paradigm. Unfortunately they assumed the form of what decent people came to call dirty-stinking hippies, a mob of unwashed savages attired in cast-off or otherwise ridiculous clothing who moved about in a sloppy mass.  The American Left in its manifestation as the Anti-war Movement had in effect taken on the modern form of a barbarian horde. But given that Socialism is essentially barbarian brigandage in modernistic makeup, why should we be surprised?
 

On Leftism

There's no point in debating a leftist on individual issues because their overall epistemological methodology for all effects and purposes reverses the relationship between reality and fantasy.  This leads to their well documented habit of systematically reversing good and evil.  And while there are many grounds for complaint on the part of the Right. (the refusal to prosecute the participants in the Waco Massacre)  And it's no suprise that a Leftist would openly label someone who opposed them as "sub-human."  Members of The Left, like many pre-literate barbarians before them are essentially moral and material parasites.  They must reject the society of consent and seek power over those who can perform the work that sustains their lives.  This drives them to see other persons as either tools they can use to further their own goals or as organic waste to be disposed of.  So when a Leftist declares someone to be "sub-human" that's in practice a precursor to the murder of that person.  The mass graves that are constantly being dug up in nations where The Left has obtained unrestrained power serve as the irrefutable proof of this fact.  So when I see a Leftist bumper sticker on a car, the first thought that comes to my mind is "murderer."  If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite GOD-LIKE patience with the behavior of the Left.  Leftists can publically assault those who won't submit to them, destroy property, and even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanized themselves.

Opinion

Calling Susan Sarandon a Leftist Twit is an insult to Leftist Twits. 

The Gaza Strip should be turned into a parking lot.

Opinions

I expect stupidity from Leftists. 

If Hillary Clinton wants to see a Totalitarian, all she has to do is look in a mirror.

Those who deny Reality doesn't have a Conscience and can do horrible things.

Rants

How does one blacken the name of Democracy?

Use the concept of Democracy as an excuse for Tyranny.

Everyone who attended Infantry Basic Training at Fort Benning in the Spring of 1982 was taught to not except excuses.  

Governor Tim Walsh of the Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party, that paragon of Democracy, has signed a bill paying for “free” school lunches.  Who’s paying for the school lunches?

The taxpayer of course.  

The taxpayer only exists to benefit the State.  In Collectivism a person only exists for the benefit of the Collective.  The Left being dependent upon others for their sustenance must stand in opposition to the society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.  We’re now one step closer to Revolution.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

--Karl Marx

Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.

--Ayn Rand

(Image by Mark Urbin)

 

Why do I oppose Democracy?  Democracy is simply another form of authoritarianism.  Based on the authority of the Mob.

Today is also the anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy.

A Leftist will believe anything except the truth.

For example the New York Times has published an editorial piece claiming that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated as a result of the Collective Will of the City of Dallas, Texas.

The fact that President Kennedy was murdered in a Democrat controlled state by a Communist apparently didn't enter the non-existent mind of the author.  Nor did the fact that there's no such clearly identifiable thing as a Collective Will.  That belief is simply a Marxist myth.  The fact is that the assassination of a significant political figure is essentially a suicide mission. The term assassin is derived from the Islamic cult of the Assassins.  A group whose members were induced into performing suicide missions through the use of hashish.

On The Left

Under the Primacy of the State the function of law is to control the productive population for the benefit of the ruling parasites.  The rulers and their immediate servants aren't subject to those laws themselves.  The actual interest of the actual citizens is irrelevant.  What matters is the whims of the rulers and those who willfully serve them.  Under the Rule of Law all real laws must be applied to all citizens equally such as the laws prohibiting homicide and theft.  As our Socialist rulers and their willing servants regard themselves as exempt from compliance with the laws on what grounds can they claim to be protected under them?  Once force is openly used against those who speak out against The Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against The Left.  Once The Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to The Left, break the rules of civil society and The Left will leave us no choice but to break The Left. 

(Image by Mark Urbin)

Leftist are essentially tyrants.

Announcement

Leftists believe they were good people.  So did the National Socialists.  Mark Urbin had his blog No Moss Here removed by some Leftists,

Opinions

Leftists believe they're superior beings.  They aren't.

Apart from a child molester I would be hard pressed to think of something more vile than an individual who would condemn other people to death and bondage under despotism in order to obtain their own euphoria fix.  Not only would I not allow such an individual anywhere near a child, I would want that individual to have the most intense and direct experience of socialism from the victim's point of view as possible.  This would be what a friend of mine once called the Lubyanka Breakfast, a cigarette in the morning and one pistol round in the back of the head.

Opinion

If a Leftist could be wrong he or she will be.

Opinions

The difference between a Fascist and a Leftist is a clean uniform.  There's no place for Racial Collectivism in the United States. 

Those who believe they know it all, don't.

Quotes Of The Day

'Gay Pride' parades: You know you live in a great country when "oppressed" people have big, colorful parades.

A favorite Leftist saying sums up the whole of Leftism: "To make an omelette, you've got to break eggs". They want to change some state of affairs and don't care who or what they destroy or damage in the process. They think their alleged good intentions are sufficient to absolve them from all blame for even the most evil deeds

In practical politics, the art of Leftism is to sound good while proposing something destructive

Leftists are the "we know best" people, meaning that they are intrinsically arrogant. Matthew chapter 6 would not be for them. And arrogance leads directly into authoritarianism

Leftism is fundamentally authoritarian. Whether by revolution or by legislation, Leftists aim to change what people can and must do. When in 2008 Obama said that he wanted to "fundamentally transform" America, he was not talking about America's geography or topography but rather about American people. He wanted them to stop doing things that they wanted to do and make them do things that they did not want to do. Can you get a better definition of authoritarianism than that?
 

-- Dr. John Ray 

Update 1400 CST: My neighbor in APT# 2312 is playing music as loud as believes he can get away with.  I have to wear two layers of hearing protection to simply exist in my own APT.

Opinions

If you'll pardon me for doing an impression of a moonbat:

"But wealth is evil and suffering is good and we must make every sacrifice possible for the good of the planet/trees/peat moss..."

One should never underestimate The Leftist capacity for spinning bugs into features. 

Those who oppose the right to say NO should be treated as Enemies Of Humanity they actually are.

Opinions

We need to start treating Leftists as the monsters they actually are.  Of course Leftists want to disarm us.  To The Left, every word of dissent or refusal is a sentence of death.  Every pistol and rifle in the hands of a private citizen is a weapon pointed straight at their heads.  Someday, we're going to have to pull the triggers.  Without the sword they'll take away your pen.  Without guns they'll take away your butter.  This isn't an either/or choice. 

I've carried firearms across multiple state lines when I moved to and from North Carolina.

 The open Anti-Semitism of The Democratic Party has become obvious.

Opinion

But the fact of the matter is that Leftists see people as something to be used.  And if a person is unusable, why keep them alive?  In a truly free society the truly generous would step in to help.  But in the nightmare of Socialism, where all resources are under the control of the state, only the rulers and those who can be used matter.
 

So Anyway

Les notices that many lefties still hate Trump, and says:

(Roll 1d6)

1-6. So what else is new?

 

Opinion

Civil Order as understood by adherents of the Platonic/Hegelian/Marxist/National Socialist collectivist ("progressive," "caring," etc.) philosophical tradition is a social state in which we, the hominid livestock, live as directed by our self appointed masters.  The bipedal cattle who don’t obey are visited by the "Guardians"/SS/ATF or other such creatures.  Civil Order in the real world as described by Aristotle and Ayn Rand is the societal condition in which we, the humans, are free to live by our own judgement of the facts of reality for our own purposes, without being put upon by thugs and tyrants.  The enemies of true civil order will always try as Orwell warned us, "...to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable," as had happened at Waco.  When we accept the definitions given by our enemies, we lose.  For The Left to call us "Erratic Primitives," is nothing less than a National Socialist style smear.  In the real world we must define or be defined.  The Left and the other self styled "progressives" have tried, through their so called "health reform" and other such actions, to force us into a state of dependency and servitude.  To turn the United States of America, the greatest nation on this planet into a vast slave labor camp. These aren’t the actions of the defenders of "civil order."  These are attacks on civilization and Mankind as such.  We must see reality for what it is, things for what they are, and people for who they are.  We, the defenders of American Civilization, must show our families, friends, and neighbors that we are who we are, and that our enemies are what they are.  Socialism is slavery.  Socialists are slavers.  And as far as I am concerned, all slavers regardless of what auditory garbage they put forth as an excuse are enemies of Mankind fit only for extermination.

Opinion

Man is a being of both mind and body.  When our ancestors began to create tools and use them to alter the environment for their own benefit the emphasis of the evolutionary process shifted from the strength of the physical body to the strength of the mind.  Our numbers began to grow as we learned to harness and control natural processes such life cycles of plants and animals.  But some so-called men, whom we should call savages or barbarians, chose a different path.  Instead of harnessing and controlling nature they chose to harness and control other men.  They took the tools that were created to improve human life and used them as instruments of subjugation and destruction.  The first of the barbarians took the spear that was invented to hunt animals for food and used it to murder and enslave other men.  Some of the present day barbarians took some commercial airliners and used them to snuff out thousands of lives as a sacrifice to a false god.  And then they have the bloody nerve to call themselves progressives.