Opinions

Environmentalists believe they are good people.  So did the National Socialists.  Al Gore needs to be treated as the Enemy Of Mankind that he actually is.

One of the things we can blame Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists on is the perception of the Reds (a.ka. The Marxists) as the good guys.

I would argue that disarming isn’t an action resulting from a good intention but from a bad one.  Because an individual or a group can choose to obtain their survival and well being through the use of force against productive persons or groups it’s necessary for the potential victims of such violence to be armed and mentally prepared to to respond with force.  Peace is simply the absence of enemies.  It’s the state of being where one isn’t subject to the will of a hostile power, be it an individual, a group, or a nation.  In practice, peace can only be obtained through the forcible suppression or outright destruction of the aggressors.  To obtain peace an individual or a nation must have superior firepower and the will to use it. In order to avoid being subject to the will of aggressors those persons or nations which disarm themselves must enter into a dependent relationship with those are remain armed.  Disarmament is therefore not an act resulting from a good intention.  At best a pacifist is a parasite.  In present practice most pacifists morally condemn the act of self defense and therefore become accessories to acts of violence carried out by aggressive individuals, groups, or nations.  In effect, they've become part of the problem.  And as a rule I favor including pacifists in the solution to the problem of aggressive violence. 

Under the reign of the false president Joe Biden we as a nation are deeply screwed.

You can't put a dollar value on Justice.

Questions

Why do atrocities happen?

Believers in doctrine X believe they're good people doing good things with their victims and opponents being evil.  We could discuss The Holocaust until we're blue in the face, so let's discuss two more recent events.  Paulette Cooper was punished for telling the truth about Scientology.  Shelly Miscavige was punished for doing her job.  From an objective perspective these acts were wrong.  From the perspective of the perpetrators these acts were right.  We need to get into heads of the perpetrators to understand their actions.  We may not like what we find.  

When are we going to treat the Democratic Party as the Enemies Of Mankind they actually are?

Another Fact

If we're to have a future then governmental power has to be limited.

Those who demand unlimited power like Hillary Clinton (A.K.A. the Big Bitch) have to be treated as the Enemies of Mankind they actually are.

Suggestion

Perhaps we should treat the Democratic Party as the Enemies of Mankind they actually are/

Thought For The Day

 (Image by Oleg Volk)

War is not peace, freedom is not slavery, ignorance is not strength, and consensual sex is not rape.  But to accept reality as being real would not allow some folks to pretend that they are some manner of superior person. Especially when they are doing something that is totally depraved.  I think some folks feel a need to achieve, but since they are not the creative or productive kind of person they must then resort to destruction in the place of positive achievement. Thus the need to denigrate their victims, those persons, groups, or nations who are actually good.  For the advocates of "Gun Control" it means calling someone who shoots in self-defense a murderer. For Mullahs, Marxists, and National Socialists it means the total dehumanization of the victims prior to murdering them.

Those who advocate "Gun Control" should be treated as the Enemies of Mankind that they are.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim

Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.

Question Of The Day

Should the Democratic Party be treated as the enemies of mankind that they are?

Yes.


Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.