Saturday, June 30, 2018

Question Of The Day

Should Maxine Waters be put to death as an Enemy Of Humanity?

Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Friday, June 29, 2018


From the collectivist view a person is simply a thing to be used. A tool. The fact that a person has a complete life outside of the alleged goals of the collective is completely blanked out. To the collectivist the full human life is completely meaningless.  And because a person is seen as simply a tool it does not matter if it breaks as a result of being misused. The tool can simply be disposed of and replaced, as were the men in Benghazi.  Hillary Clinton’s open contempt for the people serving under her is perfectly normal for a collectivist. In The Mask Of Command, historian John Keegan recounts an incident where Adolf Hitler was having dinner served to him in the dining car of his private train when it stopped at a station. When another train loaded with wounded soldiers returning from the Eastern Front stops beside Hitler's private train. Hitler had the stewards in the dining car pull down the shades so he wouldn't have to see the other train and the wounded passengers.

 The battle of Gettysburg is seen by historians as the high water mark of the Confederate cause. But what was the cause of the Confederacy? In my present view it was Elitism.

The Southern states were politically dominated by the slave holding class. A group of men who saw themselves as entitled to the labor of African slaves and the obedience of common white men. With the wealth and free time taken from the backs of their slaves they came to dominate the Southern states of the American Republic. The rise of the Republican party came as a result of the citizens of the North becoming tired of the abuses inflicted by the Southern Elites. The Southern Elites saw no alternative to preserve their class privileges but to leave The Union.  The War of Succession was presented to the common citizens of the South as a struggle for liberty but the fact was that the actual objective was to preserve the power of the Elites. When conscription was imposed on the South the slave holding class was essentially exempt from it. The true view of the common citizens by the Elites was made clear for the first time.  With the defeat at Gettysburg the cause of the Confederacy and the Elites who ruled it had no place to go but down.

So why would Barack Obama, someone was generally identified as a Marxist, decline to participate in the ceremonies at Gettysburg?  Because Marxism is an elitist doctrine. It was created by a self-appointed elite for the benefit of the self-appointed elite. Marx, Engels, and their subsequent followers, saw themselves, without qualification, as the masters of the actually rational and productive citizens of their nations. Their efforts, as with the Southern Elites, were to control and use people for their own benefit. Regardless of their public statements the natural inclination of the Marxists is to side with their fellow users of humanity.  On this basis it's no surprise that The Big Zero was a no show at Gettysburg.

Some assholes were celebrating the birthday of Karl Marx.

So what?

 Marx was a raving antisemite. Old school Progressives (the ones they NEVER teach you about in the public schools) had "issues" with those they saw as the "inferior" races. (Africans, Jews, Asians, etc.) And eliminating those who don't fit into the collective makes perfect sense to a collectivist.  I've come to the conclusion that anyone who sees another person as either a tool to be used, or as trash to be disposed of, is essentially a Leftist. (Which pretty much puts me to the right of Attila the Hun.)
We must understand that Marxism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting Karl Marx, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.

The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.  If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such. If we want to go on the ideological offensive we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.  If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.  It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.  It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.  Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such.

Killing a Marxist is not an act of murder, it it an act of self defense.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thursday, June 28, 2018

At Minicon

I also had the following exchange with a female dressed as a Klingon:

FK: (Seeing the button I was wearing) "Godless Capitalist." You must be a Ferengi.

LB: No, I'm an Objectivist, I read Ayn Rand.

FK: (Blank stare)

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Wednesday, June 27, 2018


I continue to take Democrat candidates seriously for the same reason that I paid attention to the any individual or group of menacing strangers when I made a pizza delivery in a bad neighborhood. It is the reasonable expectation that they may harm me. Over the decades that I have observed the Democrats I have noticed that not only they persistently take a wrong position on an issue, they will often do so as a simple mindless negation of the Republican position.

Violent Crime: Don't accept as a fact of reality that it is an act of will on the part of the criminal. Don't apprehend, prosecute, imprison, or where warranted execute the criminal. Instead attack innocent people, disarm them, and leave them helpless in the face of a growing population of violent criminals.

That's just one example. I could go on about insanity of their positions on National Defense, Energy Policy, Taxation, etc. But I really don't have time to do so. The Democrats are not just a party that has to be opposed on individual issues. They are demonstrating that they're following a mental methodology that consistently places them in opposition to reality. And reality is real, opposing it will hurt you.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

A Message

And I quote:

"Just remember however yoy (sic) vote. I'll Be cancelling your vote with mine."

This piece of excrement doesn't care how many of us will be murdered so that it will feel good about itself.  And speaking of hypocrisy,  while I didn't choose to be disabled and living on Social Security this inhuman being chose to obtain and use a concealed carry permit while openly supporting the traitors (yes, I know it's an insult to traitors)  who will murder American citizens for being armed.  What can be done with a blood drenched murderer who points at you and scream that you are the murderer?

I can't stop anyone from behaving as a Totalitarian piece of trash, I (and Conservatives and Libertarians in general) can treat them as such, from the neck until dead in the Nuremberg style.

 Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Monday, June 25, 2018

Quislngs Grandchildren

I'll begin with this image.
 The obvious question is how can someone be tricked into betraying any moral value when they absolutely lack one? The false prophet Mohammed commanded his followers to commit the acts of rape, robbery, and murder.  The doctrine of Islam commands enslavement and the systematic violation of the rights of man and to act as predatory animals.  Without question the doctrine and practice of Islam is absolutely depraved. 

Given that Human Life is the foundation of all valid moral values then Islam must be absolutely condemned.  But the signatories of this document condemn as immoral those who hold an actual moral standard. I am hard pressed to respond to this utterly depraved document without the use of barracks language.  But I will say this, Vidkun Quisling was shot for his betrayal of the Norwegian people and we’re going to need an all night firing squad to deal with this bunch.

They're not un-Minnesotan, they're anti-human.
And free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Sunday, June 24, 2018

Some Proposals

Today I shall propose an Amendment: 

Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general.  Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States.  But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement.  In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore.  When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school.  In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.

Another proposal:

Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:  

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

And yet another proposal:

 I would replace The Second Amendment with the following:

The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed.  To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.  The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

And there's The Rand amendment:

 Ayn Rand on the final page of  the novel Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:

Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.

At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us is removed from existence.  We are freed from the burden of bureaucracy.  Socialism in effect if not name is abolished.   Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path of Life is cleared.  I could go on all day about the practical benefits of The Rand Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other rational person.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Saturday, June 23, 2018


What is a Fascist?

According to Josef Stalin this definition includes Leon Trosky, a lifelong Marxist and founder of the Soviet Army, and like himself a henchman of Lenin.  Any who opposed Stalin was by his definition anyone who opposed him.

So are we Fascists?


A Fascist is, like Mussolini, someone who believes that everything must be within the State, like Hillary Clinton.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Free Tommy Robinson

Friday, June 22, 2018

A Reminder

Marshall Petain was once considered to be a hero in France but now he is one of the reasons that Frenchmen are considered to be cowards.

Everyone who has enlisted in the armed forces of the United States has made the following promise:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

All of us who has served in the Armed Forces made this promise to the nation. And every one of us who has served has broken that promise.  Every one of us has allowed traitors and murderers to rule over us and every one of us has obeyed every order the traitors and murderers have issued.  And it's time to treat the FBI as a criminal gang. 
 Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thursday, June 21, 2018


What's a Fascist?

According to Josef Stalin a Fascist is someone who opposes him.  This included Leon Trotsky, a lifelong Marxist and the founder and original commander of the Red Army, as well as a servant of Lenin.

Are we Fascists?


But that fact doesn’t prevent Anti-fa from assaulting us.  They treat all proper opponents of Totalitarianism as Fascists and assault them.  But if they insist on acting like Totalitarians then we will have to treat them as such, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.
Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Question Of The Day

Why does the Left openly support Islam?

Both Islam and Marxism were concocted by the uberparasites of their times, Karl the First Trustifarian and the Big Moh'. Both doctrines must deny the Right to Life -- and thus the subsidiary Rights of Liberty, Property, Free Speech, Et Cetera -- of all persons. Both ideologies must do so in order to establish and maintain the reign of terror and death, in order to control and exploit the productive population, that their parasitic adherents need to sustain their otherwise useless lives. To accept the concept of the Right to Life that underlies the society of consent is for the Marxist and the Mullah the first step in an act of suicide.  So it should be no surprise that the Left is coming out in favor of silencing the critics of Islam. They feel that the enemy of their enemy is something they can use.

Moral Standards

 The obvious question is how can someone be tricked into betraying any moral value when they absolutely lack one?  The false prophet Mohammed commanded his followers to conquer along with the commission of the acts of rape, robbery, and murder. The doctrine of Islam commands enslavement and the systematic violation of the rights of man and for the believers to act as predatory animals. Without question the doctrine and practice of Islam is absolutely depraved.  Given that Human Life is the foundation of all valid moral values then Islam must be absolutely condemned.
 Free Tommy Robinson

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Fact Of Reality

The people who imposed Prohibition on this nation truly believed that outlawing the possession and consumption of alcohol would bring about the end of drunkenness and no evidence to the contrary would ever change their beliefs. They were absolutely wrong and good people died for their sins.  The intellectual and moral successors to the Prohibitionists ignore the facts about criminal and terrorist actions and now insist on imposing their fantasies on us by force without regard to the actual deaths and other negative effects that will be inflicted on us.  In practical effect innocent people will die so they can enjoy a positive feeling about themselves.  If this isn't willful depravity then what what is?

Free Tommy Robinson

Monday, June 18, 2018

Dealing With Children

Back during the Vietnam War there were Marxists who would set fire to buildings and then cut the hoses with an axe when the firefighters showed up to fight the fire.  But now the grandchildren of those same Marxists whine about their feelings being hurt by any statement of the truth.

Too bad, bitches.

These children (and that's an insult to children) wouldn't last ten seconds in infantry basic training at Fort Benning.  And that's a good thing because I absolutely wouldn't trust any of these utterly pathetic wastes of matter and energy on any field of battle with my life. 

During the summer of 1976 I read a book and changed the way I saw myself and other people.

Robert A. Heinlein in his novel STARSHIP TROOPERS put forth the radical idea that adulthood was not only a physical state but a distinctly moral one as well.  And while physical maturity was obvious to an objective observer the moral state was not.  Given that the mentally and morally immature were not able to rationally perform the duties of citizenship he proposed to establish a system for sorting out the able from the unable.  As it's impossible to compel moral maturity what's required is voluntary system to separate functional citizens from the dysfunctional losers.  While Heinlein did present his system of Federal Service in altruistic terms it does allow the separation of moral dead weights from mentally and morally active people.

Free Tommy Robinson

Sunday, June 17, 2018

A Message To The Media

When you constantly lie to people (like the CPSU, the NSDAP, and the Church of Scientology) then you will be identified as a liar.

Free Tommy Robinson

Saturday, June 16, 2018


 Imagine for a moment that President Trump has been assassinated.

Does the Left seriously believe that there would be NO political changes as a result?

There will be political change, and it will be carried out over the dead bodies of everyone who wanted the president dead, including the Left if necessary.
Free Tommy Robinson.

Friday, June 15, 2018

Something About Dallas

President Kennedy's head snapped back, that’s normal, but the blood and brains came forward, which clearly indicates a rear shot, where Oswald was.  So why do people come up with conspiracy theories?  Because they can’t believe that President Kennedy was murdered by that pathetic little Marxist.  So why did he do it?  Oswald was doing what Marxists normally do, commit murders and lie about them.  Marxists have killed over three thousand people a day on average.  The death toll of General Pinochet and the military junta in Argentina did eventually come out and it was nowhere close to what the Marxists have done.  If you’ll permit me to quote the bastard, "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need".  It was the perfect description of a slave labor system.  Those who understand Marxism, hate the doctrine.  Those who don’t understand Marxism, love it and advocate it.  Shooting a Marxist isn’t an act of murder, it’s an act of self defence.

 Free Tommy Robinson

Thursday, June 14, 2018

Tuesday, June 12, 2018


Few things outside of the realm of Islam can be as disgusting as a bunch of overgrown spoiled brats indulging in narcissistic whining about the consequences of their own irrational behavior. These idiots complain that the United States government spends billions on munitions and delivery systems while the search for a cure to their pet disease goes unfunded. I have some news for those idiots there is no cure for stupidity. The national defense of the United States, whose citizens are for the most part decent, rational, and productive, is mandated by the Constitution. There's not one word in the Constitution that mentions, let alone mandates, that the Federal Government do anything to clean up the mess made by self indulgent idiots who act without even the pretense of rational foresight. The idiots chose the path of mindless pleasure and indulged in unrestrained sodomy and heroin use. In doing so the idiots had dug their own graves. Well now the idiots can now well lay in them.

Free Tommy Robinson

Monday, June 11, 2018


That idiot.  I do disagree with President Trump.  I want him to liberate Canada from socialist filth like Justin Trudeau.  I want him to treat advocates of Gun Control like David Hogg as enemies of Humanity.  An advocate of Gun Control could take any mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the words Gun Owner.  I also want him to treat George Soros and Hillary Clinton as enemies of Humanity. And I also want him to treat David Miscavige as the Federal criminal he is.  And I want him to erase Mecca from the face of the Earth.

Free Tommy Robinson

Update 1800 HRS CDT:

 The first thing I learned in Infantry Basic Training at Fort Benning was that the maximum effective range of an excuse was zero.

Does the British government have an excuse to imprison Tommy Robinson?


Is freedom of speech a Left Wing issue?  A Right Wing issue? Or a Human issue?

It’s a Human issue.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Heavy Metaphor

The Left abhors the thought of being judged by their character because they have none. What is present is the black hole of their lust for power. A desire for control over every aspect of our lives that distorts or destroys everything that comes within their influence. The positive side is that if we don't drop below their moral event horizon we can escape from their influence. But we will be damaged as a result.

Free Tommy Robinson

Saturday, June 09, 2018

Socialism In Action

Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing parties.

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Hillary Clinton and her followers could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Main Stream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives.  Seriously, if the Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP.  Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Friday, June 08, 2018

A Fact

Adolf Hitler and those who followed him, including the camp guards, gas chamber operators, and the SS-einstazgruppen on the Eastern Front, believed they were the good guys.  So does Hillary Clinton and those that follow her seriously believe they are the good people.

I will never vote for a Democrat and apart from my flirtation with the Libertarian Party I voted straight Republican.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Thursday, June 07, 2018


German National Socialists, Italian Fascists, Russian Soviet Communists, and American Democrats believed they were good people. To say that Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, and Hilary Clinton are pieces of totalitarian garbage isn't insulting them, it's describing them.

How many dead?

The late professor R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii placed the upper limit of the deaths caused by Marxism at 170 million. How many has the National Rifle Association killed? Apart from some old school klansmen in the South, none.

 # Free Tommy Robinson

Wednesday, June 06, 2018

In Stock

Once upon a time ago, about the time I was posting the ASCII text versions of The Resister on Usenet, I bought an AK-47 chambered in 5.56 NATO.  It had the thumb hole stock mandated at the time by our masters in Washington.  As a former combat rifleman I took it upon myself to properly zero in the sights on the weapon.  As I was doing this at the Moon Valley range down in Eden Prairie I was rudely interrupted.  It appeared that a scraggly young man wanted to sell me a folding stock for the AK-47.  I said no.  He repeated his offer.  I repeated my refusal.  Eventually he got the point.  First, I actually had no interest in a folding stock for the rifle.  The folding stock for the Ak-47 series rifle is copied from the MP-38/MP-40 series machine pistols issued by the Wehrmacht.  They are inherently unstable and were used both by the Wehrmacht and the Soviets to shorten the weapon for carriage within an aircraft or armored vehicle. An acceptable trade off for them but not for me.  Second. folding stocks at the time were illegal.  I was not about to ruin a weapon by installing an inferior stock simply for the sake of disobeying our self appointed masters.  The proper way to deal with a master is to air out his head.  By his demeanor and his insistence on selling the stock to my unwilling self I concluded that this fellow was a stooge for the BATF.  I refused to fall into the trap.  A simple bit of common sense can go a long way.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Tuesday, June 05, 2018

What Difference Does It Make?

Republicans in general (and supporters of President Trump) understand the difference between a legal immigrant and a criminal such as a member of the MS-13 gang.  A member of the Democratic Party doesn't.

Free Tommy Robinson

Monday, June 04, 2018

The Left

There's no point in debating a leftist on individual issues because their overall epistemological methodology for all effects and purposes reverses the relationship between reality and fantasy. This leads to their well documented habit of systematically reversing good and evil.  While there are many grounds for complaint on the part of the Right (the refusal to prosecute the participants in the Waco Massacre), we could hardly call the Bush Administration a failure.  And it is no surprise that a leftist would openly label someone who opposed them as "sub-human."  Members of the Left, like many pre-literate barbarians before them, are essentially moral and material parasites. They must reject the society of consent and seek power over those who can perform the work that sustains their lives. This drives them to see other persons as either tools they can use to further their own goals, or as organic waste to be disposed of.  So when a leftist declares someone to be "sub-human", that is in practice a precursor to the murder of that person.  The mass graves that are constantly being dug up in nations where the Left has obtained unrestrained power serve as the unrefutable proof of this fact.

So when I see a leftist bumper sticker on a car, the first thought that comes to my mind is "murderer."

If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite godlike patience with the behavior of the Left.  Leftists can assault in public those who won't submit to them. Destroy property. And even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not retorically dehumanise our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanised themselves.

Free Tommy Robinson

Sunday, June 03, 2018

The Truth About Islam

We are in a world war against Islam and the Mainstream Media is on the other side and we need to recognize this.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Saturday, June 02, 2018


If The Hard Left wants to behave like National Socialists, then let's treat them as such, from the neck until dead, in the Nuremberg style of course.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Friday, June 01, 2018

A Fact Of Reality

GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT in the New York Times wrote that a large part of the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other appurtenances of "actually existing socialism." We Americans (the neo-barbarians of the Hard Left excepted) prefer real courts and the other attributes of an actually existing civilization.  Mr. Wheatcroft also dug up an interesting statement by English author Evelyn Waugh: Of course, the Americans are cowards ... They are almost all the descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear of military service.

To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards.  The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up.  AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.

There, I feel better now.

Free Tommy Robinson