Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Quotes Of The Day

"Democrats seem to be drifting toward the concept of prosecution of former office holders by criminalizing policy differences. That's a certain formula for civil war; perhaps not immediate, but inevitable. The absolute minimum requirement for democratic government is that the loser be willing to lose the election: that losing an election is not the loss of everything that matters. As soon as that assurance is gone, playing by the rules makes no sense at all."

-- Jerry Pournelle

"Fascism can cause blunt head trauma and/or violent death. Keep fascism away from children and pets."

-- A banned poster in Wisconsin 

"To send men to the firing squad Judicial proof is unnecessary.  These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail.  This is a revolution and a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate."

-- Che Guevara, Marxist Murderer

Those who dehumanize them themselves can't claim protection under a human right.  Killing a Marxist is no more an act of murder than putting down a rabid dog or eliminating any other hazard to Human Life.

"Humans basically suck."

-- Professor Richard S. Faulkner. 

"...All filth is local...and a joke isn't a joke unless it's at at somebodies expense."

-- Christopher Hitchens 

"Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it. 

 -- Voltaire

“It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.” 

– Voltaire

"Beware of strong drink, for it may cause you to shoot at tax collectors and miss."

-- Robert A. Heinlein 


A competent and self-confident person is incapable of jealousy in anything. Jealousy is invariably a symptom of neurotic insecurity.

― Robert A. Heinlein

"Make awkward sexual advances, not war."

-- Thomas Snot.


"Who is this Leftist? Take his description of his political program: A 'declaration of war against the order of things which exist, against the state of things which exist, in a word, against the structure of the world which presently exists'. You could hardly get a more change-oriented or revolutionary programme than that. So whose programme was it? Marx? Lenin? Stalin? Trotsky? Mao? No. It was how Hitler described his programme towards the end of 'Mein Kampf'. And the Left pretend that Hitler was some sort of conservative! Perhaps it not labouring the point also to ask who it was that described his movement as having a 'revolutionary creative will' which had 'no fixed aim, _ no permanency, only eternal change'. It could very easily have been Trotsky or Mao but it was in fact Hitler (O'Sullivan, 1983. p. 138). Clearly, Nazism was nothing more nor less than a racist form of Leftism (rather extreme Leftism at that) and to label it as 'Rightist' or anything else is to deny reality."

-- Dr. John Ray 

"They have an idea, it's to replace the society of social and economic consent that we live in with the social and economic primacy of the parasites over the productive.  Or as their primary philosophical source (and founding trustifarian) put it, 'from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.' And as there's no limit to the needs of the parasite masters there'll be no limit on the burdens imposed on the productive slaves.  Poison is poison no matter how much grape flavoring one adds to it.  They can't avoid knowing that their ideal society is toxic to us and thus have no effective choice but to attack the opposition on trivial issues in order to head off a public examination of their basic ideological premises.  Political ideology is basically a means of giving the appearance of positive virtue to actions that're morally intolerable to the victims."

-- A Retired Cab Driver

"Revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon".

-- Friedrich Engels, On Authority, 1872.


"The Twentieth Century was not all fun and games."

-- Daniel Bonevac

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Challenge

Members of the Ayn Rand Institute has challenged Paul Krugman to a debate.  I would be surprised if he took up the challenge. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgt8k4WOLoQ

 

Questions

Why do atrocities happen?

Believers in doctrine X believe they're good people doing good things with their victims and opponents being evil.  We could discuss The Holocaust until we're blue in the face, so let's discuss two more recent events.  Paulette Cooper was punished for telling the truth about Scientology.  Shelly Miscavige was punished for doing her job.  From an objective perspective these acts were wrong.  From the perspective of the perpetrators these acts were right.  We need to get into heads of the perpetrators to understand their actions.  We may not like what we find.  

When are we going to treat the Democratic Party as the Enemies Of Mankind they actually are?



Monday, October 26, 2020

Thoughts For The Day

The pen and sword have always been together through the course of Western Civilization and can't be practically separated.  We must remember that government is force.  It should exist solely to protect the Life, Liberty, and Property of the citizens and legal residents of the nation.  Government isn't a platform for someone to strut about and feel good about themselves.  And anyone who can't make the effort to permanently eliminate the voluntary walking hazards to Human Life has no business standing for ANY public office.  None whatsoever.  How dare we not submit to their will and help them pretend that they're Superior Beings(TM)!  You can't argue or negotiate with your self anointed master, all you can do with it is to kill it. 

If there were no other ill effects I would vote for Biden just to see all the smug assholes who support him get some Gulag time.  Nothing like being the star in a live performance of DARKNESS AT NOON to give someone a real appreciation of what Socialism is really like.  We shouldn't be surprised by the existence and degree of insane or outright stupid behavior on the part of those who deem themselves superior to us mere mortals.  The illusion of superiority allows the parasites who make up The Left (and National Socialists are Leftists) to exempt themselves from the rules of the Society of Consent that's the foundation of Western Civilization.  So necessary is the illusion of authority to the parasite that he'll invent facts and rewrite reality to create it.  The fact of the matter is that Leftists lie.  They lie to themselves.  They lie to each other.  And whether they intend to or not they lie to us.  On obvious consequence of this phenomena is that rational debate with a Leftist is simply impossible.  Only violence or the credible threat of same.  The reality is that cannibalism is what some people have to do in order to survive under Communist rule. The rulers, of course, are never short on food.  It's the normal practice of totalitarians to defame their victims, creating the illusion of legitimacy, before murdering them.  In dehumanizing the victims they're in fact dehumanizing themselves.  With a death toll of well over 100 million the Communists have thoroughly demonstrated that they're Enemies of Human Kind in General, and fit only for extermination.

Those who don't remember the past are doomed to retake their history exams.  That which doesn't kill you isn't trying hard enough.  The hot babes of the sixties are now in their seventies or eighties.  The hot babes of the seventies are now in their sixties or seventies.  And the hot babes of the eighties are now in their fifties and sixties.  A future generation will be speaking of Democrats the way my generation was speaking of South American Nazis.  Poison is still poison regardless of what it's called.  And bullshit is still bullshit.

Socialists are inherently parasitic and thus can't take "no" for an answer to their demands for obedience and the material goods they need to exist.  If they did so they would wither away and die.  A dictator, on the other hand, doesn't have to take "no" for answer.  Thus socialists are by necessity inclined to favor dictatorships over citizen ruled republics.  When they see a dictator in the dock, they see their own hopes and desires go with him.  Just because someone else is holding the gun doesn't change the fact that someone's engaged in the act of robbery.  Of course being a Progressive means never having to pay attention to the lessons of Human History.

The Citizen Soldier of a free nation is living proof that the ideology and worldview of the Leftist is wrong.  The Leftist wants to believe that a soldier is an essentially mindless thug who robotically obeys their political masters regardless of the consequences.  In fact it is the mindless thug that the Leftists (and parasites in general) needs in order to inflict their will upon their productive subjects.  The Soldier on the other hand must be actively conscious in order to survive on the battlefield and carry out his mission. Every one of them, from the individual rifleman to the commanding general must constantly perform the Boyd Cycle, the Observe-Orient-Decide-Act loop, as quickly as possible in the course of the conflict.  The Soldier, being mentally active as a virtue, can see through the reams of nonsense emitted by the Leftist demagogue.  And is thus feared and hated by the Left in general.  The Thug on the other hand may be useful to the Leftist ruler but is utterly useless on the battlefield.

To deny free will is to deny personal responsibility for one's own actions.  In an age when one can kill more people with the stroke of a pen than with a lifetime's use of a personal weapon that's a pretty useful excuse.

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Thoughts For The Day

So what if a bunch of Gay Married couples want to guard their pot plants with guns?

Real science is never settled. 

Revolutions (real revolutions, not Marxist ones) happen because the state does something stupid.  In the present it's treating Scientology as being legitimate.

The managers at Pizza Hut liked me because I was constantly working, looking for things to do, and not standing around waiting for orders.   For an atheist I had one Hell of a Protestant work ethic.  The store manager paid me at a rate that was eighty five cents on hour above the Federal minimum wage.

JFK, Jr. may have been assassinated.  My grounds for believing this are, firstly, training for the Visual Flight Rules pilot's license includes training on flying with instruments.  Secondly, at the time of his death JFK. Jr. was the junior senator of New York.  Who else wanted the job?

Hillary Clinton.

The assassination of JFK, Jr. looked like an accident, and may have been an accident.  An example of an inelegant assassination was that of Jeffery Epstein.  Epstein clearly had the goods on important people, including Bill Clinton and Andrew Windsor.  (As an atheist republican I won't use a royal title.)  The act of suicide is impossible in the MCC.  The death of Epstein being reported as a suicide should've raised at least one red flag.  The complete failure of the video surveillance system and the sleeping of the guards with their falsification of their logs should've raised a virtual forest of red flags.

 (Image by Mark Urbin)

 



Saturday, October 24, 2020

It's Happening Again

 


We identify The Holocaust as the vile act it actually was.  But we're seeing The Holocaust from an objective perspective.  From the subjective perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their victims and opponents as being evil.  We're seeing this again with the Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa.  They see themselves as being good and their victims as being evil.  I've said this before: Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  I have a warning for members of Anti-fa, when you Brownshirt someone, don't be surprised that you're treated as a Brownshirt.  I've found through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the good guys.  (Thanks to Mark Urbin for the image)

For a Collectivist it makes perfect sense to punish someone who's part of racial collective for a crime committed by a different member of that racial collective, even though that particular individual was clearly innocent of that act.  For the NSDAP it made perfect sense to punish Jews in general for a bunch of alleged crimes.  No one alive today, even the actual descendants of slave owners, is guilty of the crime of chattel slavery in the anti-bellum south.  For a member of BLM all "White" persons are guilty of the crime of slave ownership and should be punished.  This is clearly wrong.  If the members of BLM want to behave like a group of racial collectivists, then they should be treated like a group of racial collectivists.  In the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  Those who believe absurdities, such as Racial Collectivism, will commit atrocities.  We saw this before with National Socialism, we’re seeing this again with Black Lives Matter.  What will Black Lives Matter do when their victims march down a street shouting that they don't owe?  It shouldn't be a surprise when Black Lives Matter resorts to violence.

To close, I'll say something in the language of the actual leader of Anti-fa, Comrade Lenin: "Ya by skazal vam idti yebat' tvoyu mat', no bylo by spravedlivo sovet."


 





 

Friday, October 23, 2020

Thoughts Of The Day

Before the adoption of the swastika by the DAP (later the NSDAP) it was seen as a good luck sign, it may qualify as an instance of virtue signaling. 

I appear to more critical of the Republicans than the Democrats.  I want the Republican Party to improve, thus the criticism.

Censorship is the forcible prevention of the transmission of information.  In the context of an adversarial situation, such as the invasion of a Free Nation by a Socialist State the act of censorship is morally mandatory.  Such an invader has no more right to information about the defending forces than a biker gang has to the location of your wife or daughters.  In the context of a civil society valid information concerning those holding or seeking public office and their goals and beliefs is necessary in order for members of the electorate to make a valid decision when they exercise their authority.  To vote correctly, the voter needs to know the truth about office seekers and their beliefs and personal conduct.  Those who must suppress the transmission of valid information, such as corrupt office holders who're acting through their lieutenants, or through the local campus communist goon squad, are harmful to the individual citizens and the political community as a whole.  Those who attempt to practice censorship in a civil society are enemies of that society and must be identified and dealt with as such. 


A man without a conscience is a hazard to human life and human society.  Case in point: George Soros.
Isn't that nice.  Our own socialist party is being actively supported by an individual who actively collaborated with the German National Socialists during the Second World War.