Opinions

 Who knew that a Gas Can could become a symbol of Freedom?  (Image by Mark Urbin)

The Left can't deal with reality because in reality they're the bad guys.  They're constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their livestock by force.  Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they're left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it.  Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

Thought For The Day

Free speech is a moral necessity.  Those who declare free speech is hate speech and must be banned are Enemies of Mankind and must be dealt with as such, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.

Questions

Are Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi Enemies of Mankind?

Yes.

Should they be treated as such?

Yes, they should be hanged from the neck until dead, in the Nuremberg style.

How many American high school students can do this?

Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" and those who are in favor of banning firearms are Enemies of Mankind and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  There's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

Questions

Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?

My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.

There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

First, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.

Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value.  The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.

Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government.  Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.

A Fact

Adolf Hitler and those who followed him, including the camp guards, gas chamber operators, and the SS-einstazgruppen on the Eastern Front, believed they were the good guys.  So does Hillary Clinton and those that follow her seriously believe they are the good people.

I will never vote for a Democrat and apart from my flirtation with the Libertarian Party I voted straight Republican.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Questions

Why don't we shut down the FBI?

Who needs a Reichministry Fur Kultur when the Mainstream Media will lie without a gun to their heads?

Should the United States of America pull out of NATO because of free speech violations in the United Kingdom?

Should the United States of America continue to have diplomatic and military or other relations with the United Kingdom?

Were we correct in succeeding from Britain in 1776?

Goals And Consequences

The basic goal of the terrorist group Hamas is to murder every man, woman and child in the state of Israel, in effect to carry out the Second Holocaust.  Furthermore Hamas is an enforcer of the anti-human doctrine of Islam.   Thus under no circumstances should anyone have any sympathy for Hamas.  But unfortunately there are some very thoroughly depraved people in the western nations who do.

Hamas uses the very thoroughly depraved tactic of hiding behind women and children on the rare occasions that they do stand up and engage the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) in firefights.  This, of course, results in the deaths of those same women and children.  This does not stop the depraved supporters of Hamas from falsely laying the blame for those deaths on the IDF.

We have the right of speech and press to ensure that we as citizens have the accurate information necessary to make rational judgements on the issues of the day.  But the supporters of Hamas abuse this right by willfully lying to us with the goal of causing us to make a clearly wrong decision.

Why?

I would expect the correct answer to be long and complex.  But, as with the First Holocaust, the simple answer may be that there is no why.