On Newspeak

Newspeak has become the dominant dialect of the academic and media establishment.  In Newspeak those who uphold, defend and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives.  In the political context the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.  A function of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought.  The function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors.  Since clarity of thought which is the correct identification of the facts of reality is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life.  Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life.  An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is impossible would be completely lethal.  Thus if we're to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the practitioners of Newspeak from the educational and media establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.

Newspeak In Action

Those who uphold and defend as well as spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives.  In effect, in the political context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.  The one of the functions of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus blood soaked tyrants such as Fidel Castro or Josef Stalin are called liberators and liberators such as President Trump are called oppressors.  But since clarity of thought, the correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans to survive and prosper, a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life.  Each subsequent revision of Newspeak with its increasing disconnection from reality is increasingly toxic to human life.  An ultimate version of Newspeak, in which any thought is impossible, would be totally lethal.  Thus if we're to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the newspeakers from our intellectual establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.

Thoughts Of The Day

Are you in control of your life?

What we do see in "Liberalism" are excuses for seizing control of your life.  Let's take a look at the concept of Global Warming.  The Terrestrial biosphere is a dynamic environment in a dynamic Universe.  Terrestrial climate change has naturally happened will always naturally happen.  Human action should have an effect on the Terrestrial climate.  But the Human action has become a political football, thus an excuse for seizing control of your life.  But as many people on the Right side of the political isle believe an excuse is NEVER valid.

Some people call themselves "Progressives" when in fact they're reactionaries.  Some people call themselves "Liberals" when in fact they're enemies of Liberty.  These are are instances of Newspeak in action.

Ideas In Action

One of the ideas gifted to us by George Orwell is the concept of Newspeak.

What is Newspeak?

From my perspective Newspeak is where words are used in opposition of their actual meaning.

Orwell used as a fictional example where the INGSOC party proclaimed that Freedom was Slavery and that War was Peace.  We're seeing this today where those persons who proclaim themselves to be progressive are in fact reactionaries.  The only people who have a valid claim to being progressive are an insurance company.

Those who proclaim themselves to be Liberal are in fact enemies of Liberty.  Those who proclaim themselves to be good guys are in fact bad people.  We saw this historically with the membership of the KKK, the CPSU, the NSDAP, the Khmer Rouge, The BATF, Al Quida, etc.  We're seeing this today with the membership of Anti-Fa and BLM.

Thoughts Of The Day

What's the difference between a Fascist and a Progressive?  One wears a silly uniform and the other's just silly.  At the core of both movements is the belief that all aspects of human life must be controlled by the apparatus of the State.  Or, to put it another way, it doesn't matter if you're bitten by a rabid doberman or a rabid poodle, you're still going to get rabies shots.  The State, like fire, can be useful but it has to be limited.

Looters need Producers.  Producers don't need Looters.  The Looters despise The Rule Of Law because under The Rule Of Law the Looters would be imprisoned or executed.  Some people identify themselves as Progressives, but in fact they're Reactionaries.  Why?  The predator culture has existed from the stone age.  Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive member’s of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force.  The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator.  Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it, even to the open use of deadly force.  Some predator have created an academic culture that's now opposed to rational thought.  Falsehoods are now treated as facts and truths are held to be untrue.  And if a failing grade isn't sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.  So what's to be done?  How do we respond to the insanity?

Those who stand up for Liberty are called Conservatives and those who oppose Liberty called Liberals, this is nothing but Newspeak.  There are always those who follow orders, no matter how insane they are.

The members of the Democratic Party want to eliminate the Electoral Collage and the National Rifle Association.  The Electoral College and the National Rifle Association were created due to the membership of the Democratic Party.

Even though many Communist states that existed fell or had retreated from their doctrine the American fellow travelers who supported the ideology remained in place in the United States.  Here they continued to preach their doctrines and eventually their students would take full control of the nation.  Those who say that they oppose Fascism are in fact Totalitarians.

Thoughts Of The Day

The posture of righteousness isn't identical with simply being right.  When one scratches a self proclaimed liberal one will find the fascist underneath.  There's a proper term for those who deny your Right of Life, they're properly called mortal enemies.

One of the functions of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought.  But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus bloodsoaked tyrants  are called liberators are called oppressors.

Il Duce, the original Fascist, used to be a leading socialist intellectual and even received fan mail from Lenin.  The fact of the matter is that the ideologies of Socialism, Fascism, et al, are nothing more than an attempt to give the appearance of legitimacy to old school savagery, which is basically the old stone age practice of beating up other people and taking their stuff.  Nowadays, whenever I see a "progressive" sign on a front lawn or a bumper sticker on a car I think, "murderer."

Whoever wrote Cult Of Personality got Hubbard's number. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEjlMvDsp9I

Thoughts Of The Day

I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

There're no safe spaces to hide in and the financial supporters of Democrats (like George Soros) will be off sipping their cool drinks on an island that doesn't have an extradition treaty with us.  The defenders of liberal values are called conservatives but opponents of liberal values are now called liberals.  Republicans were sent to Washington to do a job, but they haven't done it. 

How many lies will Joe Biden tell before the election?

The thoroughly unpleasant fact of reality is that Hollywood is run by a bunch of unimaginative twerps, the kind of people that Ayn Rand used to call Second Handers.  It's the kind of mentality that wants to maximize profits but is unwilling to try something distinctly new or different.   Thus the glut of sequels and the ongoing cinemisation of the successful television series.  Even if the project is not a sequel or a series adaptation, the Second Handers still attempt to reduce risk by only combining elements that appeared to have worked in the past.  Thus "The Adventures of Pluto Nash," an movie that combines the elements of Eddie Murphy, Computer Generated Imagery, and the Sci-Fi environment, still turns out to be an unwatchable piece of crap.  (When I saw the trailer at the 2002 Convergence, my thought was, oh its "Moon Zero Two: The Next Generation.") 

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.  Antisemitism is bad enough, but it's also a symptom of a deeper political problem. 

 

Thoughts For The Day

Newspeak has become the dominant dialect of the academic and media establishment.  In Newspeak those who uphold, defend and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives.  In the political context the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.  A function of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought.  But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors.  Since clarity of thought, which is the correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to Human Life.  Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life.  An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is impossible would be completely lethal.  Thus if we're to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the practitioners of Newspeak from the educational and media establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.

I have a clue for Fox News: There's no balance between Truth and Falsehood.

On Vegan propaganda: Let's start with the fact that not all land used for pasture can be converted for grain or veggie production.  Let's also note that a large part of what meat animals are fed, such as hay, and shredded corn stalks, is waste material from food production for humans.  The elimination of meat production would actually require an increase in the use of land for farming in order to make up for the deficit in food production.  In other words, the Vegan propagandists are engaging in mental inversion mode as usual, and let's face it, a diet without meat is unbalanced.  The Vegans that I've met tend to resemble socialist labor camp inmates without the labor camp haircut and they tend to do stupid things like voting for Democrats or Communist trash like the Green Party. 

Those who ideologically separate themselves from Humanity shouldn't complain about being identified and treated as a hazard to Human Life.  Political Ideology's basically a means of giving the appearance of positive virtue to actions that're morally intolerable to the victims.  The Left in its fundamental form is a group of essentially parasitic beings that wish to demolish the present consent-based American social-economic structure and replace it with a coercion based political order that they regard as morally superior.  Unfortunately for us The Left's ideal version of America strongly resembles a Überkonzentrationlager with themselves as the commandants and overseers.  Anyone who stands in the way of The Left in their quest to subjugate the American republic, policeman, citizen soldier, or President Trump, is rhetorically blasted as being the vilest of monsters. Those who've consistently demonstrated their hatred of American liberty, such as Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi, are worshiped as though they were the enactors of the divine will.  To govern is to restrain, those who can't or won't restrain themselves have no place in a social institution whose function is to restrain others.

The Left passionately hates the Police and the Armed Forces both of whom have traditionally stood in the path of Holy Marxist Revolution and thus the establishment of the Holy Communist Society where all activities and relationships are dictated by the self-appointed revolutionary saviors and enforced by the compulsory power of the state.  The obvious corollary is The Left appears to have a passionate love for the destroyers of civil society such as violent criminals and organized terrorists.
For a Leftist government to authorize the use of deadly force against any group of rioters would constitute a betrayal of its fundamental political premise, that civil society, where economic and social relationships are based on consent is fit only for destruction.

We need to treat Joe Biden as the Enemy of Mankind he actually is.

  
Enemies of Humanity Barack Obama and David Miscavige have bought their own death sentences.

On Bad Ideas

On Bad Ideas.

When I was pizza driver I saw a Kerry photo pasted in a car window as it were a sacred icon.  I also saw a yard sign placed on the wall of a union hall as it were a sacred icon.  In fact they weren't sacred icons, they were simply objects.  In fact they were tools for human use.

In Objective Reality one has to mentally step back and look at one's thoughts and actions.  One may not like what they find, but one has to do so.  One thought common in Racial Collectivism is the belief that one is a victim.  When we look at the doctrine of the NSDAP we see that the "Aryans" are the victims of the "Jews."  We're seeing this idea again in BLM with the idea that the "Blacks" are the victims of the "Whites."  (In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the members of BLM dismiss The Holocaust as a White on White action.)

In Newspeak the belief that all lives matter regardless of race is held as being racist.  A function of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought.  But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors.  Since clarity of thought, which is the correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life.  Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life.  An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is impossible would be completely lethal.

What Would Orwell Say?

What would Orwell say?

Those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the political context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.

The one of the functions of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality. Thus bloodsoaked tyrants such as Fidel Castro are called liberators and liberators such as President Bush are called oppressors. But since clarity of thought, the correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans to survive and prosper, a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An ultimate version of Newspeak, in which any thought is impossible, would be totally lethal.

Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the newspeakers from our educational establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.


Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

 Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.

My Opinion

A plantation owner should be embarrassed by Lester Holt.

Thought For The Day

"Progressive" is newspeak for someone who believes in the paleolithic ideal of beating up and killing people and taking their stuff.

Another Hard Truth

In Newspeak those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the political context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed. The one of the functions of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality. Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and liberators are called oppressors. But since clarity of thought, the correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans to survive and prosper, a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An ultimate version of Newspeak, in which any thought is impossible and would be totally lethal. Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the advocates of Newspeak from our educational establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.

Thought For The Day

Newspeak has become the dominant dialect of the academic and media establishment.

In Newspeak those who uphold, defend and spread economic and political liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under their total control are called Progressives. In the political context the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.

A function of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality. Thus blood soaked tyrants are called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors. Since clarity of thought which is the correct identification of the facts of reality is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is impossible would be completely lethal.

Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the practitioners of Newspeak  from the educational and media establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.