What would Orwell say?
Those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty
are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down
under their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the
political context, the practical meanings of the political labels are
The one of the functions of language is to serve as the operating
system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent
correct identification of the facts of reality. Thus bloodsoaked tyrants
such as Fidel Castro are called liberators and liberators such as
President Bush are called oppressors. But since clarity of thought, the
correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans
to survive and prosper, a language form that obscures facts and
disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human
life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing
disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An
ultimate version of Newspeak, in which any thought is impossible, would
be totally lethal.
Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a
society we must remove the newspeakers from our educational
establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in
favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated
in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.