All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that's been raised in the past is why I don't
call for a ban on Scientology by name?
A name's only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears
to be internally forbidden to change the doctrines of Scientology, the
doctrines
also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.
Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Scientologist
will occur. It's by
identifying a specific toxic attribute of Scientology that we can
properly
exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental
attribute of the doctrine of Scientology is the denial of real
laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the
real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid
Hubbard opened the door to the commission of a multitude of
crimes that would be carried out by Hubbard and other Scientologists
for their own personal benefit.
This action's absolutely intolerable in a civil society, in reality the
people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of
legislation. In reality Scientology has to go. In order
for us to live a
properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive
role in defending our rights.
Wednesday, September 30, 2020
Proposal
Labels:
Scientology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment