Some Proposals

Today I shall propose an Amendment: 

Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general.  Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States.  But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement.  In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore.  When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school.  In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.

Another proposal:

Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:  

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

And yet another proposal:

 I would replace The Second Amendment with the following:

The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed.  To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.  The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

And there's The Rand amendment:

 Ayn Rand on the final page of  the novel Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:

Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.

At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us is removed from existence.  We are freed from the burden of bureaucracy.  Socialism in effect if not name is abolished.   Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path of Life is cleared.  I could go on all day about the practical benefits of The Rand Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other rational person.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Questions

What is a Fascist?

According to Josef Stalin this definition includes Leon Trosky, a lifelong Marxist and founder of the Soviet Army, and like himself a henchman of Lenin.  Any who opposed Stalin was by his definition anyone who opposed him.

So are we Fascists?

No.

A Fascist is, like Mussolini, someone who believes that everything must be within the State, like Hillary Clinton.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.


Free Tommy Robinson

A Reminder

Marshall Petain was once considered to be a hero in France but now he is one of the reasons that Frenchmen are considered to be cowards.

Everyone who has enlisted in the armed forces of the United States has made the following promise:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

All of us who has served in the Armed Forces made this promise to the nation. And every one of us who has served has broken that promise.  Every one of us has allowed traitors and murderers to rule over us and every one of us has obeyed every order the traitors and murderers have issued.  And it's time to treat the FBI as a criminal gang. 

 Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Questions

What's a Fascist?

According to Josef Stalin a Fascist is someone who opposes him.  This included Leon Trotsky, a lifelong Marxist and the founder and original commander of the Red Army, as well as a servant of Lenin.

Are we Fascists?

No.

But that fact doesn’t prevent Anti-fa from assaulting us.  They treat all proper opponents of Totalitarianism as Fascists and assault them.  But if they insist on acting like Totalitarians then we will have to treat them as such, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.

Free Tommy Robinson.  Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Question Of The Day

Why does the Left openly support Islam?

Both Islam and Marxism were concocted by the uberparasites of their times, Karl the First Trustifarian and the Big Moh'. Both doctrines must deny the Right to Life -- and thus the subsidiary Rights of Liberty, Property, Free Speech, Et Cetera -- of all persons. Both ideologies must do so in order to establish and maintain the reign of terror and death, in order to control and exploit the productive population, that their parasitic adherents need to sustain their otherwise useless lives. To accept the concept of the Right to Life that underlies the society of consent is for the Marxist and the Mullah the first step in an act of suicide.  So it should be no surprise that the Left is coming out in favor of silencing the critics of Islam. They feel that the enemy of their enemy is something they can use.

Moral Standards

 The obvious question is how can someone be tricked into betraying any moral value when they absolutely lack one?  The false prophet Mohammed commanded his followers to conquer along with the commission of the acts of rape, robbery, and murder. The doctrine of Islam commands enslavement and the systematic violation of the rights of man and for the believers to act as predatory animals. Without question the doctrine and practice of Islam is absolutely depraved.  Given that Human Life is the foundation of all valid moral values then Islam must be absolutely condemned.

 Free Tommy Robinson

Fact Of Reality

The people who imposed Prohibition on this nation truly believed that outlawing the possession and consumption of alcohol would bring about the end of drunkenness and no evidence to the contrary would ever change their beliefs. They were absolutely wrong and good people died for their sins.  The intellectual and moral successors to the Prohibitionists ignore the facts about criminal and terrorist actions and now insist on imposing their fantasies on us by force without regard to the actual deaths and other negative effects that will be inflicted on us.  In practical effect innocent people will die so they can enjoy a positive feeling about themselves.  If this isn't willful depravity then what what is?

Free Tommy Robinson

Dealing With Children

Back during the Vietnam War there were Marxists who would set fire to buildings and then cut the hoses with an axe when the firefighters showed up to fight the fire.  But now the grandchildren of those same Marxists whine about their feelings being hurt by any statement of the truth.

Too bad, bitches.

These children (and that's an insult to children) wouldn't last ten seconds in infantry basic training at Fort Benning.  And that's a good thing because I absolutely wouldn't trust any of these utterly pathetic wastes of matter and energy on any field of battle with my life. 

During the summer of 1976 I read a book and changed the way I saw myself and other people.

Robert A. Heinlein in his novel STARSHIP TROOPERS put forth the radical idea that adulthood was not only a physical state but a distinctly moral one as well.  And while physical maturity was obvious to an objective observer the moral state was not.  Given that the mentally and morally immature were not able to rationally perform the duties of citizenship he proposed to establish a system for sorting out the able from the unable.  As it's impossible to compel moral maturity what's required is voluntary system to separate functional citizens from the dysfunctional losers.  While Heinlein did present his system of Federal Service in altruistic terms it does allow the separation of moral dead weights from mentally and morally active people.

Free Tommy Robinson

A Message To The Media

When you constantly lie to people (like the CPSU, the NSDAP, and the Church of Scientology) then you will be identified as a liar.

Free Tommy Robinson

Imagine

 Imagine for a moment that President Trump has been assassinated.

Does the Left seriously believe that there would be NO political changes as a result?

There will be political change, and it will be carried out over the dead bodies of everyone who wanted the president dead, including the Left if necessary.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Something About Dallas

President Kennedy's head snapped back, that’s normal, but the blood and brains came forward, which clearly indicates a rear shot, where Oswald was.  So why do people come up with conspiracy theories?  Because they can’t believe that President Kennedy was murdered by that pathetic little Marxist.  So why did he do it?  Oswald was doing what Marxists normally do, commit murders and lie about them.  Marxists have killed over three thousand people a day on average.  The death toll of General Pinochet and the military junta in Argentina did eventually come out and it was nowhere close to what the Marxists have done.  If you’ll permit me to quote the bastard, "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need".  It was the perfect description of a slave labor system.  Those who understand Marxism, hate the doctrine.  Those who don’t understand Marxism, love it and advocate it.  Shooting a Marxist isn’t an act of murder, it’s an act of self defence.

 Free Tommy Robinson

No Question

There's no question that David Hogg is an Enemy Of Humanity.

Free Tommy Robinson

Listening

Yes, I listen to Pat Condell.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Idiotcy

Few things outside of the realm of Islam can be as disgusting as a bunch of overgrown spoiled brats indulging in narcissistic whining about the consequences of their own irrational behavior. These idiots complain that the United States government spends billions on munitions and delivery systems while the search for a cure to their pet disease goes unfunded. I have some news for those idiots there is no cure for stupidity. The national defense of the United States, whose citizens are for the most part decent, rational, and productive, is mandated by the Constitution. There's not one word in the Constitution that mentions, let alone mandates, that the Federal Government do anything to clean up the mess made by self indulgent idiots who act without even the pretense of rational foresight. The idiots chose the path of mindless pleasure and indulged in unrestrained sodomy and heroin use. In doing so the idiots had dug their own graves. Well now the idiots can now well lay in them.

Free Tommy Robinson

Disagreement

That idiot.  I do disagree with President Trump.  I want him to liberate Canada from socialist filth like Justin Trudeau.  I want him to treat advocates of Gun Control like David Hogg as enemies of Humanity.  An advocate of Gun Control could take any mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the words Gun Owner.  I also want him to treat George Soros and Hillary Clinton as enemies of Humanity. And I also want him to treat David Miscavige as the Federal criminal he is.  And I want him to erase Mecca from the face of the Earth.

Free Tommy Robinson

Update 1800 HRS CDT:

 The first thing I learned in Infantry Basic Training at Fort Benning was that the maximum effective range of an excuse was zero.

Does the British government have an excuse to imprison Tommy Robinson?

No.

Is freedom of speech a Left Wing issue?  A Right Wing issue? Or a Human issue?

It’s a Human issue.

Heavy Metaphor

The Left abhors the thought of being judged by their character because they have none. What is present is the black hole of their lust for power. A desire for control over every aspect of our lives that distorts or destroys everything that comes within their influence. The positive side is that if we don't drop below their moral event horizon we can escape from their influence. But we will be damaged as a result.

Free Tommy Robinson

Socialism In Action

Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing parties.

Quote:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

Hillary Clinton and her followers could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Main Stream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives.  Seriously, if the Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP.  Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.

Free Tommy Robinson.

A Fact

Adolf Hitler and those who followed him, including the camp guards, gas chamber operators, and the SS-einstazgruppen on the Eastern Front, believed they were the good guys.  So does Hillary Clinton and those that follow her seriously believe they are the good people.

I will never vote for a Democrat and apart from my flirtation with the Libertarian Party I voted straight Republican.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Tolalitarians

German National Socialists, Italian Fascists, Russian Soviet Communists, and American Democrats believed they were good people. To say that Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, and Hilary Clinton are pieces of totalitarian garbage isn't insulting them, it's describing them.

How many dead?

The late professor R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii placed the upper limit of the deaths caused by Marxism at 170 million. How many has the National Rifle Association killed? Apart from some old school klansmen in the South, none.

 # Free Tommy Robinson

In Stock

Once upon a time ago, about the time I was posting the ASCII text versions of The Resister on Usenet, I bought an AK-47 chambered in 5.56 NATO.  It had the thumb hole stock mandated at the time by our masters in Washington.  As a former combat rifleman I took it upon myself to properly zero in the sights on the weapon.  As I was doing this at the Moon Valley range down in Eden Prairie I was rudely interrupted.  It appeared that a scraggly young man wanted to sell me a folding stock for the AK-47.  I said no.  He repeated his offer.  I repeated my refusal.  Eventually he got the point.  First, I actually had no interest in a folding stock for the rifle.  The folding stock for the Ak-47 series rifle is copied from the MP-38/MP-40 series machine pistols issued by the Wehrmacht.  They are inherently unstable and were used both by the Wehrmacht and the Soviets to shorten the weapon for carriage within an aircraft or armored vehicle. An acceptable trade off for them but not for me.  Second. folding stocks at the time were illegal.  I was not about to ruin a weapon by installing an inferior stock simply for the sake of disobeying our self appointed masters.  The proper way to deal with a master is to air out his head.  By his demeanor and his insistence on selling the stock to my unwilling self I concluded that this fellow was a stooge for the BATF.  I refused to fall into the trap.  A simple bit of common sense can go a long way.

Free Tommy Robinson.

What Difference Does It Make?

Republicans in general (and supporters of President Trump) understand the difference between a legal immigrant and a criminal such as a member of the MS-13 gang.  A member of the Democratic Party doesn't.

Free Tommy Robinson

The Left

There's no point in debating a leftist on individual issues because their overall epistemological methodology for all effects and purposes reverses the relationship between reality and fantasy. This leads to their well documented habit of systematically reversing good and evil.  While there are many grounds for complaint on the part of the Right (the refusal to prosecute the participants in the Waco Massacre), we could hardly call the Bush Administration a failure.  And it is no surprise that a leftist would openly label someone who opposed them as "sub-human."  Members of the Left, like many pre-literate barbarians before them, are essentially moral and material parasites. They must reject the society of consent and seek power over those who can perform the work that sustains their lives. This drives them to see other persons as either tools they can use to further their own goals, or as organic waste to be disposed of.  So when a leftist declares someone to be "sub-human", that is in practice a precursor to the murder of that person.  The mass graves that are constantly being dug up in nations where the Left has obtained unrestrained power serve as the unrefutable proof of this fact.

So when I see a leftist bumper sticker on a car, the first thought that comes to my mind is "murderer."

If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite godlike patience with the behavior of the Left.  Leftists can assault in public those who won't submit to them. Destroy property. And even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not retorically dehumanise our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanised themselves.

Free Tommy Robinson

The Truth About Islam

We are in a world war against Islam and the Mainstream Media is on the other side and we need to recognize this.

Free Tommy Robinson.

Suggestion

If The Hard Left wants to behave like National Socialists, then let's treat them as such, from the neck until dead, in the Nuremberg style of course.

Free Tommy Robinson.

A Fact Of Reality

GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT in the New York Times wrote that a large part of the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other appurtenances of "actually existing socialism." We Americans (the neo-barbarians of the Hard Left excepted) prefer real courts and the other attributes of an actually existing civilization.  Mr. Wheatcroft also dug up an interesting statement by English author Evelyn Waugh: Of course, the Americans are cowards ... They are almost all the descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear of military service.

To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards.  The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up.  AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.

There, I feel better now.

Free Tommy Robinson

Quote Of The Day

The problem with China is that there are too many Chinks here.

--L. Ron Hubbard

#Free Tommy Robinson

Beating Down

The beatdown by the neo-nazi garbage (and I will use that term) that you’ve been expecting?  It won’t happen.  So why won’t it happen?  Because the neo-nazi thugs that you were told that supported Trump never existed.

YOU WERE LIED TO.

By the professors and the mainstream media.  You were also lied to by the serious supporters of Hillary Clinton.  You can go outside of the so-called safe spaces and you find peaceful and normal people who are glad that the treasonous bitch will never occupy the White House.  And not one of them is a brownshirt in hiding waiting for the chance to beat you up.  The monsters that you imagine that are hiding under the bed are never there.

#Free Tommy Robinson

More Questions

Should we treat David Miscavige, David Hogg, and Emma Gonzalez as enemies of Humanity?

Should we terminate diplomatic and military relations with the United Kingdom?

Should we erase the followers of false prophets like Marx and Mohammed from the face of the Earth?

Thought For The Day

If O.J. Simpson had stayed home on that horrible night he would still have a career, real friends, the annoying ex-wife, a reputation as a stand up guy, and most importantly no one outside of the Los Angeles area would have ever heard the name Kardashian.

UPDATE 1000 HRS:

When the British government makes peaceful political change impossible they will make violent political change necessary.

 UPDATE 1300 HRS:

It is not the job of the British Police to just follow orders.

Questions

Why don't we shut down the FBI?

Who needs a Reichministry Fur Kultur when the Mainstream Media will lie without a gun to their heads?

Should the United States of America pull out of NATO because of free speech violations in the United Kingdom?

Should the United States of America continue to have diplomatic and military or other relations with the United Kingdom?

Were we correct in succeeding from Britain in 1776?

A Reminder

"To send men to the firing squad Judicial proof is unnecessary.  These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail.  This is a revolution and a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate."

--Che Guevara, Marxist Murderer

Those who dehumanize them themselves cannot claim protection under a human right.  Killing a Marxist is no more an act of murder than putting down a rabid dog or eliminating any other hazard to Human Life.

UPDATE 1130:

If the Democratic Party wants a Civil War they'll get one, up the ass.

UPDATE 1645:

 To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our the Democrats welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and the Democrats are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

UPDATE 1930:

We need to stop diplomatic recognition of the British Government.

Methodology

Terror is merely the method. The ultimate goal is the establishment and maintenance of a state of tyranny.   It does not matter if the tyrants calls themselves Communists, National Socialists, or Theocrats, they simply cannot be reasoned with. Negotiations, summit meetings, and other gestures of good will cannot stop them. Like any predatory animal they can only be driven off and ultimately destroyed.  If we are to continue to live a proper human life then the hunting season on tyrants and those who willingly support them must always be open.

If someone wants Gun Control, they'll get it up the ass.

Um

I keep thinking that the old movie ZARDOZ would be a neat metaphor for certain aspects of the present political and cultural situation.

 I've come to the conclusion that apart from his species the character of Invader Zim is essentially the idealized form of the complete modern utopian agitator.

Like the modern utopian agitator Zim embodies supreme arrogance combined with supreme ignorance and a total dependence on the technology created by others with a level of personal ability barely suitable for working in the fast food industry. As one the leaders of the Irkan Empire, Almighty Tallest Purple once asked Zim, "shouldn't you be frying something?"

And what can I say about the Irkans?

They not only militarized their society in the manner dreamed about by various utopians but they have also gone beyond those arch-militarists, the ancient Spartans, in completely removing the family from the social structure altogether. Zim's first words upon being decanted from the womb-machine thingy were, "I love you cold robotic arm."

Of course having achieved the utopian dream of totally regimenting their own society the Irkans then proceed to indulge in that other annoying habit of practicing utopians the conquest and ruthless exploitation of their neighbors.

Invader Zim, having been sent to Earth so he wouldn't foul-up Operation Impending Doom II the way he wrecked Operation Impending Doom I, regards himself to be grossly superior to the inhabitants (that's us) even though every one of his schemes to effect a take down of human society is thwarted by his next door neighbor, Dib, a boy who has seen far too many episodes of The X-Files.

If it weren't for the well documented effects of various utopian schemes the various efforts of our own home-grown utopians to impose their will upon us would be almost as funny.

Reality

Collectivist trash such as the National Socialist German Workers Party, Anti-fa, and Black Lives Matter saw themselves as good people, but in reality they are evil.  And the advocates of gun control also think of themselves as good people, but in fact they are evil.

All an advocate of gun control has to do is replace the word Jew with the words Gun Owner.  It's that easy to commit and advocate mass murder.  All a Statist needs to do to understand why a citizen needs an assault rifle is to look in a mirror.

L. Ron Hubbard And Sctentology

L. Ron Hubbard was getting a penny a word writing for the pulps when real authors like Ayn Rand and Robert A. Heinlein were being published by hardcover publishers. Think about that.

We're not curious about The Church Of Scientology, we're angry about their practices.

A Message To The Republican Party

What the Republican Party needs to get through their collective skulls right now is the fact that the age of politics as usual is over.  No more compromise. No more deals. No more bipartisanship.  There must be a radical clean up of the mess that the Left has created. The partisans of socialism must be systematically removed from our public institutions. And if we are to have a future as the core nation of our civilization we must make a special effort to clean out the Augean Stables that our educational establishment has become under the tutelage of the Left.   And we must with volume and clarity tell the spoiled brats who imagine themselves to be the heirs of Marx and Lenin to grow up or get out.  We need to get hard on the Enemies Of The Constitution on the Left.  Of course, if those idiots would just die, it would be nice too.

The Future

Body Count

The National Rifle Association was founded by former members of the Union Army in 1871 to teach former slaves to defend themselves from the Ku Klux Klan, the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.  The death toll of the National Rifle Association is zero. From the rise of the Bolsheviks in 1917 to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 the average daily death toll of Marxists was 3200. And that doesn't count American president John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

Who are the murderers?

The Marxist trash who are pushing Gun Control are the murderers.

On Atheism

I never received an e-mail from God@god.god saying "Les, you're wrong."

On The Assassination Of Hillary Clinton

A Hard Leftist, especially a formally indoctrinated Hard Leftist, will believe anything except the truth.  For example  the New York Times has published an editorial piece claiming that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated as a result of the collective will of the City of Dallas, Texas.  The fact that President Kennedy was murdered in a Democrat governed state by a open Marxist apparently didn't enter the non-existent mind of the author. Nor did the fact that there is no such clearly identifiable thing as a collective will, that belief is simply a Marxist myth. The fact is that the assassination of a significant political figure is essentially a suicide mission. The term assassin is derived from the Islamic cult of the Assassins.  A group whose members were induced into performing suicide missions through the use of hashish. It won't happen because those who can do so understand that Hillary Clinton isn't the cause of the problem, she's merely the symptom.  The actual problem is the culture that holds the rights of individuals in contempt and is willing to use force to reach their goals.  A single assassination will not solve this problem. Although there's no shortage of trained individuals who are able to carry out the mission, it won't happen because we who have the necessary skills understand that it would be futile.  If Hillary Clinton were assassinated it will be the result of someone within her own party who identified her as insufficiently Marxist in action.

Peace Activists

I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

Whine

Some Democrat is whining:

I actually do disagree with the president.  I want him to liberate Canada from Socialist filth like Justin Trudeau.  And I want him to treat advocates of Gun Control as enemies of Humanity.

Racism In Action

Racial Polylogism was a distinguishing characteristic of the dogma of German National Socialism. That Aryan Logic told them that they were the MASTER RACE and that they could do anything they bloody well wanted to members of all other races. Any objections raised were dismissed as non-Aryan (English, Jewish, etc.) logic and thus were not binding upon themselves.  Der Afrikanererstaznazis of the Black Caucus in Congress and Black Lives Matter apparently refuse to accept the fact that chattel slavery was perpetrated by both Whites and Blacks. Blacks in Africa would raid neighboring tribes and sell their prisoners to White and Arab slave traders.  Instead, Black tribal collectivists choose to treat chattel slavery as the act of the "White Race" inflicted upon the "Black Race." treating this as a blank check to gain plunder and favors at the expense of non-blacks. Ignoring of course the fact that price for the sin of chattel slavery has already been paid, IN BLOOD.  Unfortunately the vile institution of slavery was not destroyed but was instead nationalized. The program of the Democratic Party since the reign of Woodrow Wilson has been to inflict the German form of socialism (begun under Otto Von Bismarck and taken to its ultimate conclusion under Hitler) upon America. Hitler called his doctrine "Marxism without the Talmudic frills." What we have under the Clintonistas is National Socialism without the Aryan frills.  The dumb as a brick Marxists are still out there.

Thought For The Day

The Despocrats as part of their program to gain power through class warfare are promising to raise taxes on "the rich". Which in practice means plundering the more productive members of our society in order to buy off those persons who are less productive.  What the Despocrats fervently hope is not noticed by their marks is that every dollar that is forcibly taken from the real economy is a dollar that will not be used to create new businesses, and new jobs, or used to expand existing businesses, with more new jobs or increased pay for existing workers. In any case the money that is taken from the real economy to pay off the supporters of the Despocrats will never be part of the paycheck of a real worker.  In short, the Despocrat's claim of being the friend of laborers is only so much effluvient matter.

Update 0417 CDT:

Scientology

We know more about you than we know of National Socialism, we're not curious, we're very angry.

Pursuit Of Power

To those value power above all no act in the pursuit of power is too depraved.

Question

Who needs a Reichsministry Fur Kultur when we have a Mainstream Media?

Why?

To Democrats the fundamental value is power.  Freedom is the negation of power and therefore must be opposed.  Or at least in public Freedom must not be supported lest the victims come to understand their actual position within the socialist order.  Democrats wouldn't be caught dead standing up for an actual Human value.

Flag Burning In Action

Why should anyone make a fuss about burning our flag?  The burning of our flag is a symbolic act. As the flag represents us as a free people so does the destruction of the flag represent the destruction our nation and our way of life.  Without question those performing the act of burning the flag are nihilists who would--given the means and opportunity--actually perform the act of murdering Americans in the worst way possible.

What Difference Does It Make?

From the collectivist view a person is simply a thing to be used. A tool. The fact that a person has a complete life outside of the alleged goals of the collective is completely blanked out. To the collectivist the full human life is completely meaningless.  And because a person is seen as simply a tool it does not matter if it breaks as a result of being misused. The tool can simply be disposed of and replaced, as were the men in Benghazi.  Hillary Clinton’s open contempt for the people serving under her is perfectly normal for a collectivist. In The Mask Of Command, historian John Keegan recounts an incident where Adolf Hitler was having dinner served to him in the dining car of his private train when it stopped at a station. When another train loaded with wounded soldiers returning from the Eastern Front stops beside Hitler's private train. Hitler had the stewards in the dining car pull down the shades so he wouldn't have to see the other train and the wounded passengers.

 The battle of Gettysburg is seen by historians as the high water mark of the Confederate cause. But what was the cause of the Confederacy? In my present view it was Elitism.

The Southern states were politically dominated by the slave holding class. A group of men who saw themselves as entitled to the labor of African slaves and the obedience of common white men. With the wealth and free time taken from the backs of their slaves they came to dominate the Southern states of the American Republic. The rise of the Republican party came as a result of the citizens of the North becoming tired of the abuses inflicted by the Southern Elites. The Southern Elites saw no alternative to preserve their class privileges but to leave The Union.  The War of Succession was presented to the common citizens of the South as a struggle for liberty but the fact was that the actual objective was to preserve the power of the Elites. When conscription was imposed on the South the slave holding class was essentially exempt from it. The true view of the common citizens by the Elites was made clear for the first time.  With the defeat at Gettysburg the cause of the Confederacy and the Elites who ruled it had no place to go but down.

So why would Barack Obama, someone was generally identified as a Marxist, decline to participate in the ceremonies at Gettysburg?  Because Marxism is an elitist doctrine. It was created by a self-appointed elite for the benefit of the self-appointed elite. Marx, Engels, and their subsequent followers, saw themselves, without qualification, as the masters of the actually rational and productive citizens of their nations. Their efforts, as with the Southern Elites, were to control and use people for their own benefit. Regardless of their public statements the natural inclination of the Marxists is to side with their fellow users of humanity.  On this basis it's no surprise that The Big Zero was a no show at Gettysburg.

Some assholes are celebrating the birthday of Karl Marx.

So what?

 Marx was a raving antisemite. Old school Progressives (the one they NEVER teach you about in the public schools) had "issues" with those they saw as the "inferior" races. (Africans, Jews, Asians, etc.) And eliminating those who don't fit into the collective makes perfect sense to a collectivist.  I've come to the conclusion that anyone who sees another person as either a tool to be used, or as trash to be disposed of, is essentially a Leftist. (Which pretty much puts me to the right of Attila the Hun.)
 
We must understand that Marxism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting Karl Marx, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.

The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.  If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such. If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.  If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.  It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.  It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.  Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such.

Killing a Marxist is not an act of murder, it it an act of self defense.

Gun Control

The fact is that some adherents of what we had politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party.  As a result it has become very easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say.  All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. 

Yes, it’s that obvious.

The Facts Of Reality

The Democratic Party have an idea it is to replace the society of social and economic consent that we live in with the social and economic primacy of the parasites over the productive. Or as their primary philosophical source (and founding trustifarian) put it, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And as there is no limit to the needs of the parasite masters there will be no limit on the burdens imposed on the productive slaves.  Poison is poison no matter how much grape flavoring one adds to it. They cannot avoid knowing that their ideal society is toxic to us and thus have no effective choice but to attack the opposition on trivial issues in order to head off a public examination of their basic ideological premises.  Political ideology is basically a means of giving the appearance of positive virtue to actions that are morally intolerable to the victims.

Democratic Party

To the parasites, like the Democratic Party, power over the productive citizens of this nation is necessary for their very existence.  In short, and I simply cannot emphasize this enough: POWER IS LIFE.  Any restraint on that power -- be it the freedom of speech and press, the rights to self defense and to bear arms, or the free election of public officials (and laws regulating who may hold a specific office) -- is a danger to the parasite's continued existence.  I would expect the Democratic Party to band together and claim that the "will of the people" in some way trumps the Constitution, the terms under which the Federal Government was established.  Hilary Clinton and her closest supporters apparently believe that are on the "Progressive" version of a holy mission. To quit is to negate the self-concept that they have adopted for themselves. I absolutely believe that the act of surrendering power is literally unthinkable for them.

Adolf Hitler thought of Americans as deplorable, so does Hillary Clinton.

Yes, I disagree with President Donald Trump.  I want him to execute Hillary Clinton and put a cruise missile through the front window of George Soros.

Question Of The Day

The actual issue is who is in command of your life, you or the self appointed masters?  The Second Amendment was never about hunting, or even about self defense against violent criminals.  The Second Amendment is an inherent component of the Bill of Rights.  And the Bill of Rights defines the relationship between the Citizens and the Government.  It is the self appointed Master Class who are working to overturn the primacy of the Citizens and establish themselves as the irrevocable rulers of our nation.  And because the actions of the self appointed Masters are morally intolerable we will have no alternative but to completely eliminate them.

My Theory

Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their livestock by force. Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

That's my theory, anyway.

Totalitarian Filth

Jail is for the working class. shooting is for totalitarian filth.  Some totalitarian filth is disposed of here.

Mass Murder Day

Once again we come to May First.

This is the day on which Leftists traditionally shout out their claim to be morally superior beings who are entitled to rule over us mere humans and take the product of our thought and labor to use as they they see fit for the betterment of mankind. And if you really believe their claims then obviously you won't notice the pile of the one hundred million-plus human bodies that the self styled agents of progress have left in their wake as they have made their way to power, and willfully abused that power over us mere humans.  When we see through the ideology and other claims of the Left it is very readily apparent that their doctrine is nothing more than a modernistic facade placed over the old stone age practice of beating up or killing people and taking their stuff.  It is time that we see the Left for what they truly are, not as the vanguard of moral progress, but only a gang of thieves and murderers.
 
One of things I usually do on May Day is to repost the Affirmations for the Inner Communist, Ayn Rand once said that it was morally acceptable mock evil as long as it was recognized as evil. So once again I present:

Stuart Smalley's Daily Affirmations for the Inner Communist

Monday:

"I'm going to execute and expropriate today just for the heck of it because, gosh darn it, I deserve to have a good time."

Tuesday:

"I am not a fraud, a Marxist yes, but not a fraud."

Wednesday:

"I deserve all the mass adulation from the people I can get without feeling ashamed or being grandiose."

Thursday:

"I will express my feelings today. I will not hide them behind my mustache. My mustache is not a mask for my feelings, but rather a small patch of facial hair that covers my inadequacies."

Friday:

"When I rob a bank for the cause, I will not be playing those parent tapes in my head: "You wield a revolver like a girl" . . . "Why can't you be more like Stalin?" . . . "Philosophy? What kind of major is that? It's useless!"

Saturday:

"Just because I execute Christians and counter-revolutionaries does not mean I'm an mass-murdering psychopath like my father."

Sunday:

"If I must violently put down a counter-revolution today, it is not because I am a bad person or that I am not worthy of love; it is because my people are a bunch of religion-addicted capitalist sons-of-bitches--and I am mean enough, ruthless enough, and dog gone it, people fear me."

Quote Of The Day

A Truth

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left. Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.  It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.

What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?

It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds him or her self staring at the muzzle of an assault rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put him or her self there.

And the truth isn't a leftist strong point.

A Question

Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?

My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.

There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

First, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.

Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value.

The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.

Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government.

Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.

Update 0637 CDT:

Kanye West is apparently thinking for himself.  Lefties hate freedom of thought.

Thought For The Day

If you want to predict what will be said by the Democratic Party and their media prostitutes, all you have to do is take any statement by an old school National Socialist, cross out the word "Jew" and write in the words "Gun Owner."  That's how depraved and predictable they have become.

This Is Not A Game

The original Ku Klux Klan, the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, rode about the South to murder Blacks and those White Americans who were deemed to be traitors to the race.  Likewise the uniformed terrorist arm of the National Socialists went about attacking Jews and those deemed to be insufficiently Aryan.  Once in complete power over their nation and most of Europe the National Socialists proceeded to practice murder as an industrial process.  Even though there was an economic objective for the concentration camps the primary goal of the Holocaust was essentially spiritual.  The elimination of The Other, the extermination of those outside the Aryan Racial Collective.

A Fact Of Reality

We have to understand that George Soros is an enemy of Humanity.

Question

Who needs a Reichsministry of Propaganda when the Mainstream Media will automatically lie without a gun to their heads?

Reality

Hitler called his doctrine "Marxism without the Talmudic frills." What we have under Hillary Clinton is National Socialism without the Aryan frills.  And Hillary Clinton continues to lie as usual.

The Future

A Fact Of Reality

Those who follow Adolf Hitler as well as those who follow Hillary Clinton think they are the good guys.

Suggestion

Anti-gun students are enemies of humanity and should be put to death by whatever means necessary.

Take any mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with words Gun Owner, that's how predictable the anti-gun movement has become.

Remember Waco.

Today is the anniversary of the event commonly known as the Waco Massacre.

What happened?

The local office of the BATF received a report of automatic weapons fire at the residence of Branch Davidians outside of Waco, Texas.  No inquiry was made with the local law enforcement agencies.  Nor did they as allowed under the current regulations send agents out to inspect the federally licenced firearms dealer residing on the site.  And they could have arrested Koresh as he made his morning run but did not do so.   With his past history of cooperation with local law enforcement they could have simply asked him to come down to the local sheriff’s station.  Instead they attempted to stage a military-style assault, code named Operation Showtime, in order to impart a positive impression of the agency upon the current administration in Washington.  After the task force was driven off the Hostage Rescue Team of the FBI, descended upon the Branch Davidians and laid siege to the residence.

On this day The HRT used armored vehicles to destroy the exits from the building and to allow the wind to blow through it and then injected CS gas, known to be inflammable and toxic to children and elderly persons, into the wooden structure.  HRT fired CS rounds, which are incendiary devices into, the building.  A tactic to commit mass murder used by the Nazis in Poland and Russia was to confine civilians, especially women and children, in wooden buildings and set the structures on fire.  To this day the perpetrators remain at large.

The other anniversary today is of the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.  Timothy McVeigh, who carried out the Oklahoma City bombing was a white racial collectivist and was acting out the white racial warrior martyrdom fantasy depicted in The Turner Diaries.

The novel, if I recall reading it correctly, depicts the conquest and subjugation of the white population of the United States by a self appointed elite group that called itself "The Order." All non-whites, including Jews, were exterminated. Any white person who refused to obey The Order was executed as a race traitor. The actions of The Order as depicted in the novel were very much like the practice of Islam without the claim of divine sanction. Unlike today's political Right, but like all known collectivists, such as the National Socialists of Germany, The Order rejected all of the Rights of Man and killed anyone who served no place in their collective.  Fortunately, I read it on a website where the text was posted. So apart from the fee for Internet access, I didn't have to pay a cent to read it. I would later describe the experience of reading it as being the intellectual equivalent of the act of swimming in raw sewage.  The website and text is gone now. I think this is somewhat unfortunate because I believe that no rational person should have to pay a cent for the privilege of reading a book that calls for their own murder. .

So Anyway

Marx was a raving antisemite. Old school Progressives (the one they NEVER teach you about in the public schools) had "issues" with those they saw as the "inferior" races. (Africans, Jews, Asians, etc.) And eliminating those who don't fit into the collective makes perfect sense to a collectivist.  I've come to the conclusion that anyone who sees another person as either a tool to be used, or as trash to be disposed of, is essentially a Leftist. (Which pretty much puts me to the right of Attila the Hun.)

Some Facts

Self appointed leaders, such as Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Lenin, Or Hillary Clinton, are often wrong.

We're all Americans. So what?

R. Lee Ermey has died.

A Reminder

I'll start with a quote:

It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.

-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist

We, the truly rational, tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The self appointed masters, when they are in absolute power, simply don't care.  The fact of the matter is that the only crime to those who value power is simple disobedience. To perceive and think as a proper rational person is fundamentally toxic to the masters. And reason must be suppressed by any means necessary.  We the living believe in justice. The masters on the other hand, don't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.

Question Of The Day

What is the purpose of religious tolerance?

The individual is the sovereign authority in a civil society. Because of this the government cannot impose a belief, including a religious belief, upon him. Thus any religion that accepts the individual as sovereign authority in a civil society can and must be tolerated.  Under Islam man is the property of the deity. A person has no rights, cannot enact legislation, and cannot establish and uphold a moral standard. Compliance with Islam must be imposed by force. Furthermore a Muslim is permitted to deceive or otherwise use non-believers for their own gain and even commit murder. An underage girl who is protected under a rational code of law is seen, literally, as a usable object under the doctrine of Islam.  Such behavior, which denies the rights and sovereignty of the individual, cannot be tolerated in a civil society.

History

On this date in 1865 a sitting Republican President was shot to death by a member of the Thespian Community.  I understand that some thespians still hate us Republicans today.

Theory And Practice

The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking their stuff. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. Normally I think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to act as sub-human predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings I believe that they should be hunted down and killed. Parasite mentalities as a general rule see themselves as superior beings and other people, the productive population, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not an act of murder, in their minds is it simply the disposal of hominid garbage. In practical terms a Communist is a mortal enemy of human kind and killing a Communist can be no more wrongful than putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.
_

Thought For The Day

The Mainstream Media in the context of a political contest has a function similar to that of a witness in a criminal trial. By committing perjury the witness prevents the jury from issuing a correctly informed verdict. The results of which are wrong, such as the conviction of an innocent individual, and could be disastrous, like the acquittal of a murderous psychopath. Thus the act of perjury must be treated as a punishable crime.  Similarly, when the Mainstream Media misinforms the electorate the result can be disastrous. Such as the election on an individual who is philosophically and experientially unfit to hold the office.  But we're not supposed to hold reporters and publishers responsible for those destructive actions.

Thought For The Day

The alternative to civilized political discourse is political violence.

A Truth

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left. Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.  It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.

What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?

It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds himself staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put himself there.

The Truth About Elitism

What is an Elitist?

An elitist is one who uses human beings.  By this definition Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hillary Clinton are elitists.

The election as president of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump was a rejection of the American People of the elites.  The rejection of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump was an act of the elites.  Anti-fa and Black Lives Matter are being used by the elites but they don't know it.

An elitist is also one who lets in the barbarians.  Letting in the barbarians is an act of treason to the citizens and the soldiers who protect them but isn’t an act of betrayal to an elitist who gains power.

So what do we do to them?

Repeating Myself

What the Republican Party needs to get through their collective skulls right now is the fact that the age of politics as usual is over.  No more compromise. No more deals. No more bipartisanship.  There must be a radical clean up of the mess that the Left has created. The partisans of socialism must be systematically removed from our public institutions. And if we are to have a future as the core nation of our civilization we must make a special effort to clean out the Augean Stables that our educational establishment has become under the tutelage of the Left.   And we must with volume and clarity tell the spoiled brats who imagine themselves to be the heirs of Marx and Lenin to grow up or get out.  Of course, if those idiots would just die, it would be nice too.

Truth

Government is force.  Do I want to use force on Hillary Clinton and George Soros?

Yes.

A Fact Of Reality

Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Lenin, and Hugo Chavez were once in the custody of various police agencies.

What happened?

Facts Of Reality

I would rather dig up Richard Nixon and vote for him than see Hilary Clinton in any public office.

It doesn't matter how many votes you have. Theft is theft. Stealing remains wrong wherever you go.

If someone wants to behave like a totalitarian they will be treated like a totalitarian, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.

Scientologists need to realize that L. Ron Hubbard was an idiot.

L. Ron Hubbard was getting a penny a word when Ayn Rand and Robert A. Heinlein were being published by hardcover publishers. Think about that.

Thought For The Day

If you want to predict what will be said by the Democratic Party and their media prostitutes, all you have to do is take any mouth dropping by an old school Nation Socialist, cross out the word "Jew" and write in the words "Gun Owner."  That's how depraved and predictable they have become.

An Answer

During a discussion on gun control Harry Binswanger raised the following question:

If the majority wants a certain government, how is the minority going to defeat them with guns? The majority will have more guns.

That's a good and necessary question.  If all it took to construct a building was to stack stones upon each other there would be no science of architecture and no point in writing The Fountainhead.  If all it took to fight a war was to use brute force without rational input there would be no science of warfare or any such thing as a military organization.  If all factors were equal in warfare then a simple majority of combatants would win every time. But in reality all factors are never equal. Thus the purpose of military science is to identify the factors that favor one side or the other and use or negate those factors to one’s advantage.

Why The Left Hates Us

The Left in its fundamental form is a group of essentially parasitic beings that wish to demolish the present consent-based American social-economic structure and replace it with a coercion-based political order that they regard as morally superior. Unfortunately for us the Left's ideal version of America strongly resembles a Überkonzentrationlager with themselves as the commandants and overseers. Anyone who stands in the way of the Left in their quest to subjugate the American republic -- policeman, citizen, or a soldier -- is rhetorically blasted as being the vilest of monsters while those who have consistently demonstrated their hatred of American liberty, such as any Democrat, are worshiped as though they were the enactors of the divine will.

Let's Get Biblical

start with a quote:

“We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.”

– V.I. Lenin, 1923

My friend Mark Urbin has been kind enough to report a tweet from an outright nihilist:

“Most of the time when I encounter a cis man who has opinions that I strongly disagree with or just a shit person in general I thing about having visceral and rough sex with them.  I feel the need to assert my dominance of men with flawed opinions sexually.”

The author of this expression of hatred then describes in obscene terms the process of sexually torturing and murdering the victim.

Apart from the physical sense of the word how could this being be described as Human?

So what is this “cis” prefix that has popped up recently in the mental droppings of the other side?  It apparently refers to the concept of “Cisgender” which appears to be a new academic label for someone who identifies their self as the gender of their birth.  It is a slur for someone who practices the virtue of rationality and is a claim of mental and moral superiority over sane men. [1]

When a rational man [2] encounters a statement that is wrong with he could put forth a counter argument.  Or on seeing the statement as totally insane he could simply dismiss it.  But when encountering a disagreement the nihilist expresses the desire to torture and murder the rational man.  Why?  The predator culture has existed from the stone age.  Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive members of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force.  The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator.  Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it--even to the open use of deadly force.

Some predators have created an academic culture that is now opposed to rational thought.  Falsehoods are now treated facts and truths are held to be untrue.  And if a failing grade is not sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.  So what is to be done?  How do we respond to the insanity?  If we were to respond to the predators as Stalin did to those who rightfully refused or were unable to obey him their academic and urban centers would be reduced to piles of smoking rubble and there would be mass graves from coast to coast.

It would be Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.  So when do we get Biblical on them?

1.  Insanity is not limited to gender identity.  A former friend who had the sex change operation once said to me that he was voting for Barack Obama because the candidate would restore The Constitution.  This was at a time when Obama’s contempt for The Constitution and The Rule of Law was well known.  And he was also upset at a joke that referred to Obama supporters as a cult.  It was on driving past the local Obama campaign headquarters this I called it the Obamatology Org.  This joke referred to the Scientology practice of calling the local site an Org.

2.  I’m using the male inclusive mode of speech here, I will not submit to academic Newspeak and the use of so-called gender neutral pronouns.