Opinions

Of course we could also ask a question of the caring and compassionate champions of the peasants and livestock, did the thought ever cross whatever passes for your mind that the alternative to a crappy job with crappy wages is NO JOB AND NO WAGES AT ALL?  No.  The thought never does, but the campus Marxists will continue to strike their feel good poses at the expense of real productive people.  

What we have in the White House is the most ignorant and incompetent  (as well as senile) individual to have ever held the office of President.  He doesn't understand that Reality is real.  He doesn't understand the nature of human life and human society.  And most importantly he doesn't understand the nature and purpose of government.  And with the apparent belief in his own infallibility he's clearly in the failure mode.  It's not at all surprising that the United States Government is in the failure mode.  

The Elites need us, we don’t need the Elites.

I’ve been called a “bigot” numerous times because I didn’t believe in a person’s orthodoxy.

Blind obedience is NEVER an option. 

When an insane person is put in charge that person will give insane orders.

 

"What's The Difference?"

In reality both the Fascisti (and their ideological kin the National Socialists) and the self-styled Progressives of all eras share the same fundamental central idea, a belief in the Primacy of the Parasite.  A belief that treats the ordinary person as a tool to be used, with the product of their labor treated as the property of the collective which in turn is distributed in accordance to those needs which are identified by the leaders of the collective.  And as a rule the needs of the leadership, which is in reality a wish list, take precedence over the actual needs of the productive class.  Because willful parasitism is distinctly different as a mode of existence from that of being a rational and productive person, this leads to distinct differences in how parasites answer moral and political questions.  Where rational people prefer to deal with each other through explicit consent the parasite must take what it needs through coercion, either by fraud or by open force.

Because the parasite must control the productive population it must claim, always fraudulently, a superior status over their victims and must possess complete control over them.  This means that the parasites conception of law and justice is essentially the opposite of that of rational people.  Justice to a parasite is simply getting away with the parasitic mode of existence.  Crime is simply any resistance, regardless of intent or degree, to the actions of the parasite.  And laws are simply an excuse to carry out punitive violence against the producers.  The parasites in their delusion of superior status are tempted to feel that the ordinary productive person is nothing more than an animal.  And because they usually succumb to this temptation they usually seek to control the external stimuli that ordinary humans experience and thus control the behavior of those they have deemed to be livestock.  Thus the establishment of the Reichsministry fur Kultur by the Deutches stat under the NSDAP.  And also recent effort of American Progressives to censor Talk Radio and the Internet in order to reestablish the primacy of the Progressive ideological clique that effectively controls the Mainstream Media and the Internet.

Of course the control of external stimuli doesn't work with rational people.  When the attempt to control by fraud doesn't work the parasites have no alternative but to use open force.  To the parasites the active consciousness of the rational people isn't a normal state but is instead a sign that there's something wrong.  Those who don't obey the self appointed shepherds are looked upon as diseased animals.  Something that must be destroyed before they infect the entire herd.  The systematic murder of whole populations is looked upon not as a mass crime but as a moral necessity in the parasite's view. 

Question

 Has any alleged opponent of Fascism looked at themselves in a mirror?

Thoughts For The Day

You don't know everything, live with it.  Never underestimate the stupidity of a self appointed superior being.

On April 14 in 1865 some actor who apparently believed in an older version of the Primacy of the Parasite shot a sitting Republican president.  Fortunately, the present generation of thespians who believe in a more recent version of the Primacy of the Parasite are only sitting around and whining about Republicans, for now.

Just because someone else's holding the gun doesn't change the fact that someone's engaged in the act of robbery.  We see the perpetrators of many horrible events (The Homodor, The Holocaust, The Killing Fields, 9/11, etc) as being evil.  But we're seeing them objectively, in the subjective view the perpretrators see themselves as being good people doing good things with their victims and defenders as being evil. 

 It's simply impossible to reason with or otherwise peacefully coexist with any person, any group, or any nation, that believes that it has the right to control you or to take things from you by force.  Such persons or entities can only be physically isolated from you or ultimately destroyed.  Peace is the absence of enemies but it's not priceless.  As long as there's one person who values power who lives there'll be no peace. 

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.  Antisemitism is bad enough, but it's also a symptom of a deeper political problem.

To call those who want to "defund the police" stupid is being polite.  The police are the only people standing between The Left and their victims, The Right.  What we're left with is living by the Saigon Rules.

Thoughts For The Day

If I've a complaint about The Right it's that we've shown infinite  and godlike patience with the behavior of The Left.  Leftists can assault in public those who won't submit to them.  Destroy property, call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who're carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, we'll not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we needn't rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they've by their own choice dehumanized themselves.

Projection is when the self appointed deity, sitting on a throne of human skulls, points a finger of a blood stained hand at those who seek to stop his rampage and screams "murderers!"

 

I've found through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the good guys. 

 

The worst enemy of any nation are it's politicians.  Having a Democrat whine about someone else engaged in the sexual abuse of others, being corrupt, or having a dictatorial lust for power is like Larry Flynt complaining about someone else being obscene.  If we're to have a future then governmental power has to be limited.  Those who demand unlimited power have to be treated as the Enemies of Mankind they actually are.  But the fact of the matter is that collectivists see people as something to be used. And if a person is unusable by the collective, why keep them alive?

For an atheist nothing needs to be worshiped. 

If the Democrats get their way there will be a Second American Revolution.

Barack Obama needs to be treated as the Enemy of Mankind that he actually is.

During an Obama Administration I called Biden an idiot.  Now Biden and his supporters are fundamentally deranged.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CFXCZKlpXFjWd3_ctYZw2DiGp6lyuuMNSwdnKQ0/?igshid=2t4uvbdbr6a0  said:

"This BLM / antifa bitch name needs to be put out there she says quote don’t be fucking Trump supporter in Portland and you won’t get killed."

She as may well said: Don’t be a Jew in National Socialist Germany.

 

Sacred Cows should be machine gunned.

Thoughts For The Day

During a viewing of the film Zulu during the pacifism scene I stated that there's a reason that pistols are issued to officers.

Information control has to be seen as the vile act it actually is.  Censorship is the negation of the human mind.  As rational thought is necessary to living a human life the censor, and those who demand it, are Enemies of Mankind.  In my view censors are vermin fit only for extermination.

Gerardo Rivera, who's not known for being credible, now has more credibility than The Mainstream Media.

The negation of Freedom by Democratic means is still the negation of Freedom.

When someone votes for evil they'll be identified as evil.  Good people do bad things because they've been lied to.

The military arm is the symbol and instrument of political authority.  The citizens of a free nation have a commanding voice which a politician may ignore only at their peril. 

The National Socialists believed that The Jews were bad people, we're seeing this again with the relationship between Marxists and The Right.

Why?

The actions of Collectivists (such as the NSDAP and the CPSU) are seen as evil.  (General Patton actually vomited during an official tour of Dachau, that was never shown in the movie.)  But we're looking at those actions objectively.  Subjectively, the perpetrators of The Holocaust actually believed they were the good guys doing good things and those who opposed them were evil people.  We're seeing this again in the actions of Anti-fa and Black Lives Matter.

What part of "NEVER AGAIN" wasn't understood?

Thoughts For The Day

Anti-fa and Black Lives Matter needs to be treated as the enemies of humanity they actually are.

The totalitarians who make up the membership of Anti-fa and Black Lives Matter see themselves as good people and that those who properly oppose them as the bad guys.  This isn’t new, we saw this phenomena before with the membership of the NSDAP and the CPSU.  Totalitarians, like all people who value power, always lie.

If anything should've been learned from the Century of Death (a.k.a. the Twentieth Century) is that cowardice is NEVER an option.

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.

Some people don't like Donald Trump, I understand that, I disliked him too.  But is this dislike based on a falsehood?  Can you accept the fact that you've been lied to?

Members of the NSDAP believed they the good guys too.

L. Ron Hubbard and David Miscavige will be remembered as the evil persons they actually were.

We have to accept the fact that so-called Church of Scientology is a criminal organization.

Scientologists are told they're the most ethical people on the planet, in fact they're the most vile.  (Outside of the Collectivists.)

The so-called Church of Scientology has all the credibility of the NSDAP, which is none what so ever.

There are more lamp posts in the City of Minneapolis than there are Scientologists worldwide.

Most bad people don't understand why they're identified and dealt with as bad people.

Cheaters (like The Democratic Party) need to be taken off the (political) playing field.

Bill Clinton (a.k.a. Big Bubba) needs to treated as the Enemy of Mankind he actually is. 

What we politely call the other side refuses to understand they can be wrong.

The Redneck whose personal library consists solely of The Bible is better educated than most Marxists.

Unfortunately, most Libertarians would be on the left side of the political isle if it weren't already occupied by people who would have to work hard to qualify as idiots.

I also wrote:

 The science of spaceflight works because those who practice it have actually made the effort to discover and apply the relevant facts of reality to their endeavor. The mishaps that do occur are usually the result of someone not paying attention to the relevant facts.

The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking the products of their thought and labor. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. I basically think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to essentially behave as predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings it is clear that they should be hunted down and killed.

To the true believer a 100 million innocent human lives snuffed out in the pursuit of an invalid ideology is just not enough. Would they stop after killing 200 million or 300 million? Of course not.

The parasite mentalities of the Master Class as a rule see themselves as superior beings and that all other people, the productive population of a nation, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not seen as an act of murder. In the minds of the Master Class is it simply the disposal of garbage.

I practical effect a Communist is a mortal enemy of Mankind. And killing a Communist is as necessary as putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.

So Anyway

Those who do not remeber the past are highly sought after as voters.

During my early morning walk I found five Black Lives Matter yard signs.  On the plus side I also saw one yard sign in support of the police.  Nevertheless support for the anti-human thugs is strong in North East Minneapolis.

So Anyway

While on my morning walk I saw two yard signs for Black Lives Matter on 29th Avenue here in Northeast Minneapolis. But because I oppose racial collectivism I will be denounced as a racist.

Thought For The Day

The people who support The Big Zero and the would be successors Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are who Robert Heinlein wrote Starship Troopers.

These idiots* simply do not understand the nature of human life and function of government in protecting it.  Not only that but they have been indoctrinated to believe that tyranny is right and freedom is wrong.  Under no circumstance should any of them be allowed to exercise authority as a voting citizen.

Heinlein's proposed solution to the idiot problem is relatively easy to look up for yourself. Or you can purchase a copy of Starship Troopers from Ace Books.

My solution to the idiot problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.

The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and amendment, the duties of the citizen as the sovereign authority of the nation, and what happened when the Federal Government was allowed to enter the failure mode.  The second part of the course covers the function and use of the instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.  While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a passing grade in it will be required to exercise the authority to vote.


* A word which is derived from the ancient Hellenic word for someone who does not participate in public life as a citizen of the political body.

Bitching On The Anniversary

On this day in 1776 a bunch of subjects of the British crown declared themselves and their fellow Americans to be the free citizens of a free nation.  Needless to say King George III and the British Aristocracy objected to this revolutionary act with deadly force.

Although the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the establishment of an aristocratic class one has been brought into effect by judicial fiat.  Homosexuals -- a group once commonly identified as depraved or mentally ill -- have been granted a separate and superior status with respect to the citizens of our nation.  Anyone who refuses a demand from a homosexual on any grounds are now subject to civil punishment.  Given this it would not be a surprise when the refusal of a demand by a homosexual will result in a criminal penalty as well.

In reality this is called oppression.  In the last year the Pink Triangle of the Homosexual Collective has changed from a sign of victim status to being a symbol of the oppressors.  It has become a symbol of tyranny like the Red Star of Soviet Communism and the Broken Cross of National Socialism.

What are your questions on this rant?

UPDATE 1735 CDT:

I'm reposting  a rant on the subject of Gay Rights.


The Myth Of Gay Rights


What is a right?

In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context.  There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]

So what is a Gay Right?

The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals.  In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.

Why disassociate from homosexuals?

In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code.  In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned.  In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.

In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony.  When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination.  Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]

Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?

In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction.  The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life.  And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]  

Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block.  In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation.  This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective.  When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.

A permanent end.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?   
    

Footnotes

1.  Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.

2.  In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society.  For this he should be taken out and shot.

3.  The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation.  It was wiped out in action.

Anniversaries

In Georgia a former enlisted member of the United States Air Force was arrested for interfering with the burning of the flag of the United States by a mob of so-called students.

Why should anyone make a fuss about burning our flag?

The burning of our flag is a symbolic act. As the flag represents us as a free people so does the destruction of the flag represent the destruction our nation and our way of life.  Without question those perform the act of burning the flag are nihilists who would--given the means and opportunity--actually perform the act of murdering Americans in the worst way possible. But this isn’t simply a wishful thought on the part of a gang of collectivists.  To our shame it had actually happened here in the United States.  Today is the 22nd anniversary of the event commonly known as the Waco Massacre.

What happened?

The local office of the BATF received a report of automatic weapons fire at the residence of Branch Davidians outside of Waco, Texas.  No inquiry was made with the local law enforcement agencies.  Nor did they as allowed under the current regulations send agents out to inspect the federally licenced firearms dealer residing on the site.  And they could have arrested Koresh as he made his morning run but did not do so.   With his past history of cooperation with local law enforcement they could have simply asked him to come down to the local sheriff’s station.

Instead they attempted to stage a military-style assault, code named Operation Showtime, in order to impart a positive impression of the agency upon the current administration in Washington.  After the task force was driven off the Hostage Rescue Team of the FBI, descended upon the Branch Davidians and laid siege to the residence.

On this day 21 years ago The HRT used armored vehicles to destroy the exits from the building and to allow the wind to blow through it and then injected CS gas, known to be inflammable and toxic to children and elderly persons, into the wooden structure.  HRT fired CS rounds, which are incendiary devices into, the building.

A tactic to commit mass murder used by the Nazis in Poland and Russia was to confine civilians, especially women and children, in wooden buildings and set the structures on fire.

To this day the perpetrators remain at large.

The other anniversary today is of the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995.

Timothy McVeigh, who carried out the Oklahoma City bombing was a white racial collectivist and was acting out the white racial warrior martyrdom fantasy depicted in The Turner Diaries.

The novel, if I recall reading it correctly, depicts the conquest and subjugation of the white population of the United States by a self appointed elite group that called itself "The Order." All non-whites, including Jews, were exterminated. Any white person who refused to obey The Order was executed as a race traitor. The actions of The Order as depicted in the novel were very much like the practice of Islam without the claim of divine sanction. Unlike today's political Right, but like all known collectivists, such as the National Socialists of Germany, The Order rejected all of the Rights of Man and killed anyone who served no place in their collective.

Fortunately, I read it on a website where the text was posted. So apart from the fee for Internet access, I didn't have to pay a cent to read it. I would later describe the experience of reading it as being the intellectual equivalent of the act of swimming in raw sewage.  The website and text is gone now. I think this is somewhat unfortunate because I believe that no rational person should have to pay a cent for the privilege of reading a book that calls for their own murder.