Mythology

The Myth Of Gay Rights


What is a right?

In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context.  There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]

So what is a Gay Right?

The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals.  In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.

Why disassociate from homosexuals?

In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code.  In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned.  In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.

In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony.  When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination.  Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]

Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?

In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction.  The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life.  And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]  

Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block.  In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation.  This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective.  When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.

A permanent end.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?   
    

Footnotes

1.  Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.

2.  In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society.  For this he should be taken out and shot.

3.  The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation.  It was wiped out in action.

Bitching On The Anniversary

On this day in 1776 a bunch of subjects of the British crown declared themselves and their fellow Americans to be the free citizens of a free nation.  Needless to say King George III and the British Aristocracy objected to this revolutionary act with deadly force.

Although the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the establishment of an aristocratic class one has been brought into effect by judicial fiat.  Homosexuals -- a group once commonly identified as depraved or mentally ill -- have been granted a separate and superior status with respect to the citizens of our nation.  Anyone who refuses a demand from a homosexual on any grounds are now subject to civil punishment.  Given this it would not be a surprise when the refusal of a demand by a homosexual will result in a criminal penalty as well.

In reality this is called oppression.  In the last year the Pink Triangle of the Homosexual Collective has changed from a sign of victim status to being a symbol of the oppressors.  It has become a symbol of tyranny like the Red Star of Soviet Communism and the Broken Cross of National Socialism.

What are your questions on this rant?

UPDATE 1735 CDT:

I'm reposting  a rant on the subject of Gay Rights.


The Myth Of Gay Rights


What is a right?

In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context.  There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]

So what is a Gay Right?

The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals.  In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.

Why disassociate from homosexuals?

In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code.  In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned.  In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.

In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony.  When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination.  Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]

Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?

In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction.  The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life.  And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]  

Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block.  In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation.  This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective.  When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.

A permanent end.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?   
    

Footnotes

1.  Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.

2.  In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society.  For this he should be taken out and shot.

3.  The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation.  It was wiped out in action.

The Myth Of Gay Rights

What is a right?

In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context.  There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]

So what is a Gay Right?

The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals.  In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.

Why disassociate from homosexuals?

In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code.  In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned.  In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.

In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony.  When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination.  Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]

Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?

In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction.  The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life.  And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]  

Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block.  In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation.  This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective.  When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.

A permanent end.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?   
    

Footnotes

1.  Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.

2.  In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society.  For this he should be taken out and shot.

3.  The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation.  It was wiped out in action.

The Homosexual Privilege

As you may read from the title of this article I am not a supporter of what are commonly called Gay Rights.

How can that be?

The answer comes in a true understanding of what the so-called Gay Rights actually are.

The clearest understanding and thus definition of the concept of a right came from Ayn Rand:

A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context.

As can be expected by a rational observer Miss Rand had a great amount to say on the concept of Rights.  You may read most of it here at this link.

Now from a clearly rational perspective a homosexual is simply another person and therefore has the  rights identical to any other person.  The concept of a specific set of "Gay Rights" is therefore meaningless.

So what is the actual issue?

I will try to keep the answer short.

What "Gay Rights" are is in fact a set of privileges granted to Homosexuals as a class by the Nomenklatura* in exchange for the their support in the struggle for power over The People.

What is a privilege?

A privilege is an act of legislation enacted for the private benefit of a specific person or class of persons at the expense of other people.  Therefore a privilege is not and absolutely cannot be a proper law enacted by the government of a free society.

So why are privileges being granted to Homosexuals as a class?

 Because Homosexuals are identified as being dysfunctional.  Rational people do not want the Homosexual dysfunction to effect them in normal life.  And because rational parents clearly seek to avoid the adverse effect of Homosexual contact with their children.**

The privilege granted is the negation of individual judgement and especially the actual rights of parents to control access to their children.   For the grant of this privilege the Homosexual class exchanges their votes in the elections and are fully expected to give financial support to the ruling party***

Those who exercise rational judgement with respect to Homosexuals are now subject arrest and punishment.  Good people will be injured and dies as a result.  And the children of good people  will be used and abused by Homosexuals.  And some will also die as well.

So what can I say?

Those who benefit from tyranny are part of problem and will be included in the solution.

They will have no one to blame but themselves.

Any questions?



* Nomenklatura:  The actual ruling class in the Soviet Union and their empire.  Here the term is used to denote the present rulers and abusers of our nation.

** While there are some people who cite The Torah/Old Testament as the grounds for their aversion to homosexuals.  This book is clearly the product of an effort by the exiled People of Israel to understand what happened to them and to see a path for living in their future.  The problems with homosexuals were as evident then as they are now.  Non-reproduction and sexually transmitted diseases being at the forefront of the problems.  Remember homosexuals do not reproduce, that must recruit from the non-effected.

*** For all practical effects the Democrats and the Old Guard of the Republicans now constitute a single de-facto party.  We as citizens must identify and deal with them as such.

Statement

This is my first public statement as a presidential candidate.

I do not watch cable television and normally could not care about what is presented or how the cable channels are otherwise run.  Given that, the act of the A&E network of suspending Phil Robertson, the head of the family presented in the program Duck Dynasty, is in my view an act of sheer lunacy.

The absolute fact of reality is that each person has a distinct experience of reality. Every person must reach their own conclusions about other people and and their place in reality altogether.

This is not a right.  This is an absolute fact of realty.

Those speaking for a homosexual collective have voice their aversion to statements made by Mr. Roberson on the practice  of homosexuality.*

So what?

Phil Robertson, as with all persons, has the moral obligation to see things as they are, to exercise judgement, and to speak on such matters as necessary.  The attack on Phil Robertson is an attack on all Americans.  Phil is simply the first target.

No one, singly or as part of a collective, has the right to silence another person.  The A&E networks have the right to control what they broadcast.  And they clearly have the right to stand up to collectivist pressure groups.

The management of A&E has the right and moral obligation to themselves, their staff, their actual audience, and their stockholders to tell the Homosexual Collective to bugger off.

To say that A&E should rescind their actions with respect to the Phil  Robertson and his family and apologize to them should go without saying.


*  Seriously, in my opinion, there is nothing special about the practice of assisted masturbation.  It is filthy, unhealthy, and frankly stupid.