After I posted an article on my blog explaining why a citizen needs to armed someone named Stephen Paul sent a very long and complete waste of text into my e-mail box via Google Plus.
In his waste of text -- I won't dignify it by calling it a rant or a keyboard dropping, nor will I quote any part of it even with the obscenities along with the racial and sexual preference slurs deleted -- he declared that I was a non-sentient animal who had no political authority as a citizen and no right to be armed.
I managed to boil down his message to the essential point in about one percent of the verbiage.
So what of it? If I am a mindless animal who is under the control of a master, why send me a message? If I'm not thinking for myself I certainly won't examine my own beliefs based on the mass of unnecessary verbiage and expletives that was transmitted.
Nor will I be impressed by his command of obscenities.
Instead of being positively impressed by this display of mental posturing I would have to come to the conclusion that Stephen Paul is an idiot.
I in turn reported his message to Google Plus as an example for hate speech.
What else could I do?
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Monday, December 17, 2012
A Photo And A Question
Pamela Geller shows us how school children are protected in Israel.
Yes, that's a teacher protecting her students with a firearm.
What we have here is a solution to the problem that is simple and obvious. Except of course to those who are mentally stuck in the Kantian reality-is-unreal paradigm. But the Founders of the American Republic were not anticipating the presence of lunatics and Muslims running around and slaughtering children.
Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?
My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.
There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:
First, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.
Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value.
The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.
Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government.
Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Yes, that's a teacher protecting her students with a firearm.
What we have here is a solution to the problem that is simple and obvious. Except of course to those who are mentally stuck in the Kantian reality-is-unreal paradigm. But the Founders of the American Republic were not anticipating the presence of lunatics and Muslims running around and slaughtering children.
Why did they write in a right to bear arms in the Constitution?
My answer to the question is simply this: WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereign authority of the United States of America.
There are several natural consequences of the political primacy of the citizen. I'll just cover the first two here:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
First, the citizen as the sovereign authority must be free to examine the facts for himself and communicate his conclusions to his fellow citizens. He cannot be compelled to believe a falsehood and therefore act on it.
Second, the citizen as the sovereign authority must possess the physical instrument of political authority and be prepared to use it. The ballot that is cast by the citizen, like the paper currency in common use, must be backed by a physical value.
The government must be subordinate to the sovereign authority, the citizens of the nation. And citizens must have the knowledge and the means to enforce their authority.
Contrary to what the practicing Kantians want us to believe, the first four words of the Second Amendment does not constitute a license to disarm the citizens and render them helpless in the face of a supreme state. It means that the citizens must be armed, trained, and organized to enforce their authority upon the government.
Now no rational person wants a civil war in our nation, but if the government would simply comply with the Constitution it wouldn't be necessary.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Sunday, December 16, 2012
A Larger Problem
On Friday I posted a response on my blog to the religious ravings of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee. The link to the initial response is here.
At the time I was focused on Huckabee's commitment to theism. I missed the larger problem. This problem is simply contempt for the rights of the individual.
Life is the fundamental moral value. But to live in human mode of life does not mean mere physical existence. The human way of life requires conscious rational control of it. Freedom is the next step in the hierarchy of moral values. Because violence against men can only be stopped by force it becomes necessary to establish the institution of government to place the use of force under rational control.
The primacy of the citizen over the government required the right to speak and publish the facts and the right of the citizen to bear arms. As a result we also gained freedom from a religion being imposed on us, and a rational system of justice.
So far, so good. But from the very first day others, out of a desire for material or spiritual benefit, sought to overturn the primacy of the citizen in favor of the dominance of the state.
The desire for material benefit led to the Dred Scott decision, in which the citizens of the free states of the union were stripped of their authority to ban the practice of slavery in their own home states. This set the stage for the Civil War.
The desire for spiritual benefit (or the warm fuzzy feeling of the same) led to Prohibition. In this case the citizens were stripped of their right to decide to consume or not consume alcohol and were effectively reduced to the status of cattle under state control. Defiance and contempt for the rule of law became the order of the day and another result was the vast growth of organized crime.
But the worst was yet to come.
Combining both a desire for both material gain and spiritual dominance came the self-styled Progressives. Although there was some lining of the pockets on the part of the Progressives their primary goal was political control. Political looting was simply a means of buying the votes of the corrupted voters.1
Even before the onset of Prohibition the Progressives had gained control of the public schools and had replaced education for citizenship as the sovereign authority with John Dewey's plan for programming children to morally devalue themselves and to be drones in the Progressive collective.2
Huckabee, in calling for the return of religious indoctrination to the public schools is not advocating an valid alternative to the inherent nihilism of Progressive programming. But simply wishes to replace blind obedience to the collective with blind obedience to God.3 In doing so he has accepted the fundamental Progressive premise and is facilitating their program. He is not upholding life as a moral value but is instead taking part in the destruction of the rational way of life.
And if Huckabee is going to claim that we as humans must obey God regardless of the consequences he may as well go all the way and convert to Islam.
But then Huckabee isn't the religious conservative idiot to facilitate the goals of the Left.4
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
1. What can I say? It apparently works for them.
2. When I was a contributor to THE RESISTER we referred to the public schools as Dewey Camps.
3. Here's my rant of the year on the subject of God.
4. There was William F. Buckley, Jr.
Furthermore I was kicked off the Baen's Bar forum for rudely responding to something said by one of their published authors. A religious conservative.
Quote Of The Day
Post Of The Day
For the record, Tom Kratman wrote a piece of Neo-Nazi war porn.
Here's a review.
At the time I was focused on Huckabee's commitment to theism. I missed the larger problem. This problem is simply contempt for the rights of the individual.
Life is the fundamental moral value. But to live in human mode of life does not mean mere physical existence. The human way of life requires conscious rational control of it. Freedom is the next step in the hierarchy of moral values. Because violence against men can only be stopped by force it becomes necessary to establish the institution of government to place the use of force under rational control.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."We the People," not God, or Der Volk, et cetera, are the sovereign authority on whose behalf the government is established. With those three words the primacy of the citizen over the government is established.
The primacy of the citizen over the government required the right to speak and publish the facts and the right of the citizen to bear arms. As a result we also gained freedom from a religion being imposed on us, and a rational system of justice.
So far, so good. But from the very first day others, out of a desire for material or spiritual benefit, sought to overturn the primacy of the citizen in favor of the dominance of the state.
The desire for material benefit led to the Dred Scott decision, in which the citizens of the free states of the union were stripped of their authority to ban the practice of slavery in their own home states. This set the stage for the Civil War.
The desire for spiritual benefit (or the warm fuzzy feeling of the same) led to Prohibition. In this case the citizens were stripped of their right to decide to consume or not consume alcohol and were effectively reduced to the status of cattle under state control. Defiance and contempt for the rule of law became the order of the day and another result was the vast growth of organized crime.
But the worst was yet to come.
Combining both a desire for both material gain and spiritual dominance came the self-styled Progressives. Although there was some lining of the pockets on the part of the Progressives their primary goal was political control. Political looting was simply a means of buying the votes of the corrupted voters.1
Even before the onset of Prohibition the Progressives had gained control of the public schools and had replaced education for citizenship as the sovereign authority with John Dewey's plan for programming children to morally devalue themselves and to be drones in the Progressive collective.2
Huckabee, in calling for the return of religious indoctrination to the public schools is not advocating an valid alternative to the inherent nihilism of Progressive programming. But simply wishes to replace blind obedience to the collective with blind obedience to God.3 In doing so he has accepted the fundamental Progressive premise and is facilitating their program. He is not upholding life as a moral value but is instead taking part in the destruction of the rational way of life.
And if Huckabee is going to claim that we as humans must obey God regardless of the consequences he may as well go all the way and convert to Islam.
But then Huckabee isn't the religious conservative idiot to facilitate the goals of the Left.4
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
1. What can I say? It apparently works for them.
2. When I was a contributor to THE RESISTER we referred to the public schools as Dewey Camps.
3. Here's my rant of the year on the subject of God.
4. There was William F. Buckley, Jr.
Furthermore I was kicked off the Baen's Bar forum for rudely responding to something said by one of their published authors. A religious conservative.
Quote Of The Day
Post Of The Day
For the record, Tom Kratman wrote a piece of Neo-Nazi war porn.
Here's a review.
Friday, December 14, 2012
Brain Death Case Of The Day.
A conservative is being disgusting as usual:
Better yet, I'll let an ancient Greek philosopher start for me:
Why did ANY act of mass murder happen?
WHY DID THE NIGHTMARE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, WITH NEARLY TWO HUNDRED MILLION DEAD, HAPPEN?
"Why God, did you allow all this to happen?"
In reply to these questions there is only silence.
There is no reply because there is no God.
Earlier this year I went on a long rant on the subject of God:
In the Collectivist dogma presently taught in the public schools a person had no rights because that person belonged to the collective. One could actually see a mob of looters and be seduced by the promise of real loot.
According to religious dogma you are the property of God and must obey him. You are not allowed to make moral decisions on your own. Regardless of the actual facts of reality.
But what do religious conservatives offer as a reward for obedience?
NOTHING.
Nothing. At. All.
In fact religion does not teach us anything about reality and how to live in it. Religion is pure nonsense.
That's all that I will say today.
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee attributed the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in part to restrictions on school prayer and religious materials in the classroom.Where do I start?
"We ask why there is violence in our schools, but we have systematically removed God from our schools," Huckabee said on Fox News, discussing the murder spree that took the lives of 20 children and 6 adults in Newtown, CT that morning. "Should we be so surprised that schools would become a place of carnage?"
Law enforcement has released few details on the alleged gunman, but Huckabee suggested that the separation of church and state may have spurred his rampage.
"[W]e've made it a place where we don't want to talk about eternity, life, what responsibility means, accountability -- that we're not just going to have be accountable to the police if they catch us, but one day we stand before, you know, a holy God in judgment," Huckabee said. "If we don't believe that, then we don't fear that."
He said those suffering from a crisis from faith should look to God in the community's response to the violence. But he added that "Maybe we ought to let [God] in on the front end and we wouldn't have to call him to show up when it's all said and done at the back end."
Better yet, I'll let an ancient Greek philosopher start for me:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?In short, if there was a God, then why did this act of mass murder happen?
– Epicurus
Why did ANY act of mass murder happen?
WHY DID THE NIGHTMARE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, WITH NEARLY TWO HUNDRED MILLION DEAD, HAPPEN?
"Why God, did you allow all this to happen?"
In reply to these questions there is only silence.
There is no reply because there is no God.
Earlier this year I went on a long rant on the subject of God:
At no time in the fifty one years of my life have I ever come into physical or visual contact with God. I have never EVER received a message from God. No phone calls. No letters or other junk mail through the U.S. Postal Service. Not even an e-mail from god@god.god, even though he should be able to get something through the spam filter.
Nothing. At. All.
I simply have no reason to believe in the existence of God.
In the Collectivist dogma presently taught in the public schools a person had no rights because that person belonged to the collective. One could actually see a mob of looters and be seduced by the promise of real loot.
According to religious dogma you are the property of God and must obey him. You are not allowed to make moral decisions on your own. Regardless of the actual facts of reality.
But what do religious conservatives offer as a reward for obedience?
NOTHING.
Nothing. At. All.
In fact religion does not teach us anything about reality and how to live in it. Religion is pure nonsense.
That's all that I will say today.
Sunday, December 09, 2012
Friday, December 07, 2012
Thought For The day
If today's editorial staff of the New York Times were in charge seventy one years ago the headline would read:
And the U.S. Navy and Army would be editorially denounced for racist violence against them.
IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY VISITS HAWAII
And the U.S. Navy and Army would be editorially denounced for racist violence against them.
Wednesday, December 05, 2012
Note For The Day
Seventeen years ago on this day Lisa McPherson died after being held captive by the Church of Scientology.
Think of it as religion in action.
Think of it as religion in action.
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
An Icon For Altruism
While going through some old stuff after I moved into another apartment I found a hard copy of a draft of my obituary for Diana Spencer, The Princess of Wales. This was intended for publication in THE RESISTER, but the editor Sergeant First Class Steven Barry of the Third Special Forces Group, rewrote it and in doing so completely dropped the basic premise and even got her maiden name wrong.
Needless to say after this I stopped writing for THE RESISTER.
SFC Barry radically cut down the text to basically call her a drunken slut. As I said, I stopped writing for his publication.
Needless to say after this I stopped writing for THE RESISTER.
DIANA: A Wasted Life [The revision so far]
By Leslie Bates
One of the things I do for my own selfish pleasure is to take a sketchbook and a drafting pencil and draw. For the last fifteen years the second favorite subject of my work was the late Princess of Wales. So when Andrew Morton’s biography of Diana was originally published I purchased a copy. It took me four months to work up the nerve to finish the first chapter. I did not (and no rational egoist would) enjoy the spectacle of seeing a soul being crushed by a band of witch doctors. (When I first read this my thought was. “If this is how the ruling class educates their children then it’s no wonder that England is rapidly becoming a third world country.”)
To properly become an adult, a child must gain moral knowledge, to know what human life is and how to live it. What Diana received as a child was close to pure poison. Her parents sent her to a boarding school. The Church of England’s version of a Dewey Camp. Here she was pounded with the doctrines that selflessness was the moral ideal. That sacrifice and obedience were virtues. That independent judgement was evil. And that her mind was impotent to deal with material existence. Her mind thus mangled , it should have been no surprise that her life was mangled as well.
Diana became a Second Hander, someone who avoids moral judgement and is dependent on others for guidance. To avoid judgement is to suspend consciousness. It is to effectively shut down the mind and enter the mental equivalent of a state of death. It should not be a surprise that Diana would shortly become physically dead.
Diana was told that the royal family was the pinnacle of civilized existence. A rational person would have seen the royals as a useless remnant of a barbaric tradition, and that the monarch had become nothing more than ta hand puppet for the ruling party. No sane woman would condemn her children to such a fate.
During her engagement Diana discovered that her fiancee was a pragmatist who had an active sexual affair with an already married woman and who had no intention of breaking off the affair. A rational woman would have dumped the sniveling piece of hominid garbage on the spot. Diana asked her sisters for advice and was told to go through with the marriage out of duty.
[Insert paragraph on being an icon for altruism]
[Insert paragraph on third world savages]
All a rational woman had to avoid the aforementioned horrors was simply to say: “No. This is wrong. I won’t do it.” To do so requires a valid knowledge of moral standards, and for her to know that she was right to exercise moral judgement. It is not enough to know that there is an alternative to a particular course of action. One must know that the alternative is correct.
SFC Barry radically cut down the text to basically call her a drunken slut. As I said, I stopped writing for his publication.
Question Of The Day
Why does the Left openly support Islam?
Both Islam and Marxism were concocted by the uberparasites of their times, Karl the First Trustifarian and the Big Moh'. Both doctrines must deny the Right to Life -- and thus the subsidiary Rights of Liberty, Property, Free Speech, Et Cetera -- of all persons. Both ideologies must do so in order to establish and maintain the reign of terror and death, in order to control and exploit the productive population, that their parasitic adherents need to sustain their otherwise useless lives. To accept the concept of the Right to Life that underlies the society of consent is for the Marxist and the Mullah the first step in an act of suicide.
So it should be no surprise that the Left is coming out in favor of silencing the critics of Islam. They feel that the enemy of their enemy is something they can use.
Both Islam and Marxism were concocted by the uberparasites of their times, Karl the First Trustifarian and the Big Moh'. Both doctrines must deny the Right to Life -- and thus the subsidiary Rights of Liberty, Property, Free Speech, Et Cetera -- of all persons. Both ideologies must do so in order to establish and maintain the reign of terror and death, in order to control and exploit the productive population, that their parasitic adherents need to sustain their otherwise useless lives. To accept the concept of the Right to Life that underlies the society of consent is for the Marxist and the Mullah the first step in an act of suicide.
So it should be no surprise that the Left is coming out in favor of silencing the critics of Islam. They feel that the enemy of their enemy is something they can use.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Thought For The Day
Real men don't grovel to figments of a witch doctor's imagination.
Yes, I know it's Sunday.
I'm not groveling.
Yes, I know it's Sunday.
I'm not groveling.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Photo Of The Day
This is a mother in Israel shielding her child with her own body during a savage rocket attack.
The rockets are a copy of the BM-40 artillery rocket originally deployed by the Soviet Army. Another band of savages serving in the cause of Communism.
Why does the mainstream establishment willfully blind themselves to the truth?
The origin of the doctrine of Islam is nothing more than the expression of the depravity of a predatory savage. It is overt nihilism posturing as righteousness. Islam is nothing less than a doctrine of human annihilation.
But, say some defenders of Islam, it is a religion, we can't criticize it or even interfere in any degree in the practice.
Really?
The first thing I was taught when I entered infantry basic training at Fort Benning in the spring of 1982 was that "the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero."
Acceptance of the facts is a fundamental necessity in the combat environment. Indulgence in a fantasy gets someone needlessly killed.
Innocent people are dying because the mainstream establishment won't understand and accept a fundamental truth.
Islam is Death.
And Islam is completely outside the bounds of civilized toleration.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Friday, November 09, 2012
Oh, Bother!
Some moron tried to post an anonymous comment on an earlier post of this blog stating that there is no Black Panther Party.
Actually they presently call themselves the New Black Panther Party.
And I even posted a photo of one of them standing outside a polling place in Philadelphia.
Blah. Blah. Blah.
Actually they presently call themselves the New Black Panther Party.
And I even posted a photo of one of them standing outside a polling place in Philadelphia.
Blah. Blah. Blah.
Thursday, November 08, 2012
Quotes Of The Day
Daniel Greenfield on Frontpage Mag about a mother who doesn't understand the concept of motherhood:
The problem with evolution is that it sucks for the kids.
If you turn conscience inside out, you get Islam.Yow!
If you had a choice between placing those children with their Muslim family or the Manson family, the Manson family would start looking pretty good. At least they only killed outsiders.
The problem with evolution is that it sucks for the kids.
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
Thought For The Day
As a result of yesterday's events I'm not going to feel guilty about living like a parasite on the welfare state.
The assholes asked for it.
PS: See you in Hell, Doug.
The assholes asked for it.
PS: See you in Hell, Doug.
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Totalitarian Socialism As Usual
Paul Bedard at the Washington Examiner reports:
Also in Philadelphia the Black Panthers are positioned at polling places as they were in 2008.
And propagandist Michael Moore and other Democrats are whining about his party not being allowed to cheat.
The Democratic Party has all of the credibility and respect for the citizens shown by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Which is to say: NONE AT ALL.
Updates when I get around to it.
UPDATE 1345 CST:
Democrat vote fraud as usual.
Democrat voter intimidation as usual.
The Philadelphia GOP is reporting that court appointed Minority (read GOP) Inspectors are being thrown out of polling locations in several Wards.
These Inspectors are election officials - again, court appointed -- and are reportedly being thrown out by the Head Judges of Elections (these Judges are elected Democrats) and being replaced by Democrats.
Also in Philadelphia the Black Panthers are positioned at polling places as they were in 2008.
There’s a disturbing report coming out of Philadelphia, as it’s been confirmed that New Black Panthers are, once again, outside of a polling place — the same location they stood at, batons in hand, back in 2008 (the address is 12 and Fairmount, Ward 14).
TheBlaze originally received the following image of one of one alleged Panthers outside of the station via e-mail this morning, then FOX News confirmed their presence in a subsequent report with video.
And propagandist Michael Moore and other Democrats are whining about his party not being allowed to cheat.
The Democratic Party has all of the credibility and respect for the citizens shown by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Which is to say: NONE AT ALL.
Updates when I get around to it.
UPDATE 1345 CST:
Democrat vote fraud as usual.
Democrat voter intimidation as usual.
Monday, November 05, 2012
Thought For The Day
CHICAGO DELENDA EST!
This message brought to you by the NATO phonetic letters FOXTROT and UNIFORM.
UPDATE 2008 CST:
Those who believe that they superior and infallible beings are already in the failure mode.
Example: Condemning someone for something that is completely out of their control is a move practiced by both the National Socialist German Workers Party and my former friend Doug Graen.
Eat shit and die motherfucker.
PS: Linux sucks.
This message brought to you by the NATO phonetic letters FOXTROT and UNIFORM.
UPDATE 2008 CST:
Those who believe that they superior and infallible beings are already in the failure mode.
Example: Condemning someone for something that is completely out of their control is a move practiced by both the National Socialist German Workers Party and my former friend Doug Graen.
Eat shit and die motherfucker.
PS: Linux sucks.
Saturday, November 03, 2012
Friday, November 02, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)