Anniversary

The Imperial Japanese Navy made a serious mistake on this day in 1941.

If the present staff of the New York Times or CNN were  on duty on the Infamous Day they would denounce the United States Navy and Army Air Force for racist violence against the Imperial Japanese Navy.

 

Overheard in San Francisco:

"We shouldn't think too badly of the Japanese. After all, they would not have attacked Pearl Harbor if we had not hit them first with the atom bomb."

If this were a Monty Python sketch a knight in full plate armor would walk into the scene and strike the speaker on the top of his/her head with a rubber chicken and then walk away.  On second thought, the twit in question may actually qualify for the full sixteen-ton weight treatment.

 

Anniversary

The Imperial Japanese Navy made a serious mistake on this day in 1941.

If the present staff of the New York Times or CNN were  on duty on the Infamous Day they would denounce the United States Navy and Army Air Force for racist violence against the Imperial Japanese Navy.

 

Overheard in San Francisco:

"We shouldn't think too badly of the Japanese. After all, they would not have attacked Pearl Harbor if we had not hit them first with the atom bomb."

If this were a Monty Python sketch a knight in full plate armor would walk into the scene and strike the speaker on the top of his/her head with a rubber chicken and then walk away.  On second thought, the twit in question may actually qualify for the full sixteen-ton weight treatment.

 

Anniversary

The Imperial Japanese Navy made a serious mistake on this day in 1941.

If the present staff of the New York Times were  on duty on the Infamous Day they would denounce the United States Navy and Army Air Force for racist violence against the Imperial Japanese Navy.

 

Overheard in San Francisco:

"We shouldn't think too badly of the Japanese. After all, they would not have attacked Pearl Harbor if we had not hit them first with the atom bomb."

If this were a Monty Python sketch a knight in full plate armor would walk into the scene and strike the speaker on the top of his/her head with a rubber chicken and then walk away.  On second thought, the twit in question may actually qualify for the full sixteen-ton weight treatment.

 

 

Anniversary

The Imperial Japanese Navy made a serious mistake on this day in 1941.

If the present staff of the New York Times were  on duty on the Infamous Day they would denounce the United States Navy and Army Air Force for racist violence against the Imperial Japanese Navy.

 

Anniversary

The Imperial Japanese Navy made a serious mistake on this day in 1941.

If the present staff of the New York Times were  on duty on the Infamous Day they would denounce the United States Navy and Army Air Force for racist violence against the Imperial Japanese Navy.

Thought For The Day

If the present editors of the New York Times were in charge on that infamous day they would just say that the Japanese Navy made a visit to the island of Oahu.

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thought For The Day

Imagine if you can that Barack Obama had been the President of the United States on the Day of Infamy when the Japanese Naval Air Force had attacked our naval base at Pearl Harbor and initiated the War in the Pacific on December 7, 1941.

That's a horrible thought, isn't it?

We are clearly in a World War with the fully believing adherents of Islam and he absolutely refuses to acknowledge it.   The fact is that he was raised by Marxist grandparents to regard the United States as an evil nation and in spite of the evidence to the contrary will not question the childhood indoctrination. 

There was no question at the time of election and absolutely no question now to any rational citizen that Barack Obama is unfit to hold the office of President.  And as a result he must be removed from that office right now.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Anniversary

Today is the anniversary of the airstrike made by Imperial Japanese Navy on the Naval and Army bases on the island of Oahu.  I should have remembered it.

This morning Pamela Geller linked to a story published by The Telegraph about a Muslim family that slays together.

[LINK HERE]

from the article:

Shiraz Maher, a researcher at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King’s College, London said: “We have seen a lot of families coming from the Caucuses and from central Asia, and many of them include infant children. We are seeing at least one family a month cross to Syria.

 “I think it is a matter of time until we start seeing European women going over to Syria. There is currently a huge amount of interaction online between jihadis in Syria and women from European countries. The jihadis advertise this, they say it’s fine for men to bring their families along.”

He continued: “The families who go to Syria form a sort of home front. The women feed the fighters and indoctrinate the children to create the next generation of fighters. Their function is also to populate an area the jihadists have taken as a means of consolidating control.”

I was beyond my usual level of disgust and dismay.  I seriously thought that it was time "to start up the showers and fire the ovens."

Even though it was only to another Islamic hellhole this was an indication of a mass migration, a Volkwanderung, was now underway.

What does this mean?

As long as the migration is to other Muslim occupied land it's not objectively a problem for civilized people. Otherwise it's an old school barbarian invasion.  Rational culture and political structures are overturned and the looter structure and culture of Islam is imposed.

This is intolerable.  A proper government would stop the migration by open, and if necessary, deadly force.  But the current Progressive philosophy of ethics and politics does not recognize the difference between civilized men (and those seeking to elevate themselves to civilization) and outright barbarians.

As far as Progressives are concerned anybody is good.  The content of the mind is irrelevant. As long as you don't actually think. 

Thought For The day

If today's editorial staff of the New York Times were in charge seventy one years ago the headline would read:

IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY VISITS HAWAII

And the U.S. Navy and Army would be editorially denounced for racist violence against them.