Saturday, September 09, 2017
Friday, September 08, 2017
Another Truth
To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws. The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms. Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.
And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.
In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. In effect to live a fully Human life. The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit. This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.
And our urban collaborators need to be dealt with, too.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.When the First Amendment was adopted the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent. Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.
And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.
In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. In effect to live a fully Human life. The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name? A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.
A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit. This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.
And our urban collaborators need to be dealt with, too.
Thursday, September 07, 2017
Wednesday, September 06, 2017
Tuesday, September 05, 2017
Another Truth For The Hard Left
Once
force is openly used against those who speak out against the Hard Left then
the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Hard Left.
Once the Hard Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society
then their victims (that's us) will no longer see themselves as subject to those
same rules. Or to put it another way to any member of the Hard Left, break the rules of
civil society and you will leave your victims no choice but to break you. It's called a CIVIL WAR, and cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy. What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Hard Left persist in not understanding? It's generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against
someone simply because of their political views. But if some Hard Leftist
thug finds him or herself staring at the muzzle of our rifles it is
because the stupid Hard Leftist put him or herself there.
Monday, September 04, 2017
Yes, I'm Speaking To The Hard Left, Now
If you are are being treated as a Totalitarian (from the neck until dead) it's because you are a Totalitarian. And of course Donald Trump is not your president, you just wanted another Hard Leftist like you, just another mass murdering psychopath like yourself.
Sunday, September 03, 2017
Saturday, September 02, 2017
A Hard Truth
Once
force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then
the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left.
Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society
then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those
same rules. Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.
It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.
What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?
It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds himself staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put himself there.
It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.
What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?
It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds himself staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put himself there.
Friday, September 01, 2017
Thursday, August 31, 2017
Another Question
Why am I an atheist?
A real God would have vaporized the false prophets Mohammed and L. Ron Hubbard the moment they opened their mouths.
A real God would have vaporized the false prophets Mohammed and L. Ron Hubbard the moment they opened their mouths.
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Tuesday, August 29, 2017
Comment On Islam
The absolute first thing taught at infantry basic training during the
Cold War was that the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero. On
the face of it I saw this as the response to any attempt to explain a
failure to learn a necessary skill. But this idea also applies to the
moral nightmare we were facing during with the Communists enemy and
their excuses for their crimes. Even if the usual Marxist credibility issues did not apply to the
position of the White House, we need to remember that there are still
millions of Muslims who still believe they are following the Allah given
order to murder those who have chosen to live a rational life. Some of
them still have money and organizational skills to apply to the problem
of murdering infidels like you and me.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted Islam was not practiced on the American continent. The nation’s first interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death. And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah’s eternal whorehouse. In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. But the doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I now propose an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
An obvious question is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?
A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.
A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the actual rights of the people. In declaring “man made” laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes — including rape, robbery, and murder — that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.
This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted Islam was not practiced on the American continent. The nation’s first interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death. And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah’s eternal whorehouse. In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. But the doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I now propose an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
An obvious question is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?
A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.
A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the actual rights of the people. In declaring “man made” laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes — including rape, robbery, and murder — that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.
This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.
Monday, August 28, 2017
Sunday, August 27, 2017
Another Quote
"The fifth commandment: Thou shalt not kill, is no commandment of God but a Jewish invention."
-- Eugen Stähle, National Socialist
I came across this quote while doing research on Action T4, the program of exterminating the the mentally disabled carried out by the National Socialist state. The fact is the idea of a single God- -and with him a single moral law that applies to all men without exception--came from Judaism. The above quoted statement--as with all things in National Socialism--is clearly wrong.
-- Eugen Stähle, National Socialist
I came across this quote while doing research on Action T4, the program of exterminating the the mentally disabled carried out by the National Socialist state. The fact is the idea of a single God- -and with him a single moral law that applies to all men without exception--came from Judaism. The above quoted statement--as with all things in National Socialism--is clearly wrong.
Saturday, August 26, 2017
Another Good Question
Is Free Speech an example of Hate Speech?
Only if you hate the truth.
Hanging an authoritarian (Hitler, Stalin, Hillary) is no more an act of murder than killing another murderer, and killing a member of Antifa is more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist or a Soviet Communist.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Only if you hate the truth.
Hanging an authoritarian (Hitler, Stalin, Hillary) is no more an act of murder than killing another murderer, and killing a member of Antifa is more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist or a Soviet Communist.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Friday, August 25, 2017
Thursday, August 24, 2017
A Hard Fact
If a Modern Democrat wants to find a Totalitarian all he or she has to do is look in a mirror.
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
Monday, August 21, 2017
And Another Fact Of Reality
If a Democrat wants to find a Fascist, all he has to do is look in a mirror.
Sunday, August 20, 2017
Another Hard Truth
The difference between an Anti-fa (a self described antifascist) and a Nazi (National Socialist) is a can of ZYKLON-B.
Another Message For The Hard Left
I’ll start with a quote:
“We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.”
– V.I. Lenin, 1923
My friend Mark Urbin has been kind enough to report a tweet from an outright nihilist:
“Most of the time when I encounter a cis man who has opinions that I strongly disagree with or just a shit person in general I thing about having visceral and rough sex with them. I feel the need to assert my dominance of men with flawed opinions sexually.”
The author of this expression of hatred then describes in obscene terms the process of sexually torturing and murdering the victim. Apart from the physical sense of the word how could this being be described as Human?
So what is this “cis” prefix that has popped up recently in the mental droppings of the other side?
It apparently refers to the concept of “Cisgender” which appears to be a new academic label for someone who identifies themselves as the gender of their birth. It is a slur for someone who practices the virtue of rationality and is a claim of mental and moral superiority over sane men. [1]
When a rational man [2] encounters a statement that is wrong, he could put forth a counter argument. Or on seeing the statement as totally insane he could simply dismiss it. But when encountering a disagreement the nihilist expresses the desire to torture and murder the rational man.
Why?
The predator culture has existed from the stone age. Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive member’s of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force. The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator. Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it--even to the open use of deadly force.
Some predator have created an academic culture that is now opposed to rational thought. Falsehoods are now treated facts and truths are held to be untrue. And if a failing grade is not sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.
So what is to be done? How do we respond to the insanity?
If we were to respond to the predators as Stalin did to those who rightfully refused or were unable to obey him their academic and urban centers would be reduced to piles of smoking rubble and there would be mass graves from coast to coast.
It would be Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.
So when do we get Biblical on them?
1. Insanity is not limited to gender identity. A former friend who had the sex change operation once said to me that he was voting for Barack Obama because the candidate would restore The Constitution. This was at a time when Obama’s contempt for The Constitution and The Rule of Law was well known. And he was also upset at a joke that referred to Obama supporters as a cult. It was on driving past the local Obama campaign headquarters this I called it the Obamatology Org. This joke referred to the Scientology practice of calling the local site an Org.
2. I’m using the male inclusive mode of speech here, I will not submit to academic Newspeak and the use of so-called gender neutral pronouns.
“We must teach our children to hate. Hatred is the basis of communism.”
– V.I. Lenin, 1923
My friend Mark Urbin has been kind enough to report a tweet from an outright nihilist:
“Most of the time when I encounter a cis man who has opinions that I strongly disagree with or just a shit person in general I thing about having visceral and rough sex with them. I feel the need to assert my dominance of men with flawed opinions sexually.”
The author of this expression of hatred then describes in obscene terms the process of sexually torturing and murdering the victim. Apart from the physical sense of the word how could this being be described as Human?
So what is this “cis” prefix that has popped up recently in the mental droppings of the other side?
It apparently refers to the concept of “Cisgender” which appears to be a new academic label for someone who identifies themselves as the gender of their birth. It is a slur for someone who practices the virtue of rationality and is a claim of mental and moral superiority over sane men. [1]
When a rational man [2] encounters a statement that is wrong, he could put forth a counter argument. Or on seeing the statement as totally insane he could simply dismiss it. But when encountering a disagreement the nihilist expresses the desire to torture and murder the rational man.
Why?
The predator culture has existed from the stone age. Predators are dependent on the thought and labor of the productive member’s of society for their sustenance and their excuse is a claim to superior status which is literally enforced by deadly force. The dismissal of their excuses are in practical effect a death sentence to the predator. Thus predators are hostile to reason and must actively opposed it--even to the open use of deadly force.
Some predator have created an academic culture that is now opposed to rational thought. Falsehoods are now treated facts and truths are held to be untrue. And if a failing grade is not sufficient to silence the critic open force will do.
So what is to be done? How do we respond to the insanity?
If we were to respond to the predators as Stalin did to those who rightfully refused or were unable to obey him their academic and urban centers would be reduced to piles of smoking rubble and there would be mass graves from coast to coast.
It would be Sodom and Gomorrah all over again.
So when do we get Biblical on them?
1. Insanity is not limited to gender identity. A former friend who had the sex change operation once said to me that he was voting for Barack Obama because the candidate would restore The Constitution. This was at a time when Obama’s contempt for The Constitution and The Rule of Law was well known. And he was also upset at a joke that referred to Obama supporters as a cult. It was on driving past the local Obama campaign headquarters this I called it the Obamatology Org. This joke referred to the Scientology practice of calling the local site an Org.
2. I’m using the male inclusive mode of speech here, I will not submit to academic Newspeak and the use of so-called gender neutral pronouns.
Saturday, August 19, 2017
A Message To The Hard Left
If you are being treated as a Fascist (Hanged) it's because you are acting like a Fascist.
Friday, August 18, 2017
A Fact Of Hard Reality
The followers of Karl Marx have murdered four times more people than the followers of Adolf Hitler but college students still follow Marx.
Thursday, August 17, 2017
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
A Fact Of Reality
If the North Koreans were to erase a big city from the face of the Earth they would be doing The United States a favor.
Tuesday, August 15, 2017
Another Fact Of Reality
If you (I'm speaking to Democrats, right now) continue to act like enemies of Mankind then you will be treated as enemies of Mankind and hanged from the neck until dead.
Monday, August 14, 2017
Sunday, August 13, 2017
A Fact Of Relity
Newspeak has become the dominant dialect of the academic and media establishment.
In
Newspeak those who uphold, defend and spread economic and political
liberty are called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity
down under their total control are called Progressives. In the political
context the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed. For example in Newspeak the belief that all lives matter regardless of race is held as being racist.
A
function of language is to serve as the operating system of human
thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct
identification of the facts of reality. Thus blood soaked tyrants are
called liberators and actual liberators are called oppressors. Since
clarity of thought which is the correct identification of the facts of
reality is necessary for humans to survive and prosper a language form
that obscures facts and disconnects thought from reality has the effect
of being toxic to human life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with
its increasing disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to
human life. An ultimate version of Newspeak in which any thought is
impossible would be completely lethal.
Thus if we are to survive
and prosper as individuals and as a society we must remove the
practitioners of Newspeak from the educational and media establishments
and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.
Saturday, August 12, 2017
Some More Hard Truths
1. President Kennedy was murdered by a Communist.
2. The Hard Left always lies.
3. If a Hard Leftist wants to find a Fascist then all one has to do is look in a mirror.
4. We quote President Kennedy because he insisted on being right.
2. The Hard Left always lies.
3. If a Hard Leftist wants to find a Fascist then all one has to do is look in a mirror.
4. We quote President Kennedy because he insisted on being right.
Friday, August 11, 2017
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Wednesday, August 09, 2017
A Message For The Hard Left
You voted for a dictatorship, why are you surprised that your leaders are treated as dictators and hanged as such?
Tuesday, August 08, 2017
Monday, August 07, 2017
Another Perspective
On theoretical grounds I think all religions have exactly the same
standard of proof underpinning them. Everyone thinks their holy writings
are the holy writings and believes with equal passion that their god is the god. But
we don’t live on theoretically grounds, we live in reality. And in
reality anyone who insists all religions are equally dangerous or
blameworthy is, if I may be so blunt, out of their fucking mind. Christians
don’t marry children. Jews don’t blow up mosques. Buddhists don’t
declare jihad. There is one religion widely practiced today that is
uniquely unable to coexist peacefully with other religions (or even with
other strains of the same religion). Get with the
program, all religions are not created equal, and a Judeo-Christian
nation makes me a hell of a lot less nervous than an Islamic one.
Sunday, August 06, 2017
Saturday, August 05, 2017
Imagine
Imagine for a moment that President Trump has been assassinated.
Do you seriously believe that there would be NO political changes as a result?
There will be political change, and it will be carried out over the dead
bodies of everyone who wanted the president dead, including you
if necessary.
Friday, August 04, 2017
A Message To The Hard Left
Hillary Clinton, and those who persist in following her, are without any question Enemies Of Humanity, and they must be put to death as soon as possible.
Thursday, August 03, 2017
Definition
Those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty are
called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under
their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the political
context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed.
Wednesday, August 02, 2017
Tuesday, August 01, 2017
Monday, July 31, 2017
More Hard Truths
1. The Hard Left always lies.
2. If a member of the Hard Left wants to find a Fascist, all he or she has to do is look in a mirror.
3. If North Korea erases Democrats from the Earth the Kim Family would be doing us a favor.
4. Islam is evil and the Big Moh is a false prophet.
2. If a member of the Hard Left wants to find a Fascist, all he or she has to do is look in a mirror.
3. If North Korea erases Democrats from the Earth the Kim Family would be doing us a favor.
4. Islam is evil and the Big Moh is a false prophet.
And Another Hard Truth For The Hard Left
Hillary Clinton wants to know why she lost the election? It's because we the voters remember more than Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Sunday, July 30, 2017
Question
So the North Korean's say they can erase Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, or Washington from the face of the Earth.
So what?
So what?
Saturday, July 29, 2017
Message To the Hard Left
If you insist on behaving like a National Socialist, then you be treated as one, from the neck until dead.
Friday, July 28, 2017
Socialism In Action
Anyone, such as a Soviet Communist, a National Socialist who sees me as either livestock to be enslaved, or as a
diseased animal to be put down, is a mortal enemy, period. Such persons
have surrendered all moral claims to the status of Humanity and all
rights, including the right to live. On
what grounds can someone claim to be Human when they stand up in
defense of Socilism, an ideology that denies my right to live as a rational
human being and only permits my existence if I submit to the status of
livestock?
My answer to those who denounce me as inhuman is, no,I am not inhuman, you are. Either the lot of you people need to pull your heads out of your terminal orifices or terminate yourselves.
My answer to those who denounce me as inhuman is, no,I am not inhuman, you are. Either the lot of you people need to pull your heads out of your terminal orifices or terminate yourselves.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Some More Facts Of Reality
1. The Mainstream Media is lying like Paul Joseph Goebbels, isn't it time we start treating them as a bunch of liars?
2. Republicans are too nice, they should read some Machiavelli.
3. Reality is real, live with it.
2. Republicans are too nice, they should read some Machiavelli.
3. Reality is real, live with it.
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Another Fact Of Reality
Let's talk about Socialism.
We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.
It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.
Perhaps we should start treating them as such.
Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.
It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.
Perhaps we should start treating them as such.
Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
A Fact Of Reality
A phobia is an irrational fear. There is no such thing as an irrational
fear of Islam. Those who would subjugate us are vermin fit only for
extermination.
Monday, July 24, 2017
I'm Repeating Myself, Again
The Republican Party needs to face up to the fact that politics as usual
is no longer an option. The Republican Party has systematically
compromised, appeased, and openly bought off the other side too many
times. This had the effect of strengthening the other side and harming
us as a nation. In the Wiemar Republic the practice of parties
making deals with each other was called cattle trading. In present day
America we call this bipartisanship. And like the Germans between the
wars we are now facing the rise of a totalitarian collectivist political
cult with its own divinely appointed leader. If the Republican
Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will have no
choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make changes
and restore a rational system of government.
The Marxist comrades have suggested that us mere mortals should voluntarily limit our reproduction in or to limit the emission of carbon dioxide by human beings. Never mind the fact that carbon dioxide is a natural component of the terrestrial atmosphere whose quantity has been discernibly decreasing over the course of geological time. But because rational persons, who naturally refuse to believe the nonsense emitted by environmentalists, will not voluntarily limit the number of children they have -- so that a bunch of moral parasites can feel good about themselves -- there will be open calls for limitation of "breeders" by force. This will be followed, by those true believers in power, by the actual exercise of force to control breeding, through forced abortions and sterilization. Which in turn will be followed by the elimination of those "breathers" who are deemed by Environmentalist Elites (the Elect of Gaia, as it were) to be useless or "counter-environmental." The nice words for this are subjugation and murder.
We should not be the slightest bit surprised that the Environmentalists will join the ranks of the mass-murderers because they, like the socialists that they evolved from, basically see productive humans as livestock to controlled and used. They see us creatures without a right to live. There's a proper term for those who deny your Right of Life, they are properly called mortal enemies.
The Marxist comrades have suggested that us mere mortals should voluntarily limit our reproduction in or to limit the emission of carbon dioxide by human beings. Never mind the fact that carbon dioxide is a natural component of the terrestrial atmosphere whose quantity has been discernibly decreasing over the course of geological time. But because rational persons, who naturally refuse to believe the nonsense emitted by environmentalists, will not voluntarily limit the number of children they have -- so that a bunch of moral parasites can feel good about themselves -- there will be open calls for limitation of "breeders" by force. This will be followed, by those true believers in power, by the actual exercise of force to control breeding, through forced abortions and sterilization. Which in turn will be followed by the elimination of those "breathers" who are deemed by Environmentalist Elites (the Elect of Gaia, as it were) to be useless or "counter-environmental." The nice words for this are subjugation and murder.
We should not be the slightest bit surprised that the Environmentalists will join the ranks of the mass-murderers because they, like the socialists that they evolved from, basically see productive humans as livestock to controlled and used. They see us creatures without a right to live. There's a proper term for those who deny your Right of Life, they are properly called mortal enemies.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Message
To the Chinese Communist Party,
The North Korean State shall cease to exist, the Korean people shall be free.
What you want is irrelevant.
Les Bates
The North Korean State shall cease to exist, the Korean people shall be free.
What you want is irrelevant.
Les Bates
Friday, July 21, 2017
Yes, I'm Repeating Myself
Yes, I am repeating myself.
The Hard Left cheers as every new manifestation of barbarism rises and slaughters good people and innocent children. The chattering classes willingly support and serve the enemies of mankind and will viciously slander and condemn those who dare to raise a hand in defense of the defenseless. They sit on their fat asses in progressive coffee houses and cook up paranoid conspiracy theories about how Christian Conservatives are planning to exterminate their own particular and pathetic social fringe group.
But if the stupid conspiracy theories of the Hard Left were true they would all be dead.
Let’s see, if rational people were to treat the Hard Left the way that Great Comrade Stalin treated anyone he suspected of being an opponent, let alone someone who was an actual opponent, would any of these pathetic lunatics still be breathing? Let alone continuing to rant like a mob of mentally disconnected lunatics who are off their medications?
No, I wouldn't think so.
If Conservatives dealt with the adherents of Modern Liberalism the way the Hard Left has dealt with humans in general whenever the Hard Left has obtained unrestrained power, there wouldn't be any Hard Leftists left standing. Of the universities and the urban centers of the Hard Left there would be nothing left but smoking ruins, and there would mass graves from coast to coast.
We need to face the fact that the present day Hard Left, like the unschooled barbarians who plagued civilization before them, are essentially parasites. If the Huns or the Mongols were to take "no" for an answer to their demand for food and other material goods they would die very quickly. Control of the productive population is essential for their survival and well being. Compulsion, taking things and persons by force, is inherently necessary to the parasite manner of existence. Those who resisted the parasites had to be killed as an object lesson for others.
The Hard Left, our present-day literate post-Marxist barbarians, not only need material support they also need spiritual support as well. They need to feel that their victims are not only submitting to them today but will do so tomorrow as well.
Barbarian chieftains and tribal witch-doctors demanded degrading and often dangerous acts of worship from their subjects, up to and including human sacrifice, in order to assure themselves that they would still have a roof (or a tent) over their heads and food to eat the next day. Those refused to obey were worked over by the goon squad or simply killed.
In the classrooms, editorial offices, and coffee shops of the Hard Left the demand is for unquestioned agreement without regard to the actual facts of reality. The self-styled intellectuals of the Hard Left are the first to demand “speech codes” and other forms of censorship lest they be identified as frauds and poseurs and subsequently bounced out of their comfortable ivory towers, no longer insulated from a real world that demands real thought and real labor.
The Hard Left, being dependent upon others for their sustenance, must stand in opposition to the society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion, be it various species of Socialism or the witch-doctor rule of Islam, because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.
If the Hard Left would just die it would be nice.
I know, I'm not a nice guy, and it couldn't happen soon enough.
The Hard Left cheers as every new manifestation of barbarism rises and slaughters good people and innocent children. The chattering classes willingly support and serve the enemies of mankind and will viciously slander and condemn those who dare to raise a hand in defense of the defenseless. They sit on their fat asses in progressive coffee houses and cook up paranoid conspiracy theories about how Christian Conservatives are planning to exterminate their own particular and pathetic social fringe group.
But if the stupid conspiracy theories of the Hard Left were true they would all be dead.
Let’s see, if rational people were to treat the Hard Left the way that Great Comrade Stalin treated anyone he suspected of being an opponent, let alone someone who was an actual opponent, would any of these pathetic lunatics still be breathing? Let alone continuing to rant like a mob of mentally disconnected lunatics who are off their medications?
No, I wouldn't think so.
If Conservatives dealt with the adherents of Modern Liberalism the way the Hard Left has dealt with humans in general whenever the Hard Left has obtained unrestrained power, there wouldn't be any Hard Leftists left standing. Of the universities and the urban centers of the Hard Left there would be nothing left but smoking ruins, and there would mass graves from coast to coast.
We need to face the fact that the present day Hard Left, like the unschooled barbarians who plagued civilization before them, are essentially parasites. If the Huns or the Mongols were to take "no" for an answer to their demand for food and other material goods they would die very quickly. Control of the productive population is essential for their survival and well being. Compulsion, taking things and persons by force, is inherently necessary to the parasite manner of existence. Those who resisted the parasites had to be killed as an object lesson for others.
The Hard Left, our present-day literate post-Marxist barbarians, not only need material support they also need spiritual support as well. They need to feel that their victims are not only submitting to them today but will do so tomorrow as well.
Barbarian chieftains and tribal witch-doctors demanded degrading and often dangerous acts of worship from their subjects, up to and including human sacrifice, in order to assure themselves that they would still have a roof (or a tent) over their heads and food to eat the next day. Those refused to obey were worked over by the goon squad or simply killed.
In the classrooms, editorial offices, and coffee shops of the Hard Left the demand is for unquestioned agreement without regard to the actual facts of reality. The self-styled intellectuals of the Hard Left are the first to demand “speech codes” and other forms of censorship lest they be identified as frauds and poseurs and subsequently bounced out of their comfortable ivory towers, no longer insulated from a real world that demands real thought and real labor.
The Hard Left, being dependent upon others for their sustenance, must stand in opposition to the society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion, be it various species of Socialism or the witch-doctor rule of Islam, because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.
If the Hard Left would just die it would be nice.
I know, I'm not a nice guy, and it couldn't happen soon enough.
Thursday, July 20, 2017
More Hard Truths.
Apparently Hillary Clinton hasn’t given up on her quest to gain the presidency.
If you wanted to know what a Hillary Clinton administration would look like? There’s a scorched spot outside of Waco in Texas where an agency of the federal government does an imitation of SS-Einsanzgruppen on live television. My family doctor was surprised to hear that a Hillary Clinton administration would result in mass graves (of us) from coast to coast.
But since the mainstream media was caught lying, I have to treat them as part of the problem.
If you wanted to know what a Hillary Clinton administration would look like? There’s a scorched spot outside of Waco in Texas where an agency of the federal government does an imitation of SS-Einsanzgruppen on live television. My family doctor was surprised to hear that a Hillary Clinton administration would result in mass graves (of us) from coast to coast.
But since the mainstream media was caught lying, I have to treat them as part of the problem.
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Monday, July 17, 2017
Some More Hard Truths
1. The so-called Palestinian people are the descendants of conquerors and collaborators. The so-called Palestinian people have no honor or sovereignty.
2. Democrats always cheat.
2. Democrats always cheat.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Fact Of Reality
Those who disarm mankind are Enemies Of Mankind.
Hillary Clinton is nothing but an enemy of humanity.
Hillary Clinton is nothing but an enemy of humanity.
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Fact Of Reality
I have a message for the ubermenschen wanna-be's of the Left:
In the immortal words of Ayn Rand: You need us, we do not need you.
Or to put it in a more common vernacular: Fuck off and die.
In the immortal words of Ayn Rand: You need us, we do not need you.
Or to put it in a more common vernacular: Fuck off and die.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
Another fact of reality
We mock and prosecute Klansmen for their stupid and destructive
behavior. But the fact of the matter is that Klansmen act the way they
do because they believe that they are superior beings destined to rule
over those they have deemed to be inferiors.
Guess who else believe themselves to be superior beings?
The Left.
Who else preached hatred and murder of inferiors?
The Left.
One would be hard pressed to find a greater example of homicidal hatred (other than the NSDAP) preached and commanded at the political level than Lenin screaming for the mass murder of the Kulaks. Which is to say the extermination of those who refused to obey him and worship him as their God and Savior in the place of Jesus Christ.
As stupid and destructive as the Klan was they could not in a million years match the insanity and deadliness of The Left in absolute power. The Klan simply could not lynch enough Africans to match the 100 million person worldwide bodycount (plus!) that Leftist regimes have run up since November of 1917.
But if Lefties in America want to behave like Klansmen then let's start treating them like Klansmen.
Guess who else believe themselves to be superior beings?
The Left.
Who else preached hatred and murder of inferiors?
The Left.
One would be hard pressed to find a greater example of homicidal hatred (other than the NSDAP) preached and commanded at the political level than Lenin screaming for the mass murder of the Kulaks. Which is to say the extermination of those who refused to obey him and worship him as their God and Savior in the place of Jesus Christ.
As stupid and destructive as the Klan was they could not in a million years match the insanity and deadliness of The Left in absolute power. The Klan simply could not lynch enough Africans to match the 100 million person worldwide bodycount (plus!) that Leftist regimes have run up since November of 1917.
But if Lefties in America want to behave like Klansmen then let's start treating them like Klansmen.
Monday, July 10, 2017
Saturday, July 08, 2017
Facts Of Reality
Antifa is a terrorist organization.
The Hard Left are enemies of Mankind.
Donald Trump is our President.
The mainstream media lies to us.
The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking the products of their thought and labor. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. I basically think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to essentially behave as predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings it is clear that they should be hunted down and killed.To the true believer a 100 million innocent human lives snuffed out in the pursuit of an invalid ideology is just not enough. Would they stop after killing 200 million or 300 million? Of course not. The parasite mentalities of the Master Class as a rule see themselves as superior beings and that all other people, the productive population of a nation, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not seen as an act of murder. In the minds of the Master Class is it simply the disposal of garbage. In practical effect a Communist is a mortal enemy of Mankind. And killing a Communist is as necessary as putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.
The Hard Left are enemies of Mankind.
Donald Trump is our President.
The mainstream media lies to us.
The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking the products of their thought and labor. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. I basically think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to essentially behave as predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings it is clear that they should be hunted down and killed.To the true believer a 100 million innocent human lives snuffed out in the pursuit of an invalid ideology is just not enough. Would they stop after killing 200 million or 300 million? Of course not. The parasite mentalities of the Master Class as a rule see themselves as superior beings and that all other people, the productive population of a nation, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not seen as an act of murder. In the minds of the Master Class is it simply the disposal of garbage. In practical effect a Communist is a mortal enemy of Mankind. And killing a Communist is as necessary as putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.
Friday, July 07, 2017
Thursday, July 06, 2017
Another Message For The Hard Left
If you take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the
word Jew with the words Gun Owner or Conservative then you will understand the Hard Left.
And when you insist on behaving like a Totalitarian, then you be
treated as a Totalitarian, we will hang the lot of you from the neck until dead.
Wednesday, July 05, 2017
Facts Of Reality
1984 was written by George Orwell as a warning, not an instruction manual for the Hard Left.
To say that a Liberal is stupid is like saying that water is wet.
To say that a Liberal is stupid is like saying that water is wet.
Tuesday, July 04, 2017
Monday, July 03, 2017
And Another Message For The Hard Left
If you take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the words Gun Owner then you will understand the Left. And when you insist on behaving like a National Socialist, then you be treated as a National Socialist, from the neck until dead.
Saturday, July 01, 2017
Friday, June 30, 2017
Message To The Hard Left
If you insist behaving like a National Socialist, then you be treated as a National Socialist, from the neck until dead.
Thursday, June 29, 2017
Fact Of Reality
The Mainstream Media lie like Paul Joseph Goebbels, but now they are calling for the censorship of the Real Media. They are calling the real news a bunch of 'fake news.' Fuck them. Fuck all of them.
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
What Would Hitchens Say?
Those who uphold, defend, and spread economic and political liberty are
called Conservatives while those who seek to lock humanity down under
their total control are called Progressives. In effect, in the political
context, the practical meanings of the political labels are reversed. One of the functions of language is to serve as the operating
system of human thought. But the function of Newspeak is to prevent
correct identification of the facts of reality, but since clarity of thought, the
correct identification of the facts of reality, is necessary for humans
to survive and prosper, a language form that obscures facts and
disconnects thought from reality has the effect of being toxic to human
life. Each subsequent revision of Newspeak, with its increasing
disconnection from reality, is increasingly toxic to human life. An
ultimate version of Newspeak, in which any thought is impossible, would
be totally lethal. Thus if we are to survive and prosper as individuals and as a
society we must remove the newspeakers from our educational
establishments and if necessary isolate them from society altogether.
Sunday, June 25, 2017
Saturday, June 24, 2017
Friday, June 23, 2017
Message To The Left
As long as you hate and destroy then you will be hated and you will be destroyed.
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Facts For Lefties
Nazi is short for National Socialist, Hitler himself came out and said
the NSDAP was a bunch of Socialists, but try telling that to a Hillary supporter and you'll be called a liar. the KKK was the original
terrorist arm of the Democratic Party and was a major factor in democrat
victories well into the 20th Century, but try telling that to a Hillary supporter and you'll be called a liar. And the assholes who
are attacking and beating up Trump supporters are doing so in imitation
of the original brownshirts, but try telling that to a Hillary
supporter and you'll be called a liar.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Monday, June 19, 2017
Sunday, June 18, 2017
Saturday, June 17, 2017
Friday, June 16, 2017
Message To North Korea
Photographs of the leaders can be replaced and when you are rationing ammunition to
your elite forces you've already lost the Second Korean War.
(And the North Korea state has NO dignity to speak of.)
(And the North Korea state has NO dignity to speak of.)
Fact Of Reality
Killing a Democrat is no more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist or Soviet Communist.
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
Quote
"Jeez Mom, can't I kill 8 or 9 people on my bloody path to absolute power without getting on my case?"
--Kyle Kalligren
--Kyle Kalligren
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Note To The Left
Reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what
their intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real
world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as
some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore
the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to
error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster. They openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then
proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they are totally unfit to do
so.
Sunday, June 11, 2017
Thursday, June 08, 2017
A Messsge To Lefties
Death to Hillary Clinton and the sub-human garbage that supports her. Climate Change is purely natural. Those, like Hillary Clinton, who use it as an excuse for gaining power need to be killed.
Tuesday, June 06, 2017
A Visit
Some Americans visited Northern France seventy-three years ago today. They're still talking about it today, except for Lena Dunham.
Sunday, June 04, 2017
Another Message For Lefties
Inherent in all Socialist doctrines and public statements is the
implicit premise that the non-socialist is a mindless or soulless animal
without rights and should be treated as such by the ideal socialist
state. If there is anyone who has a right to be offended at such public
utterances it is the victims of Socialism.
Of course the Socialist Twit is going to be offended when the truth is spoken. Socialism is in practice the destruction of persons and entire societies as a whole. Socialist doctrines are the lies that the socialist must tell himself in order to avoid the self realization that he is in fact a thief and a murderer.
Of course the truth is going to hurt their feelings. So what?
And the socialist is not bothered when a Politically Correct Moron like Alec Baldwin publicly incites a mob to murder elected officials and their families because said officials appear to be complying with the supreme law to which they are subject. The Socialist apparently sees this as normal and acceptable behavior. But because they cannot or will not believe that there is a higher standard of personal and political behavior they will freak out every time they see a bunch of farmers get together for some target practice because they fear this is the mob will come after them.
Give me a break.
Socialists will also object to any statement of fact and demand that we be silent and to shut up,
No.
We will not be silent and to shut up for them.
In order to live each man require accurate information in order to make correct moral decisions. Valid knowledge is like food and oxygen, a necessary requirement of human life. Because the range of the senses of each individual is limited men have through verbal and later written communication extended the range of their own senses. This effectively improves their own prospects for survival.
Societies that value knowledge will generally tend to be more economically and technologically advanced than those societies that devalue knowledge. If we treat our own right to life as sacred then we must treat the Truth as nothing less than sacred. Those who demand that we ignore the Truth or would forcibly prevent us from learning the Truth should be treated as nothing less than Enemies of Mankind in General, to be dealt will as wolves are.
And here's another message for Leftists.
YOU LOST.
In spite of the bribes offered, the lies told, the assaults on persons and property, and the other nonsense that your side pulled, you lost the presidential election.
Get over it.
We refuse to be a living prop in your ideological fantasies. We refuse to bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we refuse to embark on the path that ultimately leads to the anonymous ditch outside of town.
This isn't Russia in 1917. We know about the ultimate results of your ideological fantasy and will not go down that path without a fight.
Of course the Socialist Twit is going to be offended when the truth is spoken. Socialism is in practice the destruction of persons and entire societies as a whole. Socialist doctrines are the lies that the socialist must tell himself in order to avoid the self realization that he is in fact a thief and a murderer.
Of course the truth is going to hurt their feelings. So what?
And the socialist is not bothered when a Politically Correct Moron like Alec Baldwin publicly incites a mob to murder elected officials and their families because said officials appear to be complying with the supreme law to which they are subject. The Socialist apparently sees this as normal and acceptable behavior. But because they cannot or will not believe that there is a higher standard of personal and political behavior they will freak out every time they see a bunch of farmers get together for some target practice because they fear this is the mob will come after them.
Give me a break.
Socialists will also object to any statement of fact and demand that we be silent and to shut up,
No.
We will not be silent and to shut up for them.
In order to live each man require accurate information in order to make correct moral decisions. Valid knowledge is like food and oxygen, a necessary requirement of human life. Because the range of the senses of each individual is limited men have through verbal and later written communication extended the range of their own senses. This effectively improves their own prospects for survival.
Societies that value knowledge will generally tend to be more economically and technologically advanced than those societies that devalue knowledge. If we treat our own right to life as sacred then we must treat the Truth as nothing less than sacred. Those who demand that we ignore the Truth or would forcibly prevent us from learning the Truth should be treated as nothing less than Enemies of Mankind in General, to be dealt will as wolves are.
And here's another message for Leftists.
YOU LOST.
In spite of the bribes offered, the lies told, the assaults on persons and property, and the other nonsense that your side pulled, you lost the presidential election.
Get over it.
We refuse to be a living prop in your ideological fantasies. We refuse to bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we refuse to embark on the path that ultimately leads to the anonymous ditch outside of town.
This isn't Russia in 1917. We know about the ultimate results of your ideological fantasy and will not go down that path without a fight.
Saturday, June 03, 2017
Message To The Left
Censorship is the negation of the human mind. As rational thought is
necessary to living a human life the censors, and those who demand censorship, are Enemies of Mankind. In my view censors are vermin fit only for
extermination. The Mass Media are part of the problem, they lie like Goebbels and then they complain about false news.
Friday, June 02, 2017
Message To The Norks
Photographs can be replaced and when you are rationing ammunition to your elite forces you've already lost the Second Korean War.
(And North Korea has NO dignity to speak of.)
(And North Korea has NO dignity to speak of.)
Thursday, June 01, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)