Comment On Islam

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our the Democrats welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and the Democrats are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

Hero Of The Day

Gill Rosenberg is a nice lady from Canada who served with the IDF as a search and rescue pilot.  She also went to Kurdistan to fight against ISIS.

Thanks to Mark Urbin for the link.

Thought For The Day

As a result of the wave of sadistic Muslim actions yesterday we are now another day closer to commencing a Final Solution to the Muslim Problem.  (What’s Arabic for Endlösung?)

But the current occupant of the White House (I absolutely will not identify him as the President of the United States) is clearly a collaborator with the Muslims who seek to conquer the civilized nations--including the United States.  As a result Barack Obama must be removed from office and put to death for collaboration with Islam and his other crimes against the United States.

And any peace-activist peace of excrement who screams "hate speech" at this statement of fact is clearly a collaborator and must also be put to death.

What are  your questions on this block of instruction?

UPDATE (Thanks to Mark Urbin):

This is what Islam is to a victim.

ANOTHER UPDATE:

I would rather fly the Confederate Battle Flag than tolerate this.

Another Atrocity

An Islamic terrorist cell carrying ISIS flags attacked an American owned factory in southern France.  Before leaving the scene they deposited the decapitated head of another victim with Arabic words written on it.

This doesn't even qualify as animal behavior.

Delenda Est Islam!

Updaet 0934 CDT--More sickness:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3140304/Decapitated-body-Islamist-flag-industrial-estate-France.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3140541/ISIS-carries-one-worst-massacres-Syria-24-hours-entering-Kobane-120-civilians-killed-snipers-rockets.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3139577/The-sex-slaves-slaughter-city-Girls-young-nine-forced-sex-ISIS-jihadis-treat-sick-reward-savagery.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3140525/Suicide-bomb-rips-Kuwaiti-mosque-Friday-prayers-killing-13-worshippers-ISIS-claims-responsibility.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3140454/Tourists-run-lives-Tunisian-beach-gunman-carries-attack-outside-hotel-packed-Britons.html

Gosh...

...what a surprise.

According to the Daily Mail site two Muslims attempted to shut down down a counter-censorship event held in the Dallas suburb of Garland, Texas by the American Freedom Defense Initiative with explosives.  

Oh!  The Muslims are offended!

So what?  Islam is a clearly false doctrine that serves only as an excuse for criminal actions that are beyond the toleration of civilized people.  Islam denies all of the Rights of Man and therefore no Muslim can claim any of those rights for himself. 

We must accept as a fact of reality that Islam is outside of the protection of the First Amendment and take the actions necessary to protect the citizens and legal residents of the United States.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

More Jihad

'Behead them in their own homes': ISIS publishes 'kill list' online of names, photos and addresses of 100 US military members

ISIS is calling for the murder of American Servicemen here in the United States.  Can we now drop the pretense that they are human and exterminate them already?

Moron Of The day

Actually calling her a moron is an insult to actual morons. 

There was a time when Neville Chamberlain and the Munich Agreement has held to be the world standard for idiocy in governmental action.  But The Big Zero and his followers in the current Federal Government are clearly outdoing Chamberlain and the other appeasers of National Socialism thus far.

Try to imagine someone proclaiming that deadly force is not the correct response to the aggressive actions of the Third Reich and the Empire of Japan back in 1941.  It would clearly be insane.

So what is the problem?  What is the cause of the mental disconnect from reality?

Quote Of The Day

Carol Brown writing at the American Thinker said:


Speaking the truth about the underlying ideology that drives this bloodbath. Educating others about the words written in the Koran that demand that non-Muslims convert, pay the jizya tax, or die. Helping people realize that these acts of jihad are not isolated events. Spreading the word that Islam is not a religion of peace, but rather a political ideology of subjugation and war. And rejecting at every turn this nation’s plunge into darkness as the president stands with evil – aligning himself with and negotiating with those who wish to destroy us.

Questions Of The Day

Can a Muslim be a good person? Is it possible for someone who was indoctrinated in the absolutely depraved ideology of Islam to act as a good person?

We saw examples of of a Muslim being good in during the terrorist actions in Paris.  The first being the police officer who was murdered by the Jidhadists in the line of duty.  The other being the young man who led others to safety during the attack on the delicatessen.

And now in the Kingdom of Jordan we are witnessing something that has not been seen in centuries as the Monarch Abdullah II is personally leading his forces in battle against the Jidhadists. 

It is possible for a Muslim to be a good person but this is a compromise.  As with all compromises it is untenable.  In the long run these people must renounce the doctrine of Islam and embrace Reason as the way of life.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Question Of The Day

Is there a solution to the problem of Islam short of a Final Solution?

The doctrine of Islam denies all of the Rights of Man including the Right of Life.  Given that Muslims are required to act as the mortal enemies of Mankind there are no middle grounds under which a peace can be negotiated with any of them.  In the end the practice of Islam must be removed from existence altogether.

Even if Muslims are not exterminated altogether they must be removed from rationally functioning human societies.  Those who deny the Rights of Man cannot live in a rational Human Society based on those rights.  Therefore Muslims have no place in a rational Human Society in and must be expelled from it.

Under no circumstances will any attempt be made to comply with any part of the Islamic code of law including the dietary code.  If for example the least expensive food available to feed the Muslims in temporary detention before deportation is pork then it will be used.  If Muslims insist on complying with the false dietary laws and starve to death as a result then it’s their fault alone.

Can any of the children be saved?

Good question.  Certainly those children who haven’t experienced full indoctrination to Islam could be separated and assigned to voluntary foster parents.  As to other children who have been indoctrinated I have no information to come up with a sound theory of action apart from treating then as adults.

What are your questions on this?

Thought For The Day

We are another day closer to the point where we start building those special camps for Muslims.

The special kind with the shower and oven facilities.

I said this a week ago:

Censorship is the negation of the human mind.  As rational thought is necessary to living a human life the censor, and those who demand it, are Enemies of Mankind.  In my view censors are vermin fit only for extermination.

 The doctrine of Islam negates all of the Rights of Man.  As a result those who adhere to Islam cannot claim the same rights for themselves.  The false prophet Mohammed and those who follow him are without question Enemies of Mankind and as such can only be dealt with by deadly force.

Extermination and expulsion  are the only options.

Thought For The Day

I just posted this updated version of a previous thought on Instapundit:

I would not be surprised if this comment is deleted by the moderators

Were it not for the adverse precedent of The Holocaust our nation and the rest of Humanity would be well on the way to performing a final solution to the problem of Islam.

The fact is that in the past the basic response to a barbaric action by primitives against an advanced society was to massacre them. There is no question that the most consistent adherents of the doctrine of Islam would have to work their way up to qualify as primitive with respect to us. Islam has rejected the basic moral laws of even the most backward societies which is the prohibition of theft and murder.

The most consistent adherents of Islam are effectively indistinguishable from predatory animals. And the war of Islam against Humanity will not end until we identify and deal with the most consistent Muslims as such.

A Suggestion

The head of the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram has stated that he intends to sell the school girls his gang had kidnapped into slavery.  My suggestion is that anyone found in possession of any of the victims should be put to death without exception.

No, it's not murder.  It's putting down a bunch of predatory animals.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Statement of Policy

In the ongoing effort to dismantle our civilization the notion has been put forth that ground forces of the United States should placed between the remnant of the State of Israel and the Muslim terrorists pretending to be a Palestinian state.

Why is this being discussed by anyone?

There is no question that Palestine is a myth.  It is load of nonsense created by stupid politicians and diplomats to give the appearance national identity to a specific mob of believers in the religion of conquest, plunder, and murder.  The fact is the every so-called nation on Earth that is ruled by Muslims was conquered from the lawful inhabitants.  And that every Muslim living now is the descendant of a conqueror or and a collaborator who converted to Islam.

The only rational policy that can be followed by the United States is the complete support of the State of Israel in their efforts to provide security the land and their people.

If by some miracle or serious hard work I were actually elected to the office of President, and the policy proposed by John Kerry were in place, the orders to the troops on the ground will be to secure the base areas until contact is made with the IDF and then to support the IDF as possible in their effort to re-establish true security over the West Bank and Gaza areas.

The fact is that the areas of the West Bank and Gaza properly belong to the people of Israel and not to descendants of the conquerors and collaborators.

Wakeup Call

I went to bed, and then I woke up and checked the web.  On Pamela Geller's Atlas Shruggs 2000 site I found the report of the twin suicide bombings in Sochi, the site of this year's Winter Olympic Games.

In the article one of the jihadists is quoted as saying:

"Why should we follow those Christian commandments, when Allah, may he be glorified, urges us to fight those kafirs [infidels]?” he added. “Why shouldn’t we leave their children orphans?"

Why indeed?

The doctrine of Islam denies that Human Life is the basic value of a real moral code.  Why then should a true Muslim NOT murder anyone at whim? The true Muslim has no real moral values.  The true Muslim is promised entry into the eternal whorehouse of Allah and supply of eternal victims to placate his most base carnal desires. 

From an Agnostic view: Rational men have identified God as the first and foremost of rational beings.  From this position rational men seek to join God in his community and to this tries to identify the means of doing so.  This the basis of the Western Monotheist Tradition. (WMT)

Furthermore in the WMT each man is responsible for and in control of his own life.  He must by his own thoughts and actions follow the correct path to enter the Community of God. Attempts by some rulers to enforce a vision of "righteousness" upon his subjects runs counter to reality and are doomed to failure.

In many Polytheist traditions Man is deemed to be the property of one or more deities.  Man exists solely to serve the deities and may be used or even killed in accordance to the doctrine of the religion.  Man is not held to comply with real laws enacted to protect the life and property of other persons.  Man must instead obey the commandments of the deities who claim ownership over him. 

Into this cognitive environment Mohammed inserted the doctrine of Islam.  Islam was a theological fraud created to recruit a mob of criminals to enforce his will upon the vast sea of victims. 

Mohammed recycled a pagan deity as his substitute for the god as identified in the WMT.  To recruit the criminals required to commit his greater crimes Mohammed promised his followers the eternal gratification of the basest sensual desires.  Here the real criminal acts are elevated to the moral position of right.

As a result where the doctrine of Islam rules there is savagery and enforced poverty in the place of the social peace and prosperity of the civilized nations.

Because the doctrine of Islam fully denies the Rights of Man and the laws enacted to protect those rights those who practice this false faith have no place in any civilization.  And in fact have no place in existence.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

On The Subject Of Islam

I will start with a real news report:

Judge imposes maximum 15-year prison sentences for Alabama-hatched terrorism plot

MOBILE, Alabama  –  Citing a lack of remorse and a failure to renounce their intentions to commit violent jihad abroad, a federal judge Friday sentenced a pair of silent men to the maximum punishment for a plot hatched in Alabama.

Randy “Rasheed” Wilson and Mohammad Abdul Rahman Abukhdair, both 26, will spend 15 years in prison for conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and then will be supervised by the U.S. Probation Office for three years.

U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose said she read hundreds of pages of recorded conversations and intercepted emails from the defendants and searched for evidence that they were “just talking a big game.” And, she added that she had reserved judgment, hoping they would renounce their intentions.

“Unfortunately, there is no other reasonable conclusion that (their conversations) were for the primary purpose of committing violent jihad,” she said. “I don’t have to speculate about that.”

As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:  

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.

It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.

As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.

The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.

And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.

Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?

A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.

A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.

This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.

Finally I must thank Robert Spencer, it was through his works that I gained a fundamental knowledge of the nature of Islam.  And I must thank Pamela Geller for bringing the original article to my attention.

Sunday

I had a plan to update my post from yesterday.  But I'm not finished with it.

The truth really sucks sometimes, but one has to say it, no matter what.  It's just going to take me longer to think on the full facts before I could publish them.

Remember, I'm not the greatest or worst man in history.  I'm just me.

Les