The Life Program

Anti-fracking protestors attach themselves to gas pumps in England.

What will they do next?

The fundamental premise of the Environmentalist or the Green Movement is that Human Life and thus Human Action is evil.   Although a mere handful of Green "thinkers" have come out for the complete extinction of Man many activists are content with simply striking a pose by physically interfering with rational men.  And some pro-communist politicians, who are already pushing the Death Program in their nations, have added to their anti-human postures by adopting Green positions.

The Life Program is easy to understand.  The Human Life is where persons with active rational minds are by right are free to use their knowledge to create real things of value for themselves in the real world.  Real Governments are established to protect people on the Life Program.

The Death Program is the exact opposite.  But being elected on the Death Program is effectively impossible.  As an alternative advantage is taken of those who have been taught the doctrine of Altruism.  That a person exists to be used by others without their consent.

Can there be compromise with The Death Program?

No.

Ayn Rand answered this question by stating that to mix food and poison always results in poisoning.

Any questions?

One Line Campaign Promise

And here it is:

BARRY SOETERO also known as, BARRACK OBAMA, has a great deal to answer for, and as your actually elected President I WILL see to it that he does!

Good Night.

Kamikaze?

Where Do I Stand?

Dr. Walter Williams has published a short article on Investors.co, the website of Investors Business Daily.  In this article Dr. Williams points out several instances in the 18th Century where a president had vetoed bills for charitable spending on the grounds that there was no Constitutional authority for charity.

In the current day things have changed for the worse.  Taxpayers are now expected to carry the burdens imposed by the Congress at the urgings of the mob of Lobbyists.  To refuse to to so would be an act of political suicide.  Thus John Bohener and the so-called leadership of the Republican Party have chosen to stand with the Washington Nomenklatura.  He has chosen to stand against the Tea Party, the citizens who can no longer carry the burdens that are imposed on them.

In the past many citizens went along with the program because it was expected of them.  They were taught that it was right to politically shift the burdens of life from the non-producers to the productive.  This in turn was a consequence of being educated in the Progressive Era.

But the fact is that virtually all of the spending that is declared to be entitlements is in fact simply a bribe to some voters paid for at the expense of others.  Drop the so-called entitlements from the budgets of the Federal government and of the states and the burden becomes manageable, if not actually tolerable.

 So how do I fit into this?

In October of 2013 I was barely getting by as a taxi driver in Minneapolis. In fact I had just signed up at a temporary labor service in order to work on the one day of the week that all taxi drivers were legally required to take off from driving.

But one day I went to bed and about a month later I woke up as I was being transferred from one hospital to another.  My Mother was with me for the transfer. I was not able to move and I was barely able to speak.

I had come down with pneumonia at home and had a heart attack while unconscious at the original hospital.  It had taken me another  three months to relern how to walk and speak clearly again.

I was told that it cost half a million dollars to save my life.

When I finally left the hospital I was no longer able to drive a taxi cab or perform any other proper work.  Even though I am working on writing one or more novels I am now living in public housing in Minneapolis and receiving payments for Social Security Disability.

But, as some people would point out, I should be collecting on the funds I paid into the Social Security system when i was working.  I am entitled to it.

In reality the Social Security system was set up as a Ponzi Scheme.  Current workers would pay into the system to cover the benefits paid to current retirees.  The current workers would be paid by the input made by the next generation of workers.

The scheme assumed that there be a continued rise in the working population as well as economic growth.  But population has leveled out and the insane policies of the Democratic Party and especially the Obama Administration have brought out nation to the brink of collaspe.

Now in normal politics my state of dependency of the system should have meant that I would have no choice but to vote for the continuance of it.  On this point I did actually thought of committing suicide.

Of the other hand I had decided that even though I was now dependent on the system I would work towards dismantling it.

But the current situation has opened up a possible new course for me.  Boehner and the GOP establishment's continuing appeasement of Barack Obama and the Democrats has essentially made them the junior branch of the de-facto Bipartisan Party.  To fill the gap left by this effective merger I decided to stand for the office of President of the United States.

And as I'm already living on the public dime I may as well earn it.

As had been pointed out before to run on a rational platform of spending and tax reduction would be to a professional politician and act of suicide.  My intent is to correct this.  I will also bring the Federal Government back into full compliance to the Constitution.

And if I, or a better person, do not succeed in this neither I, nor the United States of America will have a future.


(Yes, the title is a reference to an episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus.  The reference to the Bipartisan Party is a deliberate nod to the film Death Race 2000.  No, I do not intend to "score" on President Barack Obama.  I caved in the front end of my favorite car, a Mercury Tracer, by hitting a deer of half his mass on US 65 south of Albert Lea, Minnesota.)

Paul Ryan For President

My answer to the question of should Paul Ryan be elected to the office of President of The United States, is not only NO, but HELL NO!

News Busters reported the following:

On the final installment of PBS’s Inside Washington Friday, host Gordon Peterson asked his panelists who they thought would be elected president in 2016.

Rather surprisingly, the Washington Post’s Colby King said, “Paul Ryan because the Democratic nominee will never be able to replicate what Barack Obama has done, never bring out that base”

Let us examine the recent history of Paul Ryan.

During the campaign for the office of Vice President Ryan had stated that he was inspired by reading Atlas Shrugged to pursue a life of public service.  While this was clearly intended to draw in members of the Tea Party Movement, who are generally influenced by the writings on Ayn Rand -- especially Atlas Shrugged -- even the rational view of the current government is that of a problem to be solved. Furthermore, when his claim of being influenced by Ayn Rand was shown to be inconsistent with his continued practice of the Roman Catholic faith, and thus the continuation and growth of the welfare state, he immediately backed off of the claim of Objectivist influence.

Paul Ryan had very clearly demonstrated himself to be a political office seeker as usual.

Paul Ryan had recently negotiated, in concert with Democratic representative Patty Murray, a deal on the Federal budget that included tax increases and cuts in benefits to veterans of the Armed Forces. In this Paul Ryan had clearly demonstrated that he was a full member of the Washington ruling class.

In short, Paul Ryan is part of the problem.

Were Paul Ryan to elected in 2016 I would fully expect him to continue the present GOP practice of compromising with Democratic Party and to keep the seat warm for the next totalitarian Ubermensch to come in 2020.  

Nothing will be achieved.  No problems will be solved.  And we will not see a return of the Federal Government to full compliance to The Constitution.

In contrast my goal as President will be to restore the right of Americans to live by their own reason in the real world.

RIGHTS, REASON, REALITY.  Remember that.

Announcement

As I write this a full moon is setting to the west.

A friend recently suggested that I stand for the office of President of the United States.  After giving the concept some thought I have decided to do so.

My fundamental goal as President will be to restore complete compliance of the Federal Government to the Constitution and the complete sovereignty of our nation with respect to the transnational order.

And I fully look forward to interaction with the Fourth Estate:

Reporter: Mr. Bates, how do you as a Christian Conservative justify your opposition to Social Justice?

Candidate LB: Good question.  Have you thought of asking an actual Christian Conservative?

Reporter: What?

Candidate LB: I stopped believing in the Western Monotheist Tradition over four decades ago.  I have made no secret of my disbelief since that time.  Even when I enlisted in the United States Army during the administration of President Ronald Reagan.

In light of this answer the reporter would have to engage in actual thought in order to respond.

Regardless of the outcome I fully expect to have fun.