Question

What part of "Never Again" does a hoplophobe activist not understand?

Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.  There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.

Comment

A few minutes ago I posted this in the comments section of The Underground Bunker:

A few minutes ago as I write this an ignorant narcissist posted the following on this otherwise sane blog:

"Just shows how many fucked up people are right here in the USA. Who needs cults like ISIS when we have our American Taliban, gun nuts, Trump supporters, Planned Parenthood bombers/shooters, young boys all full of murderous fantasies, etc. Most of the above, lest I forget, are white Americans. The era of Timothy McVeighs has arrived. Everyone load up on weapons this holiday season. That will keep us all safe."

I could say a number of things about this post but I would be missing the point.  Not only is this individual a collectivist he is a racial collectivist as well. He defines a person by their race and imparts beliefs and actions on them solely on that basis.

Racial characteristics are not chosen and therefore irrelevant to human actions. What is subject to choice is a person’s beliefs and the actions derived from those beliefs. And for the record McVeigh himself was a racial collectivist who rejected human rights and human reason. As a result he rejected human reality. The actual Patriot Movement at that time fully rejected McVeigh, his beliefs, and his actions. This rejection was based on the actual moral values that were actually chosen.

And speaking of language the words “gun nut” is a pejorative term used to dehumanize a firearms owner and justify lethal acts of state violence against them.

This poster apparently feels good about his own murderous fantasies. Given what Hubbard wrote in his work the Science of Survival he should feel right at home in the Church of Scientology.

Update 0115:

According to the Daily Mail the San Bernardino shooting appears to be another case of the Sudden Jihad Syndrome.  Of course this won't stop The Big Zero and those who orally gratify him from demanding the systematic disarming of the citizens of United States and the subsequent death toll.

Update 0400:

Someone on the Underground Bunker posted a disagreement and stated that I missed the sarcasm.

I replied:

I have to disagree with you there. When anyone calls me, a Caucasian American gun owner, a murderer I take it seriously. When someone denies my very humanity I take it very seriously. Dehumanization of a specific population is historically a necessary step preceding the act of mass murder.

Am I paranoid? Perhaps I am. But I would rather be a live paranoid than a dead victim.

Rant Of The Day

Mark Urbin has passed along this keyboard dropping:

Now why would anyone make such a depraved statement?

For those who value Power for material sustenance the disobedience of their victims is a death sentence.  Even for the above quoted barbarian who uses Power to obtain a spiritual value--such as a warm fuzzy feeling--the moral independence of the armed citizen is a mortal affront.

Citizens have absolutely no use for Savages.

Update 1000:

 While at the local supermarket this morning I saw a copy of the latest edition of Mother Jones magazine*.  The cover story was an endorsement of the socialist twit from Vermont.

The fact is that given the performance of the The Big Zero in office the only way any Democrat will ever be elected to the office of president will be through the votes of the functionally brain dead and the actually dead**.  Should this actually happen there will be another civil war and it won't be like the gentlemanly affair conducted by President Lincoln.***


*Seriously? That Marxist rag is still being published?

** Such as in Chicago and other urban black holes of the Democratic Party.  (And for the brain death cases who want to scream "racism" a Black Hole is a dead star that is so massive that the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light.)

*** Who unlike The Big Zero had actaual moral authority.

Absence Of Moss Or Brains

Rolling Stone magazine has posted a list of the five most dangerous firearms in America.

They are:

1. Pistols

2. Revolvers

3. Rifles

4. Shotguns

5. Derringers

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/pictures/the-5-most-dangerous-guns-in-america-20140714/pistols-0108072

I've barely begun to read the comments.  If I were a betting man I would lay a bet on long it be before the article is removed out of embarrassment.

Assuming of course the folks at the Rolling Stone are capable of such.

Speaking Of Ignorance

For about a decade my favorite novel was Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein.

Why?

In the narrative Heinlein laid out a system for assuring that the citizens, the political authority of the Terran Federation, actually knew what they were doing and the reason for the procedures followed.  This was because authority in any field of human endeavor is founded on knowledge of that field.  Thus political authority is founded on political knowledge.

In the following image released by a hoplophobe group established by former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg they demonstrate their knowledge and thus authority to speak on the subject of firearms:

  

As they clearly demonstrate they have no functional knowledge of firearms and thus no authority to speak on the subject at all.

 The fact is that the personal weapon is the fundamental instrument of political authority, to disarm the citizen is to render him politically irrelevant.  Thus is a free nation the attempt to disarm the citizens is in practical effect an act of treason, and as such is properly punished by the penalty of death.

What are your questions? 

Dr. Ray also has something to say about this bit of art.