Thoughts For The Day

Power isn't a value.

A right of the individual is a restraint upon the powers of government and society as a whole. Which is perfectly all right for those of us who are rational and productive.  But to those who irrationally choose parasitism as their mode of existence an individual right is like staring at the muzzle of a shotgun that is aimed at their own heads.

Because a rational individual cannot be expected to willfully consent to having a parasite living continually at their expense, the parasite must resort to force and fraud in order to sustain its own life.  Thus the parasite tend to favor dictatorships, with a fully functional apparatus of censorship and repression, over free societies with governments that are accountable to the citizens.

To the parasite, power over the productive is life.

Any restraint on that power, be it the freedom of speech and press, the rights to self defense and to bear arms, or the process of democratic election, is a danger to the parasite's continued existence.   Thus the parasite must oppose tyrannicide, the liberation of the oppressed peoples, and the establishment of free republics.

On the issue of violent crime it appears that the sympathies of parasites are not with the victims but are with the criminals, thus they publicly object to the execution of a quadruple murderer but care nothing about his victims.

How could any rational person not be disgusted by such antics?

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.

I once said that Racial Collectivism sucks.  I still believe this.

John Dewey, who laid out the public school system in the United States, was a closet socialist who was working towards the indoctrination of subsequent generations of Americans into accepting the doctrine of Socialism over the rational and free nation that was originally founded and they were born in.

Thoughts For The Day

If anything should've been learned from from The Century Of Death (a.k.a The 20th Century) it's that cowardice isn't an option.

The election of Donald Trump (as well as Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan) was a rejection of the will of The Left.  If they cant live without power over us, then we as Americans will see to it that they wont.

Public education in the United States was designed by the closet communists of the so called Progressive Movement to indoctrinate Young Americans into becoming drones in their future communist collective.  If the bloody red banner of Communism is ever raised over this great nation its because The Left had a part in making it happen.

 The unavoidable fact of reality is that the self-styled "peace activist" isn't a morally superior being, he or she is a willing accomplice to conquest, slavery, and mass murder. They're an active hazard to human life.  Or in an ancient tongue: hostis humani generis, an enemy of mankind in general.  In my view killing a so-called peace activist isn't an act of murder.  It's a morally necessary homicide carried out in defense of self, of one's family, of one's nation, and of Humanity in General.

Just because your holy book says that someone with a particular characteristic should be thrown off a building shouldn't mean you should do it.

The photographs of Tank Man usually published show him blocking a platoon of tanks.  He actually blocked a battalion of tanks.

 (Images by Mark Urbin)

A Fact

History is being forgotten and repeated.

If the United States had a real educational system instead of the trash left behind by John Dewey, Socialism would be identified as the most toxic ideology of the last century.  Comrade Che was the piece of excrement Comrade Castro put in charge of murdering opponents of the revolution.  Che shirts wouldn’t be worn.  Wearing a Che shirt in America is as disgusting as wearing a Heinrich Himmler shirt in Israel.  Killing a Marxist isn’t an act of murder.  Killing a Marxist is an act of self defense.

Proposal Of The Day

Yesterday I repeated my proposal for a 28th Amendment to the Constitution and proposed a 29th Amendment.  Today I shall propose the 30th Amendment:

AMENDMENT XXX

Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Now why would I propose this?

At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general.  Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States.  But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement.  In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore.  When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school.

In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.

Go ahead, ask some questions.