All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that's been raised in the past is why I don't
call for a ban on Islam or Scientology by name?
A name's only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears
to be internally forbidden to change the doctrines of Islam or
Scientology, the doctrines
also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.
Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim or a Scientologist
will occur. It's by
identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam or Scientology that we can properly
exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental
attribute of the doctrines of Islam or Scientology is the denial of real
laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the
real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid
Mohammed and Hubbard opened the door to the commission of a multitude of
crimes --
including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by
Mohammed and Hubbard and for their own personal benefit.
This action's absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality
The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of
legislation. In reality Islam and Scientology have to go. And in order
for us to live a
properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive
role in defending our rights and the collaborators need to be dealt with
as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment