Your president is someone who unleashes you to murder anyone you want! President Trump won't allow that. He wouldn't allow you to kill anyone you want. You're just another murderer who wants to kill without a proper consequence.
The Blog Of Leslie Bates
The doctrine of Totalitarianism holds Human life in absolute contempt and sees people as things to be used or destroyed. Over the last decades Totalitarians have enslaved numerous nations and murdered tens of millions of people. Surrender to such people, regardless of the circumstances is simply not an option.
Civilized society can't tolerate predatory and destructive behavior by groups and individuals within it. There can't be any possible excuse for robbery, murder, or any other form of predatory behavior.
Racial characteristics aren’t chosen and therefore should be irrelevant to human actions. What’s subject to choice is a person’s beliefs and the actions derived from those beliefs. For the record McVeigh himself was a Racial Collectivist who rejected human rights and human reason. As a result he rejected human reality. The actual Patriot Movement at that time fully rejected McVeigh, his beliefs, and his actions. This rejection was based on the actual moral values that were actually chosen.
Members of Black Lives Matter believe they're victims
and practice Racial Collectivism. Gee, Gosh, Wow, where have we've seen
this belief before? If Black Lives Matter wants to practice Racial
Collectivism. Let's treat them as Racial
Collectivists. In the Nuremberg fashion, hang them from the neck until
dead. Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead
canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough. Antisemitism is a
subset of Racial Collectivism. We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of
Racial Collectivism. We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial
Collectivist group that it actually is. We have to see that Antisemitism
is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem. So when someone attacks
Jews they're attacking all of us. Antisemitism is a clear sign that all
of Humanity is being attacked. Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't
be a radical idea.
The Statist leader refuses to be subject to any legal restraints nor do they pay heed to any superior authority. Their victims, those persons who're to be subjected to their whims must be silenced and disarmed. This is nothing new the military arm, be it a sword, a pike or a firearm, is the symbol and instrument of political authority. The citizens of a free nation armed and ready to defend their lives and liberties have a commanding voice which a politician may ignore only at their peril. Augustus Caesar understood this when he depoliticized the citizen body of the Roman Republic by replacing the citizen militia based army of the republic with a mercenary force loyal to himself.
Democracy is the form of state that claims unlimited power from a
mandate from an unlimited mass.
For those who desire absolute power Democracy is an ideal form of the
state. But in Reality authority in any area is based on actual
knowledge in
that field. Thus political authority must be based on knowledge in the
field of politics. But in the democratic form of the state the voter
isn't required to know anything on the subject of ethics, or politics, or
in the case of Chicago to actually exist.
So why should we as Americans be subject to the will of Democrats?
WE SHOULD NOT.
Democrats in general have shown that they aren't at all concerned about
the actual facts of Reality. Nor are they concerned about the
consequences of their actions. That we'll suffer and die as a result
of their actions means absolutely nothing to them.
So why should we submit to them let alone allow them to exist?
WE SHOULD NOT AT ALL.
There's no such thing as a valid excuse.
This editorial was originally published in the Winter 1995 issue (Volume I, Number 3) of THE RESISTER.
This
editorial explains why I and a number of other rational citizens of the
American Republic will not quietly submit to the whims of the God-Kings foisted upon us by the mob of Depraved-Americans,
Corrupt-Americans, Stupid-Americans, Ignorant-Americans,
Deceased-Americans, and Imaginary-Americans.
From this view of the subject, it may be concluded, that a pure Democracy, by which I mean a society, consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will in almost every case, be felt by the majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property, and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
--Publius (James Madison), The Federalist X, 1787
If I've a complaint about The Republican Party it's that they've shown godlike patience with the behavior of The Democratic Party. Democrats can assault in public those who won't submit to them, destroy property, call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, the murder of elected officials who're carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and they'll not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a Democrat. I once told an editor that I worked for that we needn't rhetorically dehumanize our opponents all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they've by their own choice dehumanized themselves.
I've proposed starting a new political party.
If The Republican Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will
have no choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make
changes and restore a rational system of government. Revolutions (real
revolutions, not Marxist ones) happen because the government fails to
function. We in the United States are stuck with two political parties. The leadership of
one party is insane and the leadership of the other party simply doesn't
care. Rank and file members now call establishment members a bunch of Vichy Republicans.
Perhaps its time to start a new political party. Is a new political party possible?
The answer is, I don’t know.
The opponents of chattel slavery proceeded even with public opposition. We, as opponents of political power, have to. We
need to treat exercises of political power, such as censorship, as
crimes against Humanity. We need to treat bans on firearms and free
speech as the anti-Human acts that they actually are. Our political
elites have apparently forgotten the lesson taught by our original civil
war, that banning freedom doesn’t work. Our political elites tried to
ban the voluntary consumption of alcohol, it didn’t work. Our political
elites tried to ban the voluntary consumption of hard drugs, it doesn’t
work. Our political elites will try to ban the voluntary ownership of
firearms and freedom of speech, it will never work. Our politicians are supposed to do a specific job and they aren't doing
it. We have to start a new political party to go around them. We
don't have a choice.
Let's call our new party the Freedom Party.
Will the Freedom Party replace the Democratic Party?
I don't think so. What's more likely is that the Freedom Party will replace the Republican Party just like the Republicans replaced the Whigs.