Wakeup Call

I went to bed, and then I woke up and checked the web.  On Pamela Geller's Atlas Shruggs 2000 site I found the report of the twin suicide bombings in Sochi, the site of this year's Winter Olympic Games.

In the article one of the jihadists is quoted as saying:

"Why should we follow those Christian commandments, when Allah, may he be glorified, urges us to fight those kafirs [infidels]?” he added. “Why shouldn’t we leave their children orphans?"

Why indeed?

The doctrine of Islam denies that Human Life is the basic value of a real moral code.  Why then should a true Muslim NOT murder anyone at whim? The true Muslim has no real moral values.  The true Muslim is promised entry into the eternal whorehouse of Allah and supply of eternal victims to placate his most base carnal desires. 

From an Agnostic view: Rational men have identified God as the first and foremost of rational beings.  From this position rational men seek to join God in his community and to this tries to identify the means of doing so.  This the basis of the Western Monotheist Tradition. (WMT)

Furthermore in the WMT each man is responsible for and in control of his own life.  He must by his own thoughts and actions follow the correct path to enter the Community of God. Attempts by some rulers to enforce a vision of "righteousness" upon his subjects runs counter to reality and are doomed to failure.

In many Polytheist traditions Man is deemed to be the property of one or more deities.  Man exists solely to serve the deities and may be used or even killed in accordance to the doctrine of the religion.  Man is not held to comply with real laws enacted to protect the life and property of other persons.  Man must instead obey the commandments of the deities who claim ownership over him. 

Into this cognitive environment Mohammed inserted the doctrine of Islam.  Islam was a theological fraud created to recruit a mob of criminals to enforce his will upon the vast sea of victims. 

Mohammed recycled a pagan deity as his substitute for the god as identified in the WMT.  To recruit the criminals required to commit his greater crimes Mohammed promised his followers the eternal gratification of the basest sensual desires.  Here the real criminal acts are elevated to the moral position of right.

As a result where the doctrine of Islam rules there is savagery and enforced poverty in the place of the social peace and prosperity of the civilized nations.

Because the doctrine of Islam fully denies the Rights of Man and the laws enacted to protect those rights those who practice this false faith have no place in any civilization.  And in fact have no place in existence.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

New Years Day

Tuesday, the eve of the new year, shall be a day to kick back relax and think.  It will be a day to shrug off the burdens placed upon us by the God-King and the Nomenklatura. 

And it will be a day to remember:

Freddy Mercury was a real performer.  I simply cannot see him wearing a "Madonna-mike" headset on stage.

The problems we face as a nation are the result of the pressure placed on us by the self-appointed rulers.  Because  the rulers have no real authority they will be discarded and left behind in the refuse of history.

Until then. have a Happy New Year.

About Monday

Monday was basically a maintenance day.  A day for taking care of a medical issue.

And the local weather and street traffic was awful as well.

And I need to work on my typing too.

A Statement On Foreign Policy

Let me make one point absolutely clear.  Any state or non-state entity that makes war on the United States of America during my term in office will be defeated and will NEVER have the means to make war again.  If that requires the use of NUCLEAR WEAPONS then I will do so.

If I find it necessary the aggressors will be eliminated from existence.  Permanently.

Glenn Beck and David Barton on our first foreign war against a Non-European power.  The War on the Barbary Pirates:

I learned about this war in a used history text that I found being given away by a school library.  This war was not covered in any history course I attended at Edison High School in Minneapolis.

So much for public education.

Seriously, do yourself a service and do a search for the Wars Against the Barbary Pirates.  This is a clear lesson on how to deal with aggressors in general, and Islamic Terrorists in particular.

Video Update

Doriangrey1 had posted the following video on his (or possibly her, no insult intended) blog:

The disarmament of The People only benefits the criminals.  It benefits those within The State by intent.  And it benefits those outside of apparatus of The State by accident.

The claim that members of the public will be protected by their own disarmament is an absolute lie.  And disarming the citizens of the nation is clearly an act of treason.

On The Impeachment Of Barack Obama

As I wrote yesterday there is no question that Barack Obama is unfit to hold any elected office.  And certainly not the office of President of the United States.  [LINK HERE]  Simply on the basis of his beliefs it is clear that he must be removed from office.  Furthermore he has clearly demonstrated in action his absolute contempt for the lives and other rights of Americans.  Given that the fundamental task of the President is the uphold and defend the lives and rights of each person and The People as a whole this is absolutely wrong.

Barack Obama must be removed from the office of President of the United States.

To avoid an armed overthrow of the federal government the authors of our Constitution created the process of impeachment.  Within living memory this procedure was attempted during the terms of William Clinton.  But instead of indicting and trying him for a serious offense, such as the Waco Massacre, he was instead prosecuted for an act of purgery when testifying of an adultery literally committed in the Oval Office.

The indictment and subsequent trial of William Clinton was a virtual joke.

As with Clinton there are clear grounds to believe that Barack Obama has committed multiple impeachable offenses.  Blogger Doriangrey1 has created the list of Obama's violations of violations of The Constitution alone that qualify as grounds for impeachment. [LINK HERE]

So what is the hold up?

One problem, which clearly appeared during the Impeachment of William Clinton, was the solidarity of the Democratic Party.  The DP delegation in the Senate voted on a straight party line.  In my opinion the absurdity of the indictment was a clear factor in allowing the DP to vote as it did.

In the hope of heading off a lawful removal of Barack Obama the Democratic National Committee has sent out an e-mail explicitly promising that the party will be be in lock step support of their leader. [LINK HERE]  Furthermore, the caucus of the GOP in the House appears to be more concerned with cooperating with the DP in order to bring home the Pork to their constituents than with doing their clearly defined duties with respect to the Constitution.  The absolute first priority is to remove Barack Obama from the office to which he is now disqualified.

There is simply no excuse for not doing so.

I will now state it in all capital letters in a bold typeface in a blockquote:

THE FIRST AND ONLY MISSION OF THE CONGRESS AT THIS TIME IS THE LAWFUL REMOVAL OF BARACK OBAMA FROM THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

 For the Congress at this time there is no other duty and no other morally valid option.  The refusal to carry out this Constitutionally mandated procedure will clearly result in the Congress being identified as willing accessories to the clearly criminal acts of Barack Obama.  As a result WE THE PEOPLE will identify as treat the Congress as a fundamental part of the problem and will include them in the solution.

That is my statement on the subject for today.

(Some reader may have already noticed  that I refused to address Barack Obama by the title of his office.  That is because he was never fit to hold the office.)

Real Problem In The Real World

Barack Obama, the stone age god-king presently occupying our White House, has declared that our nation has a problem, the inequality of income.

In reality the difference in personal incomes is the result of differences in human actions.  This includes differences in knowledge and effort for each individual.  Differences in economic income is simply a natural consequence of the differences of each person's actions in the economic sphere of action.

The desire on the part of our god-king and his followers to ignore the reality of natural differences in  actions is similar to their insistence on ignoring the changes in the planetary environment that occur as a result of natural processes.

The fact is that within living memory the state of economic equality was enforced upon a nation.

In 1975 in the wake of the fall of Saigon to the North Vietnamese Army, the Khemer Rouge, a Communist faction took power in Cambodia.  The result was nothing less than horrible.  In order to enforce a state of material equality upon their victims the KR murdered anyone anyone who had any ability above that of a peasant farmer.  They even murdered those they suspected of being able to read.  Entire families where broken up and children were ordered to murder their own parents.

By the time the NVA invaded in 1979 one third of the people of Cambodia had been directly murdered or starved to death as a result of KR policies.

For the God-King Barack Obama to obtain a similar result, to recreate the killing fields, in the United States he and his followers would have to murder roughly ninety percent of our people.

For someone to wish a massacre upon us clearly indicates his absolute unfitness to the hold the office of President of the United States.

Barack Obama must go now!

Attention

I have resumed my membership in the National Rifle Association, which I allowed to lapse due to financial conditions.  I have also have answered their National Gun Owners Action Survey.

The twelve questions with my answers are.

1. Do you agree that the Second Amendment to our United States Constitution guarantees your individual right to own a gun and that the Second Amendment is just as important you other constitutional rights.
  
Yes.
  
2. Should the federal government have the power to tell you how many firearms you’re allowed to own?

No.

3. Should the federal government have the power to ban you from purchasing a handgun?

No.

4. Do you support a national gun registration system allowing federal government officials to keep track of all your firearm purchases.

No.

5. Do you oppose the United Nations gun ban treaty that would give international bureaucrats the power to dictate firearms policy here in the United States.

Yes.

6. Should the United States Senate deny confirmation to any U.S. Supreme Court nominee who refuses to affirm that the Second Amendment protects a fundamental individual right?

Yes.

7. In your view, should law-abiding citizens like you be allowed to sell or give your firearms to family members without being under the thumb of the federal government?

Yes.

8. Do you think the federal government should ban standard-capacity magazines that hold than 10 rounds of ammunition?

No.

Do you think that the federal government should once again impose a ban on semi-auto firearms.

No.

10. Would you knowingly elect a member of the U.S. House or Senate who supports the Obama gun-ban agenda?

No.

11. Will you authorize the NRA to use your survey answers to fight for your fundamental rights at the federal level and in your state legislature?

Yes.

12. Will you help fight for your freedom by by joining the NRA today?

Yes.

All of the these questions should have been no-brainers.  But the fact that some of the questions have been asked may indicate a willingness to compromise on some of the issues as deemed necessary.

All ten articles of the Bill Of Rights establish without question the primacy and authority of the People over the federal government.

While over the course of the last century and a half real progress has been made to establishing the legal equality of all persons without regard to race or gender.  The so-called Progressive movement has negated all real progress by reversing the relationship between the People and the governments of our nation and the states.  The federal and various state governments have assumed the role of master while the People are condemned to the status of livestock.

This must end now. 

Furthermore, the establishment and continued membership in the United Nations Organization is clearly wrong.

As Ayn Rand has pointed out, allowing the Soviet Union into an organization is clearly a mistake.  This only served the goals of the USSR.

We have a lot of work to do to correct these errors.

Kamikaze?

Where Do I Stand?

Dr. Walter Williams has published a short article on Investors.co, the website of Investors Business Daily.  In this article Dr. Williams points out several instances in the 18th Century where a president had vetoed bills for charitable spending on the grounds that there was no Constitutional authority for charity.

In the current day things have changed for the worse.  Taxpayers are now expected to carry the burdens imposed by the Congress at the urgings of the mob of Lobbyists.  To refuse to to so would be an act of political suicide.  Thus John Bohener and the so-called leadership of the Republican Party have chosen to stand with the Washington Nomenklatura.  He has chosen to stand against the Tea Party, the citizens who can no longer carry the burdens that are imposed on them.

In the past many citizens went along with the program because it was expected of them.  They were taught that it was right to politically shift the burdens of life from the non-producers to the productive.  This in turn was a consequence of being educated in the Progressive Era.

But the fact is that virtually all of the spending that is declared to be entitlements is in fact simply a bribe to some voters paid for at the expense of others.  Drop the so-called entitlements from the budgets of the Federal government and of the states and the burden becomes manageable, if not actually tolerable.

 So how do I fit into this?

In October of 2013 I was barely getting by as a taxi driver in Minneapolis. In fact I had just signed up at a temporary labor service in order to work on the one day of the week that all taxi drivers were legally required to take off from driving.

But one day I went to bed and about a month later I woke up as I was being transferred from one hospital to another.  My Mother was with me for the transfer. I was not able to move and I was barely able to speak.

I had come down with pneumonia at home and had a heart attack while unconscious at the original hospital.  It had taken me another  three months to relern how to walk and speak clearly again.

I was told that it cost half a million dollars to save my life.

When I finally left the hospital I was no longer able to drive a taxi cab or perform any other proper work.  Even though I am working on writing one or more novels I am now living in public housing in Minneapolis and receiving payments for Social Security Disability.

But, as some people would point out, I should be collecting on the funds I paid into the Social Security system when i was working.  I am entitled to it.

In reality the Social Security system was set up as a Ponzi Scheme.  Current workers would pay into the system to cover the benefits paid to current retirees.  The current workers would be paid by the input made by the next generation of workers.

The scheme assumed that there be a continued rise in the working population as well as economic growth.  But population has leveled out and the insane policies of the Democratic Party and especially the Obama Administration have brought out nation to the brink of collaspe.

Now in normal politics my state of dependency of the system should have meant that I would have no choice but to vote for the continuance of it.  On this point I did actually thought of committing suicide.

Of the other hand I had decided that even though I was now dependent on the system I would work towards dismantling it.

But the current situation has opened up a possible new course for me.  Boehner and the GOP establishment's continuing appeasement of Barack Obama and the Democrats has essentially made them the junior branch of the de-facto Bipartisan Party.  To fill the gap left by this effective merger I decided to stand for the office of President of the United States.

And as I'm already living on the public dime I may as well earn it.

As had been pointed out before to run on a rational platform of spending and tax reduction would be to a professional politician and act of suicide.  My intent is to correct this.  I will also bring the Federal Government back into full compliance to the Constitution.

And if I, or a better person, do not succeed in this neither I, nor the United States of America will have a future.


(Yes, the title is a reference to an episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus.  The reference to the Bipartisan Party is a deliberate nod to the film Death Race 2000.  No, I do not intend to "score" on President Barack Obama.  I caved in the front end of my favorite car, a Mercury Tracer, by hitting a deer of half his mass on US 65 south of Albert Lea, Minnesota.)

A Real Christmas Message From Jerusalem

This is a Christmas message from Prime Mister Benyamin Natanyahu.

Thanks to Pamela Geller at Atlas Scruggs 2000.  (It won't link directly from You Tube. Why?)

Below the Video Greeting there is the image of the card sent out by The Big Zero from the White House:

There is no mention of the concept of Christmas.

To put this in a fuller context, even Objectivists explicitly celebrate Christmas as a proper holiday.  Here is Doctor Harry Binswanger and his wife Jean and their holiday greeting:

The fact is that Jerusalem remains one of the centers of  our global civilization.  On the other hand the city of Washington is clearly in the hands of barbarians.

Again, Merry Christmas.

Another Anniversary

Yesterday was the anniversary of George Washington's Raid on Trenton, New Jersey.  In this operation a brigade sized force, including hoses and cannon, was put across the Delaware River. 

The raid should have been seriously contested if not an actual failure.  A Loyalist had observed the crossing and went to Trenton to report it.  A note was written and given to the commander of the Hessian regiment stationed in the town.  Colonel Rall placed the note in his coat pocket and returned to his ongoing card game.  When the battle properly began he was one of the Hessian dead.

It really helps when the opponent is being stupid.

If our opposition continues to ignore reality we may a chance of taking back our nation.

Anniversary

On this day in 1991 the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was formally dissolved.

Groan!

Christmas Day is supposed to be a day of rest.  Of course back when I used to work as a uniformed security officer I would always grab every overtime shift available.

I had never heard the word "twit" before I began watching Monty Python's Flying Circus on the local public television station as I was growing up.  When the Twitter service became available I avoided it because I associated the name of the service with the concept of "twit."

As reported by Twitchy.com, the so-called comic Sarah Silverman has unintentionally confirmed the validity of my decision. Fortunately spittle cannot be transmitted through the Internet.

First Silverman addresses us -- the real citizens who accept responsibility for the armed defense of ourselves, our families, and our nation -- with an apparently new pejorative term: Gun Boners.

Isn't that special?

The fundamental rule of argument is to address your audience with respect.  This is the case especially with those who clearly disagree with your proposition.  But then Liberals rarely had respect for their opponents.  Or for their victims.

Silverman had also spoke of Pope Francis as an authority in this case.  Which is complete nonsense as Liberals as a rule hold the Papacy and Catholicism in utter contempt.  And in the actual context of the statement actually made by the Pope it clearly appears that he doesn't understand that the cause of the problem is not the presence of arms but the ideology of the factions, that being the differing interpretations of the doctrine of Islam.

But then the truth is never true to a Liberal.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Merry Christmas.

For the first time as an adult I can say that as an expression of joy and without embarrassment.

Christmas and the Winter Solstice are holidays that celebrate life.  Let us do so without any shame or embarrassment.  Let us live this as a day of happiness.

I'll get back to work tomorrow.

Short Version of The Letter To The Editor

I am a reader and contributor to the Harry Binswanger List.  An e-mail list where Objectivists can calmly discuss any topic relevant to the philosophy of Objectivism.  One advantage to the list is that all posts have to be kept to less than four hundred words.

In effect one has to think again.

Of course I had to cut a bit in order to post a comment on The Letter To The Editor.

Here is the final version:

I oppose pacifism.

I once clipped out a letter to the editor of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and taped it to back of the cover of a notebook, but did not record the date of the letter.

To quote the emission of non-sentience:

One child dies

Regarding Jim Klobuchar’s March 8 column, “8-year old boy died with grace and courage, but without an answer”: Michael Blake’s mother came into WAMM last April for information on the relationship of health-care cuts and military increases.  Her visit was motivated by son Michael’s deep understanding that research on disease saves lives while research on Star Wars ends lives.

Sometimes it’s so simple. One child dies.  One hundred thousand children live in poverty.  We spend almost $300 billion on defense.  Yet our children are left defenseless against poverty and disease.

Michael understood this.  Why can’t we?

– Nikki LaSorella, co-director, Women Against Military Madness, Minneapolis.

If consciousness is the process of identification then this letter was the clear evidence of brain death.  Here the child-like condition of ignorance is held to be superior to clear knowledge.  An eight year old child is not normally educated in the theory of individual rights and the history of relations with foreign nations.  Nor would that child be aware of the mass graves and other monuments to the ideologies of totalitarian  power across Europe and Asia.  As well as the similar but yet undiscovered and unnamed horrors across Cuba, China, and North Korea.   

A child can be forgiven for his lack of knowledge.  But an adult has absolutely no excuse.  This specific adult has absolutely no excuse for the facilitation of criminal predation within our nation and assistance given to foreign aggressors by the so-called peace movement.

The condition of Peace in fact cannot be identified as a moral value apart from the fundamental value of Human Life in the state of Freedom. But LaSorella is not just a pacifist.  She is clearly a Communist as well.  Her target audience in writing this letter were those persons who are ignorant of moral philosophy and political history and wish to remain so.

LaSorella denies the fact that the American Government protects a society of free people against domestic criminals and foreign conquerors.  Her vision is of an entire nation converted at gunpoint to a vast slave labor system.

 Unfortunately I cannot cut the Marxist nonsense as such.

Letter To The Editor

I am an opponent to pacifism.

As I was expecting a visitor to my home within the next week I began to clean up the apartment.  I was rearranging items when I came across a letter to the editor of the Star-Tribune, the Marxist rag of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul.  The paper originated and is still published in Minneapolis but the owners have a long standing streak of the pretense of superiority. 

I had clipped out the letter and taped it to back of the cover of a notebook, but did not record the date of the letter.  I would have to guess that it originated during the administration of the Elder President Bush.  Placing it roughly twenty-five years ago or a bit more.

But this is only a guess on my part.

To quote the emission of non-sentience:

One child dies

Regarding Jim Klobuchar’s March 8 column, “8-year old boy died with grace and courage, but without an answer”: Michael Blake’s mother came into WAMM last April for information on the relationship of health-care cuts and military increases.  Her visit was motivated by son Michael’s deep understanding that research on disease saves lives while research on Star Wars ends lives.

Sometimes it’s so simple. One child dies.  One hundred thousand children live in poverty.  We spend almost $300 billion on defense.  Yet our children are left defenseless against poverty and disease.

Michael understood this.  Why can’t we? 

– Nikki LaSorella, co-director, Women Against Military Madness, Minneapolis.

If consciousness is the process of identification then this keyboard dropping is the clear evidence of brain death.  I have and continue to seriously wonder how any of these people manage to wake up in the morning and remove themselves from their own beds without killing or seriously injuring themselves.

Here the child-like condition of ignorance is held to be superior to clear knowledge.  An eight year old child is not normally educated in the theory of individual rights and the history of relations with foreign nations.  Nor would that child be aware of the mass graves and other monuments to the ideologies of totalitarian  power across Europe and Asia.  As well as the similar but yet undiscovered and unnamed horrors across Cuba, China, and North Korea.    

A child can be forgiven for his lack of knowledge.  But an adult has absolutely no excuse.  That specific adult has absolutely no excuse for the facilitation of criminal predation within Our Republic and the assistance given to foreign aggressors by the so-called peace movement.

The condition of Peace in fact cannot be identified as a moral value apart from the fundamental value of Human Life in the state of Freedom. But LaSorella is not just a pacifist.  She is clearly a Communist as well.  She is most clearly one of the enemies of mankind against whom an actual government must stand.  Her target audience in writing this letter was those alleged adults who are ignorant of moral philosophy and political history and wish to remain so.

The illusion of social justice that LaSorella promotes denies the fact that the American Federal Government protects a society of free people against domestic criminals and foreign conquerors.  Her vision is of an entire nation converted at gunpoint to a vast slave labor system.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” 

This is the exact description of the system of slavery.  And the needs of those who impose and enforce the system have no absolute limits.

The fact is that those who call themselves pacifists are vilest and most violent Enemies of Mankind of all time.

Obituary

Mikhail Kalashnikov, the creator of the AK-47 assault rifle, has died at the age of 94.

I owned several semiautomatic copies of the rifle including two chambered for the 5.56 x 45 mm NATO intermediate round.

Even though he would have been on the other side of a US-Soviet War I still have to say, Farewell Comrade.

Betrayal Of Trust

In the short editorial piece published in USA Today, Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin begins by saying in large text:

Military compensation reform controversy simply can't deter us from doing the right thing.

There’s a meaning of "right" in the real world and unfortunately there is a different meaning for the word in the puzzle palaces of Washington.

Ryan furthermore continues by saying:

The Bipartisan Budget Act that Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and I drafted will soon become law. We think it's a small step toward fiscal discipline in Washington.

Really?

Fiscal discipline ended in the Federal Government with the establishment of the Federal Reserve system and the income tax.  The first necessary step in restoring fiscal discipline is to shut down the Federal Reserve System, return to the issuance of a fully gold backed Dollar, and repeal the income tax.  In short the return to the Gold Standard and clearly limited taxation.  This will in turn will halt the inflation of prices for goods and services paid by the both the private sector and all levels of government.

Through this the inevitable increases in the Federal budget can be brought to a halt.

In addition to the practical issues that I just addressed there is a moral issue. A promise was made to young men and women to put their lives at mortal risk during the healthiest and most productive years of those lives.  We as a nation have an unbreakable obligation to keep that promise.

There is simply no excuse to violate this promise made in our name.

Now one may ask, if the solution to the problems of inflation and the budget deficit is so simple why wont it be implemented?

Because the Federal Reserve System and the income tax were established to facilitate the transfer of wealth from the rightful owners to the politically favored.  The program of the so-called Progressive Era is essentially a sophisticated system of subjugation and plunder, the barbarian mode of life. 

The legalized process of plunder is used to enrich the political class and their close supports and to buy the votes needed to empower them.  They need us to be under their control. The fact of the matter is that Representative Paul Ryan is a full member of the “bipartisan” ruling class.  His claim to have been influenced by Ayn Rand was shown during the last election and his present open compromise with the open looters to be a complete lie. 

If we as a people are to restore command over our own lives then we must begin by fully separating ourselves from the “bipartisan” ruling class.  To this end I have stepped up as a candidate for the office of President of the United States, independently of any party affiliation.

Comparison

I will start with an image:

When I was the age of this alleged man I was a Combat Rifleman in the United States Army (MOS 11 B) stationed at Fort Benning.   I lived in the barracks in the remote Harmony Church area of the military reservation.  And I was preparing for a transfer to Germany to face the Soviet Army.

It was fully understood that the Soviet Union held international conventions protecting the rights of soldiers and civilians in war zones in absolute contempt.  I had a close friend  whose Cossack family had escaped from Russia by hijacking a ship while half a step ahead of the Bolshevik Red Army.  He asked me that if in the event I was killed in combat if he could wear my identification tags so he wouldn't be identified as being from a family that had escaped from the Soviets.  And to avoid being immediately murdered as a result.

Of course I said yes.

The old school Soviet Communists had nothing but contempt for Human Life.  They had nothing but contempt for those under their rule.

The present day Progressives still hold Humans in contempt.  But that contempt appears to us differently.  In this case the ideal man who was prepared to face an unspeakable evil is replaced by over-grown child who is to whine his parents into compliance with the whims of The Big Zero.

At least the old school Soviets were real men.

Meanwhile In The Real World

A member of The Blogmacracy site has discovered that the Sci-Fi Meshes site has been hacked by Muslims.

Here's the screen shot of the site:

The Human mode of life requires active perception and rational thought. Islam prohibits both.

Islam is absolutely toxic to Human life.  And those, including the enforcers of Islamic doctrine, who deny the Rights Of Man absolutely cannot claim those very same rights for themselves.Those who act to enforce the doctrine of Islam are absolute Enemies of Mankind.  They are fit solely for extermination.

What are your questions on this block on instruction?

Thank's to The Blogmacracy 2.0 site for this information.

On The Subject Of Islam

I will start with a real news report:

Judge imposes maximum 15-year prison sentences for Alabama-hatched terrorism plot

MOBILE, Alabama  –  Citing a lack of remorse and a failure to renounce their intentions to commit violent jihad abroad, a federal judge Friday sentenced a pair of silent men to the maximum punishment for a plot hatched in Alabama.

Randy “Rasheed” Wilson and Mohammad Abdul Rahman Abukhdair, both 26, will spend 15 years in prison for conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists and then will be supervised by the U.S. Probation Office for three years.

U.S. District Judge Kristi DuBose said she read hundreds of pages of recorded conversations and intercepted emails from the defendants and searched for evidence that they were “just talking a big game.” And, she added that she had reserved judgment, hoping they would renounce their intentions.

“Unfortunately, there is no other reasonable conclusion that (their conversations) were for the primary purpose of committing violent jihad,” she said. “I don’t have to speculate about that.”

As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:  

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.

It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.

As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.

The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.

And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.

Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?

A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.

A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.

This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.

Finally I must thank Robert Spencer, it was through his works that I gained a fundamental knowledge of the nature of Islam.  And I must thank Pamela Geller for bringing the original article to my attention.

Paul Ryan For President

My answer to the question of should Paul Ryan be elected to the office of President of The United States, is not only NO, but HELL NO!

News Busters reported the following:

On the final installment of PBS’s Inside Washington Friday, host Gordon Peterson asked his panelists who they thought would be elected president in 2016.

Rather surprisingly, the Washington Post’s Colby King said, “Paul Ryan because the Democratic nominee will never be able to replicate what Barack Obama has done, never bring out that base”

Let us examine the recent history of Paul Ryan.

During the campaign for the office of Vice President Ryan had stated that he was inspired by reading Atlas Shrugged to pursue a life of public service.  While this was clearly intended to draw in members of the Tea Party Movement, who are generally influenced by the writings on Ayn Rand -- especially Atlas Shrugged -- even the rational view of the current government is that of a problem to be solved. Furthermore, when his claim of being influenced by Ayn Rand was shown to be inconsistent with his continued practice of the Roman Catholic faith, and thus the continuation and growth of the welfare state, he immediately backed off of the claim of Objectivist influence.

Paul Ryan had very clearly demonstrated himself to be a political office seeker as usual.

Paul Ryan had recently negotiated, in concert with Democratic representative Patty Murray, a deal on the Federal budget that included tax increases and cuts in benefits to veterans of the Armed Forces. In this Paul Ryan had clearly demonstrated that he was a full member of the Washington ruling class.

In short, Paul Ryan is part of the problem.

Were Paul Ryan to elected in 2016 I would fully expect him to continue the present GOP practice of compromising with Democratic Party and to keep the seat warm for the next totalitarian Ubermensch to come in 2020.  

Nothing will be achieved.  No problems will be solved.  And we will not see a return of the Federal Government to full compliance to The Constitution.

In contrast my goal as President will be to restore the right of Americans to live by their own reason in the real world.

RIGHTS, REASON, REALITY.  Remember that.

Return Of The Moron

In the concept of DOUBLETHINK as identified by George Orwell the person holds two completely opposite concepts as being true at the same time and in the same respect.

An individual I responded to in a previous post spoke again.

Here's the original post.

Here's the response to his response.

The damned fool spoke again, thus verifying his foolishness.

Me again. So basically, you're just really, really, really stupid.

That's not a question, but a statement of fact.

And you still don't understand what the 1st amendment means, nor what hypocrisy is. Bravo, sir, bravo. You just keep wearing that ignorance like a badge of honor

I will admit that my brain was damaged as the result of a serious illness but I still practice rational thought. Let's start with the charge of ignorance of the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging freedom of speech,or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That is the actual First Amendment of the United States Constitution.  As a declared candidate for the office of President of the United States I have to know this.  Or at least keep a copy of the document within arms reach when possible.

Now look at my initial statement concerning the Duck Dynasty mess.  I clearly did not call for the violation of the First Amendment.   What I did call for was that the owners of A&E should identify those allegedly speaking for the Homosexual Collective as hostiles and treat them as such.

And the best way to do this is to simply ignore their whining.

As for the charges of hypocrisy and ignorance, there is no proof given and thus no need to answer the charges.

Reality is real.  No statement to the contrary can ever change it.

Reply To Previous Statement

Some nameless person attempted to leave a piece of non-thought in response to my statement on the Duck Dynasty controversy:

"Phil Robertson, as with all persons, has the moral obligation to see things as they are, to exercise judgement, and to speak on such matters as necessary. The attack on Phil Roberson is an attack on all Americans. Phil is simply the first target."

This was the dumbest part of your blog. Do you really lack the self awareness to see how hypocritical that is? You will make a perfect Republican candidate.

Really?

The Republican Party has already rejected our nation as a whole.  Why should they accept me as a candidate for any office?  They wouldn't.  But the anonymous moron wouldn't understand that at all.  That would require actual thought on his, her, or it's part

And hypocrisy?  Come off it!

Based on what I read of the anonymous responder I have clearly identified him/her/it as a self-styled Progressive.  As a rule they see the subjects of their whim as mindless morons.  When their victims speak up the Progressives do not respond rationally but are the first to actively silence the voice of dissent.

Hypocrisy is the pretense of governing in the name of The People while ruling in ignorance of their actual will.

In other words Totalitarianism as usual.

.

Statement

This is my first public statement as a presidential candidate.

I do not watch cable television and normally could not care about what is presented or how the cable channels are otherwise run.  Given that, the act of the A&E network of suspending Phil Robertson, the head of the family presented in the program Duck Dynasty, is in my view an act of sheer lunacy.

The absolute fact of reality is that each person has a distinct experience of reality. Every person must reach their own conclusions about other people and and their place in reality altogether.

This is not a right.  This is an absolute fact of realty.

Those speaking for a homosexual collective have voice their aversion to statements made by Mr. Roberson on the practice  of homosexuality.*

So what?

Phil Robertson, as with all persons, has the moral obligation to see things as they are, to exercise judgement, and to speak on such matters as necessary.  The attack on Phil Robertson is an attack on all Americans.  Phil is simply the first target.

No one, singly or as part of a collective, has the right to silence another person.  The A&E networks have the right to control what they broadcast.  And they clearly have the right to stand up to collectivist pressure groups.

The management of A&E has the right and moral obligation to themselves, their staff, their actual audience, and their stockholders to tell the Homosexual Collective to bugger off.

To say that A&E should rescind their actions with respect to the Phil  Robertson and his family and apologize to them should go without saying.


*  Seriously, in my opinion, there is nothing special about the practice of assisted masturbation.  It is filthy, unhealthy, and frankly stupid.

The Definition Of Courage

Combat veteran and police officer Aaron Weiss speaking for the repeal of the New York State "SAFE Act."

There are clearly better citizens in our nation who clearly deserve to serve in the Congress and the state legislatures than the criminal trash sitting in those places right now.

Thought For The Day

The purpose of a trial is the resolve doubt.

There is no doubt as to what Barack Obama is.  There is no doubt as to what he has done to our nation.  And there is absolutely no doubt as to what should be done to him once he is properly removed from office.

But I will ask anyway.  Any questions?

Read This!

Harry Binswanger, an associate of Ayn Rand post a new article at Forbes.com:

Top Ten Reasons Why Rush Limbaugh Is Right: The Pope's Statement IS Marxist

 

Idiot Of The Day

John Podesta, an adviser to The Big Zero, said the following:

"They need to focus on executive action given that they are facing a second term against a cult worthy of Jonestown in charge of one of the houses of Congress,"

[LINK HERE]

What is wrong with this mental picture?

In 1978 The People's Temple  was  a cult focused on the personality of Jim Jones  and his doctrine of Apostolic Socialism.  Which offered eternal salvation as a trade for self subjugation to the leader.  With this social-political premise the terminal failure of their colony was effectively ordained.  On the other hand the Grumpy Old Party, on the days they actually do their jobs, stands against the leadership cult of The Big Zero and the conversion of our nation into a fully subjugated collective.

Those who cannot properly identify and communicate the clear facts of reality have no place in government or outside of a mental hospital.

Question

Why do I have the awful feeling that I've just checked into the Hotel California?

Announcement

As I write this a full moon is setting to the west.

A friend recently suggested that I stand for the office of President of the United States.  After giving the concept some thought I have decided to do so.

My fundamental goal as President will be to restore complete compliance of the Federal Government to the Constitution and the complete sovereignty of our nation with respect to the transnational order.

And I fully look forward to interaction with the Fourth Estate:

Reporter: Mr. Bates, how do you as a Christian Conservative justify your opposition to Social Justice?

Candidate LB: Good question.  Have you thought of asking an actual Christian Conservative?

Reporter: What?

Candidate LB: I stopped believing in the Western Monotheist Tradition over four decades ago.  I have made no secret of my disbelief since that time.  Even when I enlisted in the United States Army during the administration of President Ronald Reagan.

In light of this answer the reporter would have to engage in actual thought in order to respond.

Regardless of the outcome I fully expect to have fun.   

No One To Mourn

Leftie propagandist Tom Laughlin just died at the age of 82. Thus my idea for a Billy Jack movie will never me made:

Billy Jack Meets Reality

It wouldn't last ten seconds past the opening credits.

The Second Thought

On Saturday I posted a short rant about the followers and founder of Islam. I was not being nice when I did so. The fact is that I held back a bit. When I began to write the article the thought at the front of my mind was the complete annihilation of Islam.

Yes. The absolute extermination of all Muslims. Showers And Ovens for the lot of them. Why would I have such an absolutely horrible thought?

And why would I have a second thought about it? The final sentence published on Saturday basically covered it.

How does one deal with a mortal enemy except to kill them?

Every Muslim, at least in theory, is human.  A fundamental part of being human is the capacity for reason, full perception and conscious thought. 

But the doctrine of Islam forbids rational thought.  Islam reduces all persons to the moral status of animals and thus to property.  In submitting to the alleged will of the false god Allah the Muslim renounces responsibility for their own actions.  All murders and other crimes committed by a Muslim are simply the Will Of Allah.  In reality when a Muslim desires to commit an act of rape, robbery, or murder he simply declares that he only following the orders of Allah.

But how one deals with another person determines how that person responds.  When the Muslim renounces responsibility for their own thoughts and actions they can no longer be rationally identified as being human. 

And we who remain rational humans can no longer identify and deal with a Muslim as a proper person who is responsible for their own life and actions.  We can only see them as toxic organisms to be removed as a hazard to our lives.  And worse the indoctrination of children in the doctrine of Islam condemns them to extinction as well.

To remain the rational people of of nations of our earth we are left with no alternative but to kill them all.

On the day of the extinction of Islam I will feel no guilt about it. And neither should anyone else.

Sunday

I had a plan to update my post from yesterday.  But I'm not finished with it.

The truth really sucks sometimes, but one has to say it, no matter what.  It's just going to take me longer to think on the full facts before I could publish them.

Remember, I'm not the greatest or worst man in history.  I'm just me.

Les

Moral Dilemma

I'll start with a photo:

This photo, from the Daily Mail, depicts a demonstration by a group of Muslims in the East End on London against the sale of alcohol. So what?  The prohibition of alcohol was clearly demonstrated to be a clearly bad idea in the United States.  Prohibition opened the way for petty criminals to become fabulously wealthy and bring about the corruption of the police and other sections of government.  It reversed the relationship between the citizens and the government and doing so caused the people to hold it in utter contempt.

Given this history the thought of forbidding alcohol should be dead before the neurons completed firing.  In a normal person it would be.

Muslims are NOT normal people.

The doctrine of Islam was solely the creation of a slave trader and all around career criminal.  This doctrine served the purpose of establishing the illusion of legitimacy for his actions and to create the army that would enforce his will.

THE WILL OF MOHAMMED AND NO ONE ELSE.

The prohibition of alcohol made the force effective with respect to opponents.  The de facto legalization of rape made that force loyal to the false prophet.  The denial of the right of property of the victims, and thus the promise of looting, would drive the continuing expansion of Islam over the world.

In short, the creation of the doctrine of Islam was a crime against Humanity In General.

The followers of Islam continued to inflict horror and destruction upon Humanity after the death of the perpetrator.  Only to be stopped by the occasional superior force or logistical difficulty.  But now Muslims are allowed and even encouraged to emigrate to civilized nations.  They continue to hold themselves above the nonbelievers and in doing so they have begun their program to inflict their will upon us.  In allowing this our current governments have failed us.

The idea that The People of a nation are the sovereign authority was overturned by the Progressive movement.  In doing so the Progressives have opened the path for Muslims to impose their doctrine and their will upon us.   Islam flat out denies the authority of The People to govern themselves and to make our own laws based on our actual experience. 

But reality is unreal to a Muslim.  All that matters is our submission to their will.  No matter how depraved and disconnected from reality it is. And when we will not submit voluntarily they will use deadly force.

Every time.

So what do we do?

How does one deal with a mortal enemy except to kill them?

Repeating Myself

Six and a half years ago I said this:

What the Republican Party needs to get through their collective skulls right now is the fact that the age of politics as usual is over.

No more compromise. No more deals. No more bipartisanship.

There must be a radical clean up of the mess that the Left has created. The partisans of socialism must be systematically removed from our public institutions. And if we are to have a future as the core nation of our civilization we must make a special effort to clean out the Augean Stables that our educational establishment has become under the tutelage of the Left.

And we must with volume and clarity tell the spoiled brats who imagine themselves to be the heirs of Marx and Lenin to grow up or get out.

Of course, if those idiots would just die, it would be nice too.

 At this point it wouldn't be nice.  It is absolutely necessary.

Global Warming

It's snowing in Israel and Egypt.

Seriously, three feet of snow in Jerusalem and snow in Cairo for the first time in a century.

[LINK HERE]

The Global Warming scammers will of course blame this on global warming.

Thought For The Day

For me this week sucked.  And yesterday really sucked. 

But I'm not going to pack it in.

Certainly not after seeing this:

Have a nice day.

Thought For The Day

The first time I heard the term “dickhead” was during infantry basic training at Fort Benning. At the time I identified it as a distinctly Army term for a distinctly Army phenomena. An example of a dickhead is Lieutenant Colonel Robert Bateman, someone who clearly does not understand the United States Constitution and his role and limitations as a commissioned officer.

In an opinion piece published in Esquire [LINK HERE] he clearly demonstrates his ignorance of the proper meaning of the Second Amendment and declares his willingness to obey orders to murder American Citizens:

We will pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers.

Really?

No.

What Bateman as a REMF* academic who has failed to understand is that the Second Amendment is not about sporting use or even self defense against violent criminals. The Second Amendment is an integral component of the Bill of Rights, which in turn clearly defines the relationship between the People of the United States and the Federal Government. The People are the political authority of the nation. And the Federal Government serves The People.**

A very fundamental failure on the part of Bateman is his apparent belief that his subordinates will simply follow orders without thought. The fact is that American soldiers do think. And they do act on the facts of reality they have identified. Alvin York and Audie Murphy did not receive the Medal of Honor for simply following orders. Both men identified the actions that were necessary on the field of battle and carried them out.

If Bateman, a socialist in our uniform, were to issue the order the real soldiers will identify him as a traitor and murderer and air him out.

I prefer one round in the head in the old Soviet style for that sort of action.



*. Rear Echelon Mother Fucker. Another distinctly military term.

**. Or we could say that The People rule and the government drools.

Rant Of The Day

My friend Dave Hall just sent this to me:

Reflecting

A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality they imagine that America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves.

Pause a moment, reflect back.

These events are actual events from history.

They really happened!!!

Do you remember?

1. In 1968 , Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim male.

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by Muslim males.

3. In 1972 a Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach and it was blown up shortly after landing by Muslim males.

4. In 1973 a Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome , with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim males.

5. In 1979 , the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim males.

6. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim males.

7. In 1983 , the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by Muslim males.

8. In 1985 , the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males.

9. In 1985 , TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens , and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim males.

10. In 1988 , Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim males.

11. In 1993 , the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by Muslim males.

12. In 1998 , the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim males.

13. On 9/11/01 , four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and
crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by Muslim males.

14. In 2002 , the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against Muslim males.

15. In 2002 , reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by---you guessed it was a--- Muslim males.

16. In 2013 , Boston Marathon Bombing 4 Innocent people including a child killed, 264 injured by Muslim males.

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people.

Absolutely No Profiling!

They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave Muslim Males alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

Have the American people completely lost their Minds, or just their Power of Reason???

Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Aldreds and other stupid attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart common sense, feel ashamed of themselves -- if they have any such sense.

Another Thought For The Day

Global Warming, that would be nice.

Really nice.

It's minus three on the Fahrenheit scale outside at 1045 CST.

A Reminder

You have a right to form your own opinion, but you cannot form your own facts.

Reality is real.

Live with it.

Quote Of The day

Bill Whittle on PJTV.COM -- Members Only Video:

Nothing is impossible if you have the courage to speak the truth.

Bill, just announce your candidacy for the office of President, and get on with it.

You already have my vote.

Definition

Liberal:  One who identifies clear criticism of racism as being racist.

I'm not making this up.

Anniversary

Today is the anniversary of the airstrike made by Imperial Japanese Navy on the Naval and Army bases on the island of Oahu.  I should have remembered it.

This morning Pamela Geller linked to a story published by The Telegraph about a Muslim family that slays together.

[LINK HERE]

from the article:

Shiraz Maher, a researcher at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence at King’s College, London said: “We have seen a lot of families coming from the Caucuses and from central Asia, and many of them include infant children. We are seeing at least one family a month cross to Syria.

 “I think it is a matter of time until we start seeing European women going over to Syria. There is currently a huge amount of interaction online between jihadis in Syria and women from European countries. The jihadis advertise this, they say it’s fine for men to bring their families along.”

He continued: “The families who go to Syria form a sort of home front. The women feed the fighters and indoctrinate the children to create the next generation of fighters. Their function is also to populate an area the jihadists have taken as a means of consolidating control.”

I was beyond my usual level of disgust and dismay.  I seriously thought that it was time "to start up the showers and fire the ovens."

Even though it was only to another Islamic hellhole this was an indication of a mass migration, a Volkwanderung, was now underway.

What does this mean?

As long as the migration is to other Muslim occupied land it's not objectively a problem for civilized people. Otherwise it's an old school barbarian invasion.  Rational culture and political structures are overturned and the looter structure and culture of Islam is imposed.

This is intolerable.  A proper government would stop the migration by open, and if necessary, deadly force.  But the current Progressive philosophy of ethics and politics does not recognize the difference between civilized men (and those seeking to elevate themselves to civilization) and outright barbarians.

As far as Progressives are concerned anybody is good.  The content of the mind is irrelevant. As long as you don't actually think. 

Peacemaker Idiots

The Christian Peacemaker Teams, to whom rational thought is an alien concept, has released a new symbol on their site:

[LINK HERE]

Did anyone responsible for the design of this logo notice the resemblance to a certain notorious political symbol?

Of course not.  That would require responsibility, perception, knowledge and thought.  And those personal attributes would make the CPT members feel bad.

BLEH!

Room Temperature Savage

Ayn Rand was once asked if it was better to submit to Communism or to die.  She answered that it was to better to see the Reds dead.

I had to completely agree.

It has come to my attention that a famous Communist Stooge and all around waste of matter and energy has finally descended to ambient temperature.  Of course The Big Zero will shortly release a statement about how he -- the occupant of the White House -- was so utterly wonderful.  As The Big Zero has clearly demonstrated, the idea that anyone could achieve anything is completely alien to him.

If by reading this you have concluded that I’m using this opportunity to show off my skill at writing sarcasm, you’re right.

The Communist Stooge only reached ambient temperature not because of the life support system that he was privileged to be hooked up to, but because the last real government of the Republic of South Africa failed to do it’s job.  The fact was that the Communist Stooge was an enemy of Civilization and Humanity in General.  The Communist Stooge should have been put to death upon identification. 

Instead he was imprisoned.  While in prison the Communist Stooge carried out a campaign of coercion through guilt with the tactic of the hunger strike.  Again the government failed to properly correct the situation.  At the start of the hunger strike the Communist Stooge should have been executed.  Thus ending the otherwise pathetic attempt at coercion.

Instead the Communist Stooge became a celebrated cause for useless idiots around the world.  The sale of military equipment needed to fight the ongoing Communist insurgency and other forms of lawful trade were embargoed by the United Nations Organization.  To the everlasting shame of our nation the United States Government participated in the embargo of the Republic of South Africa. 

When the last real government fell to savages the Communist Stooge was granted power that he was neither entitled to nor fit to exercise. 

At this point some readers would conclude that I’m a racist.

Yes.

I am a member of the Human Race.  As such I will not submit to the rule of a mindless racially based mob simply on the base of a majority vote.  Reality is real and no number of ballots will ever change that.  Solidarity to what are actually sub-groups within the Human Race is a clear rejection of reason and is not a valid option.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

UPDATE  0140 CST:

 David Horowitz has his own opinion on the Communist Stooge.  It's not at all nice.

[LINK HERE]

Proposal Of The Day

Yesterday I repeated my proposal for a 28th Amendment to the Constitution and proposed a 29th Amendment.  Today I shall propose the 30th Amendment:

AMENDMENT XXX

Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Now why would I propose this?

At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general.  Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States.  But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement.  In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore.  When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school.

In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.

Go ahead, ask some questions.

One For The Duke.

From the Weaponsman.com blog:

Clearly not issued in the present day army.

[LINK HERE]

Another Proposal

In November I made the following proposal:

AMENDMENT XXVIII

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Today I put forth another proposal:

AMENDMENT XXIX

Section 1. The sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

Section 2. Neither a tax upon upon the income of a person, nor upon the income of a commercial enterprise, shall be levied within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 3.  Neither a tax upon land and structures built upon it, nor the unsold inventory of a commercial enterprise, shall be levied within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 4. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

  Let's see the Donks and RINOs run against this.
  

Moron Monday

The National Football League in their infinite wisdom has decided to ban this advertisment from being aired during the next Super Bowl:

Now I have to admit that I'm not a fan of the game of football, and that I stopped watching the Super Bowl after the Minnesota Vikings lost it for the fourth time.

I can't boycott the game but but this is clear grounds for everyone else to boycott.

UPDATE 1905 CST:

An old friend wrote:  "It has gotten to the point where I can't even see what is objectionable in these ads."

That's because we are still rational people.  The NFL appears to be influenced by the Marxist version of the concept of sympathetic magic.  That the instrument causes the action instead the person who decides to use it.

Moron Sunday In London

London was once the capital of a global empire.  Now it is the center of insanity.

Here's two photos published by Pamela Geller:

How did these occupants of a target rich environment morons expect to implement their ban on Democracy?  A democratic vote? Of course not.  That would violate the doctrine of Islam.

While the present rulers of Angola have been frightened into denying that they have banned Islam, I as a Citizen of the United States of America will not submit to their whims.  I will not obey the false law created by an illiterate career criminal to validate his life of depravity and crime.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Question Of The Day

Why is the United States Army and Marine Corps still deployed in Afghanistan?

It's very clear to a rational observer that The Big Zero is sympathetic to Islam.  And that he is very sympathetic to the most consistent practitioners, and thus murderous believers, of this clearly false religion.  There is simply no point in continuing this operation.

 A possible answer is that a Soldier or Marine deployed anywhere outside the continental United States (CONUS) will not be able to uphold his oath of enlistment and participate in the overthrow of the current Neo-Communist regime.  A Soldier or Marine who is isolated in Afghanistan would simply be stuck in place, unable to intervene.  This is particularly true in the cast of members of elite formations such as the Special Forces.  The Special Forces Underground was established under the less tyrannical conditions of the Clinton Administration.  I would not at all be surprised if a similar organization was in place at this very moment.

(And if it is, they would not contact me as I should have been under surveillance for nearly two decades, now.)

The fact of the matter is that The Big Zero does not trust anyone in the Armed Forces.  The ongoing purge of flag and general officers and the complete disarmament of personnel on base and on duty is a clear indication of this.

(Seriously?  Removing bolts from rifles while on parade?  Paranoid are we, Zero?)

What are your questions on this?