History Lesson

If you asked the most blood soaked member of the SS-Totenkopfverbande if he was one of the good guys, he would answer in the affirmative.  We must remember that the perpetrators of every horror (The Holocaust is no exception) believed they was a good person doing a good thing.

Personal History

I was once a member of the Libertarian Party.

Changing the subject's a standard tactic that's taught at Toastmasters.  For those of you who aren't familiar with Toastmasters International, it's a group that teaches the techniques of public speaking, which in practice means teaching dull and boring people to be even more tedious, dull, and boring. How do I know this?  Well, my participation in Toastmasters was strongly recommended by the Chairman and the Treasurer of the Libertarian Party of Minnesota during my brief involvement with them.  To make a long story short (too late), I was called upon to speak for two minutes on a subject that I knew nothing about.  The usual technique for dealing with this situation was to either change the subject or make up something to say.  This to me was the height of rudeness, Instead I stood up and said this:

Mr. President, fellow Toastmasters, and honored guest, I have absolutely nothing to say on this subject.  Thank you.

And then I sat down.  The Chairman and the Treasurer of the LP-MN continued to pester me about attending Toastmasters until I found and ran off copies of a short story, in STARLOG magazine of all places, that mocked the organization.  I never heard a word from either of them on the subject after that. 

I was also once a member of the Special Forces Underground and a writer for The Resister.

Back in April of 1994 when we still used dial up modems and held discussions in USENET newsgroups someone named Carol posted the following about The Resister on TALK.POLITICS.GUNS:

hold on there! before anybody subscribes, READ one of these things. i mean, the ENTIRE thing. i've read four or five over the last year and it all seems ok for a time. get way down into the guts of the thing and you start finding racial/racist crap.

I immediately replied:

Gee-Gosh-Wow "carol!" Could you *please* explain to us how you managed to read "four or five" issues "over the last year" of a newsletter that only been in print for *nine* months when I am still eagerly awaiting my grey copy of the fourth issue?

BTW, what is the number of your CPUSA membership card?

There is only one race on this planet -- THE HUMAN RACE.

A tribal collectivist -- be he a member of the Black congressional Caucus or of the National Socialist German Workers Party -- is someone who treats his particular ethnic heritage as an license to subjugate, plunder, and massacre anyone who is not part of his collective.

Tribal collectivists claim that they are exempt from the rules of civilized society. Let us take they at their word and cast them out of civilization and into the garbage dump of history.

Carol didn't reply.  But an idiot from Canada did:

She has better mail service than you?

Is it a monthly or bi-monthly set-up? If so, then 9 months will, in fact produce "four or five issues"...

What the HELL are you blathering about?! She's SLAMMING it for racism! You know, using a "particular ethnic heritage as a[n] license to subjugate plunder and massacre anyone who is not part of his collective"? Read the whole post before you go ballistic. You'll look like less of a clot...

As you can see, this idiot with delusions of mental superiority wasn't paying attention.

I responded:

Here are some clues *tovarish*:

1. I quoted the WHOLE post.

2. Since the "stupid cow" (as one of my friends called her) didn't give a specific citation for her accusation I assumed that the criticism (to put it politely) of the Black Congressional Caucus was one of the points that she was referring to. The RESISTER also condemns mandatory racial discrimination A.K.A "affirmative action."

3. The RESISTER is a quarterly newsletter. I am a subscriber. I am also the person responsible for posting the ASCII text of each issue on t.p.g. I receive e-mail and phone calls from people who believe that I actually have contact with the Special Forces Underground.

I once received a call from Tim Kern, a radio talk show host from Colorado (his program is syndicated by the USA Patriot Network, M-F 0500-0700 MT on Galaxy 6, Transponder 14, Audio 5.8 wideband) asking me if I could put him in touch with the SFU. Needless to say, I couldn't.

4. CPUSA = Communist Party USA.

5. *GEE-GOSH-WOW* Comrade Don!!! If you didn't sleep through classes you might know that *Racial Polylogism* was a distinguishing characteristic of the dogma of German National Socialism. That *Aryan Logic* told them that they were the MASTER RACE and that they could do anything they bloody well wanted to members of all other races. Any objections raised were dismissed as non-Aryan (English, Jewish, etc.) logic and thus were not binding upon themselves.

*Der Afrikanererstaznazis* of the Black Caucus refuse to accept the fact that chattel slavery was perpetrated by both Whites and Blacks. Blacks in Africa would raid neighboring tribes and sell their prisoners to White and Arab slave traders.

Instead, Black tribal collectivists choose to treat chattel slavery as the act of the "White Race" inflicted upon the "Black Race." treating this as a blank check to gain plunder and favors at the expense of non-blacks. Ignoring of course the fact that price for the sin of chattel slavery has already been paid -- IN BLOOD.

Unfortunately the vile institution of slavery was not destroyed but was instead nationalized. The program of the Democratic Party since the reign of Woodrow Wilson has been to inflict the German form of socialism (begun under Otto Von Bismarck and taken to its ultimate conclusion under Hitler) upon America. Hitler called his doctrine "Marxism without the Talmudic frills." What we have under the Clintonistas is National Socialism without the Aryan frills.

The dumb as a brick Marxists are still out there. 

 

 

 

Differences

 

In Russia high school students are required to read The Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn with assembling and disassembling a standard infantry weapon.  American high school students can't even do that.  American high school students are ignorant of Totalitarianism and tought to fear weapons.  Many American High School students have become advocates of Totalitarianism.  This is clearly wrong.    

Date

 

On November 7 in 1917 something very bad happened in the city of Saint Petersburg of the former Russian Empire.  Even though the doctrine of Communism has been proven to be a load of toxic nonsense they're still true believers who're trying to impose it upon us.  Apparently 100 (+) million dead isn't enough.

Progressives have set the world standard for stupid since this day.

 

Thoughts Of the Day

You can't regain the moral high ground by digging deeper into depravity.  Do you know what a Socialist is?  A Socialist is a barbarian in Sunday clothes.

 

Thoughts Of The Day

There is NEVER a valid argument for evil.  As Ayn Rand once pointed out, reality can't be faked.  Self deception leads to self defeat.  Self deception, if persistently pursued, will ultimately bring about self destruction. 

 

Suggestion

The Republican Party needs to face up to the fact that politics as usual is no longer an option.  The Republican Party has systematically compromised, appeased, and openly bought off the other side too many times.  This had the effect of strengthening the other side and harming us as a nation.  The Wiemar Republic the practice of parties making deals with each other was called cattle trading.  In present day America we call this bipartisanship. Like the Germans between the wars we're now facing the rise of a totalitarian collectivist political cult with its own divinely appointed leader.  If the Republican Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will have no choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make changes and restore a rational system of government.

What are our questions on this block of instruction? 

Thought Of The Day

 BLM should be called Die Swartzerstrumabteilung.

 

Thoughts Of The Day

YouTube has removed the Scientology Fair Game podcast channel.  I wouldn't be surprised if Scientology was involved in this action.  No act is too vile for those who value political power.

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.  Antisemitism is a subset of Racial Collectivism.  We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of Racial Collectivism.  We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial Collectivist group that it actually is.  We have to see that Antisemitism is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem.  So when someone attacks Jews they're attacking all of us.  Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't be a radical idea.

Does anyone have a spare copy of the Necronomicon that they wouldn't mind mailing to the White House? 

When we look at the Democratic Party and their relationship to the problems we face at the social or political level one thing becomes very obvious.  They're either the primary cause of the problem, the primary aggravating factor of the problem, or the primary obstacle to a rational solution to a problem.  What the Democrats should do, as Ayn Rand put it, is get out of the way.

Gripe

I keep having to rely on unreliable people.

Another Motivator

 

Motivation

 

It's appalling what someone will do in the service of a false holy cause.

Comment

It appears that the best thing that could happen for Scientology is for David Miscavige* to drop dead.  

* The spell checker wanted this replaced with Miscarriage.

Thought Of The Day

 Adolf Hitler was a Vegan.  Vegans (or Vegetarians) believe they're superior people.

Thoughts Of The Day

 When a Marxist declares themself to be an Atheist, that person is engaged in virtue signaling.

If Scientology got along with other people they wouldn't be opposed.

Personal History

I was attending a concert put on by an Australian folk singer at the Cedar Cultural Center.  The people who operated the venue were proud of serving Nicaraguan coffee.  This was at a time when the relevant coffee beans would've been grown by slave labor.

On Racial Collectivism

Of all ideologies Racial Collectivism stands with the ugliest and most irrational of doctrines.  It denies the minds and rights of all individuals and reduces all people to mere things.  The content of character and the moral choices made by a person mean nothing.  The race of person, something completely outside of choice, is all that matters to the Racial Collectivist.  In this case the Blacks are raised to the status of a Master Race and Whites are condemned to inferior status and death.  We've seen this before.  The Racial Collectivist mentally raises himself to a separate and superior status over Humans in general.  To him the Rights of Man are rendered meaningless and he may rob and murder people at will and an with a posture of righteousness. We are deemed to be things that are used and disposed of.  And for them murder is not a wrong but a moral duty.  In fact a Racial Collectivist is an Enemy of Mankind in General.  In a more rational day Enemies of Mankind were hunted down and killed.  Let's return to reason.

A Statement On Drug Policy

The Drug Cartels, the organizations that produce and smuggle hard drugs for distribution and sale in the United States are using a series of increasingly sophisticated techniques to bring their wares into our country.  As a consequence the cost of enforcing the prohibition on the sale and use of the same hard drugs has risen to virtually astronomical levels.

What's to be done?

Let's start by examining how the mess began.

One theory is that at the repeal of Prohibition, the insane attempt to ban the consumption of alcohol, there were a mass of federal agents looking for work.  And by looking for work, I mean the acquisition of another federal job, not an actually honest job doing real work.  The appalling employment situation in the civilian sector during The Depression may not have been a factor here.  They're federal government employees after all.  Another factor was that the unholy alliance of Holy Rollers and Progressives still believed in the social control attempted in Prohibition.  They refused to understand that real virtues, such as sobriety, can't be enforced at the point of a gun.  Instead the unholy coalition sought to deny their error and instead inflict another mistake on our nation with another insane act of legislation. 

Hard drugs such as Cocaine and Heroin were developed by pharmaceutical companies as proper pain suppression medicines.  At the time there was only a minor subculture in existence that abused these medicines.  But the fact that there were only that a small number of people abused these medicines, and that the negative social impact was nonexistent, didn't stop the those lobbying for unemployed Prohibition agents and moral morons from pushing the clearly necessary legislation.

The mass of politicians faced with being held to account for Prohibition and the Great Depression needed a sacred cause to restore their exalted position with the electorate.  The prohibition of hard drugs along with Marijuana fit the bill.  At first there was no clearly discernible adverse effects.  Some users switched back to alcohol to destroy themselves while others remained undetected.  The task of a federal agent was a government job after all.

Cocaine was still administered under medical supervision.  By one report President Roosevelt received a dose from his doctor later in the afternoon on the Infamous Day, and quite frankly I don't blame him at all.

But there were still users of hard drugs and therefore a market.  The manufacture only required a  simple knowledge of chemistry that an upper level of criminal could understand and the early suppression efforts were only a jobs program and therefore a joke.  But the street level pushers were only receiving a minimum income at best.  They had to expand their user base in order to increase their income.

The increase in the number of discernible users in turn provoked a call for tighter enforcement which in turn increased the cost drug pushing.  The self-reinforcing cycle continued to gain more power until the present absurd situation has come to effect.

So what's to be done?

The absolute first thing that must be understood is that no actual virtue, in this case cleanness from drugs, can never be imposed at gunpoint.  The only person who ever stop a drug user is the user himself.  He has to recognize the fact that he is destroying himself, and only he can make the decision and act to save himself.

With the pretense of morality buried we must then legalize the hard drugs and Marijuana.  The specialized enforcers of the drug laws can be retired, retrained and reassigned to real police positions, or simply fired.  Legalization will have the beneficial effect of reducing federal spending at the same time.  A further effect will be to cut off the federally mandated stream of funding to the Drug Cartels.  Criminals simply can't compete on pricing with a business that has no overhead costs associated with operating in a black market.  Criminal organizations will be faced with the alternatives of legitimization or bankruptcy, but that's their problem.

With the subsequent drop in drug prices the pressure to commit crimes to pay for the addiction will be relieved.  But again the only valid solution to drug addiction is for the user to end it himself.  The legalization of hard drugs won't solve all of the associated problems of usage but it will restore government to the proper mission of defending our lives.  And it will make he situation better for everyone in general.

I fully acknowledge the fact that this was the position of the Libertarian Party.  I was an active member of the Libertarian Party.  But the Libertarian Party in fact is a joke.

Thoughts For The Day

Politicians should come with warnings. 

What we have in the White House is the most ignorant and incompetent individual to have ever held the office of President.  He doesn't understand that reality is real.  He doesn't understand the nature of human life and human society.  And most importantly he doesn't understand the nature and purpose of government.  And with the apparent belief in his own infallibility he is clearly in the failure mode.  It's not at all surprising that the United States Government is in the failure mode.  

Should that totalitarian piece of filth Joe Biden attempt to violate the Constitution through the censorship of criticism of his regime then the members of the the Armed Forces must keep the promise they made to the nation and overthrow him by a military coup and put him to death.

A criminal act in a rationally governed society is a violation of an individual’s rights.  In a rational society it's also understood that because human beings aren't omniscient or always honest, it's therefore possible that an innocent person may be prosecuted for a crime by mistake or as a result of an act of malice.  It's this fact that leads to the creation of the Due Process of Law that is practiced by a rational government. (And which is all too often twisted around by criminals and their legal supporters to their advantage.)  But a parasite is dependent on the violation of individual rights for his sustenance.  Thus the parasite’s conception of crime and justice must be opposed to that of a rational society.  Justice to a parasite is simply getting away with the parasitic mode of existence.  Crime is simply any resistance, regardless of intent or degree, to the actions of the parasite.

Racial characteristics aren't chosen and therefore irrelevant to human actions.  What's subject to choice is a person’s beliefs and the actions derived from those beliefs.  For the record McVeigh himself was a racial collectivist who rejected human rights and human reason.   As a result he rejected human reality.  The actual Patriot Movement at that time fully rejected McVeigh, his beliefs, and his actions.  This rejection was based on the actual moral values that were actually chosen. 

A problem with The Anointed is that they are the last to suffer the negative consequences of their own insanity.

And Now, A Song!

I once rewrote the first verse of The Internationale to reflect the reality of Communism in practice:

Arise, Ye Children Of The Trust Fund!
Arise, Ye Parasites!
Go Forth, And Plunder The Productive!
And Slaughter The Innocent!

I didn’t care about the remainder of the song.

Attention!

 A sign that was common before the glut of personal computers:

ACHTUNG!

ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!
DAS KOMPUTERMASCHINE IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENFUSEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.
IST NICHT FÜR GEWERKEN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.
ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN.

On Peace Activism

If there's one thing I've certainly noticed, it's that Peace Activists in general have no objection to enjoying the benefits of civilization but are unwilling to take the measures necessary to defend it from foreign and domestic barbarians.  Such as National Socialists, Soviet Socialists, and the home grown Socialists of the Democratic Party.  Contrary to their general delusion of virtue, Peace Activists are in effect, moral and political parasites upon civilized society.

Peace in the real world is simply the absence of those, such as the Socialists, who seek to deprive you, I, and our fellow citizens of our own Life, Liberty, and Property.  Real peace can only be achieved by the physical isolation or outright elimination of those who seek to subjugate, plunder and murder us.  This can only be done through the use of physical force.   In short, true peace can only be achieved only through the possession of superior firepower and the moral will to use it.

The narcissistic trash that makes up the membership of the so-called Peace Movement simply don't care whether you and your children live, die, or suffer under the yoke of an unwashed barbarian.  Peace Activists plaster their cars with bumper stickers, carry signs, bang on drums, throw Frisbees, and perform other useless rituals so that they can feel good about themselves and show the world how morally superior they are.  Never mind that Peace Activists openly deny the fundamental fact which is the foundation of all valid moral law.  Human Life as a rational being in control of one's own life is the standard of all moral values.  Those who would damage or destroy Human Life must be removed from society and if necessary be destroyed.  The adherents of pacifism have so inverted their own mental processes that they look upon the perpetrators of mass slavery and mass murder as good and those who take up arms to defend the society of consent as being evil.

Now there’re some folks who regard themselves as morally superior beings who question why the other bastard has to die.  The answer is that the other bastard is attempting to impose his will, or the will of his leader, upon you by force.  It's the act of coercion by force that makes what General Patton called the other bastard an enemy.   Peace is simply the absence of enemies.  But there's folks, who pretend to be morally superior beings, who would have us believe that "peace" could be achieved by submission to the will of the other bastard.  In reality this isn't peace, it's slavery.  There’re some well meaning people, some of whom that I respect, who believe that there're times that one can't have both peace and freedom at the same time.  I have to disagree.   Liberty is simply the condition of existence in which the person is free to live his own life in accordance with his own rational judgment.  This does of course require the absence of some other bastard who is attempting to impose his will upon the person by force.  In practical terms real peace and real freedom are inseparable.  I'll go further is saying that to a civilized person, peace, freedom, and security, are simply three words that can be used to describe the identical condition, the absence of another bastard imposing his will upon the civilized person.  Contrary to what those who describe themselves as peace activists would have us believe, and as General Patton has ably demonstrated, the path to real peace invariably takes us over the real dead bodies of those other bastards who insist on violently imposing their will upon us.  Unfortunately this process is by no means a safe one.   Let us take this day to remember those who died on the path to real peace.

A rational study of the real world would show that a real state of Peace is indistinguishable from a state of Liberty.  Peace, Liberty, and Security are simply three words that a rational person uses to describe the same condition, the rightful ability to live one's own life without coercive interference by others.   A rational study of actual history would show that the state of peace for the citizens of a free nation is the result of the violent elimination of the would be conquerors and their pet quislings. If we rationally examine those who constitute the membership of the so-called Peace Movement we find that virtually every one of them is an open advocate of the coercive subjugation of the productive members of the Human Race.  The occasional exception being a self blinded fool who isn't paying attention to what they're ideologically in bed with.   In short, a Peace Activist and the Peace Movement are in fact enemies of Peace.

Peace is only an affirmative value to those who live in the condition of liberty, that's being in charge of one's self and able to set the goals for one's life.  Peace can't be a value to the subjects of a totalitarian socialist state.  To the victim of such a state, the ordinary worker who's bullied by a commissar, the inmate of a slave labor camp, or the occupant of a darkened cell awaiting murder at the hands of the local chekists, war, either an internal uprising against the socialist masters, or an invasion by an army of liberation, is in fact the positive value.When I was in the United States Army and stationed at Fort Benning, a bunch of Peace Activists were parked at the front gate and singing songs.  Most Peace Activists openly supported the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

I know how to deal with an enemy.

If I was in charge of dealing with the Rainbow Warrior, I wouldn’t send out a bunch of secret agents to place a bomb aboard her, I’d blow her out of the water on the high seas.

I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

Conscience and Liberal are two words that don't go together. 

A Reminder

It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.

-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist

We on the Right tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we won't put an innocent person to death.  The Left, when it's in absolute power simply doesn't care.  We on the Right believe in justice.  The Left on the other hand doesn't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.

 

An Article

On Extremism
by J.F.A. Davidson


In the wake of publicity surrounding The RESISTER after the Oklahoma City bombing, Togo West, Secretary of the Army, and GEN Sullivan, former Army Chief of Staff, sent official message traffic to all Army activities warning of the dangers of service members participating in or belonging to "extremist" organizations. Their messages were little more than reinterations of AR 600-20, Army Command Policy, Paragraph 4-12, Extremist Organizations. While never mentioning The RESISTER by name, everyone understood the underlying intent. Their motive was clearly designed to smear The RESISTER with the same sloppy rhetoric used by the media to smear patriots and constitutionalists.

The term "extremism" defines exactly nothing. It is a term used to connote an issue no one dare denote. It is a term used by devotees of the cult of moral greyness to 'define' that which they fear the most--principled adherence to truth, morality, and ethics. It is a term used by political moderates to discredit constitutionalists who believe in unalienable individual rights exercised in rational self-interest, the liberty to exercise those rights, and capitalism, which makes possible the acquisition of property--the source of all unalienable rights.

Funk and Wagnalls New Practical Standard Dictionary (1947) defines the word extreme thus: "Ex-treme adj. 1. Being of the highest degree, at best, worst, greatest, etc...." Extreme, then, is a measure of degree. When the word "extreme" is used by political and media smear artists, it is intended to mean an extreme of any degree regardless of its nature. This implication is inherently evil. It means that extreme morality and immorality are equally undesirable; extreme honesty and dishonesty are equally immoral, and extreme virtue and extreme depravity are equally evil.

Defining oneself as a moderate is an admission of being a compromiser and an appeaser. Philosophically, what, then, is the implication of compromise between the truth and a lie? What is the implication of compromise between morality and immorality? What is the ethical implication of compromise between principled action and unprincipled action? The implications are advocacy of lies, immorality, and unprincipled action.

Politically, what is the implication of compromise between unalienable individual rights and collectivism? What is the implication of compromise between liberty and slavery? What is the implication of compromise between capitalism and socialism? The answer is, the same result as the compromise between food and poison--death: the death of unalienable individual rights, the death of liberty, and the death of property. The implications are the advocacy of collectivism, slavery, and socialism.

The term "extremism" is nothing other than a smear; a smear used by self-proclaimed moderates, who have no principles, to defile those who adhere to principled thought and action. It is a terror phrase intended to instill a sense of guilt and uncertainty in the irrational mob by reference to undefined and constantly fluctuating ideological package-deals.

One such package-deal is so-called "white-supremacy." Although racism is implied, the true target of this smear is western culture, (meaning specifically, of course, Anglo-Saxon culture). The deprecation of western culture by moderates notwithstanding, the simple fact they attempt to deny is that if the cumulative impact of minority contributions to western culture were suddenly eliminated from the whole, the advance of western culture would have not been delayed one single day.

Minorities who recognize this fact, those whose rational actions logically embrace the principle of reasoned individual effort as the source of success do, in fact, succeed. Note well that self-appointed minority spokesmen immediately attack those minorities who succeed as traitors to their race! Here, the principle under attack by moderates using the smear "white-supremacy," is reasoned action.

We maintain that race is irrelevant. Rational men are rational men--their skin color is trivia. Irrational men end up exactly where they deserve to be--on the trash-heap.

Another deprecating package-deal term is "isolationism." It is a term used by United Nations one-world socialists, and altruists, to connote lack of selfless concern for the rest of the world. Although no isolationist ever maintained that the rest of the world is of no concern, the smear term "isolationist" is nothing more than a straw man used to misrepresent the principle of patriotism and national self-interest.

The connotation of those who smear others as "isolationists" is that patriotism and national self-interest are evil. Their altruistic goal is to loot the wealth and capital of America and redistribute it to peasants and savages across the world. Their persistent shrieks demanding acceptance of multiculturalism denote nothing less than a demand that a mud hut be viewed as the technological equal of a Skyscraper, a Voodoo priest be given equal status to that of a neurosurgeon, and a story teller be given the same recognition as a literary genius.

We maintain that the premises of one-world socialists, altruists and multiculturalists are unspeakably evil. Productive genius is productive genius--its origin is trivia. Incompetent men deserve exactly what happens to them--failure.

The connotation of those who smear others as "cultists" is that the voluntary freedom of association by individuals is evil. This filthy smear is a direct attack on individual choice, whether that individual choice is rational or irrational.

Philosophically, this smear deliberately sets up the notion that only collective associations are acceptable. All collective associations are, by definition, coercive. They necessarily involve the use of force; either force by fraud, or force at the point of a gun. Politically, this smear is the rationalization of unlimited democracy; the belief that might makes right. This smear is a deliberate assault on the philosophical framework of the First Amendment--uncoerced, voluntary individual choice. The uncoerced voluntary choices of individuals are their own individual responsibility. Collectivists deserve exactly what they advocate--slavery.

Pleas for "moderation" are nothing less than pleas for compromise and appeasement; in other words, the primacy of untruth, immorality, and unethical action. "Moderation" is the abrogation of rights, liberty, and property. "Compromise" is the war cry of evil.

The RESISTER has been smeared by moderates, compromisers and appeasers within the chain of command as an extremist publication. We agree with their assessment-- but not their underlying smear. We admire truth, morality, ethical action, unalienable individual rights, liberty to exercise those rights, and acquisition of the origin of rights and liberty-- -property; meaning, capitalism. In today's political climate our admiration of these philosophical and political values means we hold extreme views. There is no alternative.

There is only one reasonable answer to the question invariably posed by smear artists: "Surely, you don't believe in good and bad, and think in terms of black and white?" The answer is: "You're damn right I do!"

 

Anniversary

Some Americans, British, and Canadians visited Northern France on this day in 1944 and gave the Wehrmacht a very bad day.  They're still talking about it today.

Thoughts Of The Day

If the stupid conspiracy theories of The Left were true they would all be dead.  One can’t achieve balance if one's nose is stuck in the sacred Marxist instruction manual.  The idea that one should be able to live one's own life in accordance to one's own judgement is such an alien idea to a Leftist that it may as well come from the planet Mars.  One of the functions of language is to serve as the operating system of human thought.  But the function of Newspeak is to prevent correct identification of the facts of reality.  Thus blood soaked tyrants such as Fidel Castro are called liberators and liberators are called oppressors. 

UPDATE 1030 HRS CDT:  Comrade Fauci needs to be treated as a Enemy Of Mankind.  We need to set up the gallows again.

An Open Message To Joe Biden

 I have a message for Joe Biden the fool who's visibly upset at the fact that we won't blindly submit to his whims.

Get over it.

Sure, you claimed to won a presidential election by a majority of the votes cast. (After all, you're a Democrat)

So what?

An election in a constitutional republic is a process of hiring someone to perform a constitutionally defined task.  It's not a mystical collectivist ritual for the anointment of a stone age god-king.  We don't believe in The Leader Principle.  We don't believe that the stone age god-king that you've become is in any way the embodiment of a collective will.  And we certainly don't believe that we're in any way subject to what is in fact your personal whim.  We aren't and never will be a living prop in your ideological fantasy.  We won't bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us.  And we'll never embark on the path that always leads to the anonymous ditch outside of a town.

What you are is a believer in what Ayn Rand used to call the Primacy of Consciousness, a belief that reality isn't inherently real but is in some way alterable by a ruling consciousness.  In your case, the Collective, which in many versions of Socialist doctrine has a distinct consciousness of its own.  Some Leftists have gone as far as to claim that the individual perception of actual reality, which invariably contradicts the doctrines of the collectivists, is a form of false consciousness.

This explains why The Left has made the effort to gain control of the Mainstream Media, and why they insist on "shaping opinion" instead of simply reporting the facts.  Your supporters in the media are through the deliberate issuance of falsehoods trying to alter reality.  But reality is inherently real.  Facts are facts.  Or to put it in the simplest terms: A is A.

The number of votes you received (or claimed to received) doesn't change the fact that you're wrong. Might (or the appearance of might) is not right.

You are about to learn in the worst way that reality is not subject to a majority vote.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Thoughts Of The Day

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.  Antisemitism is a subset of Racial Collectivism.  We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of Racial Collectivism.  We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial Collectivist group that it actually is.  We have to see that Antisemitism is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem.  So when someone attacks Jews they're attacking all of us.  Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't be a radical idea.

We must take into account the fact that The Left's ideal of society is one where the State controls all aspects of human life and where the refusal to submit to the will of the State is a punishable offense.   Punishments which include the penalty of death.  In short, The Left seeks to establish a state of tyranny.  We have to remember that The Left regards existing societies as an evil to demolished in order to make way for their perfect fantasy collective.  Anyone, or any group, that acts in defense of the existing society is evil in the eyes of The Left.  Which is of course why The Left passionately hates the Police and the Armed Forces, both of whom have traditionally stood in the path of Holy Marxist Revolution and thus the establishment of the Holy Communist Society where all activities and relationships are dictated by the self-appointed revolutionary saviors and enforced by the compulsory power of the state.  The obvious corollary is The Left appears to have a passionate love for the destroyers of civil society such as violent criminals and organized terrorists. They appear to especially fond of those who murder police officers.  For a Leftist government to authorize the use of deadly force against any group of rioters would constitute a betrayal of its fundamental political premise, that civil society where economic and social relationships are based on consent, is fit only for destruction.  

Socialists are inherently parasitic and thus can’t take NO for an answer to their demands for obedience and the material goods they need to exist.  If they did so they would wither away and die.  A dictator, on the other hand, doesn’t have to take NO for answer.  Thus socialists are by necessity inclined to favor dictatorships over citizen ruled republics.  The abuse of the criminal justice system for partisan purposes is a crime against the citizens of this republic.

The limousine liberals, a bunch of folks who haven't quite grasped the fact that Karl Marx was full of it, are calling for a riot when their efforts to regain power over us fail.  That's right, they will take by force that which they couldn't now obtain by consent.  After all, even without the armed forces and the constabulary in the mix, we on The Right still outgun, and out martial knowledge The Left in all of its manifestations. 

Censorship is the negation of the human mind.  As rational thought is necessary to living a human life the censor, and those who demand it, are Enemies of Mankind.  In my view censors are vermin fit only for extermination.

Islam is not submission.  Islam is in fact systematic and nihilistic aggression against Humanity and all aspects of Human life.  The rockets Hamas was bombing Israel with rockets that are a copy of the BM-40 artillery rocket originally deployed by the Soviet Army.  Another band of savages serving in the cause of Communism.  Why does the mainstream establishment willfully blind themselves to the truth?

The origin of the doctrine of Islam is nothing more than the expression of the depravity of a predatory savage.  It's overt nihilism posturing as righteousness.  Islam is nothing less than a doctrine of human annihilation.  But, say some defenders of Islam, it's a religion, we can't criticize it or even interfere in any degree in the practice.

Really?

The first thing I was taught when I entered infantry basic training at Fort Benning in the spring of 1982 was that "the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero."

Acceptance of the facts is a fundamental necessity in the combat environment. Indulgence in a fantasy gets someone needlessly killed.  Innocent people are dying because the mainstream establishment won't understand and accept a fundamental truth.

Islam is Death.  And Islam is completely outside the bounds of civilized toleration.

War isn't peace, freedom isn't slavery, ignorance isn't strength, and consensual sex isn't rape.  But to accept reality as being real wouldn't allow some folks to pretend that they're some manner of superior person.  Especially when they are doing something that's totally depraved.  I think some folks feel a need to achieve, but since they're not the creative or productive kind of person they must then resort to destruction in the place of positive achievement.  Thus the need to denigrate their victims, those persons, groups, or nations who are actually good.  For the advocates of "Gun Control" it means calling someone who shoots in self-defense a murderer.  For Mullahs, Marxists, and National Socialists it means the total dehumanization of the victims prior to murdering them.  Those who advocate "Gun Control" should be treated as the Enemies of Mankind that they are.

(Image by Oleg Volk)

Leftism In Action

There's a reason I no longer buy newspapers and switch on the network news programs.  Their reporting on political and ethical issues simply can't be trusted.  There are days that I wish that this branch of our own national fifth column could be held accountable for their ongoing support of slavers and murderers.   But would require the creation of the government bureau whose function is to determine what the truth is and to punish those publish contradictions of it.  And that's a power I don't want to fall into the hands of socialist trash like The Left.

It's Happening Again

 Why did The Holocaust happen?

The actual author of the Book of Genesis actually had a point: Evil often presents itself as Good.

The Holocaust wasn't a unique event.  The Holocaust (and other horrors) were the result of normal people acting normally.  Why did a particular horror happen?  There's an answer but you may not like it.  A horror happened because the perpetrators believed they were good people with their victims and opponents being evil.  We've seen this before with numerous horrors and it will happen again.  What we're dealing with are people who believe they're good people.  We have to deal with them as such no matter how horrible the things they actually do.  Many of the people who’re loudly proclaiming “never again” are going to do it again.  The National Socialists and Soviets believed themselves to be good people, we're seeing the same phenomena with Anti-Fa.  Anti-Fa claims to be opposed to Fascism no matter what they actually do.  Anti-Fa does the things that Fascists actually do.  Members of Anti-Fa will believe the lies they're told regardless of the consequences.  Members of Anti-Fa claim to oppose Fascism, in fact they're what Fascists are.  Most members of Anti-Fa don't know that they're following the dictators handbook.  Most proponents of tyranny, such as members of Anti-Fa (National Socialists, Soviet Communists, etc.) believe they're good people and that their opponents are evil.  If a dogma requires the commission of a vile act then that act WILL be committed.  When someone denies their own Humanity then they WILL commit crimes against Humanity.  It's very easy to predict what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will say.  Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the word Fascist.

Those who don't remember history are a highly sought after group of followers.  We identify The Holocaust as the horrible act it actually was.  And we should be horrified.  But we're seeing The Holocaust from an objective perspective.  From the subjective perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their victims and opponents as being evil.  We're seeing this again with the Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa.  They see themselves as being good and their victims as being evil.  I've said this before: Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  I have a warning for members of Anti-fa, when you Brownshirt someone, don't be surprised that you're treated as a Brownshirt.  I've found through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the good guys.  If a member of Anti-fa wants to see a Totalitarian, all they have to do is look in a mirror.  Totalitarians are never hiding under the bed, they're in plain view.  For those who value power no act is too vile.  Killing a member of Anti-Fa isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  Members of Anti-fa should be engaged with aircraft like the AC-130 and A-10.  A Fascist isn't who the self styled opponents of the doctrine believe they are.  WE HAVE THE DUTY to see the self described antifascist as they truly are a National Socialist piece of shit who should be hanged from the neck until dead.  And WE HAVE THE DUTY to identify the Mainstream Media are a bunch of liars.  Once a difference in opinion is criminalized a civil war is inevitable.

Voltaire said it: Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities.

I have a question for members of Anti-Fa and BLM: what part of "Never Again" didn't you understand?

(Thanks to Mark Urbin@No Moss Here for the images)

Why don't we assassinate Joe Biden and/or Kamala Harris?  Because their assassinations won't solve the problem.  The actual problem is a culture that holds the rights of individuals in contempt.  The assassination of Biden and/or Harris won't solve that problem.