Sunday, December 31, 2017

Another Truth

The Romanian Nomenklatura had to line the Ceaucescus against the wall because they knew they knew they were next.  The American Nomenklatura doesn’t understand this, they will be lined up against the wall after the Clintons

Saturday, December 30, 2017

Another Quote

Humanity is not merely a physical condition, it is a state of mind. To be human is to be essentially rational and productive. The human mentality (or soul) looks upon the world, the land, the animals and plants, the natural forces, as things to be mastered for the benefit of himself and his posterity. On the other hand, the predator, or savage mentality does not seek to to master the world, but to be the master of men. The savage prefers not to sustain himself by his own effort, but to seize and consume the lives and property of others for material and spiritual sustenance. To the predator, justice consists of "getting away with it" -- those who rightfully resist the predator are to be punished or destroyed.

Friday, December 29, 2017

Enemies Of Humanity

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton traitors?

Is George Soros an enemy of Humanity?

Yes.

Should they put to death?

Yes.

A Quote

I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

--Leslie Bates

Thursday, December 28, 2017

Madonna News

A walking brain death case said she is leaving the United States because we refused to elect a totalitarian piece of shit as president.  So what?

My Theory

Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their "livestock" by force. Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

That's my theory, anyway.

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

A Reminder

It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.

-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist

We on the Right tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The Left, when it is in absolute power, simply doesn't care.

We on the Right believe in justice. The Left on the other hand, doesn't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Monday, December 25, 2017

Truth

GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT in the New York Times wrote:

A large part of the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other appurtenances of "actually existing socialism." We Americans (the neo-barbarians on the left excepted) prefer real courts and the other attributes of an actually existing civilization.

Mr. Wheatcroft also dug up an interesting statement by English author Evelyn Waugh:
Of course, the Americans are cowards ... They are almost all the descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear of military service.
To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody-handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards.  The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up.

AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.

There, I feel a lot better now.

Sunday, December 24, 2017

Someone In Congress

Can she be that stupid?

Rant

Inherent in Socialist doctrines implicit premise that the mere human being is an animal without a mind, or a soul, and thus without rights,  and it should be treated as such by the ideal socialist state.  If there is anyone who has a right to be offended at such public utterances it is the victims of Socialism.

Of course the Socialist believer is going to be offended when the truth is spoken. Socialism is in practice the destruction of persons and entire societies as a whole. Socialist doctrines are the lies that the socialist must tell himself in order to avoid the self realization that he is in fact a thief and a murderer.  Of course the truth is going to hurt their feelings. So what?  A Socialist is not bothered in the slightest when one of them publicly incites a mob to murder elected officials and their families because the officials are upholding and defending the Constitution to which they have sworn.  The Socialist sees this as normal and acceptable behavior.  But because the Socialists cannot--or will not--believe in a higher standard of behavior they will freak out every time they see a bunch of farmers or other citizens get together for some target practice in fear that this is the mob that is coming after them.

In order to live each man require accurate information in order to make correct moral decisions. Valid knowledge is like food and oxygen, a necessary requirement of human life.  Because the range of the senses of each individual is limited, men have through the practice of verbal (and later written) communication used communication with each other as a means of extending the range of their own senses and thus improving their own prospects for survival.  Societies that value knowledge will generally tend to be more economically and technologically advanced than those societies that devalue knowledge.  Whenever a military confrontation occurs between Rational states and those ruled by the Irrational, the Rational as a general rule, will prevail in the struggle.  As we see our own right to life as sacred, then we must see the Truth as nothing less than sacred.  Those who demand that we ignore the Truth or would forcibly prevent us from learning the Truth should be treated as nothing less than Enemies of Mankind in General, to be dealt will as wolves are.

Saturday, December 23, 2017

(Repost) The Second Civil War

The next civil war will be nothing like the gentlemanly affair conducted by President Lincoln and that nice Mr. Davis.* It will be a bloody knock-down and drag-out fight to the death. And it will make the Spanish Civil War of the last century look like a schoolyard brawl in comparison.

The enemy values power and under no circumstance will they willfully surrender it. And even if they do allow a partial succession it will only be a temporary respite as they prepare to take back full power over what they regard as rightful control of their slaves. And in the areas under their control they will go fully collectivist. Anyone seen as a traitor or insufficiently enthusiastic will be put to death. And those they cannot use will also be put down. Little girls confined to wheelchairs won’t have their stuffed toys taken from them out of malice–they will be put down to preserve the resources of the collective. And the enemy will feel good about it too.

When we go into a civil war we will have to kill every last one of them without exception.

*Yes, I’m being sarcastic.

Friday, December 22, 2017

Another Fact About The Left

They value power.

They don't care how high the innocents are piled as long as they are in change.

So what?

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Monday, December 18, 2017

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Friday, December 15, 2017

Ten More Facts For Liberals

1. The beatdown by the neo-nazi garbage (and I will use that term) that you’ve been expecting?

It won’t happen.  So why won’t it happen?  Because the neo-nazi thugs that you were told that supported Trump never existed.

YOU WERE LIED TO.

By the professors and the main stream media.  You were also lied to by the serious supporters of Hillary Clinton.  You can go outside of the so-called safe spaces and you find peaceful and normal people who are glad that the treasonous bitch will never occupy the White House.  And not one of them is a brownshirt in hiding waiting for the chance to beat you up.

2.  The monsters that you imagine that are hiding under the bed are never there.

3.  If the Democrats had nominated a middle of the road guy who was willing to correct an obvious mistake like Obamacare, someone like Donald Trump for example, they would likely have won.

4.  If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail.  And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil.  But try to tell that to a supporter of  Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.

5.  Nazi is short for National Socialist, Hitler himself came out and said the NSDAP was a bunch of Socialists, but try telling that to a Hillary Clinton supporter and you'll be called a liar. the KKK was the original terrorist arm of the Democratic Party and was a major factor in democrat victories well into the 20th Century, but try telling that to a Hillary Clinton supporter and you'll be called a liar. And the assholes who are attacking and beating up Trump supporters are doing so in imitation of the original brownshirts, but try telling that to a Hillary Clinton supporter and you'll be called a liar.

6.  There are no safe spaces to hide in and the financial supporters of Hillary Clinton (like George Soros) will be off sipping their cool drinks on an island that doesn't have an extradition treaty with us.

7.  Life is a process and compliance with a moral standard takes time and effort, and an act of moral condemnation by the depraved is just a load of noise.

8.  Evil generally doesn't realize that it is evil.

9.  The assholes (yes, I know I'm insulting assholes) who ran the extermination apparatus at various death camps knew what they were doing but also identified themselves as good people.  So do most of those who have cast a ballot (or more) for Hillary Clinton.  They are in fact nothing more than murderers, and must be dealt with as such. you can't argue with evil, you can only destroy it.

10.  If by some horrible mistake Hillary Clinton is selected as president by the Elites then that will be a good thing.  Why? Because when we make the necessary corrections, and by that I mean shoot the bastards, there will be no restraints on us.

Thursday, December 14, 2017

TRUTH

There is no difference between the Democratic party and a criminal gang.

HANG HILLARY!

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Facts

1. If you want to know why an American citizen needs to buy an assault rifle, all you have to do is look in a mirror.

2.  I think censorship should be a capital crime, but that's my opinion.

3.   The Left looks at us as things to used or trash to be disposed of, they want laws that effect others but don't effect them, there is no middle ground.

4.  The Left will believe anything except the truth.

5.  When treason becomes the normal behavior of the ruling class then the ruling class must be replaced.

6.  You have the right to be a lying jackass (like the Mainstream Media) and we have the absolute right to see you as such.

7.  If the Left on behaving like a bunch of old school National Socialists then they will be treated as a bunch of old school National Socialists, from the neck until dead.

8.  The original Young Turks committed the Armenian Genocide.  Even Hitler commented on it and then said if  no one cared about the Armenian Genocide then why should anyone care about the Jews.  The people who call themselves Young Turks now want an American Genocide.  To Hell with them.

9.  The Left have always needed us, we have never needed them.

10.  Reality is not the opening scene from ZARDOZ.

Monday, December 11, 2017

Definition

Our respective cultures are to a large degree defined by what we consider to be divine. (For the record, I'm an atheist.)

In the Christian gospel (if I recall correctly) God came to us in the person of Jesus Christ, a carpenter, a member of the building trades, someone who did creative work for a living. And Christians as a rule generally follow that example.

Islam on the other hand is solely the creation of a self appointed spokesman for a recycled pagan deity. The false prophet Mohammad was an essentially parasitic individual who married for money and then proceeded to pursue a career of wanton vandalism, robbery, murder, rape, and pedophilia, all while claiming to pass on messages from a false god. In the course of his career Mohammad also created the practice of modern political terrorism. Muslims, the slaves of the false god Allah, are commanded to follow the example of Mohammad.

I'm usually loathe to agree with any Marxist but one of them made what I now consider a valid point. We imagine our divine authority to be a reflection of ourselves and our values. The Lord God of the Judaic and Christian tradition is the creator of Heaven and Earth, and the creator and protector of Life, and we in our lives work to emulate him. On the other hand the false god Allah is the perfect reflection of the depraved creature who created him, a malignant narcissist who wantonly destroys and murder at a whim, and hardcore Muslims have not the slightest clue as to why this is wrong.

The product of our respective values is plainly obvious. Jews and Christians are builders and protectors. Those who obey the false prophet Mohammad to the letter are destroyers and murderers.

Sunday, December 10, 2017

Another Fact

The Left is against the justice system because because they would be properly identified as criminals if it actually worked.

Saturday, December 09, 2017

Liberalism In Acrion

The idea that one should be able to live one's own life in accordance to one's own judgement is such an alien idea to a liberal that is may as well come from the planet Mars.  Liberal's are, after all, nothing more than a bunch of parasites themselves. Without the capacity to force their will upon us they would shrivel up and die. So in order to live at our expense they have to teach their victims to accept the state of submission regardless of the consequences.

Friday, December 08, 2017

Wednesday, December 06, 2017

Immigration

There's a FUNDAMENTAL difference between a legal immigrant and a illegal immigrant, but try telling that to a Democrat and you'll be called a liar.

Tuesday, December 05, 2017

Quote Of The Day

"Some things, the more you understand the more you loathe them."

-- Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Another Fact Of Reality

No one on the Hard Left has a conscience, they don't care how high the bodies are piled as long as they are firmly seated on top.

Monday, December 04, 2017

Question

What is the difference between the Democratic party and a criminal gang?

There isn't any.

Sunday, December 03, 2017

A Fact Of Reality

Al Franken and his socialst minions clearly stole the election for the senate seat.  He should be put to death.

http://mopu.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-unpublished-memoirs-of-allen.html

Saturday, December 02, 2017

Another Fact Of Reality

I believe in capital punishment but I believe in being certain that the executed is in fact guilty but the Hard Left doesn't care how high the bodies are piled as long as they are firmly seated on top.

Fact

Yes the Cylons had a plan, but plans never work in reality.

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Message To The Left

In the Marxist lexicon civilization consists of states that treat human beings as hominid livestock and which run up body counts in the millions. At last count the death toll due to the various attempts to practice what Marx preached runs from 100 million to 170 million and is still rising to places such as Cuba, China, and North Korea. In the Marxist lexicon arrogance consists of the moral certainty that each person has the inalienable rights of Life, Liberty, and Property, and such rights must be defended by deadly force either by the individual or collectively through the institution of government.  In the Marxist lexicon unwarranted bloodshed consists of the act of shooting back at and ultimately hunting down and killing those willfully inhuman creatures who, in accordance to the ravings of false prophets such as Mohammed and Marx, seek to forcibly enslave and murder human beings.  In the Marxist lexicon idiocy consists of looking at the world through one's own eyes, thinking for one's self, and refusing to believe the immense load of ideological excrement left by Marx, Engels, and their intellectual heirs. (Yes, I know, calling them intellectuals is a contradiction) In effect in the marxist lexicon reality is unreal.

Marxists in general have apparently mastered the practice of double-think, the treatment of concepts as opposite of their true meaning.

The doublethinker worships despots such as the Castro brothers and the father-son-grandson team of the Kims as liberators and saviors while the United States and it's allies, the true liberators of Afghanistan and Iraq, are treated as conquerors and murderers. The doublethinker treats literally bloody handed murderers as innocent victims while willfully ignoring the mass graves of hundreds of thousands of helpless men, women, and children found in Iraq. The doublethinker treats the society of contract and consent, for which Marx invented the pejorative term CAPITALISM, as a slave system while SOCIALISM, which in practice requires compulsion, slave labor, and the outright murder of those who resist, is called true liberation. The doublethinker treats the acts of robbery and murder as just while the act of self defense is punished as the foulest of crimes. Ultimately the doublethinker treats the United States of America, the greatest and most morally advanced nation on Earth, as vilest of evils, fit only for destruction. As an individual the doublethinker is merely insane, as a political activist the doublethinker is a mortal hazard to individual persons and to Mankind in General.

If President Trump was murdered by the Marxists or their Islamist allies the result would not be, as the Leftist elite imagines it, the ascendance of the Marxist elite, but instead it would be the initiation of the long overdue extermination of the followers of Karl Marx.

Hell, skip the assassination, let's start now.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Another Fact

The Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore is under fire.

The Democrats are likely lying as usual.

Another Fact Of Reality For The Left

If you yourself being dragged to the execution ditch, you only have yourself to blame.

Monday, November 27, 2017

A Fact Of Reality

If all you listen to is National Socialist propaganda you shouldn't be surprised that you've end up in the National Socialist Party.

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Another Fact

If I could speak I would say that Hillary Clinton and Al Franken should be put to death.

Another Fact Of Reality

There's no question that Al Franken stole the U.S. Senate seat.

 http://mopu.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-unpublished-memoirs-of-allen.html

Another Truth

Nothing like being the star in a live performance of DARKNESS AT NOON to give someone a real appreciation of what socialism is really like.

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Doublethink In Action

In the Marxist lexicon civilization consists of states that treat human beings as hominid livestock and which run up body counts in the millions. At last count the death toll due to the various attempts to practice what Marx preached runs from 100 million to 170 million and is still rising to places such as Cuba, China, and North Korea.  In the Marxist lexicon arrogance consists of the moral certainty that each person has the inalienable rights of Life, Liberty, and Property, and such rights must be defended by deadly force either by the individual or collectively through the institution of government.  In the Marxist lexicon unwarranted bloodshed consists of the act of shooting back at and ultimately hunting down and killing those willfully inhuman creatures who, in accordance to the ravings of false prophets such as Mohammed and Karl Marx, seek to forcibly enslave and murder human beings.  In the Marxist lexicon idiocy consists of looking at the world through one's own eyes, thinking for one's self, and refusing to believe the immense load of ideological excrement left by Marx, Engels, and their intellectual heirs. (Yes, I know, calling them intellectuals is a contradiction)


 Marxists in general have apparently mastered the practice of doublethink, the treatment of concepts as opposite of their true meaning.  The doublethinker worships despots such as Fidel  and Raul Castro and Kim Jong Un as liberators and saviors while the United States and it's allies  are treated as conquerors and murderers.

The doublethinker treats the society of contract and consent, for which Karl Marx invented the pejorative term CAPITALISM, as a slave system while SOCIALISM, which in practice requires compulsion, slave labor, and the outright murder of those who resist, is called true liberation.

Ultimately the doublethinker treats the United States of America, the greatest and most morally advanced nation on Earth, as vilest of evils, fit only for destruction. As an individual the doublethinker is merely insane, as a political activist the doublethinker is a mortal hazard to individual persons and to Mankind in General.  In effect in the Marxist lexicon reality is unreal.  They treat the acts of robbery and murder as just while the act of self defense is punished as the foulest of crimes.

Friday, November 24, 2017

Question

What is the difference between the Democratic Party and a criminal gang?

Some Facts Of Reality

1. I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

2.  A Socialist is someone who's dumb enough to complain about the fact that food's cheap and plentiful.

3.  Progressive is newspeak for someone who believes in the paleolithic ideal of beating up and killing people and taking their stuff.

4. I still wonder how folks on the Left manage to get out of bed in the morning (or early afternoon) without seriously hurting themselves.

5.  There's no point in debating a leftist on individual issues because their overall epistemological methodology for all effects and purposes reverses the relationship between reality and fantasy. This leads to their well documented habit of systematically reversing good and evil.  And while there are many grounds for complaint on the part of the Right. (the refusal to prosecute the participants in the Waco Massacre)  And it is no suprise that a leftist would openly label someone who opposed them as "sub-human."  Members of the Left, like many pre-literate barbarians before them, are essentially moral and material parasites. They must reject the society of consent and seek power over those who can perform the work that sustains their lives. This drives them to see other persons as either tools they can use to further their own goals, or as organic waste to be disposed of.  So when a leftist declares someone to be "sub-human", that is in practice a precursor to the murder of that person.  The mass graves that are constantly being dug up in nations where the Left has obtained unrestrained power serve as the irrefutable proof of this fact.  So when I see a leftist bumper sticker on a car, the first thought that comes to my mind is "murderer."  If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite GOD-LIKE patience with the behavior of the Left.  Leftists can publically assault those who won't submit to them, destroy property, and even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanized themselves.

6.  Why do I feel like I'm tied up and gagged in the back seat of a car driven by someone who insists on driving on the wrong side of the road and who responds to the appearance of oncoming traffic by denying that it exists and stomping on the accelerator pedal?

7. The science of aviation works because those who practice it actually made the effort to discover and apply the relevant facts of reality to their endeavor.  The aviation mishaps that do occur are usually the result of someone not paying attention to the relevant facts.  Parasite mentalities as a general rule see themselves as superior beings and other people, the productive population, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of.  Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not an act of murder, in their minds is it simply the disposal of hominid garbage.  In practical terms a Communist is a mortal enemy of human kind and killing a Communist can be no more wrongful than putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Another Hard Truth

The Hard Left doesn't care how high the pile of bodies is as long as they're firmly seated on top and in power.  And what is the difference between the Democratic Party and a criminal gang?

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

About The Left

They call themselves friends of Humanity.

But they're not.  They are in fact enemies of Humanity.

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Suggestion

Washington city and the federal government should be erased from the face of the Earth.

Friday, November 17, 2017

Something I Said

I called for a military coup against Barrack Obama.

Some affirmative diversity hire didn't do her job.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

Another Truth

Humanity is not merely a physical condition, it is a state of mind. To be human is to be essentially rational and productive. The human mentality (or soul) looks upon the world, the land, the animals and plants, the natural forces, as things to be mastered for the benefit of himself and his posterity. On the other hand, the predator, or savage mentality does not seek to to master the world, but to be the master of men. The savage prefers not to sustain himself by his own effort, but to seize and consume the lives and property of others for material and spiritual sustenance. To the predator, justice consists of "getting away with it" -- those who rightfully resist the predator are to be punished or destroyed.

-- Leslie Bates, The Resister, Vol VI, N. 1, Page 42

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

A Question About Our Rulers

Under the Primacy of the State the function of law is to control the productive population for the benefit of the ruling parasites. The rulers, and their immediate servants, are not subject to those laws themselves.  The actual interest of the actual citizens is irrelevant. What matters is the whims of the rulers and those who willfully serve them.  Under the Rule of Law all real laws must be applied to all citizens equally such as the laws prohibiting homicide and theft.  As our Socialist rulers and their willing servants regard themselves as exempt from compliance with the laws, on what grounds can they claim to be protected under them?

Now, what are your questions on this block of instruction?

Monday, November 13, 2017

Qustion About Liberalism.

The defenders of liberal values are called conservatives but opponents of liberal values are now called liberals.

What's wrong with this?

Saturday, November 11, 2017

Disagreement

Believe it or not,  I do disagree with President Trump, Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted for her crimes against our nation and put to death.

Friday, November 10, 2017

Another Truth

The Church Of Scientology should be treated as a criminal gang.

A Truth

It's a good thing that (piece of shit) L.Ron Hubbard had gone into religion and not politics.  We'd have to execute his successors as Enemies Of Humanity.

Wednesday, November 08, 2017

Another Question

When will we put to death the Enemies Of Humanity, those who would disarm and censor us, already?

Truth

You can replace the words Gun Owner in the mouth droppings of the Democrats with the word Jew in the mouth droppings of any National Socialist, that's how predictable they've become.

Tuesday, November 07, 2017

Question

Why don't we put a cruise missile into the home of George Soros?

Thought For Ihe Day

If by some horrible mistake Hillary Clinton is selected by the self styled opponents of Fascism as the president then that will be a good thing.  Why? Because when we make the necessary corrections, and by that I mean shoot the bastards, there will be no restraints on us.

Monday, November 06, 2017

Messages For Antifa

1. Reality is real, live with it.

2. When you follow a false prophet like Karl Marx, don't be surprised when you believe in falsehoods.

3. When you look in a mirror you will find a Fascist.

4. When you overthyow the government we will overthrow you.

5.  You will end up in the ditch.

Sunday, November 05, 2017

Saint Hillary

Once upon a time ago I was working on a bit fiction set in the Official Traveller Universe:

Ian saw that the old bakery building at 22nd Avenue and Washington Street was boarded up again, another attempt to redevelop the property without demolishing the original single story brick structure had failed.

Plastered all over the structure were posters showing a black and white photograph of a sixty-ish woman, with short fake blonde hair, a standard nine-millimeter service pistol was aimed at her head. The hammer of the pistol in the photograph was blurred as though it were falling on the firing pin.

Over the photograph on the poster in all capital letters was the one word, REMEMBER.


"I'm sorry sir," said the Chief as he pointed to the posters, "but I'm not fully familiar with that bit of Terran history."


"Well," Ian replied, "That's Saint Hillary, a martyr for the holy cause of Democracy. She was just a stupid old bitch who believed that being democratically elected somehow constituted an excuse for abusive and destructive behavior."

Saturday, November 04, 2017

Antifa

Let's talk about Socialism.

We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.  The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.  If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such. If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.  If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.  It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.  It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.  Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such.
A Mass Murderer.

A Question

What part of "never again" did you not understand?

Friday, November 03, 2017

About Islam

Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Monday, October 30, 2017

Surprise!

My doctor was surprised to that the election of Hillary Clinton would result in a bunch of mass graves from coast to coast.

Another Quote

I could start out by quoting George Santayana, but those of us who actually perceive and think already know the statement.  History is being repeated and we are condemned to witness it.  The fundamental problem with Hillary Clinton and those who aid and support her is that they see themselves as exempt from the reality that we perceive and understand.  The history of errors made by the Progressive movement is absolutely meaningless to them.  The wave of destruction and the death toll is completely blanked out.  And there may not be someone left alive to record the history.

And Yet Another Message For The Hard Left

The Democratic Party are behaving as Ememies Of Mankind, it's time that they are treated as such.

Sunday, October 29, 2017

Gun Control

The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the means it is brought about.  The case in this point is that the disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this.  In their view reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder of citizens who own guns is morally correct.

But Reality is Real.  Reality is not subject to a vote.  And Murder is Murder.  No vote by any political body can change that.

The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder.  A government that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and devolves to a gang of criminals.  And as such it must be put down by deadly force.

And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners  must themselves be put to death.

But is gun control effective?

No.

 The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."

"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."

If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.

The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party.  As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say.  All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew.

Yes, it’s that obvious.

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Another Message For The Hard Left

Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists, like the Democrats, thought they were superior people, maybe we could threat them as such, from the neck until dead.

A Message To The Hard Left

As long as you behave as a National Socialist then you will be treated as a National Socialist, from the neck until dead.  We are not European Jews and other victims of National Socialism, we will fight back.

Friday, October 27, 2017

Another Message To Antifa

There's no question that you and ( yes, I disagree with President Trump) Hillary Clinton are mortal enemies of Mankind and America.  And you should be treated as such, from the neck until dead.

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Another Fact Of Reality

President Donald Trump and the Republican Party are protecting you from us.  We tend to shoot for the head.  If you resort to violence then we will respond with our violence to your violence.  If you remove President Trump and the Republicans there will be nothing between you and the rest of us.

And if you try to silence us by force then we will silence you by deadly force.

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Another Fact Of Reality

I once went to a Liberal owned coffee house.  They didn't know how to make a cup of coffee.

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

A Fact Of Reality

Let's see, if we in Humanity to treat the Left the way that Great Comrade Stalin treated anyone he suspected of being an opponent, let alone someone who was an actual opponent, would anyone on the Left still be breathing, let alone continuing to rant like a mentally disconnected lunatic who's off his medicines?

I wouldn't think so.

If Humanity dealt with the adherents of Modern Liberalism the way the Left has dealt with humans in general whenever the Left has obtained unrestrained power, there wouldn't be any Leftists left standing. Of the universities, the mainstream media, and the urban centers of the Left there would be nothing left but smoking ruins, and there would mass graves from coast to coast. (Personally, if I were in charge of a political cleansing program, I would just dump the remains in the public landfills with the rest of the garbage.)

In my own view the present day Left, like the unschooled barbarians who plagued civilization before them, are essentially parasites. If the Hun or the Mongol were to take "no" for an answer to their demands for food and other material goods they would die very quickly. Compulsion, taking things and persons by force, is inherently necessary to the parasite manner of existence. And those who resisted had to be killed as an object lesson for others.

The Left, the present-day literate post-marxist barbarians, not only need material support they also need spiritual support as well. Barbarian chieftains and tribal witch-doctors demanded degrading and often dangerous acts of worship from their subjects, up to and including human sacrifice, in order to assure themselves that they would still have a roof (or a tent) over their heads and food to eat the next day. Those refused to obey were worked over by the goon squad or simply killed.  In the classrooms and editorial offices of the Left the demand is for unquestioned agreement without regard to the actual facts of reality. The self-styled intellectuals of the Left are the first to demand “speech codes” and other forms of censorship lest they be identified as frauds and poseurs and subsequently bounced out of their comfortable ivory towers.  They are no longer insulated from a real world that demands real thought and real labor.

Faced with the refusal of Russian farmers to comply with his sacrificial demands, Lenin laid a curse upon the farmers and in the name of his false god, “the toilers”, ordered:

Merciless war against these kulaks! Death to them!
The Left, being dependent by force upon others for their sustenance, must stand in opposition to the society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion, be it various species of Socialism or the witch-doctor rule of Islam, because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.  Of course, in my view, if the Left would just die it would be nice.

Monday, October 23, 2017

A Message To The Mainstream Media

When you lie to us then you will be identified as a liar.

When you act as the propaganda arm of a political party then you be identified and dealt with as such.

Saturday, October 21, 2017

Another Message To Antifa

Does Paul Joseph Goebbels or the hard left have the right to speak?

YES.

And we have the right, NO, WE HAVE THE DUTY, to see him as he was, a National Socialist mouthpiece and a lying piece of shit. And we have the duty to see him as a National Socialist propagandist.


And we have the right, NO, WE HAVE THE DUTY, to see you (the self described anti-fascist) as you truly are a New National Socialist piece of shit who should be hanged from the neck until you are dead.

And we have the duty to identify the mainstream media are a bunch of liars.

Execute Hillary.

Friday, October 20, 2017

Thursday, October 19, 2017

A Fact Of Reality

Was it necessary to remove the ramp to nowhere?

No.

The removal was simply a Pork Barrel project.

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Another Post

Antifa has identified a gay man as a neo-nazi and beaten him up, if Antifa wants to behave as a bunch National Socialists then Antifa will be treated as a bunch of National Socialists, from the neck until dead.

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Another Hard Truth

Socialism sucks.

We buy cars and trucks from South Korea but North Korea has nothing to sell.

Saturday, October 14, 2017

Socialism In Action

A bunch of mass murdering psychopaths.
Let's talk about Socialism.

We must understand that Socialism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting the First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.

The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.  If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such. If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.  If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.  It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.  It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.  Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such.
Another mass murdering pschopath.


Friday, October 13, 2017

Promises, promises

The very first act that every individual performs upon enlisting in the Armed Forces of the United States is promise to uphold and defend The Constitution.

For the Army the oath of enlistment was this:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

 All of us who served in the Armed Forces made this promise to the nation.


And every one of us who has served has broken that promise.  Every one of us has allowed traitors and murderers to rule over us and every one of us has obeyed every order the traitors and murderers have issued.

We deserve to punished for this. We really do deserve to be punished for this.

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Truth

Conscience and Liberal are two words that don't go together.

Sunday, October 08, 2017

Friday, October 06, 2017

Another Hard Fact

I saw a film where the state practiced gun control, it was called Shindler's List.


Thursday, October 05, 2017

History

I could start out by quoting George Santayana, but those of us who actually perceive and think already know the statement.  History is being repeated and we are condemned to witness it.  The fundamental problem with Hillary Clinton and those who aid and support her is that they see themselves as exempt from the reality that we perceive and understand.  The history of errors made by the Progressive movement is absolutely meaningless to them.  The wave of destruction and the death toll is completely blanked out.  And there may not be someone left alive to record the history.

Wednesday, October 04, 2017

Some More Hard Truths

 1. Our universities have gone from centers of learning and tolerance to centers of ignorance and hatred because of the Social Justice Warriors.

2. If the Social Justice Warriors insist on behaving as National Socialist Brownshirts then they will treated as such from the neck until dead.

3.Killing a Social Justice Warrior is no more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist Brownshirt.

4. If a Social Justice Warrior want to see why a citizen wants an automatic weapon all a Social Justice Warrior has to do is look in a mirror.

5.  Knowing Marxism amounts to knowing nothing.

6.  Reality is real and no amount of force in the name of social justice will change it.

7.  In Newspeak those who favor and defend Human Liberty are called conservatives or fascists and those who oppose Human Liberty are called liberals or progressives.

8.  We need to separate education and state.

9.  Hanging Hillary Clinton is no more an act of murder than hanging Adolf Hitler.

10.  The Ivy League has become a group of diploma mills for the establishment.

Tuesday, October 03, 2017

A Message To Social Justice Warriors

If you insist on acting like a brownshirt then you will be treated as one, from the neck until dead.

Thruth

Killing a Social Justice Warrior is no more an act of murder than killing a National Socialist.

Question

Why don't we just hang the self appointed censors on the hard left already?

Suggestion

Hang Hillary already.

Monday, October 02, 2017

Facts Of Reality

1. The problem with the ruling class is that it exists.

2. If we were as violent as you believe we are, then you wouldn’t exist.

3. The Left have always needed us, we have never needed The Left.

4. Marxists are bullies with machine guns.

5. If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail.  And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil.

6.  The assholes who are attacking and beating up Trump supporters are doing so in imitation of the original National Socialist Brownshirts.

7. There are no safe spaces to hide in and the financial supporters of Hillary Clinton will be off sipping their cool drinks on an island that doesn't have an extradition treaty with The United States.

8. It's always some well bred asshole in silk that betrays the people and lets the barbarians in the city gates.

9. Evil generally doesn't realize that it is evil.

10. The Left see their victims as things to be used and then are mystified as to why their victims want them dead

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Message To Antifa

If you want to behave as a Totalitarian, then you will treated as a Totalitarian, from the neck until dead.

Friday, September 29, 2017

A Fact Of Reality

The Democratic Party is effectively an industrial scale version of the Manson Family with postgraduate degrees and paramilitary swat teams instead of LSD and old kitchen knives.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

On Hillary

Ayn Rand used to describe the "mainstream" of modern thought and culture as a stagnant swamp.  The fact of the matter is that there is nothing divine about Hillary Clinton.  What this says about those who voted for her I will leave as exercise for the reader.  Before one can lie to another one has to lie to one's self. I don't see why I should waste my time reading or listening to a bunch of liars.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

So What?


In some places an election is nothing more than a voodoo ritual that is used to create the appearance of moral legitimacy for the regime in power. As in the cases of the Soviet Union, Baathist Iraq, and the City of Chicago.  We have to remember that Islam is a scam. Thus it should come to no surprise to us that the rulers of Iran, who hold themselves above accountability, would resort to fraud in order to keep their stooges in their positions in the apparatus of the state.  A state without a functioning mechanism of accountability, and a means of peacefully removing those who are unfit to govern, will eventually fall into corruption and a state of tyranny. (In the case of Iran that point is moot. It was a corrupt and tyrannical state from day one.)  It is unlikely that any real reform will occur in Iran. The scam religion of Islam was created in part to legitimize the tyranny of the false prophet Mohammad. Any legal mechanism that holds the apparatus of the state accountable to the people would be deemed a man made law, and thus would be null and void according to the doctrine of Islam. And since Islam denies all of the rights of man any attempt to defend those rights is an offense against the false god Allah.  In order for Iranians to truly obtain freedom they must abandon Islam altogether.

And yes, Hillary Clinton was unfit to govern this nation and she (and her followers) should be hanged.

Monday, September 25, 2017

Another Thought For The Day

It looks like Leftism is basically an excuse to feel smugly superior to everyone else without regard to actual knowledge, actual ability, and the actual consequences of their actions.

Thought For The Day

The conservative camp largely consists of people who treat reality as being real and human beings as being human. The other side on the other hand treats reality as being unreal and human beings as a form of livestock without inherent rights. Thus in the long term rational people, regardless of how grossly miseducated they were through the socialist controlled school systems, tend to move towards the conservative camp. Alternatively, irrational people, seeking to indulge whatever fantasy that they believe in, will usually fall into the socialist camp in order to actualize that fantasy.

On Euthanasia

In the collectivist version of a social-political order founded on the Primacy of the Parasite the ordinary person is looked upon as a tool to be used, the product of their labor is treated as the property of the collective which is distributed in accordance to those needs which are identified by the leaders of the collective.  An individual who is retired from the workforce requires food, housing, and medical care, all of which is taken from the collective pool of assets without any input to the resource pool from the retiree in return. From the point of view of the collective leadership a retiree is a liability to the collective. The good of the collective requires the reduction of such liabilities as early as possible. Thus it is in the best interest of the collective to encourage self-termination by the elderly and the seriously or terminally ill. And it is also in the best interest of the collective to abort those fetuses that will not grow up to be productive workers in the collective.  And if you think that what I just wrote is outrageous, then think again. One group of collectivists, the National Socialists of Germany, actually carried out a program of euthanasia on developmentally challenged individuals of all ages.  Anyone who believes that an individual has no inherent Right to Life is capable of believing anything and, as history has demonstrated, capable of doing anything.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

Hangings

Adolf Hitler should have been hanged.

Hugo Chavez should have been hanged.

Hillary Clinton should be hanged.
On February 1st the Minneapolis StarTribune, the socialist rag of the Twin Cities, published the following full page ad:



 The obvious question is how can someone be tricked into betraying any moral value when they absolutely lack one?  The false prophet Mohammed commanded his followers to conquer along with the commission of the acts of rape, robbery, and murder. The doctrine of Islam commands enslavement and the systematic violation of the rights of man and for the believers to act as predatory animals. Without question the doctrine and practice of Islam is absolutely depraved.  Given that Human Life is the foundation of all valid moral values then Islam must be absolutely condemned. But the signatories of this document refuse to understand these facts of reality and condemn as immoral those who hold an actual moral standard.  Of couse the signatories of this document are enemies of Mankind.

I am hard pressed to respond to this utterly depraved document without the use of barracks language.

Friday, September 22, 2017

A Question

Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

A Fact

The Democratic Party follows the doctrine of National Socialism without the Aryan frills.

Question

Can we just treat Antifa as just a bunch of enemies if Mankind and hang them?

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Thought For The Day

In my opinion I think the whole doctrine or practice of Leftism, and thuggery in general, can be reduced down to eight words:

"BEHOLD ME! ADORE ME! OBEY ME! OR ELSE!"

Well, that's my theory.

Monday, September 18, 2017

Definition For Today

From The New Devil's Dictionary:

Fascist : Totalitarian political party founded by former Marxist Benito Mussolini, someone who subsequently killed, imprisoned, or otherwise harshly dealt with his former progressive comrades. This would cause the term "fascist" to be commonly used as a label for any person, group, or a political community who objects in any fashion or to any degree to the subjugation and plunder of themselves or of Mankind In General by progressive, or caring and compassionate people who claim to be acting on behalf of The Earth, The Animals, The Rain Forest, The Children, or The World Proletariat. Example: "Leslie Bates is a Fascist Pig! Kill him!"

Another Monday

Given the long documented tendency for the Left to take positions that are consistently contrary to reality one should wonder what's really the driving force behind their apparent madness.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Message To Liberals

If you insist on behaving like a National Socialist then you will be treated as a National Socialist, from the neck until dead.

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Thought For The Day

The Hard Right or the White Nationalists do not exist, but the Hard Left does exist, to protest against the White Nationalists is essentially useless.  The Hard Left must be destroyed.

Monday, September 11, 2017

Comment On Islam

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

Another Question

Why I do not believe in the concept of God?

An omnipotent being doesn't need a servant.  And all false prophets should be vaporized the moment they open their mouths such as Mohammed (Islam), Joseph Smith (Mormonism), and L. Ron Hubbard (Scientology).

Sunday, September 10, 2017

Friday, September 08, 2017

Another Truth

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:  

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.

It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.

As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.

The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.

And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.

Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.

A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.

And our urban collaborators need to be dealt with, too.



Tuesday, September 05, 2017

Another Truth For The Hard Left

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Hard Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Hard Left. Once the Hard Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims (that's us) will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to any member of the Hard Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave your victims no choice but to break you.  It's called a CIVIL WAR,  and cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.  What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Hard Left persist in not understanding?  It's generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Hard Leftist thug finds him or herself staring at the muzzle of our rifles it is because the stupid Hard Leftist put him or herself there.

Monday, September 04, 2017

Yes, I'm Speaking To The Hard Left, Now

If you are are being treated as a Totalitarian (from the neck until dead) it's because you are a Totalitarian.  And of course Donald Trump is not your president, you just wanted another Hard Leftist like you, just another mass murdering psychopath like yourself.

Saturday, September 02, 2017

A Hard Truth

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left. Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.

It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.

What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?

It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thug finds himself staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid Leftist put himself there.

Friday, September 01, 2017

Thursday, August 31, 2017

Another Good Question

What's it like to not have a Human soul?

Another Question

Why am I an atheist?

A real God would have vaporized the false prophets Mohammed and L. Ron Hubbard the moment they opened their mouths.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Comment On Islam

The absolute first thing taught at infantry basic training during the Cold War was that the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero. On the face of it I saw this as the response to any attempt to explain a failure to learn a necessary skill. But this idea also applies to the moral nightmare we were facing during with the Communists enemy and their excuses for their crimes. Even if the usual Marxist credibility issues did not apply to the position of the White House, we need to remember that there are still millions of Muslims who still believe they are following the Allah given order to murder those who have chosen to live a rational life. Some of them still have money and organizational skills to apply to the problem of murdering infidels like you and me.

As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted Islam was not practiced on the American continent. The nation’s first interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.

It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.

As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.

The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah’s eternal whorehouse.  In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. But the doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.

Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I now propose an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

An obvious question is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?

A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.

A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the actual rights of the people. In declaring “man made” laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes — including rape, robbery, and murder — that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.

This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.