The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler has been kind enough to answer the irrational rantings of this Socialist Twit.

In my younger days I used to enjoy the act of intellectually pummeling those persons that Ayn Rand (on one of her nicer days) used to call Looters. My problem is that the act of rubbing their noses in the conceptual fecal matter that they routinely produce has become way too easy (which sort of implies that the Looters are way too stupid) and not as emotionally satisfying for me as it was about ten years ago when I started posting on Usenet newsgroups.

Misha at the Rottweiler takes an essentially defensive position and simply points out the fact that the self-proclaimed "conceptual guerrilla" is rather throughly disconnected from reality. Which is fine as far as it goes.

If one wanted to go on the offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) one may simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.

"From each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.

It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.

It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manefestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occured when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.

Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.

Perhaps we should start treating them as such.