Someone that I would presume to be what is commonly called a liberal sent this e-mail message to the editor of a conservative weblog:
From: Jay Leet (JAYL80@*********)
Subject: (none)
"It's hard to take you seriously when you call it "mustard gas" you ignorant fool. It's "Muster Gas". As if Saddam was killing people with gas made from mustard...you retard."
Mustard Gas is the common name for a blister agent that was invented and used by both sides in the First World War. (Hitler was hospitalized for exposure to it.)
Here's what one website said on the subject of Mustard Gas as used during that war:
The skin of victims of mustard gas blistered, the eyes became very sore and they began to vomit. Mustard gas caused internal and external bleeding and attacked the bronchial tubes, stripping off the mucous membrane. This was extremely painful and most soldiers had to be strapped to their beds. It usually took a person four or five weeks to die of mustard gas poisoning. One nurse, Vera Brittain, wrote: "I wish those people who talk about going on with this war whatever it costs could see the soldiers suffering from mustard gas poisoning. Great mustard-coloured blisters, blind eyes, all sticky and stuck together, always fighting for breath, with voices a mere whisper, saying that their throats are closing and they know they will choke."
The original plan for the seizure of the island of Iwo Jima called for the saturation bombardment of the island with Mustard Gas munitions. President Roosevelt personally vetoed this part of the plan.
But now a liberal (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, a progressive) decides to strike a pose of intellectual superiority to a conservative by mentally rewriting reality.
Mustard Gas... blank out... "It's 'Muster Gas'".
But reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what their intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster.
The liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they are totally unfit to do so.
_
11 comments:
I'm always amazed by how leftist extremists "pride" themselves on being experts on a profession they hate.
For example, one far left knee jerk liberal who makes Deaniacs look conservative, said the following about the D.C. sniper, John Allen Muhammad:
"He's not as black as people think he is. He was in the Army and the Army turns people white."
I asked the veterans on the tml-chat list the following question:
"Is there any accuracy in his statement, or is as clueless as he sounds?"
One of the replies came from someone who claims to be the only member of the active duty military to vote for Mondale in 1984:
Let me put it this way:
Right now, rock stars are coming together for Clue-aid to help people like your associate.
Christ, I was in an all-black but for me squad early on, and because of that I was into rap when it was still in its infancy. I am probably the only white every to go to a NWA show and live to tell the tale!
Mark, I think you need to use some quotation marks here.
Mark wrote:
For example, one far left knee jerk liberal who makes Deaniacs look conservative, said the following about the D.C. sniper, John Allen Muhammad:
"He's not as black as people think he is. He was in the Army and the Army turns people white."
What, in the psychological sense of the concept, does Comrade Kneejerk feel constitutes whiteness?
Is it the ability to plan and carry out actions over a long period for the purpose of achieving a defined goal, as opposed to the apparently mindless pursuit of intense intoxication and sexual contact?
In that case Doctors Sowell, Williams, and Rice would qualify for membership in the Klan, if they weren't disqualified for having too high a score on the intelligence test.
Once again, Mark has to come back and clear up his own comments. :-(
First, I gave up long ago trying to make sense of Comrade Kneejerk.
Second, Here is the quoted text of what Doug said (a dedicated liberal dispite getting through Jump School, Air Assault School & Sniper School; according to Comrade Kneejerk, this should have forced him to devout Republican status):
"Let me put it this way:
Right now, rock stars are coming together for Clue-aid to help people like your associate.
Christ, I was in an all-black but for me squad early on, and because of that I was into rap when it was still in its infancy. I am probably the only white every to go to a NWA show and live to tell the tale!"
----
Personally, I was never in the military. I did spend a good chunk of my youth on base. My dad was in the Army Corp of Engineers for 22 years. He also served in Vietnam.
He didn't complete his full 1 year tour, but he was med-evaced out and didn't have much say in the matter.
There's always italics.
Obviously, I made some assumptions that may not be entirely valid about what Comrade Kneejerk would believe constitutes blackness.
I am certainly not a fan of the gangsta-rap culture and quite frankly would not mind at all if its adherents were to pull their pants up, speak in a grammatically correct manner, and treat productive work as honorable instead of condemning productive people as chumps.
I wouldn't mind winning the Powerball drawing either...
Careful there Leslie, Bill Cosby started making noises like that (dress better, speak English, stay in School) and the, ahem, "Leadership" of the Black Community turned on him.
All of whom if I recall correctly are members in good standing of the socialist movement. How dare Mr. Cosby question the Marxist Doctrine of the Primacy of the Parasite!
If they're going to sell out to the white man they could certainly do better than to sell out to Karl Marx, Et Al.
I think your "muster gas" idiot was a juvenile. There are a lot of know-nothing punks out here shooting off their virtual mouths, just as socialized 'education' has trained them to.
"Liberals" are REGRESSIVES, since they consistently stand for envy, tribalism and coercion, each of which is more than old enough to fossilize.
And OOOOOH THEY HATE IT when I point out that MY kind is the new breed, and THEIR kind is the atavism headed for the dust of history. There is nothing they can say to dispute it, but OOOOOH THEY HATE IT!
It's great fun for me. :-)
PR1ME
Oh yes, absolutely!
Post a Comment