Censorship is the negation of the human mind. As rational thought is
necessary to living a human life the censor, and those who demand it,
are Enemies of Mankind. In my view censors are vermin fit only for
extermination.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in
favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated
in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Showing posts with label Execute Hillary Clinton and George Soros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Execute Hillary Clinton and George Soros. Show all posts
Sunday, December 16, 2018
Saturday, December 15, 2018
Dealing With Children
Back during the Vietnam War there were Marxists who would set fire to
buildings and then cut the hoses with an axe when the firefighters
showed up to fight the fire. But now the grandchildren of those same
Marxists whine about their feelings being hurt by any statement of the
truth.
Too bad, bitches.
These children wouldn't last ten seconds in infantry basic training at Fort Benning. And that's a good thing because I absolutely wouldn't trust any of these utterly pathetic wastes of matter and energy on any field of battle with my life. Seriously, if Comrade Stalin was still around these virtual morons would hand the entire planet over to him right now.
During the summer of 1976 I read a book and changed the way I saw myself and other people.
Robert A. Heinlein in his novel STARSHIP TROOPERS put forth the radical idea that adulthood was not only a physical state but a distinctly moral one as well. And while physical maturity was obvious to an objective observer the moral state was not. Given that the mentally and morally immature were not able to rationally perform the duties of citizenship he proposed to establish a system for sorting out the able from the unable. As it's impossible to compel moral maturity what's required is voluntary system to separate functional citizens from the dysfunctional losers. While Heinlein did present his system of Federal Service in altruistic terms it does allow the separation of moral dead weights, such as the losers above, from mentally and morally active people.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Too bad, bitches.
These children wouldn't last ten seconds in infantry basic training at Fort Benning. And that's a good thing because I absolutely wouldn't trust any of these utterly pathetic wastes of matter and energy on any field of battle with my life. Seriously, if Comrade Stalin was still around these virtual morons would hand the entire planet over to him right now.
During the summer of 1976 I read a book and changed the way I saw myself and other people.
Robert A. Heinlein in his novel STARSHIP TROOPERS put forth the radical idea that adulthood was not only a physical state but a distinctly moral one as well. And while physical maturity was obvious to an objective observer the moral state was not. Given that the mentally and morally immature were not able to rationally perform the duties of citizenship he proposed to establish a system for sorting out the able from the unable. As it's impossible to compel moral maturity what's required is voluntary system to separate functional citizens from the dysfunctional losers. While Heinlein did present his system of Federal Service in altruistic terms it does allow the separation of moral dead weights, such as the losers above, from mentally and morally active people.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Friday, December 14, 2018
My Theory
Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the
bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus
they have to control their "livestock" by force. Since reason tells us
that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional
whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing
themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional
bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated
on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die
motherfucker!"
That's my theory, anyway.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
That's my theory, anyway.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Question Of The Day
Why do intelligent people oppose Socialism?
Be Socialism never works.
There were warnings for over a century, and every warning was ignored.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Be Socialism never works.
There were warnings for over a century, and every warning was ignored.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Thought For The Day
Those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Socialism never worked, but that never stops idiots from trying.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Socialism never worked, but that never stops idiots from trying.
Punishing a man for an act he didn't commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Monday, December 10, 2018
A Fact
Is there such a thing as Islamophobia?
No.
It's perfectly natural to have a fear of being conquered by a bunch of ignorant and violent people.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
No.
It's perfectly natural to have a fear of being conquered by a bunch of ignorant and violent people.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Sunday, December 09, 2018
Happy Birthday.
Someone was born on this day in 1960.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Saturday, December 08, 2018
In Stock
Once upon a time ago, about the time I was posting the ASCII text
versions of The Resister on Usenet, I bought an AK-47 chambered in 5.56
NATO. It had the thumb hole stock mandated at the time by our masters in Washington. As a former combat rifleman I took it
upon myself to properly zero in the sights on the weapon. As I was
doing this at the Moon Valley range down in Eden Prairie I was rudely
interrupted.
It appeared that a scraggly young man wanted to sell me a folding stock
for the AK-47. I said no. He repeated his offer. I repeated my
refusal. Eventually he got the point.
First, I actually had no interest in a folding stock for the rifle. The
folding stock for the Ak-47 series rifle is copied from the MP-38/MP-40
series machine pistols issued by the Wehrmacht. They are inherently
unstable and were used both by the Wehrmacht and the Soviets to shorten
the weapon for carriage within an aircraft or armored vehicle. An
acceptable trade off for them but not for me.
Second. folding stocks at the time were illegal. I was not about to
ruin a weapon by installing an inferior stock simply for the sake of
disobeying our self appointed masters. The proper way to deal with a
master is to air out his head.
By his demeanor and his insistence on selling the stock to my unwilling
self I concluded that this fellow was a stooge for the BATF. I refused
to fall into the trap.
A simple bit of common sense can go a long way.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Friday, December 07, 2018
Question
What's a socialist?
A socialist is also someone who believe in the Primacy Of The State.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
A socialist is also someone who believe in the Primacy Of The State.
What part of Adolf Hitler was a socialist does The Left not understand?
What part of National Socialist German Workers Party (the English name) does The Left not understand?
Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing parties.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Mainstream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.
To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high. If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail. And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil. But try to tell that to a supporter of Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.
What part of National Socialist German Workers Party (the English name) does The Left not understand?
Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing parties.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Mainstream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.
To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high. If history has taught us anything it is that those who imagine themselves to be infallible will fail. And those who imagine themselves incapable of evil will do evil. But try to tell that to a supporter of Hillary Clinton and they will call you a liar.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Thursday, December 06, 2018
Question Of The Day
What's a Fascist?
A Fascist to The Left is anyone that opposes them. But in fact a Fascist is someone, like Hillary Clinton and Benito Mussolini, that believes in the primacy of the state.
But there is another definition.
According to Josef Stalin a Fascist is anyone who opposes him. This included Leon Trotsky who was a lifelong Marxist and the founder and original leader of Red Army along with being a servant of Vladimir Lenin.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
A Fascist to The Left is anyone that opposes them. But in fact a Fascist is someone, like Hillary Clinton and Benito Mussolini, that believes in the primacy of the state.
But there is another definition.
According to Josef Stalin a Fascist is anyone who opposes him. This included Leon Trotsky who was a lifelong Marxist and the founder and original leader of Red Army along with being a servant of Vladimir Lenin.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Wednesday, December 05, 2018
Thought Of The Day
If the FBI did it's job I would be in prison and so would Hillary Clinton.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Tuesday, December 04, 2018
Thought For The Day
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Monday, December 03, 2018
A Blast From The Past
The scientific concept, dictatorship, means neither more or less than unlimited power resting directly on force, not limited by anything, not restrained by any laws or any absolute rules. Nothing else but that.Without the restraints of human legislation or of natural and permanent moral laws we are left with one thing, the law of the jungle, to kill or to be killed.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
It's simply impossible to reason with or otherwise peacefully coexist with any person, any group, or any nation, that believes that it has the right to control you or to take things from you by force. Such persons or entities can only be physically isolated from you or ultimately destroyed. Peace is the absence of enemies but it's not priceless. As long as there's one person who values power who lives there will be no peace.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Sunday, December 02, 2018
A Reminder
I'll start with a quote:
We, the truly rational, tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The self appointed masters, when they are in absolute power, simply don't care. The fact of the matter is that the only crime to those who value power is simple disobedience. To perceive and think as a proper rational person is fundamentally toxic to the masters. And reason must be suppressed by any means necessary. We the living believe in justice. The masters on the other hand, don't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
It is better to kill one hundred innocents than to let one guilty person go.
-- Dolores Ibarruri ("La Pasionaria"), Spanish Communist
We, the truly rational, tolerate the long and drawn out appeals process for death penalty cases, as frustrating as it is, because in we want to be certain that we will not put an innocent person to death. The self appointed masters, when they are in absolute power, simply don't care. The fact of the matter is that the only crime to those who value power is simple disobedience. To perceive and think as a proper rational person is fundamentally toxic to the masters. And reason must be suppressed by any means necessary. We the living believe in justice. The masters on the other hand, don't care how high the pile of human corpses is as long as they are firmly seated on top.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Saturday, December 01, 2018
Publishing
L. Ron Hubbard was receiving a penny a word writing for the pulps when Ayn Rand had her novels published in hard covers and adapted for motion pictures. Some of Ayn Rand's works are still in print while Hubbard's works have to be published by an internal department of the Church of Scientology.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Friday, November 30, 2018
Thought For The Day
Socialism never works. Killing a Socialist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Thursday, November 29, 2018
Thought For The Day
Reality isn't the opening scene of Zardoz.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Thought For The Day
I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll
keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem
with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.
The fact of the matter is that the self-described "Peace Activist" does not act out of conscience but out of a fraudulent desire to pose as a morally superior being without any regard for the millions of innocents that they condemn to death and servitude. A "Peace Activist" is a willing accessory to the acts of mass slavery and mass murders committed by the various adherents of toxic ideologies such as Socialism and Islam. And killing a "Peace Activist" is not an act of murder, it is in effect the putting down of a diseased animal which is a demonstrated hazard to innocent Human Life.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
The fact of the matter is that the self-described "Peace Activist" does not act out of conscience but out of a fraudulent desire to pose as a morally superior being without any regard for the millions of innocents that they condemn to death and servitude. A "Peace Activist" is a willing accessory to the acts of mass slavery and mass murders committed by the various adherents of toxic ideologies such as Socialism and Islam. And killing a "Peace Activist" is not an act of murder, it is in effect the putting down of a diseased animal which is a demonstrated hazard to innocent Human Life.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
A Fact Of Reality
Who needs a National Socialist Reichsministry of Propaganda and
Culture to control what we see and hear when we have CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, the Washington Post,
and the New York Times?
Even Fox News, in an effort to appear "fair and balanced", gives airtime to the enemies of our republic. But just as their is no balance between food and poison there is also no balance between truth and falsehood.
So am I now calling for government control of the press?
No. Do I look like a fucking piece of socialist filth?
In the context of the present struggle between Western Civilization and Islamic Barbarism, the former is called telling the truth, the latter is called something else. What that something else is labeled and defined as follows:
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Even Fox News, in an effort to appear "fair and balanced", gives airtime to the enemies of our republic. But just as their is no balance between food and poison there is also no balance between truth and falsehood.
So am I now calling for government control of the press?
No. Do I look like a fucking piece of socialist filth?
In the context of the present struggle between Western Civilization and Islamic Barbarism, the former is called telling the truth, the latter is called something else. What that something else is labeled and defined as follows:
Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.And that doesn't mean that they're fluffing up a Muslim's pillows now, does it?
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Monday, November 26, 2018
Some Proposals
Today I shall propose an Amendment:
Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general. Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States. But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement. In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore. When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school. In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.
Another proposal:
Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?
To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws. The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms. Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal. As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. In effect to live a fully Human life. The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals. Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name? A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam or Scientology that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam or Scientology is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit. This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights. And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.
And yet another proposal:
I would replace The Second Amendment with the following:
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
And there's The Rand amendment:
Ayn Rand on the final page of the novel Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.
At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us is removed from existence. We are freed from the burden of bureaucracy. Socialism in effect if not name is abolished. Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path of Life is cleared. I could go on all day about the practical benefits of The Rand Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other rational person.
Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general. Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States. But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement. In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore. When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school. In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.
Another proposal:
Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?
To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws. The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms. Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal. As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.When the First Amendment was adopted the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent. Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers. It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom. As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue. The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death. And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.
In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. In effect to live a fully Human life. The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals. Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name? A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam or Scientology that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam or Scientology is the denial of real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit. This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights. And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.
And yet another proposal:
I would replace The Second Amendment with the following:
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
And there's The Rand amendment:
Ayn Rand on the final page of the novel Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.
At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us is removed from existence. We are freed from the burden of bureaucracy. Socialism in effect if not name is abolished. Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path of Life is cleared. I could go on all day about the practical benefits of The Rand Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other rational person.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Death to Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)