Quote Of The Day

The problem with China is that there are too many Chinks here.

--L. Ron Hubbard

#Free Tommy Robinson

Beating Down

The beatdown by the neo-nazi garbage (and I will use that term) that you’ve been expecting?  It won’t happen.  So why won’t it happen?  Because the neo-nazi thugs that you were told that supported Trump never existed.

YOU WERE LIED TO.

By the professors and the mainstream media.  You were also lied to by the serious supporters of Hillary Clinton.  You can go outside of the so-called safe spaces and you find peaceful and normal people who are glad that the treasonous bitch will never occupy the White House.  And not one of them is a brownshirt in hiding waiting for the chance to beat you up.  The monsters that you imagine that are hiding under the bed are never there.

#Free Tommy Robinson

More Questions

Should we treat David Miscavige, David Hogg, and Emma Gonzalez as enemies of Humanity?

Should we terminate diplomatic and military relations with the United Kingdom?

Should we erase the followers of false prophets like Marx and Mohammed from the face of the Earth?

Thought For The Day

If O.J. Simpson had stayed home on that horrible night he would still have a career, real friends, the annoying ex-wife, a reputation as a stand up guy, and most importantly no one outside of the Los Angeles area would have ever heard the name Kardashian.

UPDATE 1000 HRS:

When the British government makes peaceful political change impossible they will make violent political change necessary.

 UPDATE 1300 HRS:

It is not the job of the British Police to just follow orders.

Questions

Why don't we shut down the FBI?

Who needs a Reichministry Fur Kultur when the Mainstream Media will lie without a gun to their heads?

Should the United States of America pull out of NATO because of free speech violations in the United Kingdom?

Should the United States of America continue to have diplomatic and military or other relations with the United Kingdom?

Were we correct in succeeding from Britain in 1776?

A Reminder

"To send men to the firing squad Judicial proof is unnecessary.  These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail.  This is a revolution and a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate."

--Che Guevara, Marxist Murderer

Those who dehumanize them themselves cannot claim protection under a human right.  Killing a Marxist is no more an act of murder than putting down a rabid dog or eliminating any other hazard to Human Life.

UPDATE 1130:

If the Democratic Party wants a Civil War they'll get one, up the ass.

UPDATE 1645:

 To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our the Democrats welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and the Democrats are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution: 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by himself and for his own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam has to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights.  And the urban collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

UPDATE 1930:

We need to stop diplomatic recognition of the British Government.

Methodology

Terror is merely the method. The ultimate goal is the establishment and maintenance of a state of tyranny.   It does not matter if the tyrants calls themselves Communists, National Socialists, or Theocrats, they simply cannot be reasoned with. Negotiations, summit meetings, and other gestures of good will cannot stop them. Like any predatory animal they can only be driven off and ultimately destroyed.  If we are to continue to live a proper human life then the hunting season on tyrants and those who willingly support them must always be open.

If someone wants Gun Control, they'll get it up the ass.

Um

I keep thinking that the old movie ZARDOZ would be a neat metaphor for certain aspects of the present political and cultural situation.

 I've come to the conclusion that apart from his species the character of Invader Zim is essentially the idealized form of the complete modern utopian agitator.

Like the modern utopian agitator Zim embodies supreme arrogance combined with supreme ignorance and a total dependence on the technology created by others with a level of personal ability barely suitable for working in the fast food industry. As one the leaders of the Irkan Empire, Almighty Tallest Purple once asked Zim, "shouldn't you be frying something?"

And what can I say about the Irkans?

They not only militarized their society in the manner dreamed about by various utopians but they have also gone beyond those arch-militarists, the ancient Spartans, in completely removing the family from the social structure altogether. Zim's first words upon being decanted from the womb-machine thingy were, "I love you cold robotic arm."

Of course having achieved the utopian dream of totally regimenting their own society the Irkans then proceed to indulge in that other annoying habit of practicing utopians the conquest and ruthless exploitation of their neighbors.

Invader Zim, having been sent to Earth so he wouldn't foul-up Operation Impending Doom II the way he wrecked Operation Impending Doom I, regards himself to be grossly superior to the inhabitants (that's us) even though every one of his schemes to effect a take down of human society is thwarted by his next door neighbor, Dib, a boy who has seen far too many episodes of The X-Files.

If it weren't for the well documented effects of various utopian schemes the various efforts of our own home-grown utopians to impose their will upon us would be almost as funny.

Reality

Collectivist trash such as the National Socialist German Workers Party, Anti-fa, and Black Lives Matter saw themselves as good people, but in reality they are evil.  And the advocates of gun control also think of themselves as good people, but in fact they are evil.

All an advocate of gun control has to do is replace the word Jew with the words Gun Owner.  It's that easy to commit and advocate mass murder.  All a Statist needs to do to understand why a citizen needs an assault rifle is to look in a mirror.

L. Ron Hubbard And Sctentology

L. Ron Hubbard was getting a penny a word writing for the pulps when real authors like Ayn Rand and Robert A. Heinlein were being published by hardcover publishers. Think about that.

We're not curious about The Church Of Scientology, we're angry about their practices.

A Message To The Republican Party

What the Republican Party needs to get through their collective skulls right now is the fact that the age of politics as usual is over.  No more compromise. No more deals. No more bipartisanship.  There must be a radical clean up of the mess that the Left has created. The partisans of socialism must be systematically removed from our public institutions. And if we are to have a future as the core nation of our civilization we must make a special effort to clean out the Augean Stables that our educational establishment has become under the tutelage of the Left.   And we must with volume and clarity tell the spoiled brats who imagine themselves to be the heirs of Marx and Lenin to grow up or get out.  We need to get hard on the Enemies Of The Constitution on the Left.  Of course, if those idiots would just die, it would be nice too.

The Future

Body Count

The National Rifle Association was founded by former members of the Union Army in 1871 to teach former slaves to defend themselves from the Ku Klux Klan, the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.  The death toll of the National Rifle Association is zero. From the rise of the Bolsheviks in 1917 to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 the average daily death toll of Marxists was 3200. And that doesn't count American president John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

Who are the murderers?

The Marxist trash who are pushing Gun Control are the murderers.

On Atheism

I never received an e-mail from God@god.god saying "Les, you're wrong."

On The Assassination Of Hillary Clinton

A Hard Leftist, especially a formally indoctrinated Hard Leftist, will believe anything except the truth.  For example  the New York Times has published an editorial piece claiming that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated as a result of the collective will of the City of Dallas, Texas.  The fact that President Kennedy was murdered in a Democrat governed state by a open Marxist apparently didn't enter the non-existent mind of the author. Nor did the fact that there is no such clearly identifiable thing as a collective will, that belief is simply a Marxist myth. The fact is that the assassination of a significant political figure is essentially a suicide mission. The term assassin is derived from the Islamic cult of the Assassins.  A group whose members were induced into performing suicide missions through the use of hashish. It won't happen because those who can do so understand that Hillary Clinton isn't the cause of the problem, she's merely the symptom.  The actual problem is the culture that holds the rights of individuals in contempt and is willing to use force to reach their goals.  A single assassination will not solve this problem. Although there's no shortage of trained individuals who are able to carry out the mission, it won't happen because we who have the necessary skills understand that it would be futile.  If Hillary Clinton were assassinated it will be the result of someone within her own party who identified her as insufficiently Marxist in action.

Peace Activists

I could go on about what I really think of peace activists but I'll keep it short by paraphrasing Keith Richards: I don't have a problem with shooting peace activists, I only have a problem with the police.

Whine

Some Democrat is whining:

I actually do disagree with the president.  I want him to liberate Canada from Socialist filth like Justin Trudeau.  And I want him to treat advocates of Gun Control as enemies of Humanity.

Racism In Action

Racial Polylogism was a distinguishing characteristic of the dogma of German National Socialism. That Aryan Logic told them that they were the MASTER RACE and that they could do anything they bloody well wanted to members of all other races. Any objections raised were dismissed as non-Aryan (English, Jewish, etc.) logic and thus were not binding upon themselves.  Der Afrikanererstaznazis of the Black Caucus in Congress and Black Lives Matter apparently refuse to accept the fact that chattel slavery was perpetrated by both Whites and Blacks. Blacks in Africa would raid neighboring tribes and sell their prisoners to White and Arab slave traders.  Instead, Black tribal collectivists choose to treat chattel slavery as the act of the "White Race" inflicted upon the "Black Race." treating this as a blank check to gain plunder and favors at the expense of non-blacks. Ignoring of course the fact that price for the sin of chattel slavery has already been paid, IN BLOOD.  Unfortunately the vile institution of slavery was not destroyed but was instead nationalized. The program of the Democratic Party since the reign of Woodrow Wilson has been to inflict the German form of socialism (begun under Otto Von Bismarck and taken to its ultimate conclusion under Hitler) upon America. Hitler called his doctrine "Marxism without the Talmudic frills." What we have under the Clintonistas is National Socialism without the Aryan frills.  The dumb as a brick Marxists are still out there.

Thought For The Day

The Despocrats as part of their program to gain power through class warfare are promising to raise taxes on "the rich". Which in practice means plundering the more productive members of our society in order to buy off those persons who are less productive.  What the Despocrats fervently hope is not noticed by their marks is that every dollar that is forcibly taken from the real economy is a dollar that will not be used to create new businesses, and new jobs, or used to expand existing businesses, with more new jobs or increased pay for existing workers. In any case the money that is taken from the real economy to pay off the supporters of the Despocrats will never be part of the paycheck of a real worker.  In short, the Despocrat's claim of being the friend of laborers is only so much effluvient matter.

Update 0417 CDT:

Scientology

We know more about you than we know of National Socialism, we're not curious, we're very angry.

Pursuit Of Power

To those value power above all no act in the pursuit of power is too depraved.

Question

Who needs a Reichsministry Fur Kultur when we have a Mainstream Media?

Why?

To Democrats the fundamental value is power.  Freedom is the negation of power and therefore must be opposed.  Or at least in public Freedom must not be supported lest the victims come to understand their actual position within the socialist order.  Democrats wouldn't be caught dead standing up for an actual Human value.

Flag Burning In Action

Why should anyone make a fuss about burning our flag?  The burning of our flag is a symbolic act. As the flag represents us as a free people so does the destruction of the flag represent the destruction our nation and our way of life.  Without question those performing the act of burning the flag are nihilists who would--given the means and opportunity--actually perform the act of murdering Americans in the worst way possible.

What Difference Does It Make?

From the collectivist view a person is simply a thing to be used. A tool. The fact that a person has a complete life outside of the alleged goals of the collective is completely blanked out. To the collectivist the full human life is completely meaningless.  And because a person is seen as simply a tool it does not matter if it breaks as a result of being misused. The tool can simply be disposed of and replaced, as were the men in Benghazi.  Hillary Clinton’s open contempt for the people serving under her is perfectly normal for a collectivist. In The Mask Of Command, historian John Keegan recounts an incident where Adolf Hitler was having dinner served to him in the dining car of his private train when it stopped at a station. When another train loaded with wounded soldiers returning from the Eastern Front stops beside Hitler's private train. Hitler had the stewards in the dining car pull down the shades so he wouldn't have to see the other train and the wounded passengers.

 The battle of Gettysburg is seen by historians as the high water mark of the Confederate cause. But what was the cause of the Confederacy? In my present view it was Elitism.

The Southern states were politically dominated by the slave holding class. A group of men who saw themselves as entitled to the labor of African slaves and the obedience of common white men. With the wealth and free time taken from the backs of their slaves they came to dominate the Southern states of the American Republic. The rise of the Republican party came as a result of the citizens of the North becoming tired of the abuses inflicted by the Southern Elites. The Southern Elites saw no alternative to preserve their class privileges but to leave The Union.  The War of Succession was presented to the common citizens of the South as a struggle for liberty but the fact was that the actual objective was to preserve the power of the Elites. When conscription was imposed on the South the slave holding class was essentially exempt from it. The true view of the common citizens by the Elites was made clear for the first time.  With the defeat at Gettysburg the cause of the Confederacy and the Elites who ruled it had no place to go but down.

So why would Barack Obama, someone was generally identified as a Marxist, decline to participate in the ceremonies at Gettysburg?  Because Marxism is an elitist doctrine. It was created by a self-appointed elite for the benefit of the self-appointed elite. Marx, Engels, and their subsequent followers, saw themselves, without qualification, as the masters of the actually rational and productive citizens of their nations. Their efforts, as with the Southern Elites, were to control and use people for their own benefit. Regardless of their public statements the natural inclination of the Marxists is to side with their fellow users of humanity.  On this basis it's no surprise that The Big Zero was a no show at Gettysburg.

Some assholes are celebrating the birthday of Karl Marx.

So what?

 Marx was a raving antisemite. Old school Progressives (the one they NEVER teach you about in the public schools) had "issues" with those they saw as the "inferior" races. (Africans, Jews, Asians, etc.) And eliminating those who don't fit into the collective makes perfect sense to a collectivist.  I've come to the conclusion that anyone who sees another person as either a tool to be used, or as trash to be disposed of, is essentially a Leftist. (Which pretty much puts me to the right of Attila the Hun.)
 
We must understand that Marxism is essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting Karl Marx, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much greater than the needs of the slaves.

The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.  If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such. If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.  If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.  It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.  It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)

The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.  Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such.

Killing a Marxist is not an act of murder, it it an act of self defense.

Gun Control

The fact is that some adherents of what we had politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party.  As a result it has become very easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say.  All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. 

Yes, it’s that obvious.

The Facts Of Reality

The Democratic Party have an idea it is to replace the society of social and economic consent that we live in with the social and economic primacy of the parasites over the productive. Or as their primary philosophical source (and founding trustifarian) put it, "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." And as there is no limit to the needs of the parasite masters there will be no limit on the burdens imposed on the productive slaves.  Poison is poison no matter how much grape flavoring one adds to it. They cannot avoid knowing that their ideal society is toxic to us and thus have no effective choice but to attack the opposition on trivial issues in order to head off a public examination of their basic ideological premises.  Political ideology is basically a means of giving the appearance of positive virtue to actions that are morally intolerable to the victims.

Democratic Party

To the parasites, like the Democratic Party, power over the productive citizens of this nation is necessary for their very existence.  In short, and I simply cannot emphasize this enough: POWER IS LIFE.  Any restraint on that power -- be it the freedom of speech and press, the rights to self defense and to bear arms, or the free election of public officials (and laws regulating who may hold a specific office) -- is a danger to the parasite's continued existence.  I would expect the Democratic Party to band together and claim that the "will of the people" in some way trumps the Constitution, the terms under which the Federal Government was established.  Hilary Clinton and her closest supporters apparently believe that are on the "Progressive" version of a holy mission. To quit is to negate the self-concept that they have adopted for themselves. I absolutely believe that the act of surrendering power is literally unthinkable for them.

Adolf Hitler thought of Americans as deplorable, so does Hillary Clinton.

Yes, I disagree with President Donald Trump.  I want him to execute Hillary Clinton and put a cruise missile through the front window of George Soros.

Question Of The Day

The actual issue is who is in command of your life, you or the self appointed masters?  The Second Amendment was never about hunting, or even about self defense against violent criminals.  The Second Amendment is an inherent component of the Bill of Rights.  And the Bill of Rights defines the relationship between the Citizens and the Government.  It is the self appointed Master Class who are working to overturn the primacy of the Citizens and establish themselves as the irrevocable rulers of our nation.  And because the actions of the self appointed Masters are morally intolerable we will have no alternative but to completely eliminate them.

My Theory

Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their livestock by force. Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

That's my theory, anyway.

Totalitarian Filth

Jail is for the working class. shooting is for totalitarian filth.  Some totalitarian filth is disposed of here.

Mass Murder Day

Once again we come to May First.

This is the day on which Leftists traditionally shout out their claim to be morally superior beings who are entitled to rule over us mere humans and take the product of our thought and labor to use as they they see fit for the betterment of mankind. And if you really believe their claims then obviously you won't notice the pile of the one hundred million-plus human bodies that the self styled agents of progress have left in their wake as they have made their way to power, and willfully abused that power over us mere humans.  When we see through the ideology and other claims of the Left it is very readily apparent that their doctrine is nothing more than a modernistic facade placed over the old stone age practice of beating up or killing people and taking their stuff.  It is time that we see the Left for what they truly are, not as the vanguard of moral progress, but only a gang of thieves and murderers.
 
One of things I usually do on May Day is to repost the Affirmations for the Inner Communist, Ayn Rand once said that it was morally acceptable mock evil as long as it was recognized as evil. So once again I present:

Stuart Smalley's Daily Affirmations for the Inner Communist

Monday:

"I'm going to execute and expropriate today just for the heck of it because, gosh darn it, I deserve to have a good time."

Tuesday:

"I am not a fraud, a Marxist yes, but not a fraud."

Wednesday:

"I deserve all the mass adulation from the people I can get without feeling ashamed or being grandiose."

Thursday:

"I will express my feelings today. I will not hide them behind my mustache. My mustache is not a mask for my feelings, but rather a small patch of facial hair that covers my inadequacies."

Friday:

"When I rob a bank for the cause, I will not be playing those parent tapes in my head: "You wield a revolver like a girl" . . . "Why can't you be more like Stalin?" . . . "Philosophy? What kind of major is that? It's useless!"

Saturday:

"Just because I execute Christians and counter-revolutionaries does not mean I'm an mass-murdering psychopath like my father."

Sunday:

"If I must violently put down a counter-revolution today, it is not because I am a bad person or that I am not worthy of love; it is because my people are a bunch of religion-addicted capitalist sons-of-bitches--and I am mean enough, ruthless enough, and dog gone it, people fear me."