On this day in 1776 a bunch of guys in Philadelphia signed the ultimate breakup letter.
Showing posts with label United States of America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States of America. Show all posts
Monday, July 04, 2022
Anniversary
Sunday, July 04, 2021
Saturday, July 04, 2020
Anniversary
On this day in 1776 a bunch of guys in Philadelphia signed the ultimate breakup letter.
Sunday, May 17, 2020
Thoughts Of The Day
Collaborators always appear when conquest happens, this is unfortunate.
I once had to close a checking account at TCF Bank. The person I was talking to was making excuses for not complying with my request. It was only when I told them that I would call the MN Attorney General’s office did they comply. I suppose it did help that the sitting Attorney General was the DFL goon Skip Humphrey, who had a reputation of being one trench coat short of being a proper Soviet thug.
In reality the Citizens of the United States are the sovereign authority. As such have the right to publish and speak the truth, and to read and hear the truth, in order to carry out their obligation as the sovereign authority.
The novels 1984 and Atlas Shrugged were written as warnings to Humanity. Not as instruction manuals for enemies of Mankind.
Justice consists of getting what someone deserves, not receiving what someone wants. The absolute last thing the other side wants is justice, because that would result in their extinction.
It doesn't matter if you're bitten by a rabid doberman or a rabid poodle, you're still going to get rabies shots.
Many of my predictions are wrong, such as this one.
Before one can lie to others, one has to lie to one's self.
To Democrats the fundamental value is power. Freedom is the negation of power and therefore must be opposed. Or at least in public Freedom must not be supported lest the victims come to understand their actual position within the socialist order.
That which doesn't kill you isn't trying hard enough.
I once had to close a checking account at TCF Bank. The person I was talking to was making excuses for not complying with my request. It was only when I told them that I would call the MN Attorney General’s office did they comply. I suppose it did help that the sitting Attorney General was the DFL goon Skip Humphrey, who had a reputation of being one trench coat short of being a proper Soviet thug.
In reality the Citizens of the United States are the sovereign authority. As such have the right to publish and speak the truth, and to read and hear the truth, in order to carry out their obligation as the sovereign authority.
The novels 1984 and Atlas Shrugged were written as warnings to Humanity. Not as instruction manuals for enemies of Mankind.
Justice consists of getting what someone deserves, not receiving what someone wants. The absolute last thing the other side wants is justice, because that would result in their extinction.
It doesn't matter if you're bitten by a rabid doberman or a rabid poodle, you're still going to get rabies shots.
Many of my predictions are wrong, such as this one.
Before one can lie to others, one has to lie to one's self.
To Democrats the fundamental value is power. Freedom is the negation of power and therefore must be opposed. Or at least in public Freedom must not be supported lest the victims come to understand their actual position within the socialist order.
That which doesn't kill you isn't trying hard enough.
Friday, April 26, 2019
Prediction
The United States will have another civil war.
The next civil war will be nothing like the gentlemanly affair conducted by President Lincoln and that nice Mr. Davis.* It'll be a bloody knock-down and drag out fight to the death. And it'll make the Spanish Civil War of the last century look like a schoolyard brawl in comparison. The enemy values power and under no circumstance will they willfully surrender it. And even if they do allow a partial succession it'll only be a temporary respite as they prepare to take back full power over what they regard as rightful control of their slaves. And in the areas under their control they will go fully collectivist. Anyone seen as a traitor or insufficiently enthusiastic will be put to death. And those they can't use will also be put down. Little girls confined to wheelchairs won’t have their stuffed toys taken from them out of malice, they'll be put down to preserve the resources of the collective. And the enemy will feel good about it too. When we go into a civil war we'll have to kill every last one of them without exception.
*Yes, I’m being sarcastic. There'll be another civil war in the United States.
The next civil war will be nothing like the gentlemanly affair conducted by President Lincoln and that nice Mr. Davis.* It'll be a bloody knock-down and drag out fight to the death. And it'll make the Spanish Civil War of the last century look like a schoolyard brawl in comparison. The enemy values power and under no circumstance will they willfully surrender it. And even if they do allow a partial succession it'll only be a temporary respite as they prepare to take back full power over what they regard as rightful control of their slaves. And in the areas under their control they will go fully collectivist. Anyone seen as a traitor or insufficiently enthusiastic will be put to death. And those they can't use will also be put down. Little girls confined to wheelchairs won’t have their stuffed toys taken from them out of malice, they'll be put down to preserve the resources of the collective. And the enemy will feel good about it too. When we go into a civil war we'll have to kill every last one of them without exception.
*Yes, I’m being sarcastic. There'll be another civil war in the United States.
Friday, June 01, 2018
A Fact Of Reality
GEOFFREY WHEATCROFT in the New York Times wrote that a large part of
the European left spent a large part of the 20th century hating the
United States not because it had economic inequality or Jim Crow but
because it did not have show trials, labor camps and the other
appurtenances of "actually existing socialism." We Americans (the
neo-barbarians of the Hard Left excepted) prefer real courts and the
other
attributes of an actually existing civilization. Mr. Wheatcroft also
dug up an interesting statement by English author Evelyn Waugh:
Of course, the Americans are cowards ... They are almost all the
descendants of wretches who deserted their legitimate monarchs for fear
of military service.
To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards. The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up. AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.
There, I feel better now.
Free Tommy Robinson
To Hell with you Mister Waugh. I'm sure General Tojo, Il Duce, und Der Fuherer would be very happy to hear that Americans are cowards. Those bloody handed power tripping motherfuckers had their destinies very thoroughly settled by those whom that fatuous English twit calls cowards. The courage of Americans fighting for a just cause has never failed and anyone whose continued existence is (or was in the case of that fatuous English twit) dependent on the courage of American Citizens should properly acknowledge that fact or shut the Hell up. AMERICANS ARE CITIZENS, not the chattel of some perfumed and over-dressed descendant of some barbarian chieftain (or a commissar or other such sub-human filth), we (and the rest of the human race in general) are not subjects or slaves who exist solely to expended at the whim of the ruler, anyone who cannot accept this as an unevadable fact of reality should have their head struck off and stuck on a pike.
There, I feel better now.
Free Tommy Robinson
Sunday, May 27, 2018
Questions
Why don't we shut down the FBI?
Who needs a Reichministry Fur Kultur when the Mainstream Media will lie without a gun to their heads?
Should the United States of America pull out of NATO because of free speech violations in the United Kingdom?
Should the United States of America continue to have diplomatic and military or other relations with the United Kingdom?
Were we correct in succeeding from Britain in 1776?
Who needs a Reichministry Fur Kultur when the Mainstream Media will lie without a gun to their heads?
Should the United States of America pull out of NATO because of free speech violations in the United Kingdom?
Should the United States of America continue to have diplomatic and military or other relations with the United Kingdom?
Were we correct in succeeding from Britain in 1776?
Saturday, July 04, 2015
Bitching On The Anniversary
On this day in 1776 a bunch of subjects of the British crown declared themselves and their fellow Americans to be the free citizens of a free nation. Needless to say King George III and the British Aristocracy objected to this revolutionary act with deadly force.
Although the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the establishment of an aristocratic class one has been brought into effect by judicial fiat. Homosexuals -- a group once commonly identified as depraved or mentally ill -- have been granted a separate and superior status with respect to the citizens of our nation. Anyone who refuses a demand from a homosexual on any grounds are now subject to civil punishment. Given this it would not be a surprise when the refusal of a demand by a homosexual will result in a criminal penalty as well.
In reality this is called oppression. In the last year the Pink Triangle of the Homosexual Collective has changed from a sign of victim status to being a symbol of the oppressors. It has become a symbol of tyranny like the Red Star of Soviet Communism and the Broken Cross of National Socialism.
What are your questions on this rant?
UPDATE 1735 CDT:
I'm reposting a rant on the subject of Gay Rights.
The Myth Of Gay Rights
What is a right?
In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context. There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]
So what is a Gay Right?
The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals. In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.
Why disassociate from homosexuals?
In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code. In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned. In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.
In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony. When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination. Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]
Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?
In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction. The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life. And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]
Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block. In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation. This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective. When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.
A permanent end.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Footnotes
1. Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.
2. In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society. For this he should be taken out and shot.
3. The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation. It was wiped out in action.
Although the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the establishment of an aristocratic class one has been brought into effect by judicial fiat. Homosexuals -- a group once commonly identified as depraved or mentally ill -- have been granted a separate and superior status with respect to the citizens of our nation. Anyone who refuses a demand from a homosexual on any grounds are now subject to civil punishment. Given this it would not be a surprise when the refusal of a demand by a homosexual will result in a criminal penalty as well.
In reality this is called oppression. In the last year the Pink Triangle of the Homosexual Collective has changed from a sign of victim status to being a symbol of the oppressors. It has become a symbol of tyranny like the Red Star of Soviet Communism and the Broken Cross of National Socialism.
What are your questions on this rant?
UPDATE 1735 CDT:
I'm reposting a rant on the subject of Gay Rights.
The Myth Of Gay Rights
What is a right?
In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context. There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]
So what is a Gay Right?
The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals. In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.
Why disassociate from homosexuals?
In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code. In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they are to be shunned. In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.
In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a pretend marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony. When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination. Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]
Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?
In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction. The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life. And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]
Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block. In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation. This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective. When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.
A permanent end.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Footnotes
1. Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.
2. In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society. For this he should be taken out and shot.
3. The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation. It was wiped out in action.
Friday, July 04, 2014
Anniversary
Today is the anniversary of the signing of the American Declaration of Independence.
Is there something to celebrate?
Today we are under the domination of a tyrant who is far more contemptible than King George III. Someone who has renounced the remnant of rational government to inflict a regime that has fully renounced reason and reality. Someone who is a follower of doctrines that are clearly false. And someone who is in full contempt for the law.
The time has come to permanently remove our rulers from power and from existence.
Is there something to celebrate?
Today we are under the domination of a tyrant who is far more contemptible than King George III. Someone who has renounced the remnant of rational government to inflict a regime that has fully renounced reason and reality. Someone who is a follower of doctrines that are clearly false. And someone who is in full contempt for the law.
The time has come to permanently remove our rulers from power and from existence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)