Thought For The Day

I once was told when I worked in a hospital system that being right was unhealthy

But being right in a hospital is a fundamental part of the job.  If an employee is wrong a patient suffers and dies.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Question Of The Day

Are advocates of what is politely called "Gun Control" enemies of Humanity?

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thought For The Day

Why does Bullwinkle the Moose keep trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat?  In spite of clear evidence that it's toxic some people continue to believe in enforced economic equality which was the doctrine that served as the foundation of the Soviet state. And because the Soviet state enforced a falsehood it had to act in an adversarial fashion with respect to Humanity in General. Like the Church of Scientology the Soviet State must lie to everyone without exception.  The continued fail of a cartoon character to perform a magic trick is funny.  The suffering that will be inflicted by the insane Hillary Clinton and her followers is nothing short of appalling, and most importantly it will be absolutely preventable.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Question Of The Day

Who needs a Ministry of Culture (like the Third Reich had) to force an obvious falsehood on us when the Mainstream Media will do it without a gun to their collective heads?

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thought For The Day

That which does not kill you isn't trying hard enough.
 

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thought For The Day

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against the Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left. Once the Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.

Or to put it another way to the Left, break the rules of civil society and you will have left us no choice but to break you.

It's called a civil war. And cars with bumper stickers, tee-shirts, and other examples of open posturing will make target identification very easy.

What part of "Liberty or Death" does the Left persist in not understanding?

It is generally considered to be bad form to advocate violence against someone simply because of their political views. But if some Leftist thugs finds themselves staring at the muzzle of a rifle it is because the stupid individuals put themselves there.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

A No Brainer

German National Socialists, Italian Fascists, Russian Soviet Communists, members of the Church of Scientology, and American Democrats believed they were good people. To say that Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, David Miscavige, and Hilary Clinton are pieces of totalitarian garbage isn't insulting them, it's describing them.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Enemy Of Humanity

I got this image from Mark Urbin.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Why?

The First American Civil War happened because we got tired of being abused by the Elites the Second American Civil War will occur because we will get tired of being abused by the Elitists like Hillary Clinton..

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

A Reminder

To Hell with the Left.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Some Questions

 Should Adolf Hitler have been executed for treason?

Yes.

Have Progressives set the world standard for stupidity since November of 1917?

Yes.

Are Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and David Miscavige Enemies of Humanity?

Yes.

Should they be treated as such?

Yes.

What is a Fascist?

According to Josef Stalin a Fascist is anyone who opposes him.  This includes Leon Trotsky, who was a lifelong Marxist and the founder and original leader of Red Army along with being a servant of Vladimir Lenin.

According to the CPUSA or Anti-fa a Fascist was an opponent of them.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

A Fact Of Reality

Why is income equality impossible?   Every human shares things in common but each person has their own unique set of attributes in terms of physical and mental abilities and as a result no two persons can be equal in thought or the production of material goods.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Rant

Inherent in Socialist doctrines implicit premise that the mere human being is an animal without a mind, or a soul, and thus without rights,  and it should be treated as such by the ideal socialist state.  If there is anyone who has a right to be offended at such public utterances it is the victims of Socialism.

Of course the Socialist believer is going to be offended when the truth is spoken. Socialism is in practice the destruction of persons and entire societies as a whole. Socialist doctrines are the lies that the socialist must tell himself in order to avoid the self realization that he is in fact a thief and a murderer. 

Of course the truth is going to hurt their feelings. So what?

A Socialist is not bothered in the slightest when one of them publicly incites a mob to murder elected officials and their families because the officials are upholding and defending the Constitution to which they have sworn.  The Socialist sees this as normal and acceptable behavior.  But because the Socialists cannot--or will not--believe in a higher standard of behavior they will freak out every time they see a bunch of farmers or other citizens get together for some target practice in fear that this is the mob that is coming after them.

In order to live each man require accurate information in order to make correct moral decisions. Valid knowledge is like food and oxygen, a necessary requirement of human life.  Because the range of the senses of each individual is limited, men have through the practice of verbal (and later written) communication used communication with each other as a means of extending the range of their own senses and thus improving their own prospects for survival.

Societies that value knowledge will generally tend to be more economically and technologically advanced than those societies that devalue knowledge.  Whenever a military confrontation occurs between Rational states and those ruled by the Irrational, the Rational as a general rule, will prevail in the struggle.

As we see our own right to life as sacred, then we must see the Truth as nothing less than sacred.  Those who demand that we ignore the Truth or would forcibly prevent us from learning the Truth should be treated as nothing less than Enemies of Mankind in General, to be dealt will as wolves are.
 

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Some Proposals

Today I shall propose an Amendment: 

Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was carried out by the churches in general.  Thus Freedom of Education was an inherent right of the People of the United States.  But late in the 19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive Movement.  In the last generation the process of falsifying history and the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to ignore.  When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I would never send any child of mine to a public school.  In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.

Another proposal:

Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?

To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal under our so-called laws.  The grandparents of our so-called rulers welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers are now welcoming Muslims with open arms.  Never mind that the false prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal.  As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment of the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When the First Amendment was adopted  the so-called religion of Islam was not practiced on the American continent.  Our nation's first and regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign relations.  It was during the administration of President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted.  When in the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate  USS George Washington was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.  It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates.  While President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.  As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not become a constitutional issue.  But because emigration of Muslims to the United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a political issue.  The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam.  The open contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly into the doctrine.  As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers.  As a doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.  And where the doctrine of Islam  does make a spiritual promise it only has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed.  In this it is promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.

In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people.  In effect to live a fully Human life.  The doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam.   To behave as predatory animals.  Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed an amendment to the Constitution:  

All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.  The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam or Scientology by name?  A name is only a mental label for the concept.  Even though it appears to be internally forbidden to change the doctrines of Islam or Scientology, the doctrines also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.   Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim  or a Scientologist will occur.  It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.  A fundamental attribute of the doctrines of Islam or Scientology is the denial of real laws.  The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the real rights of the people.  In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid Mohammed and Hubbard opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes -- including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by Mohammed and Hubbard and for their own personal benefit.  This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society.  In reality The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of legislation.  In reality Islam and Scientology have to go.  And in order for us to live a properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive role in defending our rights and the collaborators need to be dealt with as well.

And yet another proposal:

 I would add to The Second Amendment with the following:

The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed.  To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.  The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

And there's The Rand amendment:

 Ayn Rand on the final page of  the novel Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:

Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.

At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us is removed from existence.  We are freed from the burden of bureaucracy.  Socialism in effect if not name is abolished.   Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path of Life is cleared.  I could go on all day about the practical benefits of The Rand Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other rational person.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Question

Should L. Ron Hubbard have been imprisoned for his crimes?

Yes.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Statuary

I once called for a coup against Barrack Obama (I won't call him a president).

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Thought For The Day

Were if not for the adverse precedent of The Holocaust we would be well on the way to a final solution to the problem of Islam.  The fact is that in the past our basic response to barbaric actions by primitives against advanced societies like ours was to massacre them.  And there is no question that the consistent adherents of Islam would have to work their way up to qualify as primitives with respect to us.  The fact is Islam rejects the basic moral laws of even the most backward societies, the prohibition of theft and murder.  In practical effect the consistent adherents of Islam are practically indistinguishable from predatory animals.  And the Islamic war against Humanity will not end until we identify and deal with Muslims as such.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Totalitianism

All versions of the doctrine of Totalitarianism hold Human Life in absolute contempt and identifies a mere person as a thing to be used or destroyed.   Surrender to any Totalitarian state, regardless of the circumstances, is simply not an option.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

A Message For Hillary Clinton And Her Followers

Hillary Clinton isn't entitled to a damned thing, except a bullet in the head in the Soviet style, or a piece of rope in the Nuremberg style.

Are Hillary Clinton with George Soros and other Democrats Enemies of Humanity?

Yes.

Should they be treated as such?

Yes.

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.

Question

Should we treat members of the so-called Church of Scientology as the Enemies Of Humanity that they actually are?

And Free Tommy Robinson.   Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.  To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.