The absolute first thing taught at infantry basic training during the Cold War was that the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero. On the face of it I saw this as the response to any attempt to explain a failure to learn a necessary skill. But this idea also applies to the moral nightmare we were facing during with the Communists enemy and their excuses for their crimes. Even if the usual Marxist credibility issues did not apply to the position of the White House, we need to remember that there are still millions of Muslims who still believe they are following the Allah given order to murder those who have chosen to live a rational life. Some of them still have money and organizational skills to apply to the problem of murdering infidels like you and me.
As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act
with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment
of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
When the First Amendment was adopted Islam was not practiced on the
American continent. The nation’s first interaction with Islam was in the
field of foreign relations. It was during the administration of
President John Adams that the European practice of making extortion
payments to the states sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in
the process of delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers,
Captain William Bainbridge of the frigate USS George Washington
was compelled at cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to
the Sultan of the Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas
Jefferson sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to
directly engage and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While
President Jefferson was fully a man of peace he clearly understood that
the value of peace could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not
become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the
United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open
contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly
into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of
Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of
the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a
doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the
profitable wave of crime and terror after his death. And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only
has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is
promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply
of eternal rape victims in Allah’s eternal whorehouse. In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set
down by God, including the command to respect the rights of other
people. But the doctrine of Islam commands the followers to rob and
murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of
toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I now propose an amendment
to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
An obvious question is why do I not call for a ban on Islam by name?
A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears
to be internally forbidden to change the doctrine of Islam, the
doctrine also commands the believer to deceive the victims where
necessary. Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim will
occur. It is by identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we
can properly exclude it from protection under the First Amendment.
A fundamental attribute of the doctrine of Islam is the denial of
real laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect
the actual rights of the people. In declaring “man made” laws to be
invalid Mohammed opened the door to the commission of a multitude of
crimes — including rape, robbery, and murder — that would be carried out
by himself and for his own personal benefit.
This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality
The People are the sovereign authority and the sole source of
legislation. In reality Islam has to go. And in order for us to live a
properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive
role in defending our rights.