"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."Really?
If I was a Christian I would say that Mohammad was one of the false messiahs predicted in the New Testament.
But I'm not a Christian. I'm an Objectivist.
If we accept the accounts written by Mohammad's earliest followers as the truth then it is very apparent that he committed serious crimes such as robbery, murder, and other acts that are not discussed outside of a lecture on the subject of the SS-Dirlewanger Brigade.
And Mohammad did so while claiming the sanction of the Magical Mystical Master in the sky.
A claim that any rational person must reject as total nonsense.
Apparently the current occupant of the White House believes that an honest discourse on the subject of Mohammad constitutes slander.
Really?
Contrary to what the current occupant of the White House may believe he is not a monarch and my not determine what the citizens of this (or any other) nation may discuss in public. In reality the Citizens of the United States are the sovereign authority. And as such have the right to publish and speak the truth, and to read and hear the truth, in order to carry out their obligation as the sovereign authority.
Those who do have a problem with this fact, or do not understand it, have no place in public office.
In this or any other nation.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
No comments:
Post a Comment