Motivation

 

Quote Of The Day

 Judge and prepare to be judged.

-- Ayn Rand

A Reasonable Expectation And A Statement

Given the inherently predatory nature of Islam and its most consistent adherents I would expect that someone, some day, will drop a high yield nuke on the Grand Mosque and Kaaba then burn those abominations from the face of the Earth.  I don't see it as a possibility.  I see it as a certainty.  

I want the Russian Imperialist State to be crushed and rendered harmless.  I want Putin to be put down with a round in his head in the Soviet style.  The expansion of Imperial States are limited by by their modes of transportation and the opposition of other states.  Since present transportation technology allows forces to be transported anywhere on the planet the only effective limit to imperial expansion is superior firepower and the will to use it.

Update 0815: If I was younger (in my forties) I’d volunteer to be a defender of the Ukraine.

Oh, today I have a message for Soviet Leader (yes, that was deliberate) Comrade President Vladimir Putin.  When I was growing up here in Minnesota, a state of a western civilized nation, I was taught something about the practice of name calling:

“Sticks and stones may hurt my bones but names will never hurt me.”

Yes, I did just engage in name calling.  And no harm will ever come to you as a result, Comrade.  Except, perhaps in your head.

This message is sponsored by the NATO Phonetic Letters ECHO SIERRA ALPHA DELTA.

(Postscript: When are you going to give Comrade Lenin a decent burial? Or better yet, just dump his remains in a landfill with the rest of the garbage?)

Opinions

 Life is the learning experience.

Those who believe they're superior people aren't.

Just because someone else's holding the gun doesn't change the fact that someone's engaged in the act of robbery.

Those who see themselves as infallible are already in the failure mode. 

Barack Obama was bad as the President of the United States.  (Was Obama actually elected?)  But the self selected Joe Biden was actually a worse President.

Opinions

We need to understand that Hillary Clinton is clearly an Enemy Of Mankind and deal with her as such.  In the Nuremberg fashion. 

Censorship is the negation of the human mind.  As rational thought is necessary to living a human life the censor, and those who demand it, are Enemies of Mankind. 

Another associate of Jeffery Epstein was found dead in a jail cell. My lack of God!  What a surprise!

Opinions

Monstrous people will often see themselves as the good guys. 

If you believe you're morally superior you're likely aren't.

Every Socialist is a Dictator in waiting.

The leadership of The Democratic Party should be treated as the Enemies Of Mankind they actually are.  In the Nuremberg fashion, from the neck until dead.  

To Democrats POWER IS LIFE.

I made a prediction about Democrats in the past.

We should expect terror attacks not only from our external enemies, especially after a withdrawal from Iraq, but also a full Leninist reign of terror against anyone that they perceive to be an opponent. Like Lenin, who saw himself and his followers to not be subject to any law or other moral restraint, they will not only violate but may very well openly disavow the Constitution and use any means to cement their power over us. No act will be too heinous to them. We will see mass arrests and imprisonments based on fraudulent grounds. They will command us to disarm ourselves, and when we rightfully refuse they will deliberately commit atrocities against us in order to break our will. They may even perpetrate one or more horrors like the Waco Massacre. 

 

Another Comment

Censorship appears to have been practiced in Canada.  Reporters are being beaten by police in Ottawa.  The line may have already been crossed in Canada.  The following article was published in The Resister.

    The Tripwire
    by
    D. van Oort & J.F.A. Davidson
    From The Resister

"How we burned in the prison camps later thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive?"-- Alexander Solzhenitzyn, Gulag Archipelago

What would be the tripwire resulting in open rebellion? Examining the Bill of Rights, and considering EXISTING laws only, and not failed attempts, you will find that every clause has been violated to one degree or another.

Documenting those violations would fill volumes, and it is important to remember that only government can violate the exercise of unalienable individual rights and claim immunity from retribution. We omit martial law or public suspension of the Constitution as a tripwire. The overnight installation of dictatorship obviously would qualify as "the tripwire," but is not likely to occur. What has occurred, what is occurring, is the implementation of every aspect of such dictatorship without an overt declaration. The Constitution is being killed by attrition. The Communist Manifesto is being installed by accretion. Any suggestion that martial law is the tripwire leads us to the question: what aspect of martial law justifies the first shot?

For much the same reason, we will leave out mass executions of the Waco variety. For one thing, they are composite abuses of numerous individual rights. Yet, among those abuses, the real tripwire may exist. For another, those events are shrouded in a fog of obfuscation and outright lies. Any rebellion must be based on extremely hard and known facts. Similarly, no rebellion will succeed if its fundamental reasons for occurring are not explicitly identified. Those reasons cannot be explicitly identified if, in place of their identification, we simply point to a composite such as Waco and say, "See, that's why; figure it out." Any suggestion that more Wacos, in and of themselves, would be the tripwire, simply leads us back again to the question: what aspect of them justifies rebellion?

For the same reasons, we leave out a detailed account of Ayn Rand's identification of the four essential characteristics of tyranny. She identified them quite correctly, but together they are just another composite from which we must choose precipitating causes. These characteristics are: one-party rule, executions without trial for political offenses, expropriation or nationalisation of private property, and "above all," censorship.

With regard to the first characteristic of tyranny, what is the real difference between the Fabian socialist Republican Party and the overtly [Bolshevik] socialist Democratic Party? Nothing but time. Regarding the second we have the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team and the ATF's enforcement branch. In action they simply avoid the embarrassment of a trial. Regarding the third, we have asset forfeiture "laws," the IRS, the EPA, the FCC, the FDA, the Federal Reserve, the Justice Department's Antitrust Division, and a myriad of other executive branch agencies, departments, and commissions whose sole function is to regulate business and the economy. Regulating business for the common good (fascism) is no different in principle than outright nationalisation (communism).

However, the fourth characteristic of tyranny, censorship, is the obvious primary tripwire. When ideology and the reporting of facts and how-to instructions are forbidden, there is nothing remaining but to fight. Freedom of speech and persuasion -- the freedom to attempt to rationally convince willing listeners -- is so fundamental an individual right that without it no other rights, not even the existence of rights, can be enforced, claimed, debated, or even queried.

Does this censorship include the regulation of the "public" airwaves by the FCC, as in the censorship which prohibits tobacco companies from advertising -- in their own defense -- on the same medium which is commanded by government decree to carry "public service" propaganda against them? Does it include federal compulsion of broadcasters to air politically-correct twaddle for "The Children"? Does it include the Orwellian "Communications Decency Act"? Does it include any irrationalist "sexual harassment" or tribalist "hate speech" laws which prohibit certain spoken words among co-workers? The answer: unequivocally yes.

Although the above do not pertain to ideological or political speech, yet they are censorship and are designed to intimidate people into the acceptance of de facto censorship. We say that any abrogation of free speech, and any form of censorship, which cannot be rectified by the soap box, the ballot box, or the jury box, must be rectified by the cartridge box -- or lost forever.

Americans have been stumbling over tripwires justifying overt resistance for well over 130 years. On one hand, we submit that gun confiscation is a secondary tripwire only. It is second to censorship because if speech is illegal we cannot even discuss the repeal of gun control, or any other population controls. If only guns are illegal, we may still convince people to repeal those laws. On the other hand, gun confiscation may be a sufficient tripwire because the primary one, censorship, can be fully implemented only after the citizenry has been disarmed.

Resistance, in the context of this article, means those legitimate acts by individuals which compel government to restrict its activities and authority to those powers delegated to the Congress by the people in the Constitution.

The distinction to be drawn here is that the objective of patriotic resistance is to restore original Constitutional government, not change the form of government. To this end we believe: The enforcement of any laws -- local, state, or federal -- that through the action or inaction of the courts makes nugatory the individual means of resisting tyranny, justifies resistance.

The operative terms of the above statement are the parameters that must be defined and understood if resistance to tyranny and despotism is to be honourable, and for the cause of individual liberty, rather than anarchy resulting from a new gang of tyrants. Rebellion can never be justified so long as objective means of redress are available, which are themselves not subverted or rendered impotent by further or parallel subjective legislation.

The goal of patriots throughout the country must be the restoration of objective constitutional law and order. The failure to enforce a subjective law (i.e. the Communications Decency Act) does not justify that law existing, but it also does not justify resistance. This is because non-enforcement leaves avenues of redress, including the forbidden activity itself, still available. Should a lower court uphold or ignore a case that challenges subjective law, peaceable means of redress are still open by higher or lateral courts in another jurisdiction.

However, should the U.S. Supreme Court uphold subjective laws, or refuse to hear the cases challenging them, then the legislative, executive, and judicial branches have all failed to guarantee individual liberty, from the widest principles to the smallest details. A single refusal by the highest court in the land to overturn a whim-based subjective law, or to refuse to hear the case, is sufficient to justify resistance to that law because there is simply nowhere left to turn for further attempts at redress. At such time nobody is morally bound by that law. Tyranny gets one chance per branch.
America is either a constitutional republic or it is not. If we can restore our republic it will ultimately occur through reason, and reason will then lead our representatives to make unconstitutional those laws which, by any objective standard of justice, should have never been considered in the first place. However, we cannot assert our claim to restore our liberty if we but accede to a single socialist construct. Freedom and serfdom cannot coexist. We cannot have it both ways.

Life, and the means to preserve it, cannot coexist with disarmament. Liberty, and its rational exercise, cannot coexist with subjective constraints. Property, and its acquisition, use, and disposal cannot coexist with expropriation. The federal government's first task is to obey the Constitution. It has refused. Our first task as free men is to force the government to obey it again. The Constitution of the United States of America is a constraint on the federal government, not on the individual.
Likewise, the constitutions of the various states are constraints on the state governments, not on the individual. The Constitution contains many provisions allowing the violation of our natural rights as free men by immoral and unethical men in government. The true heroes of the ratification debates were the Anti-federalists, who secured Federalist guarantees that the Bill of Rights would amend the Constitution.

To their undying credit, the Federalists lived up to their promise. Nevertheless, only after constitutional limitations on government have been restored in their original form can we consider amending the Constitution to redress its very few remaining defects (for example, the absence of a separation of state and the economy clause).

Laws that make nugatory the means of resisting tyranny and despotism determine the tripwire. The creeping legislative erosion of the 2nd Amendment is not the only tripwire that justifies resistance. We submit that any gun control is a secondary tripwire. Not only because it can be effortlessly evaded, but also because it strengthens our cause. It is second only to censorship. If speech is illegal we can discuss neither repeal of gun control, or the repeal of any other unconstitutional "law."

Censorship is not a tripwire, it is THE tripwire. Thus, by default, censorship morally justifies rebellion.

Under censorship, no other rights, including the right to be free from censorship, can be advocated, discussed, or queried. It is incorrect to say that after censorship comes utter subjugation. Censorship is utter subjugation. There is no greater usurpation of liberty while remaining alive. After censorship come the death camps, and they are not a prerequisite of censorship, they are merely a symptom of it. Censorship qua censorship is sufficient in itself to justify open rebellion against any government that legislates, enforces, or upholds it.

However, that is not the half of it. Censorship is alone in being the only violation of individual rights that does not require actual enforcement or challenges in court, before rebellion is justified. When the government forbids you to speak or write, or use your own or a supporter's property to address willing listeners or readers, that government has openly and forcibly declared that the art of peaceful persuasion is dead and will not be tolerated. Upon that very instant, all peaceful avenues of redress have been closed and the only possible method of regaining that liberty is force. Whenever we give up that force, we are not only ruined, we deserve to be ruined.

Censorship is already being "legally" imposed through accretion by compromisers, appeasers, and pragmatists within government at all levels. Note the demands by "progressive" organisations and self-appointed "civil rights" groups to ban so-called "hate" speech (they mean thought and debate), or "extreme" language (they mean principled dissent), or "paramilitary" books (they mean the knowledge of how to resist). When our government imposes censorship, it will be because our ability to use force to resist censorship no longer exists. Buying copies of The Resister is not yet prohibited; buying machine guns already is. Unwarranted search for unlicensed books has not yet occurred; unwarranted search for unlicensed weapons has already begun. As your unalienable right of peaceable discussion and dissent is being daily abridged, your right to peaceably assemble and associate in advocacy of your own self-defence, according to your own free will, has already been outlawed (courtesy of ADL's "model" anti-militia legislation).

Unconstitutional federal agencies now arm themselves with weapons that you may not own, and train in tactics that you are prohibited from mastering. Before a government is sure you won't resist, it will make sure you can't resist.

The most irrational, contradictory, short-range, whimsical notion possible to men who claim the unalienable right to resist tyrannical government is the notion that they must first let their ability to resist be stripped from them before they have the right to use it. This is the argument of so-called conservatives who pish-tosh the notion of legislative "slippery-slopes," and sycophantic adherents of a supreme Court that has no constitutionally delegated authority to interpret the Constitution in the first place. We reject the notion of mindless compliance with subjective "laws." Subjective laws must be resisted on metaphysical and epistemological principles, moral and ethical grounds, and on constitutional and historical precedence.

No rational man desires ends without means. No rational man can be faced with his own imminent subjugation and truly believe that, once things are as bad as they can get, "sometime" "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. Any man who counsels another to appeal to those mystical equivalents of "divine intervention" for "deliverance" from tyranny is our enemy by all principles conceivable within the scope of rational human intelligence.

The time to organise resistance is not after censorship, but before it. The time to prepare resistance is when our ability to resist is being threatened. The time to begin resistance is when that threat has been upheld or ignored by the courts. The unalienable rights that safeguard our ability to resist are limited to those which, if not violated, allow us to plan and use all materials necessary for resistance. We submit that only the following meet that criteria: freedom of speech and of the press, and the right to peaceably assemble--so that we may advocate ideas, report and discuss news, and instruct others how to carry out resistance activities (1st Amendment); the right to keep and bear arms -- so that we may have appropriate force in our hands should we need it, and be trained to use such force as necessary (2nd Amendment); the right to be let alone -- so that we may be free of government intrusion in our lives, liberty, and property (3rd Amendment)); the right to be secure in our persons, dwellings, papers, and property from unwarranted, unaffirmed searches and seizures -- so that our records, ideological materials, and weapons will remain in our hands (4th Amendment).

For the purpose of this discussion, we believe that no other rights are relevant because if every individual right other than those four were violated -- although it would be an unspeakably evil act on the part of the government, justifying immediate and unforgiving resistance -- their abridgement would not effect our ability to resist. If any of the first four amendments are infringed by legislation, enforced by executive power, and their abrogation is upheld or ignored by the courts, unremitting, forcible resistance, and aid and comfort to its citizen-soldiers, is a moral imperative for every single person who believes that life, liberty, and property are unalienable and self-existing, and not grants of government privilege.

"The United States should get rid of its militias." -- Josef Stalin, 1933

"The foundation of a free government begins to be undermined when freedom of speech on political subjects is restrained; it is destroyed when freedom of speech is wholly denied." -- William Rawle, LL.D. Philadelphia, 1825

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes ... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -- Thomas Jefferson (1764) -- Quoting 18th Century criminologist Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and Punishment
 

Comment

There were veterans of the Second World War in the United States Army when I was in.  If I recall correctly there some orders were NEVER to be followed.  Unfortunately, the Clinton and Obama regimes came to power in the United States since then.  We’re seeing in Ottawa the police ARE following orders.  A common defense of many of the defendants of the Nuremberg Trials was that they were following orders.  A defense used by Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem was that he was just following orders.  We must hang those who defend themselves by saying they were just following orders.  We have no choice.  The State in Canada is malfunctioning.  A Canadian Revolution is now inevitable.

Quote

 

Opinions

Democrats want to be tyrants. 

Fine.

We know how to deal with tyrants.  In the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.  (A firing squad works okay, too.)

Has the thought ever occurred to anyone that Jesus Christ died for God's sins? 

Expecting the Mainstream Media to lie is like expecting water to be wet.

Under the Primacy of the State the function of law is to control the productive population for the benefit of the ruling parasites.  The rulers and their immediate servants aren't subject to those laws themselves.  The actual interest of the actual citizens is irrelevant.  What matters is the whims of the rulers and those who willfully serve them.  Under the Rule of Law all real laws must be applied to all citizens equally such as the laws prohibiting homicide and theft.  As our Socialist rulers and their willing servants regard themselves as exempt from compliance with the laws on what grounds can they claim to be protected under them?

Once force is openly used against those who speak out against The Left then the gloves will come off and force WILL be openly used against the Left.  Once The Left openly repudiates the rules for living in a civil society then their victims will no longer see themselves as subject to those same rules.  Or to put it another way to The Left, break the rules of civil society and you will leave us no choice but to break you.

Update 1450 HRS: The bank accounts of Canadian protestors are being shut down.  Ayn Rand once said that a threat to a person's livelihood is a death threat.

Opinions

 Who knew that a Gas Can could become a symbol of Freedom?  (Image by Mark Urbin)

The Left can't deal with reality because in reality they're the bad guys.  They're constantly trying to live off the work of others thus they have to control their livestock by force.  Since reason tells us that such behavior is morally intolerable they're left with emotional whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing themselves to feel good about it.  Any refusal to accept the emotional bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die motherfucker!"

Quote

TIL about The Grievance Study Affair. Two professors changed the text of Mein Kampf replacing the word “Jews"with “the patriarchy”. It got published in an academic journal.

--  xodiumvivamx:

 Thanks to Mark  Urbin for the quote.

On Collectivism

Many of the things taught to American children are simply wrong.  American children are taught to fear firearms.  

This is simply wrong.  

American children are taught the doctrine of Collectivism.

This is simply wrong.  

The doctrine of Collectivism has been shown to be wrong over and over again. In all forms of the doctrine of Collectivism an Individual is a form of property and may be used as such.  All forms of the doctrine of Collectivism justify the use of coercion.  I once attended a folk music concert held at the Cedar Art Center.  The Cedar Art Center was built in the closed single screen Cedar Theater.  One thing I remember was that the snack bar was proudly serving Nicaraguan coffee.  At the time the nation of Nicaragua was under the rule of Collectivist Sandinista Regime.  In effect the production of the coffee required the use of coercion to produce.

American children are also taught that right is wrong and that A is non-A.

This is clearly wrong.

The SS-Totenverbande believed they were the good guys with their victims and opponents being evil.

This was clearly wrong.

We’re seeing the same phenomena.  Collectivist groups such as Anti-FA and BLM believe they’re the good people.  They believe that their victims and opponents are evil.  The fact is that Collectivist groups like Anti-Fa and BLM are evil.

Opinion

Justin Trudeau is clearly an Enemy Of Mankind. 

Opinions

Contrary to popular belief, we science fiction writers don’t predict the future -- we try to prevent undesirable futures.

-- Sir Arthur C. Clarke 

When I spent two weeks working in a Republican Party fundraising call center the use of what our boss called the "effenheimer" was grounds for termination from employment and we had to exercise caution in the language we used in general.  One day I tacked up in my cubicle the following verse:

Yea though I travel in the Valley of Death, I shall fear no evil, for I'm the kind of person whose character and conduct may not be discussed in the call center.

Of course after two weeks of listening to a bunch of "family farmers" and elderly whine on and on about how they're entitled to a piece of the taxpayers money I was ready to start dropping some F-bombs myself.

 

Opinion

Those who advocate Dictatorship believe they are the good people.

Image

 

Opinions

 A mind is a terrible thing to lose.

The doctrines emitted by Karl Marx can only be taken by faith.

Many people on The Left believe themselves to be the good guys.  Some people on The Left believe that anyone who doesn’t believe as they do is a “Fascist.”  In Objective Reality The Left has devolved into bad people.

Opinions

Alec Baldwin should just shut up and lawyer up. 

A Marxist is someone who doesn't understand that Karl Marx was really and truly full of it.

In the lobby of the Emergency Room of the North Memorial Hospital I witnessed crying of several family members of a teenage boy that was shot in the head.  We have to understand that no innocent person should suffer the consequences of negative actions of criminals.

Opinions

The Left looks at us as things to used or trash to be disposed of, they want laws that effect others but don't effect them, there's no middle ground.  I could go on with the subject of The Left but why bother?  

The assholes (I know I'm insulting assholes) who ran the extermination apparatus at various death camps knew what they were doing but also identified themselves as good people.  So do most of those who have cast a ballot (or more) for Joe Biden.  They 're nothing more than murderers and must be dealt with as such.  You can't argue with evil.  You can only destroy it. 

Revolutions and civil was occur when a state malfunctions.  A second revolution or civil war in the United States is now inevitable. 

On the face of it the Commissar Order looks like a good idea?  Not only No, but Hell No.  National Socialism and Soviet Communism are competing forms of collectivism.  An order to murder a competitor is a clearly criminal order.

Quote

Blacks were not enslaved because they were black but because they were available. Slavery has existed in the world for thousands of years. Whites enslaved other whites in Europe for centuries before the first black was brought to the Western hemisphere. Asians enslaved Europeans. Asians enslaved other Asians. Africans enslaved other Africans, and indeed even today in North Africa, blacks continue to enslave blacks.

– Thomas Sowell

 

Answer

What is Evil?

Many people have this vision of a villain (or villains) performing a vile act (singular or plural) wile gleefully rubbing their hands together.

The reality is far different.

Horrors (such as The Holocaust) are performed by normal people who believe they’re doing things that are right and proper.  An example is that Scientologists who harass critics of Scientology (i.e. Fair Gaming them) believe themselves to be good people going a good thing.  But in Reality what they’re doing is horrible.  An example is the harassment of Paulette Cooper (or any other Holocaust survivor) by Scientologists.

 

Opinion

Something I've noticed: The Parasites and their partisans in the media are constantly going on and on about how stupid those who rationally oppose them are.  They're really beginning to sound like the alien invaders in Plan Nine From Outer Space.

Opinion

No one gets out of life alive.  There is ALWAYS a successor. 

Opinion

Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough.  Antisemitism is a subset of Racial Collectivism.  We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of Racial Collectivism.  We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial Collectivist group that it actually is.  We have to see that Antisemitism is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem.  So when someone attacks Jews they're attacking all of us.  Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't be a radical idea.  I’ve been called a “bigot” numerous times because I didn’t believe in a person’s orthodoxy.

Opinion

 Revolutions and Civil Wars happen because the state becomes nonfunctional.  The Federal Government of the United States is becoming nonfunctional.  A second American Revolution or Civil War is now inevitable.

Personal History

I once wrote some fan fiction that crossed Traveller and series UFO.

"Keller could just imagine what the peace-activist trash who parked themselves in front of the main gate at Fort Benning would say: How dare the selfish fascist pigs shoot at and oppress those poor desperate aliens!"

"Maybe if we hand the peace activists over to the aliens for spare parts they’ll leave the rest of us alone, Keller thought for a moment. It wasn't any sillier than any other peace-freak thought. And quite frankly, Keller thought, they deserve it."

https://freelancetraveller.com/features/stories/ftm/ftm00.html

Evidence

The physical evidence for the non existence of God is in a car.  The motor oil and gasoline was made from petroleum that's older than age of the Universe according to the Book Of Genesis.

Opinions

Bad ideas lead people to do bad things. 

If you think you’re fighting Fascism and you find it easy and fun you’re not actually fighting Fascism.  If you’re fighting for more government control you’re not actually fighting Fascism

Opinion

Those who deny your right to exist are mortal enemies.

It's Happening Again

 

Why did The Holocaust happen?

The actual author of the Book of Genesis actually had a point: Evil often presents itself as Good.

The Holocaust wasn't a unique event.  The Holocaust (and other horrors) were the result of normal people acting normally.  Why did a particular horror happen?  There's an answer but you may not like it.  A horror happened because the perpetrators believed they were good people with their victims and opponents being evil.  We've seen this before with numerous horrors and it will happen again.  What we're dealing with are people who believe they're good people.  We have to deal with them as such no matter how horrible the things they actually do.  Many of the people who’re loudly proclaiming “never again” are going to do it again.  The National Socialists and Soviets believed themselves to be good people, we're seeing the same phenomena with Anti-Fa.  Anti-Fa claims to be opposed to Fascism no matter what they actually do.  Anti-Fa does the things that Fascists actually do.  Members of Anti-Fa will believe the lies they're told regardless of the consequences.  Members of Anti-Fa claim to oppose Fascism, in fact they're what Fascists are.  Most members of Anti-Fa don't know that they're following the dictators handbook.  Most proponents of tyranny, such as members of Anti-Fa (National Socialists, Soviet Communists, etc.) believe they're good people and that their opponents are evil.  If a dogma requires the commission of a vile act then that act WILL be committed.  When someone denies their own Humanity then they WILL commit crimes against Humanity.  It's very easy to predict what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will say.  Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the word Fascist.

Those who don't remember history are a highly sought after group of followers.  We identify The Holocaust as the horrible act it actually was.  And we should be horrified.  But we're seeing The Holocaust from an objective perspective.  From the subjective perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their victims and opponents as being evil.  We're seeing this again with the Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa.  They see themselves as being good and their victims as being evil.  I've said this before: Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  I have a warning for members of Anti-fa, when you Brownshirt someone, don't be surprised that you're treated as a Brownshirt.  I've found through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the good guys.  If a member of Anti-fa wants to see a Totalitarian, all they have to do is look in a mirror.  Totalitarians are never hiding under the bed, they're in plain view.  For those who value power no act is too vile.  Killing a member of Anti-Fa isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  Members of Anti-fa should be engaged with aircraft like the AC-130 and A-10.  A Fascist isn't who the self styled opponents of the doctrine believe they are.  WE HAVE THE DUTY to see the self described antifascist as they truly are, a National Socialist piece of shit who should be hanged from the neck until dead.  And WE HAVE THE DUTY to identify the Mainstream Media are a bunch of liars.  Once a difference in opinion is criminalized a civil war is inevitable.

Voltaire said it: Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities.

I have a question for members of Anti-Fa and BLM: what part of "Never Again" didn't you understand?

Why don't we assassinate Joe Biden and/or Kamala Harris?  Because their assassinations won't solve the problem.  The actual problem is a culture that holds the rights of individuals in contempt.  The assassination of Biden and/or Harris won't solve that problem.