Today I shall propose an Amendment:
Congress, nor the States, shall make no law respecting the
establishment of an institute of education, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof.
Now why would I propose this? At the time of the founding of the republic the process of education was
carried out by the churches in general. Thus Freedom of Education was
an inherent right of the People of the United States. But late in the
19th Century the move to government run "Public" schools took off. This
was in part because of the influence of collectivists of the Progressive
Movement. In the last generation the process of falsifying history and
the general dumbing down of the students has become too obvious to
ignore. When I finally escaped from high school I promised myself that I
would never send any child of mine to a public school.
In this amendment we restore to the parents the authority and responsibility of educating their children.
Another proposal:
Can we eliminate Islam from the face of the Earth?
To say that Islam is savagery is the truth and it apparently illegal
under our so-called laws. The grandparents of our so-called rulers
welcomed Hitler and his goons with open arms and our so-called rulers
are now welcoming Muslims with open arms. Never mind that the false
prophet Mohammed was, without question, a criminal. As it is the guide to how the Federal and state governments must act
with regard to the issue of religion, I will quote the First Amendment
of the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the First Amendment was adopted the so-called religion of Islam
was not practiced on the American continent. Our nation's first and
regrettable interaction with Islam was in the field of foreign
relations. It was during the administration of President John Adams
that the European practice of making extortion payments to the states
sponsored Barbary Pirates was adopted. When in the process of
delivering the extortion payment to the Dey of Algiers, Captain William
Bainbridge of the frigate
USS George Washington was compelled at
cannon point to deliver tribute, including slaves, to the Sultan of the
Ottoman empire while under the flag of Algiers.
It was in response to this barbaric act that President Thomas Jefferson
sent the United States Navy to the Mediterranean Sea to directly engage
and suppress the state sponsored pirates. While President Jefferson was
fully a man of peace he clearly understood that the value of peace
could not be separated from the value of freedom.
As long as Islam was solely an aspect of foreign affairs it would not
become a constitutional issue. But because emigration of Muslims to the
United States and proselytism was permitted Islam has now become a
political issue.
The fundamental problem is the criminal nature of Islam. The open
contempt for the rights of individuals and nations is written directly
into the doctrine. As a historically confirmed fact the doctrine of
Islam was invented solely as a means to justify the predatory actions of
the obviously false prophet Mohammed and his willing followers. As a
doctrine Islam allowed the followers of Mohammed to continue the
profitable wave of crime and terror after his death.
And where the doctrine of Islam does make a spiritual promise it only
has a meaning with the criminal followers of Mohammed. In this it is
promised the followers of Islam will receive eternal access to a supply
of eternal rape victims in Allah's eternal whorehouse.
In an actual religion the follower must comply with the rules set down
by God, including the command to respect the rights of other people. In
effect to live a fully Human life. The doctrine of Islam commands the
followers to rob and murder those who properly reject Islam. To behave
as predatory animals.
Within a civilized nation this is absolutely beyond the boundary of
toleration. To deal with the problem of Islam I had previously proposed
an amendment to the Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that has been raised in the past is why do I not call for a ban on Islam or Scientology by name?
A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears
to be internally forbidden to change the doctrines of Islam or Scientology, the doctrines
also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.
Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Muslim or a Scientologist will occur. It is by
identifying a specific toxic attribute of Islam that we can properly
exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental attribute of the doctrines of Islam or Scientology is the denial of real
laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the
real rights of the people. In declaring "man made" laws to be invalid
Mohammed and Hubbard opened the door to the commission of a multitude of crimes --
including rape, robbery, and murder -- that would be carried out by Mohammed and Hubbard and for their own personal benefit.
This action is absolutely intolerable in a civil society. In reality
The people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of
legislation. In reality Islam and Scientology have to go. And in order for us to live a
properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive
role in defending our rights and the collaborators need to be dealt with as well.
And yet another proposal:
I would add to The Second Amendment with the following:
The
People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the
nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce
legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense. The
Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.
And there's The Rand amendment:
Ayn Rand on the final page of the novel
Atlas Shrugged proposed an amendment to The Constitution:
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade.
At one stroke the entire body of progressive legislation imposed upon us
is removed from existence. We are freed from the burden of
bureaucracy. Socialism in effect if not name is abolished.
Our minds are freed from the chains imposed by the mindless and The Path
of Life is cleared. I could go on all day about the practical benefits
of The Rand
Amendment, but I have other things to do, and so does every other
rational person.
And Free Tommy Robinson. Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
