Offering

All L. Ron Hubbard (and the self appointed successor David Miscavige) had to offer were Slavery and Death.

That's an offer that must be refused.

History Lesson

There was once a time when a divine being was held responsible for all instances of a natural phenomena.  This phenomena was called paganism.

It was discovered that all natural phenomena was actually natural.  That no divine being was responsible for any of it.  It was then believed that one divine being was responsible for the entire universe.  This phenomena was called Monotheism.  This being was commonly called God.

We're supposed to believe that God was equal to the tribal deity of a bunch of goatherds?

Opinion

Not are those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat it.  But such people are valuable followers to those who value power.

Opinion

Am I'm lying?

You have to make that determination yourself.

You are responsible for your own actions.

Opinion

 Actions ALWAYS have consequences.  A vote for a Democrat always is a vote for dysfunction.  The false president Joe Biden was dysfunctional before he went senile.

 

Opinion

The fundamental problem with the enemy is that they value power.  Loot has always been a secondary issue for them.   It's their lust for power that's currently driving their efforts to silence and disarm the People.   And it's these efforts that will ultimately bring about the revolution that will destroy them.

 

Opinion

Those who try to be helpful ALWAYS get things wrong.

Fact

I once authored a Traveller fan fiction story titled Friends In High Places.  There was a transsexual character.

Of course Dana had undergone some modifications herself, but that was a choice she made as an adult. There were some things that should not be done to young children, regardless of the apparent benefits to their families.

On the other hand, the FS clan had no objections to hiring male-to-female transsexuals, unlike damned near every other ship owner operating in the Third Imperium.

Opinion

Scientology is a source of suffering.  The source of suffering has to dealt with as such.

Opinion

I wouldn't want to be a stockholder in the Disney Company.

Question

Is Evelyn Boatman a Mary Sue?

On an Alternative History site (which no longer exists) I posted a story titled Step Back.  I based the central character on myself, with a gender neutral name.  The story details the interaction of people from the 24th Century interacting with people from the late 20th Century.  It gets violent in places.

Reality

Reality is real, unless you're a Scientologist.  Case in point: Hubbard never said that Blue Asbestos was harmful.  But in fact Blue Asbestos is a major carcinogen.  Blue Asbestos was never removed from the MV Freewinds: the Sea Org ship.  If the MV Freewinds was confiscated, she would debunkered then towed beyond the Continental Shelf to be sunk.  The scrap value of the MV Freewinds would be less than the cost of decontaminating her.

Sharing A Photograph

 It would be shame if this picture got around.

Jeffery Epstein with Harvey Weinstein.  Not only is Jeffery Epstein a pedophile, he's a valor thief.  Here's a clue, when a row (or more) of ribbons is worn medals don't have to be worn.

Decent people are horrified by what Epstein and Weinstein did.  Decent people would never support or vote for either Clinton.  But Epstein and Weinstein believed that how they behaved was right and proper.

Oh, and everybody in the military of the United States wears a cover (That's a hat for civilians) out of doors.

Another Rant

Parasite mentalities (Hubbard, et al) as a general rule see themselves as superior beings and other people, the productive population, existing solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of.  Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings isn’t an act of murder, in their minds it’s simply the disposal of hominid garbage. 

Rant

There is only one race on this planet, THE HUMAN RACE.  A tribal collectivist, be that person a member of the Black Lives Matter or of the National Socialist German Workers Party, is someone who treats their particular ethnic heritage as an license to subjugate, plunder, and massacre anyone who's not part of their collective.  Tribal collectivists claim that they’re exempt from the rules of civilized society.  Let’s take them at their word and cast them out of civilization and into the garbage dump of history.  *Der Afrikanererstaznazis* of the BLM refuse to accept the fact that chattel slavery was perpetrated by both Whites and Blacks.  Blacks in Africa would raid neighboring tribes and sell their prisoners to slave traders.  Instead, Black tribal collectivists choose to treat chattel slavery as the act of the "White Race" inflicted upon the "Black Race."  Treating this as a blank check to gain plunder and favors at the expense of non-blacks.  Ignoring of course the fact that price for the sin of chattel slavery has already been paid, IN BLOOD.  Unfortunately the vile institution of slavery wasn’t destroyed but was instead nationalized.  The program of the Democratic Party since the reign of Woodrow Wilson has been to inflict the German form of Socialism (begun under Otto Von Bismarck and taken to its ultimate conclusion under Hitler) upon America.  Hitler called his doctrine "Marxism without the Talmudic frills."  What we have under the Democratic Party is National Socialism without the Aryan frills.  The dumb as a brick Marxists are still out there.
 

More Facts

Objectivism treats Reality as independent of consciousness.  Scientology treats Reality as dependent on consciousness.  Right and Wrong are determined by authority figures like L. Ron Hubbard.  This is simply wrong.

Fact

The fact is that those who claim to be persecuted are often the persecutors.

 

Opinion

If the Mainstream Media told the truth numerous politicians would have ended their lives at the end of a rope.  Instead they were elected.

Opinion

The Despocrats as part of their program to gain power through class warfare are promising to raise taxes on "the rich".  Which in practice means plundering the more productive members of our society in order to buy off those persons who are less productive.  What the Despocrats fervently hope isn’t noticed by their marks is that every dollar that’s forcibly taken from the real economy is a dollar that won’t be used to create new businesses, new jobs, or used to expand existing businesses, with more new jobs or increased pay for existing workers.  In any case the money that’s taken from the real economy to pay off the supporters of the Despocrats will never be part of the paycheck of a real worker.  In short, the Despocrats claim of being the friend of laborers is only so much effluent matter. 

Responibility

I once had a friend named Doug Graen.

Doug was an irresponsible guy.  Doug was once hired for security at a Midnight showing at the Uptown Theater.  (Not The Rocky Horror Picture Show.)  While Doug talked to the projectionist some people damaged some property.  Doug blamed me for this even though he wasn’t doing the job he was hired for.  Before he died Graham Chapman did a speaking tour.  One of the stops was at the first Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis.  Chapman didn’t say a word about the cancer he would eventually succumb to but he did speak about his own participation in The Dangerous Sports Club.  Doug blamed me for not getting him a ticket for the event.

A fundamental part of being an adult is accepting responsibility.

Doug was an irresponsible guy.

Personal History And Political Privilege

I once lived in a single room in a house on the corner of 24th Street and Humboldt Avenue.  I once was a member of the Libertarian Party of Minnesota.  I once parked a car on 24th Street.  My driver's license and street address was on Humboldt Avenue.  A member Minneapolis municipal soviet exercised her political privilege and had my car towed.  She was a member of the Democratic Farmer Labor party of Minnesota.

A politically privileged son of a DFL state representative blew though a stop light and killed five people.  This is wrong.

Dead Prophet Sketch

Ayn Rand said it was right to mock evil as it was recognized as evil.  I know it’s not original but I had to do it, so here’s the Dead Prophet Sketch.


The cast:  Tom Cruise, a short guy.  David Miscavige, a really short guy.


Tom Cruise enters the shop pushing a large leather chair with dead old man on it.

TC: Hello, I want to complain.

(Miscavige doesn’t respond.)

TC: Hello, Miss?

DM: What do you mean "miss"?

TC: I'm sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!

DM: We're closing for lunch.

TC: Never mind that! I’m here to complain about this prophet that I purchased about half an hour ago from this shop.

DM: Oh yes, the, uh, the Nebraska Red. What's, uh...What's wrong with him?

TC: He's dead, that's what's wrong with him!

DM: No, no, he's uh,...he's resting.

TC: Look, I know a dead prophet when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

DM: No, no, he's not dead, he's, he's resting! Remarkable prophet, isn't, it? Beautiful haircut!

TC: But he's stone dead.

DM: Nononono, no, no! He's resting!

TC: All right then, if he's resting, I'll wake him up! (shouting at the chair) 'Hello, Ronnie! I've got some lovely cash for you to grab if you show...

(Miscavige hits the chair)

DM: There, he moved!

TC: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the chair!

DM: I never!!

TC: Yes, you did!

Owner: I never, never did anything...

TC: (yelling and hitting the chair repeatedly) HELLO RONNIE!!!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call!

(Takes Hubbard out of the chair and thumps his head on the counter. Stands him up and watches him fall to the floor.)

TC: Now that's what I call a dead prophet.

DM: No, no.....No, he's stunned!

TC: STUNNED?!?

DM: Yeah! You stunned him, just as he was waking up! Nebraska Reds stun easily, sir.

TC: Now look... I've definitely had enough of this. That prophet clearly deceased, and when I bought him not half an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it being tired and shagged out following a prolonged lecture.

DM: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the wheat fields.

TC: PINING for the WHEAT FIELDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?  And why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got him home?

DM: Nebraska Reds prefer to lay on the back! Remarkable prophet, isn’t he? Lovely haircut!

TC: Look, I took the liberty of examining that prophet when I got him home, and I discovered the only reason that it had been sitting in his chair in the first place was that he had been NAILED there.

(pause)

DM: Well, of course he was nailed there! If I hadn't nailed him down, he would have stood up and gone VOOM!

TC: "VOOM"?!? Sir, this man wouldn't "voom" if you put four million volts through him! He's totally demised!

DM: No, no! He's pining!

TC: He's not pining! He’s passed on! This prophet is no more! He has ceased to be! He’s expired and gone to meet his maker! He’s a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed him to the chair he'd be pushing up the daisies! His metabolic processes are now history! He’s off the twig! He’s kicked the bucket. He’s dropped his body and moved on to Target Two!! THIS IS AN EX-PROPHET!!

(pause)

DM: Well, I'd better replace him, then. (he takes a quick peek behind the counter) Sorry sir, I've had a look 'round the back of the shop we're out of prophets.

TC: I see. I see, I get the picture.

DM: I got a slug.

(pause)

TC: Does it talk?

DM: Nnnnot really.

TC: WELL IT'S NOT A REPLACEMENT, IS IT?!!???!!?

DM: N-no, I guess not. (gets ashamed, looks at his feet)

TC: Well?

DM: It leaves a trail of slime.

TC: All right. 

Differences

In Objectivism Reality is real.  In Scientology Reality is unreal.  In Objectivism Right is always right and Wrong is always wrong.  In Scientology Right and Wrong are determined by the Scientologist.  In Objectivism Existence exists separate from consciousness.  In Scientology Existence is created by consciousness.  The doctrines of Scientology contradicts the doctrines of Objectivism.

 

Opinion

The Left leap at the chance to rob and murder and then complain that they're treated as robbers and murderers.  They refuse to apologize for their actions but demand that we apologize for ours.

No.

Thought For The Day

When I was a lad before entering high school I read Heinlein’s Starship Troopers a decade before reading Atlas Shrugged.  I read the novel for the ideas.

One of the ideas I formed at the time was that the personal weapon was both the instrument and the symbol of political authority.  As the sword denoted the authority of the monarch the rifle denoted the authority of the Citizen.  The disarmament of the Citizen would effectively strip him of political authority.  Thus the attempt to disarm the Citizens was effectively a tripwire to warn us of the attempt to establish a Tyranny. 

Of course the Citizen must understand and accept his political responsibilities.  The instrument is useless without the idea to guide it.  

A Message For Joe Biden

Get over it.

Sure, you claimed to won a presidential election by a majority of the votes cast.

So what?

An election in a constitutional republic is a process of hiring someone to perform a constitutionally defined task.  It’s not a mystical collectivist ritual for the anointment of a stone age god king.  We don’t believe in The Leader Principle.  We don’t believe that the stone age god king that you’ve become is in any way the embodiment of a collective will.  And we certainly don’t believe that we are in any way subject to what is in fact your personal whim.  We aren’t and never will be a living prop in your ideological fantasy.  We won’t bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us.  And we will never embark on the path that always leads to the anonymous ditch outside of a town.

What you are is a believer in what Ayn Rand used to call the Primacy of Consciousness, a belief that reality isn’t inherently real but is in some way alterable by a ruling consciousness.  In your case, the Collective, which in many versions of Socialist doctrine has a distinct consciousness of its own.  Some Leftists have gone as far as to claim that the individual perception of actual reality which invariably contradicts the doctrines of the collectivists is a form of false consciousness.

This explains why the Left has made the effort to gain control of the Mainstream Media and why they insist on "shaping opinion" instead of simply reporting the facts.  Your supporters in the media are through the deliberate issuance of falsehoods trying to alter reality.  But reality is inherently real.  Facts are facts. Or to put it in the simplest terms: A is A.

The number of votes you received doesn't change the fact that you're wrong.  Might is not right.

You are about to learn in the worst way that reality is NOT subject to a majority vote.

Deaing With Outlaws

The West needs to revive the classic English Common Law concept of the Outlaw, i.e., those who become a law unto themselves, defy all civilized societies, and commit murder and mayhem against the rest of us.  "Outlaws" under the English Common Law automatically lost all civil rights and protections by placing themselves OUTSIDE the law, hence the label. Those declared as "Outlaws" --a civil "death sentence"-- could be hunted down with impunity by anyone at any time. 

Bitching On The Anniversary

On this day in 1776 a bunch of subjects of the British crown declared themselves and their fellow Americans to be the free citizens of a free nation.  Needless to say King George III and the British Aristocracy objected to this revolutionary act with deadly force.  Although the United States Constitution clearly prohibits the establishment of an aristocratic class one has been brought into effect by judicial fiat.  Homosexuals -- a group once commonly identified as depraved or mentally ill -- have been granted a separate and superior status with respect to the citizens of our nation.  Anyone who refuses a demand from a homosexual on any grounds are now subject to civil punishment.  Given this it wouldn't be a surprise when the refusal of a demand by a homosexual will result in a criminal penalty as well.  In reality this is called oppression.  In the last year the Pink Triangle of the Homosexual Collective has changed from a sign of victim status to being a symbol of the oppressors.  It has become a symbol of tyranny like the Red Star of Soviet Communism and the Broken Cross of National Socialism.

 

I'm reposting  a rant on the subject of Gay Rights.


The Myth Of Gay Rights


What is a right?

In Objectivism a right is a moral principle that defines and sanctions an individual’s freedom of action in a social context.  There’s only one basic right, a person’s right to their own life.[1]

So what is a Gay Right?

The so-called Gay Right is a political privilege, a law enacted for the private benefit of homosexuals, which negates the freedom of non-homosexuals.  In most of the cases on record it’s the freedom to not associate with homosexuals.

Why disassociate from homosexuals?

In the cases that have come up for judicial action individuals are being punished for complying with the Christian moral code.  In Christianity homosexuality is identified as a sin and as a result they're to be shunned.  In reality the act of shunning a homosexual does not violate his real rights because in a free society all personal interactions are voluntary.

In a case that came up for judicial action a homosexual couple entering into a marriage sought to buy a wedding cake for their ceremony.  When they were refused on Christian moral grounds they sued the baker for the act of discrimination.  Instead of choosing a different baker to voluntarily provide the cake as is proper in a free society they chose to reject the principle of freedom and to judicially inflict their will upon the baker.[2]

Are there grounds to disassociate from homosexuals and thus a rational basis to do so?

In reality homosexuality is a mental dysfunction.  The homosexual act runs counter to the normal biological functions of human life.  And homosexuals have been disruptive to the normal interactions in civil and military groups. [3]  

Given that there are both religious and rational grounds for disassociating from homosexuals it’s no surprise that the adherents of tyranny, those that seek to establish the Primacy of the State with themselves fully in control, have quickly and firmly moved to exploit the homosexual voting block.  In exchange for the privilege of negating the rights of non-homosexuals this collective is consistently supporting the complete effort of the tyrants to impose their rule upon our nation.  This should result in a negative outcome for the homosexual collective.  When the present cold civil struggle becomes an open war the victims of the homosexual collective will seek an end to their problem.

A permanent end.


Footnotes

1.  Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness.

2.  In finding for the homosexual couple the judge acted in the opposite manner of a judicial officer in a free society.  For this he should be taken out and shot.

3.  The ancient Greek city state of Thebes had a dedicated all homosexual military formation.  It was wiped out in action.

 

Opinions

In reality individuals and groups that consistently practice the virtues of rationality and self discipline will always have an advantage over those who don't.  A fundamental part of rationality is the understanding that there's always something more to learn.  That life is THE learning experience.  What one doesn't know WILL hurt them.  The Southern white boy whose personal library consists solely of The Bible has a clear advantage over the African tribal chieftain or a Marxist.  I wouldn't trade being the former for being any of the latter.

The fact is that Judaism, with the idea of a parental God, is a fundamental part of our civilization.  Where pagan deities were malevolent or useless at best, God at the core of the Western Monotheist Tradition (WMT) is the creator, teacher, and the positive example that we try to follow in our own lives. 

So when someone attacks Jews they're attacking all of us. 

Vladimir Putin has been between a rock and a hard place since he ordered the invasion of The Ukraine.
 

Proposal

If I've a complaint about The Republican Party it's that they've shown godlike patience with the behavior of The Democratic Party.  Democrats can assault in public those who won't submit to them, destroy property, call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, the murder of elected officials who're carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and they'll not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a Democrat.  I once told an editor that I worked for that we needn't rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they've by their own choice dehumanized themselves.  To Democrats the fundamental value is power.  Freedom is the negation of power and therefore must be opposed.  A Democrat wouldn't be caught dead standing up for an actual Human value.  Has anyone noticed that The Republicans are clearly once again the party of liberation while The Democrats have resumed their old role as the party of subjugation.
 
The worst enemy of any nation are it's politicians.  Having a Democrat whine about someone else engaged in the sexual abuse of others, being corrupt, or having a dictatorial lust for power is like Larry Flynt complaining about someone else being obscene.  If we're to have a future then governmental power has to be limited.  Those who demand unlimited power have to be treated as the Enemies of Mankind they actually are.  But the fact of the matter is that Democrats see people as something to be used. And if a person is unusable by The Democrats, why keep them alive?  The Democrats sent young men to die in the Vietnam War, a Republican administration stopped the Vietnam War.

I've proposed starting a new political party.  If The Republican Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will have no choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make changes and restore a rational system of government.  Revolutions (real revolutions, not Marxist ones) happen because the government fails to function.  We in the United States are stuck with two political parties.  The leadership of one party is insane and the leadership of the other party simply doesn't care.  Rank and file members now call establishment members a bunch of Vichy Republicans.

Perhaps its time to start a new political party.  Is a new political party possible?

The answer is, I don’t know.  The opponents of chattel slavery proceeded, even with public opposition.  We, as opponents of political power, have to.  We need to treat exercises of political power, such as censorship, as crimes against Humanity.  We need to treat bans on firearms and free speech as the anti-Human acts that they actually are.  Our political elites have apparently forgotten the lesson taught by our original civil war, that banning freedom doesn’t work.  Our political elites tried to ban the voluntary consumption of alcohol, it didn’t work.  Our political elites tried to ban the voluntary consumption of hard drugs, it doesn’t work.  Our political elites will try to ban the voluntary ownership of firearms and freedom of speech, it will never work.  Our politicians are supposed to do a specific job and they aren't doing it.  We have to start a new political party to go around them.  We don't have a choice.

Let's call our new party the Freedom Party.

Will the Freedom Party replace the Democratic Party?

I don't think so.  What's more likely is that the Freedom Party will replace the Republican Party just like the Republicans replaced the Whigs.

It's Happening Again

Susan Huck (Ph.D) told me directly that monsters are never hiding under the bed, they’re right out in the open.

Why did The Holocaust happen?

The actual author of the Book of Genesis actually had a point: Evil often presents itself as Good.

The Holocaust wasn't a unique event.  The Holocaust (and other horrors) were the result of normal people acting normally.  Why did a particular horror happen?  There's an answer but you may not like it.  A horror happened because the perpetrators believed they were good people with their victims and opponents being evil.  We've seen this before with numerous horrors and it will happen again.  What we're dealing with are people who believe they're good people.  We have to deal with them as such no matter how horrible the things they actually do.  Many of the people who’re loudly proclaiming “never again” are going to do it again.  The National Socialists and Soviets believed themselves to be good people, we're seeing the same phenomena with Anti-Fa.  Anti-Fa claims to be opposed to Fascism no matter what they actually do.  Anti-Fa does the things that Fascists actually do.  Members of Anti-Fa will believe the lies they're told regardless of the consequences.  Members of Anti-Fa claim to oppose Fascism, in fact they're what Fascists are.  Most members of Anti-Fa don't know that they're following the dictators handbook.  Most proponents of tyranny, such as members of Anti-Fa (National Socialists, Soviet Communists, etc.) believe they're good people and that their opponents are evil.  If a dogma requires the commission of a vile act then that act WILL be committed.  When someone denies their own Humanity then they WILL commit crimes against Humanity.  It's very easy to predict what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will say.  Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the word Fascist.

Those who don't remember history are a highly sought after group of followers.  We identify The Holocaust as the horrible act it actually was.  And we should be horrified.  But we're seeing The Holocaust from an objective perspective.  From the subjective perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their victims and opponents as being evil.  We're seeing this again with the Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa.  They see themselves as being good and their victims as being evil.  I've said this before: Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  I have a warning for members of Anti-fa, when you Brownshirt someone, don't be surprised that you're treated as a Brownshirt.  I've found through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the good guys.  If a member of Anti-fa wants to see a Totalitarian, all they have to do is look in a mirror.  Totalitarians are never hiding under the bed, they're in plain view.  For those who value power no act is too vile.  Killing a member of Anti-Fa isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense.  Members of Anti-fa should be engaged with aircraft like the AC-130 and A-10.  A Fascist isn't who the self styled opponents of the doctrine believe they are.  WE HAVE THE DUTY to see the self described antifascist as they truly are a National Socialist piece of shit who should be hanged from the neck until dead.  And WE HAVE THE DUTY to identify the Mainstream Media are a bunch of liars.  Once a difference in opinion is criminalized a civil war is inevitable.

Voltaire said it: Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities.

I have a question for members of Anti-Fa and BLM: what part of "Never Again" didn't you understand?

Collectivists will behave as Collectivists.

Why don't we assassinate the false president Joe Biden and/or the false vice president Kamala Harris?  Because their assassinations won't solve the problem.  The actual problem is a culture that holds the rights of individuals in contempt.  The assassination of Biden and/or Harris won't solve that problem.