The thoroughly unpleasant fact of reality is that Hollywood is run by a
bunch of unimaginative twerps, the kind of people that Ayn Rand used to
call Second Handers. It's the kind of mentality that wants to maximize
profits but is unwilling to try something distinctly new or different. Thus the glut of sequels and the ongoing cinemisation of the successful
television series. Even if the project isn't a sequel or a series
adaptation, the Second Handers still attempt to reduce risk by only
combining elements that appeared to have worked in the past. Thus The
Adventures of Pluto Nash, an movie that combines the elements of Eddie
Murphy, Computer Generated Imagery, and the Sci-Fi environment, still
turns out to be an unwatchable piece of crap. (When I saw the trailer at
the 2002 Convergence, my thought was, oh its Moon Zero Two: The Next
Generation.)
Another problem is realism. While certain liberties can be taken with space operas films set in
the real world (including 2001: A Space Odyssey) should be as realistic
as possible as permitted by the film's budget. My own personal BS alarm
went off when I saw the trailer for the second Charlie's Angels
flick. It showed a scene where the main rotor on a helicopter gunship
began to self deploy. A mechanism for moving rotor blades from the
storage position to the operational position would add weight to the
aircraft. This is a bad thing in military aircraft. And if the additional weight wasn't an issue a self deploy system
would still be useless in the operation context for one very good
reason. Every helicopter operated by an air force or army aviation unit
comes with something called a ground crew. A bunch of people whose job is
to open, close, fold, and unfold components and perform maintenance on
the aircraft. When I see a BS
element in an advertisement for a movie I as a rule usually tend to
avoid seeing it.
There's the issue of personal aesthetics.
While a brain dead bimbo with obviously fake hair, eyebrows, lips,
and breasts may be attractive to the urban pimp and his clientele. As I've said else where, I find such creatures to be repulsive. something
about such such females just says "STAY AWAY" in big ugly
letters. I absolutely refuse to see anything with Angolina Jolie in it,
even for free. That's how put off by cosmetological fakery I am.
No comments:
Post a Comment