We're all Americans here, no hyphens needed.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in
favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated
in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
Thought For The Day
We miss Christopher Hitchens.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, October 29, 2018
A Message For Liberals
We were warned about vermin like you. If you insist on behaving like National Socialists, then you will be treated as such, in the Nuremberg style.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Sunday, October 28, 2018
Thought For The Day
The Church of Scientology has all the credibility of the NSDAP.
Which is to say none at all.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control." those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Which is to say none at all.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control." those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Saturday, October 27, 2018
Question
The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the
means it is brought about. The case in this point is that the
disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates
of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this. In their view
reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder
of citizens who own guns is morally correct.
But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.
The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A government
that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and
devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by
deadly force.
And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Friday, October 26, 2018
Expectation
The beatdown by the neo-nazi garbage (and I will use that term) that you’ve been expecting?
It won’t happen. So why won’t it happen? Because the neo-nazi thugs that you were told that supported Trump never existed.
YOU WERE LIED TO.
By the professors and the main stream media. You were also lied to by the serious supporters of Hillary Clinton. You can go outside of the so-called safe spaces and you find peaceful and normal people who are glad that the treasonous bitch will never occupy the White House. And not one of them is a brownshirt in hiding waiting for the chance to beat you up.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
It won’t happen. So why won’t it happen? Because the neo-nazi thugs that you were told that supported Trump never existed.
YOU WERE LIED TO.
By the professors and the main stream media. You were also lied to by the serious supporters of Hillary Clinton. You can go outside of the so-called safe spaces and you find peaceful and normal people who are glad that the treasonous bitch will never occupy the White House. And not one of them is a brownshirt in hiding waiting for the chance to beat you up.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Thursday, October 25, 2018
Thought For The Day
Even though I was an open and public critic of Adolf Hitler and National
Socialism I will be described as a Nazi by the Mainstream Media. I
also said openly and in public that reading an important piece of White
Nationalist literature was like swimming in raw sewage. But I will be
described by the Mainstream Media as a White Nationalist.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control." those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control." those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Thought For The Day
All Socialists (including Hitler) were beaten in the psychopath sweepstakes by the God of the Bible.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Tuesday, October 23, 2018
Thought For The Day
Have a self appointed opponent of Fascism examined their own beliefs?
Apparently they haven't.
The Waffen-SS believed they were the good guys, but reality is real, and they were the bad guys.
It's easy to predict what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will say. Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialism and replace the word Jew with the word Fascist.
If members of Anti-fa want to behave like Nazis, then they will be treated like Nazis, in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, October 22, 2018
Thought For The Day
John Cleese said that he abhors Political Correctness, that's putting it mildly John.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Sunday, October 21, 2018
Disagreement
I do disagree with President Trump, I want him to execute Hillary Clinton as the Enemy of Humanity that she is. If he doesn't do it, someone else will.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Saturday, October 20, 2018
Explaination
In public records I was an opponent of National Socialism, but I will be called a Nazi.
Why?
Because I oppose all forms of desire for power. Even the Marxist ones.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Why?
Because I oppose all forms of desire for power. Even the Marxist ones.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Friday, October 19, 2018
Question Of The Day
Do I want to be ruled by idiots?
No.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
No.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Question Of The Day.
What part of NEVER AGAIN do the proponents of public disarmament not understand?
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Questions
Do you question your beliefs?
Do you want power over another person?
If the answer is no, you will never be a Fascist or any other brand of totalitarian.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Do you want power over another person?
If the answer is no, you will never be a Fascist or any other brand of totalitarian.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Some Facts
Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists are the crazy relatives that
the mainstream left won't talk about. If there is one myth that I would
really like to bury, it is the myth
that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and
those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing
parties.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Mainstream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.
To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Someone on The Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one, in the usual leftist audience, or the Mainstream Media, would call them out on it. The myth that National Socialism is a right wing ideology basically originated in the the Kremlin and has continued to be repeated by those who are embarrassed about their German ideological relatives. Seriously, if The Left were seriously and openly called out on this they would either have to drop their beliefs or bust their collective backsides to rehabilitate Hitler and the NSDAP. Or they would just jump up and down and call us a bunch of liars.
To those who value power over all else, no act is too depraved and no bodycount is too high.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, October 15, 2018
Thoughts For The Day
If God is good (also known as Jehovah or Yahweh) then Stalin or Mao have to be better.
You really don't want to to be a drummer for the band Spinal Tap.
A South American drug lord can't compete with a corner pharmacist
George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as an instruction manual
Anyone who arrested David Miscavige would be doing the Church of Scientology a favor.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
You really don't want to to be a drummer for the band Spinal Tap.
A South American drug lord can't compete with a corner pharmacist
George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as an instruction manual
Anyone who arrested David Miscavige would be doing the Church of Scientology a favor.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Sunday, October 14, 2018
My Theory
Well, the Left can't deal with reality because in reality they are the
bad guys. They are constantly trying to live off the work of others thus
they have to control their "livestock" by force. Since reason tells us
that such behavior is morally intolerable they are left with emotional
whining as their means of justifying their actions and allowing
themselves to feel good about it. Any refusal to accept the emotional
bullshit and obey the self-appointed masters is automatically translated
on the emotional level as something to the effect of "die
motherfucker!"
That's my theory, anyway.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
That's my theory, anyway.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Saturday, October 13, 2018
Question Of The Day
Why does an unarmed man stand in front of a tank during an uprising? Or to resist any other act of tyranny even at the risk of death? Because to not do so is the very act of submission.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Friday, October 12, 2018
Thoughts For The Day
Who needs a Reichsministry of Culture and Propaganda when the Mainstream Media will lie to everyone without a statist gun to their heads.
When someone consistently tells lies, then like the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the National Socialist German Workers Party, and the Church of Scientology, they will be eventually identified as a liar.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
When someone consistently tells lies, then like the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the National Socialist German Workers Party, and the Church of Scientology, they will be eventually identified as a liar.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Thursday, October 11, 2018
Thought For The Day
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Thoughts For The Day
A Democrat will take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the word Jew with the word Republican. I'm on public record as being hostile to the doctrine of National
Socialism and National Socialists, but I will be identified as a Nazi.
Those who value power will stop at nothing to get it.
Never threaten anyone, just do it.
Tyranny always triumphs with thunderous applause.
A Democratic Socialist is still a Socialist and an Enemy of Mankind.
It's easier to be honest
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Those who value power will stop at nothing to get it.
Never threaten anyone, just do it.
Tyranny always triumphs with thunderous applause.
A Democratic Socialist is still a Socialist and an Enemy of Mankind.
It's easier to be honest
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Tuesday, October 09, 2018
Question Of The Day
Should George Soros be treated as enemy of humanity that he is?
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, October 08, 2018
A Warning To The Mainstream Media
When you lie to people, you be identified as a liar.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Sunday, October 07, 2018
Thought For The Day
How did that idiot Sheila Jackson Lee get elected?
Even if it kills me I will work to establish the Heinlein system as the government of the United States.
So what is the system Heinlein described in his novel Starship Troopers? (Don't see the movie, it wasn't a proper adaptation of the novel.)
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
It was not enough to restrict the powers of government but to restrict who could actually participate in the process of governing. In effect to idiot-proof the system.
So is it actually necessary to fully implement the system that Heinlein proposed?
The fact is that all forms of authority are based on knowledge and political authority is no exception. But in the present system political authority is granted to any warm body without regard to their the actual state of knowledge. As a result some warm bodies have traded their votes for a material object such as an IPad or a wad of cash. Or worse they have traded their votes for the warm and fuzzy feeling of having been compassionate.
The result is out present state of our nation. Those who lack knowledge or simple concern for consequences should not have authority over another person, let alone the fate of a nation.
My solution to the problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.
The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and amendment, the duties of the citizen as a member of the sovereign authority of the nation, and what is expected to happen when the Federal Government enters the failure mode.
The second part of the course covers the function and use of the instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.
While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a passing grade will be required to exercise the authority to vote.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Even if it kills me I will work to establish the Heinlein system as the government of the United States.
So what is the system Heinlein described in his novel Starship Troopers? (Don't see the movie, it wasn't a proper adaptation of the novel.)
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
It was not enough to restrict the powers of government but to restrict who could actually participate in the process of governing. In effect to idiot-proof the system.
So is it actually necessary to fully implement the system that Heinlein proposed?
The fact is that all forms of authority are based on knowledge and political authority is no exception. But in the present system political authority is granted to any warm body without regard to their the actual state of knowledge. As a result some warm bodies have traded their votes for a material object such as an IPad or a wad of cash. Or worse they have traded their votes for the warm and fuzzy feeling of having been compassionate.
The result is out present state of our nation. Those who lack knowledge or simple concern for consequences should not have authority over another person, let alone the fate of a nation.
My solution to the problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.
The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and amendment, the duties of the citizen as a member of the sovereign authority of the nation, and what is expected to happen when the Federal Government enters the failure mode.
The second part of the course covers the function and use of the instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.
While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a passing grade will be required to exercise the authority to vote.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Saturday, October 06, 2018
Question
What part of "Never Again" does a hoplophobe activist not understand?
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Friday, October 05, 2018
Some More Messages For The Republican Party
The Republican Party needs to face up to the fact that politics as usual
is no longer an option. The Republican Party has systematically
compromised, appeased, and openly bought off the other side too many
times. This had the effect of strengthening the other side and harming
us as a nation. In the Wiemar Republic the practice of parties
making deals with each other was called cattle trading. In present day
America we call this bipartisanship. And like the Germans between the
wars we are now facing the rise of a totalitarian collectivist political
cult with its own divinely appointed leader. If the Republican
Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will have no
choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make changes
and restore a rational system of government.
In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. They’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Barack Hussein Obama. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.
If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite godlike patience with the behavior of the Left. Leftists can assault in public those who won't submit to them. Destroy property. And even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist. I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanized themselves.
Humanity is not merely a physical condition, it is a state of mind. To be human is to be essentially rational and productive. The human mentality (or soul) looks upon the world, the land, the animals and plants, the natural forces, as things to be mastered for the benefit of himself and his posterity. On the other hand, the predator, or savage mentality does not seek to to master the world, but to be the master of men. The savage prefers not to sustain himself by his own effort, but to seize and consume the lives and property of others for material and spiritual sustenance. To the predator, justice consists of "getting away with it" -- those who rightfully resist the predator are to be punished or destroyed.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. They’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Barack Hussein Obama. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.
If I have a complaint about the Right it is that we have shown infinite godlike patience with the behavior of the Left. Leftists can assault in public those who won't submit to them. Destroy property. And even call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, and the murder of elected officials who are carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and we will not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a leftist. I once told an editor that I worked for that we need not rhetorically dehumanize our opponents, all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they have by their own choice dehumanized themselves.
Humanity is not merely a physical condition, it is a state of mind. To be human is to be essentially rational and productive. The human mentality (or soul) looks upon the world, the land, the animals and plants, the natural forces, as things to be mastered for the benefit of himself and his posterity. On the other hand, the predator, or savage mentality does not seek to to master the world, but to be the master of men. The savage prefers not to sustain himself by his own effort, but to seize and consume the lives and property of others for material and spiritual sustenance. To the predator, justice consists of "getting away with it" -- those who rightfully resist the predator are to be punished or destroyed.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Thursday, October 04, 2018
Question Of The Day
Should the Democratic Party be treated as the enemies of mankind that they are?
Yes.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Yes.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Wednesday, October 03, 2018
A Message To Antifa
If you want a Civil War, you'll get one up the ass.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a
man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who
are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason.
To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language.
There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in
favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated
in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Tuesday, October 02, 2018
Thought For The Day
L. Ron Hubbard did smash his name into Human History, as a liar, cheat, and conman.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Monday, October 01, 2018
Question
Is the Media or the LAPD worthy of trust?
No.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
No.
Punishing a man for an act he did not commit is unjust. Imprisoning a man for speaking the truth is tyrannical. Disarming the citizens -- who are the sovereign authority of the nation -- is treason. To say anything more would require the extensive use of barracks language. There's no such thing as "common sense gun control" those who are in favor of banning firearms are enemies of Humanity and should be treated in the Nuremberg style, from the neck until dead. And there's no limit to what a Statist can do to a disarmed victim.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)