Saturday, March 31, 2018
Friday, March 30, 2018
A Fact About Hillary
The original National Socialists in Germany had to establish a
Reichsministry to bring the press under control. The American media is
voluntarily covering the backside of our glorious female fuhrer. Disgusting, isn't it?
Yes, it is.
The one thing that the willfully depraved are loathe to do is to acknowledge the fact that there are people who are in fact better in some respect than they are. To make such an acknowledgement is to issue an indictment of themselves and their own actions. The willfully depraved will murder individuals or even exterminate entire nations before they will recognize the truth about themselves.
Yes, it is.
The one thing that the willfully depraved are loathe to do is to acknowledge the fact that there are people who are in fact better in some respect than they are. To make such an acknowledgement is to issue an indictment of themselves and their own actions. The willfully depraved will murder individuals or even exterminate entire nations before they will recognize the truth about themselves.
Thursday, March 29, 2018
Disturbance
This is a disturbing thought.
Has anyone else noticed that Charles Schumer is the literal embodiment of the subject of anti-Semitic propaganda? That POS has deceived and used the Jewish voters of New York to gain power and those same voters will be left holding the bag when it is time to hold him accountable for his crimes. We know that Schumer is fully responsible for his acts, but not everyone will be properly enlightened and innocent (or at least ignorant) people will be wrongly punished. This is clearly wrong.
Has anyone else noticed that Charles Schumer is the literal embodiment of the subject of anti-Semitic propaganda? That POS has deceived and used the Jewish voters of New York to gain power and those same voters will be left holding the bag when it is time to hold him accountable for his crimes. We know that Schumer is fully responsible for his acts, but not everyone will be properly enlightened and innocent (or at least ignorant) people will be wrongly punished. This is clearly wrong.
Wednesday, March 28, 2018
A Fact Of Reality
We must understand that Socialism is
essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting Karl Marx, "from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the
antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much
greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.
It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such. Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
The socialist master class, both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
Those who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet as the attire of choice.
If you will pardon me for the use of shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
If you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of a slave labor economic system.
It is invariably the full socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to survive.
It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat, etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
The socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if the goods and services created by others were something naturally found in nature.
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such. Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
Monday, March 26, 2018
A Message For Hillary Clinton
I have a message for Hillary Clinton the fool who is visibly upset at the fact that we won't blindly submit to her whims.
Get over it.
Sure, you claimed to won a presidential election by a majority of the votes cast. (After all, you are a Democrat)
So what?
An election in a constitutional republic is a process of hiring someone to perform a constitutionally defined task. It is not a mystical collectivist ritual for the anointment of a stone age goddess. We do not believe in The Leader Principle. We do not believe that the stone age goddess that you have become is in any way the embodiment of a collective will. And we certainly do not believe that we are in any way subject to what is in fact your personal whim. We are not and never will be a living prop in your ideological fantasy. We will not bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we will never embark on the path that always leads to the anonymous ditch outside of a town.
What you are is a believer in what Ayn Rand used to call the Primacy of Consciousness, a belief that reality is not inherently real but is in some way alterable by a ruling consciousness. In your case, the Collective, which in many versions of Socialist doctrine has a distinct consciousness of its own. Some Leftists have gone as far as to claim that the individual perception of actual reality, which invariably contradicts the doctrines of the collectivists, is a form of false consciousness.
This explains why the Hard Left has made the effort to gain control of the Mainstream Media, and why they insist on "shaping opinion" instead of simply reporting the facts. Your supporters in the media are through the deliberate issuance of falsehoods trying to alter reality. But reality is inherently real. Facts are facts. Or to put it in the simplest terms: A is A.
The number of votes you received (or in the democrat system, claimed to received) doesn't change the fact that you are wrong. Might (or in the democrat system, the appearance of might) is not right.
You are about to learn in the worst way that reality is not subject to a majority vote.
Get over it.
Sure, you claimed to won a presidential election by a majority of the votes cast. (After all, you are a Democrat)
So what?
An election in a constitutional republic is a process of hiring someone to perform a constitutionally defined task. It is not a mystical collectivist ritual for the anointment of a stone age goddess. We do not believe in The Leader Principle. We do not believe that the stone age goddess that you have become is in any way the embodiment of a collective will. And we certainly do not believe that we are in any way subject to what is in fact your personal whim. We are not and never will be a living prop in your ideological fantasy. We will not bind ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we will never embark on the path that always leads to the anonymous ditch outside of a town.
What you are is a believer in what Ayn Rand used to call the Primacy of Consciousness, a belief that reality is not inherently real but is in some way alterable by a ruling consciousness. In your case, the Collective, which in many versions of Socialist doctrine has a distinct consciousness of its own. Some Leftists have gone as far as to claim that the individual perception of actual reality, which invariably contradicts the doctrines of the collectivists, is a form of false consciousness.
This explains why the Hard Left has made the effort to gain control of the Mainstream Media, and why they insist on "shaping opinion" instead of simply reporting the facts. Your supporters in the media are through the deliberate issuance of falsehoods trying to alter reality. But reality is inherently real. Facts are facts. Or to put it in the simplest terms: A is A.
The number of votes you received (or in the democrat system, claimed to received) doesn't change the fact that you are wrong. Might (or in the democrat system, the appearance of might) is not right.
You are about to learn in the worst way that reality is not subject to a majority vote.
Sunday, March 25, 2018
A Fact About George Orwell
The novel 1984 was written as a warning to all of us. Not as an instruction
manual for the Democratic Party or members of Anti-fa. Control over everything and everyone
productive must be a Democrats or a member of Anti-fa wet dream.
And here's a quote about George Orwell:
The progressive left really doesn’t like the concept of Free Speech. They want to make any speech they disagree with illegal. They use Orwell’s 1984 as a training manual, instead of the warning it was meant to be.
-- Mark Urbin
And here's a quote about George Orwell:
The progressive left really doesn’t like the concept of Free Speech. They want to make any speech they disagree with illegal. They use Orwell’s 1984 as a training manual, instead of the warning it was meant to be.
-- Mark Urbin
Saturday, March 24, 2018
A Fact Of Reality
Apart from the Aryan frills there is no essential difference between the Democratic Party and the National Socialist German Worker's Party. Kill them all.
Friday, March 23, 2018
Things I've Said About Peace Activism
Here's a number of things I've said on the subject of peace activism:
If there is one thing I have certainly noticed, it is that pacifists in general have no objection to enjoying the benefits of civilization but are unwilling to take the measures necessary to defend it from foreign and domestic barbarians. Such as the National Socialists, the Soviet Socialists, and the home grown socialists of the Democratic Party. Contrary to their general delusion of virtue, pacifists are in effect, moral and political parasites upon civilized society.
Peace in the real world is simply the absence of those -- such as the socialists -- who seek to deprive you, I, and our fellow citizens of our own Life, Liberty, and Property. Real peace can only be achieved by the physical isolation or outright elimination of those who seek to subjugate, plunder and murder us. This can only be done through the use of physical force. In short, true peace can only be achieved only through the possession of superior firepower and the moral will to use it.
The narcissistic trash that makes up the membership of the so-called peace movement simply do not care whether you and your children live, or die, or suffer under the yoke of an unwashed barbarian. They plaster their cars with bumper sticker, carry signs, bang on drums, throw Frisbees, and perform other useless rituals so that they can feel good about themselves and show the world how morally superior they are. Never mind that they openly deny the fundamental fact which is the foundation of all valid moral law, that Human Life -- life as a rational being in control of one's own life -- is the standard of all moral values, and that those who would damage or destroy Human Life must be removed from human society and if necessary be destroyed. The adherents of pacifism have so inverted their own mental processes that they look upon the perpetrators of mass slavery and mass murder as good and those who take up arms to defend the society of consent as the most depraved evil.
Now there are some folks, who regard themselves as morally superior beings, who question why the other bastard has to die. The answer of course is that the other bastard is attempting to impose his will, or the will of his leader, upon you by force. It is the act of coercion by force that makes what General Patton called the other bastard an enemy. Peace is simply the absence of enemies. But there are some folks, who pretend to be morally superior beings, who would have us believe that "peace" could be achieved by submission to the will of the other bastard. In reality this is not peace, it is slavery. There are some well meaning people, some of whom that I respect, who believe that there are times that one cannot have both peace and freedom at the same time. I have to disagree. Liberty is simply the condition of existence in which the person is free to live his own life in accordance with his own rational judgment. This does of course require the absence of some other bastard who is attempting to impose his will upon the person by force. In practical terms real peace and real freedom are inseparable. I will go further is saying that to a civilized person, peace, freedom, and security, are simply three words that can be used to describe the identical condition, the absence of another bastard imposing his will upon the civilized person. Contrary to what those who describe themselves as peace activists would have us believe, and as General Patton has ably demonstrated, the path to real peace invariably takes us over the real dead bodies of those other bastards who insist on violently imposing their will upon us. Unfortunately this process is by no means a safe one. Let us take this day to remember those who died on the path to real peace.
A rational study of the real world would show that a real state of Peace is effectively indistinguishable from a state of Liberty and a state of Security. Peace, Liberty, and Security are simply three words that a rational person uses to describe the same condition, the rightful ability to live one's own life without coercive interference by others. A rational study of actual history would show that the state of peace for the citizens of a free nation is the result of the violent elimination of the would be conquerors and their pet quislings. If we rationally examine those who constitute the membership of the so-called Peace Movement we find that virtually every one of them is an open advocate of the coercive subjugation of the productive members of the Human Race. The occasional exception being a self-blinded fool who isn't paying attention to what they're ideologically in bed with. In short, a "peace activist" and the "peace movement" are in fact enemies of Peace.
Peace is only an affirmative value to those who live in the condition of liberty, that is being rightfully in charge of one's self and able to set the goals for one's own life. Peace cannot be a value to the subjects of a totalitarian socialist state. To the victim of such a state -- the ordinary worker who is bullied by a commissar, the inmate of a slave labor camp, or the occupant of a darkened cell awaiting murder at the hands of the local chekists -- war, either an internal uprising against the socialist masters, or an invasion by an army of liberation, is in fact the positive value.
I stand by what I said.
If there is one thing I have certainly noticed, it is that pacifists in general have no objection to enjoying the benefits of civilization but are unwilling to take the measures necessary to defend it from foreign and domestic barbarians. Such as the National Socialists, the Soviet Socialists, and the home grown socialists of the Democratic Party. Contrary to their general delusion of virtue, pacifists are in effect, moral and political parasites upon civilized society.
Peace in the real world is simply the absence of those -- such as the socialists -- who seek to deprive you, I, and our fellow citizens of our own Life, Liberty, and Property. Real peace can only be achieved by the physical isolation or outright elimination of those who seek to subjugate, plunder and murder us. This can only be done through the use of physical force. In short, true peace can only be achieved only through the possession of superior firepower and the moral will to use it.
The narcissistic trash that makes up the membership of the so-called peace movement simply do not care whether you and your children live, or die, or suffer under the yoke of an unwashed barbarian. They plaster their cars with bumper sticker, carry signs, bang on drums, throw Frisbees, and perform other useless rituals so that they can feel good about themselves and show the world how morally superior they are. Never mind that they openly deny the fundamental fact which is the foundation of all valid moral law, that Human Life -- life as a rational being in control of one's own life -- is the standard of all moral values, and that those who would damage or destroy Human Life must be removed from human society and if necessary be destroyed. The adherents of pacifism have so inverted their own mental processes that they look upon the perpetrators of mass slavery and mass murder as good and those who take up arms to defend the society of consent as the most depraved evil.
Now there are some folks, who regard themselves as morally superior beings, who question why the other bastard has to die. The answer of course is that the other bastard is attempting to impose his will, or the will of his leader, upon you by force. It is the act of coercion by force that makes what General Patton called the other bastard an enemy. Peace is simply the absence of enemies. But there are some folks, who pretend to be morally superior beings, who would have us believe that "peace" could be achieved by submission to the will of the other bastard. In reality this is not peace, it is slavery. There are some well meaning people, some of whom that I respect, who believe that there are times that one cannot have both peace and freedom at the same time. I have to disagree. Liberty is simply the condition of existence in which the person is free to live his own life in accordance with his own rational judgment. This does of course require the absence of some other bastard who is attempting to impose his will upon the person by force. In practical terms real peace and real freedom are inseparable. I will go further is saying that to a civilized person, peace, freedom, and security, are simply three words that can be used to describe the identical condition, the absence of another bastard imposing his will upon the civilized person. Contrary to what those who describe themselves as peace activists would have us believe, and as General Patton has ably demonstrated, the path to real peace invariably takes us over the real dead bodies of those other bastards who insist on violently imposing their will upon us. Unfortunately this process is by no means a safe one. Let us take this day to remember those who died on the path to real peace.
A rational study of the real world would show that a real state of Peace is effectively indistinguishable from a state of Liberty and a state of Security. Peace, Liberty, and Security are simply three words that a rational person uses to describe the same condition, the rightful ability to live one's own life without coercive interference by others. A rational study of actual history would show that the state of peace for the citizens of a free nation is the result of the violent elimination of the would be conquerors and their pet quislings. If we rationally examine those who constitute the membership of the so-called Peace Movement we find that virtually every one of them is an open advocate of the coercive subjugation of the productive members of the Human Race. The occasional exception being a self-blinded fool who isn't paying attention to what they're ideologically in bed with. In short, a "peace activist" and the "peace movement" are in fact enemies of Peace.
Peace is only an affirmative value to those who live in the condition of liberty, that is being rightfully in charge of one's self and able to set the goals for one's own life. Peace cannot be a value to the subjects of a totalitarian socialist state. To the victim of such a state -- the ordinary worker who is bullied by a commissar, the inmate of a slave labor camp, or the occupant of a darkened cell awaiting murder at the hands of the local chekists -- war, either an internal uprising against the socialist masters, or an invasion by an army of liberation, is in fact the positive value.
I stand by what I said.
Thursday, March 22, 2018
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
Gun Control
The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the
means it is brought about. The case in this point is that the
disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates
of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this. In their view
reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder
of citizens who own guns is morally correct.
But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.
The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A government
that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and
devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by
deadly force.
And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious.
But is gun control effective?
No.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious.
Tuesday, March 20, 2018
Thoughts For The Day
The followers of Adolf Hitler believed they were good people, so do the followers of Hillary Clinton.
The Democrats haven't been this angry since their slaves were taken away.
We know what violence is and we refuse to use it. The Hard Left doesn't know what violence is and are willing to use it,
If we had a functioning government Hillary Clinton and George Soros would already be put to death.
Political Correctness isn't correct.
I still believe in hanging censors.
The Democrats haven't been this angry since their slaves were taken away.
We know what violence is and we refuse to use it. The Hard Left doesn't know what violence is and are willing to use it,
If we had a functioning government Hillary Clinton and George Soros would already be put to death.
Political Correctness isn't correct.
I still believe in hanging censors.
Monday, March 19, 2018
Thought For The Day
The fact of the matter is that the worst enemy of a nation and the
armed forces of a nation is the government itself. The fact of the
matter is that governing class in general decided to treat what should
have been a total war as if it were a fight between street gangs.
We are losing what is in fact the Third World War because the rulers
refuse to identify it as such. And that the cause of liberty is in fact
a holy cause. We are in fact in a holy war.
One does not prevail in a holy war by pretending that the opposing faith
is in fact valid. We can only prevail if we correctly expose the
falsehoods for which the enemy is fighting. By treating their doctrine
as false. And by systematically destroying their ideological
infrastructure of indoctrination and enforcement. And eliminate their enforcers and and indoctrinators.
And trailers for Monty Python And The Holy Grail have been recut as serious trailers, here and here.
Arrest and execute Hillary Clinton and George Soros.
And trailers for Monty Python And The Holy Grail have been recut as serious trailers, here and here.
Arrest and execute Hillary Clinton and George Soros.
Sunday, March 18, 2018
Thought For The Day
We should make Censorship a capital offense.
But Les, you're calling for the execution of the owners of Google and Youtube.
Well yes, and if we did an execution one once in a while, Pour Enbourager L'autres, we wouldn't be facing Hillary Clinton and her followers. The last thing The Big Bitch wants is to held accountable for her actions.
But Les, you're calling for the execution of the owners of Google and Youtube.
Well yes, and if we did an execution one once in a while, Pour Enbourager L'autres, we wouldn't be facing Hillary Clinton and her followers. The last thing The Big Bitch wants is to held accountable for her actions.
Saturday, March 17, 2018
Gun Control In Reality
But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.
The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A government that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by deadly force. And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.
But is gun control effective?
No, it isn't.
The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ And The Airborne Forces."
"We landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said, 'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over. They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found them'."
If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is not going to do so in Soviet America. The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew. Yes, it’s that obvious.
I once was called a murderer by a Leftist. No Leftists are bloody murderers.
That is reality.
Execute Hillary Clinton and George Soros!
Friday, March 16, 2018
A Message To Black Lives Matter
We (White Americans) didn't invent slavery. We inherited it. We paid for slavery with human blood. We owe you nothing!
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Question
Since the Democratic Party has committed multiple crimes and is a criminal gang, perhaps it's time we start treating it as such?
Execute Hillary Clinton!
Execute Hillary Clinton!
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
Lefties
Back during the Cold War some Lefties posed as being morally superior because they were drinking Nicaraguan coffee. Which in reality was grown by forced labor on collective farms
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Remember
Please remember that the so-called Palestinians are the descendants of
conquerors and collaborators and as such they have no prior claim on the land of
Israel. And because of their adherence to the doctrine of Islam, which
fully denies all of the Rights of Man, they have no claim of sovereign
rights at all.
The people of Israel have shown astounding patience in the face of the
genocidal actions of the so-called Palestinians but everyone has a
limit.
And reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what their intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster. The liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they are totally unfit to do so.
And reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what their intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster. The liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they are totally unfit to do so.
Monday, March 12, 2018
A Problem With Elitism
The problem with the Elites is that they exist.
The Elites need to understand that they aren't in control.
The Elites need to understand that they aren't in control.
Sunday, March 11, 2018
Ten Facts Or Questions
1. The gun control people are saying that it is easier to buy firearms than groceries.
No.
This is a lie.
Anyone in the State of Minnesota can buy groceries but if you have as much as a misdemeanor on your record forget about buying a firearm. The gun control people are lying as usual.
2. The assholes who ran the gas chambers at the Nazi death camps really thought they were the good guys, the SS-Einsatzgruppen who exterminated Jews on the Eastern Front did too. So do Social Justice Warriors and Democrats, what do we do with them?
3. You didn’t actually believe God actually rained fire and brimstone on the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, did you? Of course not. The burning of a city is what happens when that city extends power over the people in the area it rules over, and the people become sick and tired of their stupid rules. So do we have to burn the cities of New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles? I’m afraid so, we have to, the inhabitants of those cities see us as things to be used for their benefit or as stuff to be disposed of. The inhabitants of those cities believe that they supposedly have a democratically granted power over us. But they don’t have the power they believe they have over us.
4. The doctrine of Totalitarianism holds Human life in absolute contempt and sees people as things to be used or destroyed, over the last decades Totalitarians have enslaved numerous nations and murdered tens of millions of people, and surrender to such people, regardless of the circumstances, is simply not an option.
5. Is Donald Trump the Democrats president? Of course not! The Democrats president is someone who unleashes the Democrats to murder anyone they want! President Trump won't allow that. He would not allow the Democrat's to kill anyone they want. The Democrats are just another bunch of murderers who wants to kill without a proper consequence.
6. What part of Hillary Clinton is unfit for public office did the Democrats not understand?
7. The prohibition of any object (guns, drugs, or alcohol} never works.
8. If they want to know why an American citizen needs to buy an assault rifle, all a Democrat has to do is look in a mirror.
9. I do have a disagreement with President Trump. (Yes, Lefties won't believe it, but it's the truth.) Hillary Clinton must held accountable for her actions in public office. There's no way around it.
10. Liberals wouldn't hold any demonstrations if if they got shot doing so. And to Hell with the Left,
No.
This is a lie.
Anyone in the State of Minnesota can buy groceries but if you have as much as a misdemeanor on your record forget about buying a firearm. The gun control people are lying as usual.
2. The assholes who ran the gas chambers at the Nazi death camps really thought they were the good guys, the SS-Einsatzgruppen who exterminated Jews on the Eastern Front did too. So do Social Justice Warriors and Democrats, what do we do with them?
3. You didn’t actually believe God actually rained fire and brimstone on the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, did you? Of course not. The burning of a city is what happens when that city extends power over the people in the area it rules over, and the people become sick and tired of their stupid rules. So do we have to burn the cities of New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles? I’m afraid so, we have to, the inhabitants of those cities see us as things to be used for their benefit or as stuff to be disposed of. The inhabitants of those cities believe that they supposedly have a democratically granted power over us. But they don’t have the power they believe they have over us.
4. The doctrine of Totalitarianism holds Human life in absolute contempt and sees people as things to be used or destroyed, over the last decades Totalitarians have enslaved numerous nations and murdered tens of millions of people, and surrender to such people, regardless of the circumstances, is simply not an option.
5. Is Donald Trump the Democrats president? Of course not! The Democrats president is someone who unleashes the Democrats to murder anyone they want! President Trump won't allow that. He would not allow the Democrat's to kill anyone they want. The Democrats are just another bunch of murderers who wants to kill without a proper consequence.
6. What part of Hillary Clinton is unfit for public office did the Democrats not understand?
7. The prohibition of any object (guns, drugs, or alcohol} never works.
8. If they want to know why an American citizen needs to buy an assault rifle, all a Democrat has to do is look in a mirror.
9. I do have a disagreement with President Trump. (Yes, Lefties won't believe it, but it's the truth.) Hillary Clinton must held accountable for her actions in public office. There's no way around it.
10. Liberals wouldn't hold any demonstrations if if they got shot doing so. And to Hell with the Left,
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Thought For The Day
Apart from a child molester, I would be hard pressed to think of
something more vile than an individual who would condemn other people to
death and bondage under socialism in order to obtain their own euphoria
fix. Not only would I not allow such an individual anywhere near a child,
I would want that individual to have the most intense and direct
experience of socialism from the victim's point of view as possible.
This would be what Steven Barry once called the Lubyanka Breakfast, a
cigarette in the morning and one pistol round in the back of the head.
Friday, March 09, 2018
Truths
The worst enemy of a nation is its politicians.
Our colleges and universities used to be centers of tolerance and learning but under the tutelage of the Marxists they have become the centers of ignorance and hatred. What happened?
Our colleges and universities used to be centers of tolerance and learning but under the tutelage of the Marxists they have become the centers of ignorance and hatred. What happened?
Thursday, March 08, 2018
A No Brainer
Even if it kills me I will work to establish the Heinlein system as the government of the United States.
So what is the system Heinlein described in his novel Starship Troopers?
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
It was not enough to restrict the powers of government but to restrict who could actually participate in the process of governing. In effect to idiot-proof the system.
So is it actually necessary to fully implement the system that Heinlein proposed?
The fact is that all forms of authority are based on knowledge and political authority is no exception. But in the present system political authority is granted to any warm body without regard to their the actual state of knowledge. As a result some warm bodies have traded their votes for a material object such as an IPad or a wad of cash. Or worse they have traded their votes for the warm and fuzzy feeling of having been compassionate.
The result is out present state of our nation. Those who lack knowledge or simple concern for consequences should not have authority over another person, let alone the fate of a nation.
My solution to the problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.
The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and amendment, the duties of the citizen as a member of the sovereign authority of the nation, and what is expected to happen when the Federal Government enters the failure mode.
The second part of the course covers the function and use of the instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.
While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a passing grade will be required to exercise the authority to vote.
So what is the system Heinlein described in his novel Starship Troopers?
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
It was not enough to restrict the powers of government but to restrict who could actually participate in the process of governing. In effect to idiot-proof the system.
So is it actually necessary to fully implement the system that Heinlein proposed?
The fact is that all forms of authority are based on knowledge and political authority is no exception. But in the present system political authority is granted to any warm body without regard to their the actual state of knowledge. As a result some warm bodies have traded their votes for a material object such as an IPad or a wad of cash. Or worse they have traded their votes for the warm and fuzzy feeling of having been compassionate.
The result is out present state of our nation. Those who lack knowledge or simple concern for consequences should not have authority over another person, let alone the fate of a nation.
My solution to the problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.
The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and amendment, the duties of the citizen as a member of the sovereign authority of the nation, and what is expected to happen when the Federal Government enters the failure mode.
The second part of the course covers the function and use of the instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.
While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a passing grade will be required to exercise the authority to vote.
Wednesday, March 07, 2018
Why?
The Hard Left in its fundamental form is a group of essentially parasitic
beings that wish to demolish the present consent-based American
social-economic structure and replace it with a coercion-based political
order that they regard as morally superior. Unfortunately for us the
Hard Left's ideal version of America strongly resembles a Überkonzentrationlager
with themselves as the commandants and overseers. Anyone who stands in
the way of the Left in their quest to subjugate the American republic,
policeman, citizen soldier, or President Trump, are rhetorically blasted
as being the vilest of monsters while those who have consistently
demonstrated their hatred of American liberty such as Hillary Clinton are worshiped as though they were the enactors of the divine will.
Tuesday, March 06, 2018
What Does The Left Want?
In a word, everything.
As a consequence there are things that the Left will not tolerate. The Left will not tolerate the independent exercise of force, especially when it is an act of self defense. The left seeks to disarm their subjects and will maliciously persecute those who dare raise a hand in their own defense. Nor will the Left tolerate the existence and operation of the independent rational mind, for any factual refutation of any of the Left's beliefs will inevitably puncture their collective delusion of infallibility. Anyone who thinks for himself, let alone actually speaks up against the Left is publicly maligned and, where it is possible, physically assaulted. In Rouge Kampuchea under Pol Pot the fear and hatred of independent thought was so strong that anyone who was suspected of being able to read was immediately taken out and shot. And as the Khmer Rouge ran up their bodycount leftist rags in America like the New York Times sat by and cheered them on.
As a consequence there are things that the Left will not tolerate. The Left will not tolerate the independent exercise of force, especially when it is an act of self defense. The left seeks to disarm their subjects and will maliciously persecute those who dare raise a hand in their own defense. Nor will the Left tolerate the existence and operation of the independent rational mind, for any factual refutation of any of the Left's beliefs will inevitably puncture their collective delusion of infallibility. Anyone who thinks for himself, let alone actually speaks up against the Left is publicly maligned and, where it is possible, physically assaulted. In Rouge Kampuchea under Pol Pot the fear and hatred of independent thought was so strong that anyone who was suspected of being able to read was immediately taken out and shot. And as the Khmer Rouge ran up their bodycount leftist rags in America like the New York Times sat by and cheered them on.
Monday, March 05, 2018
Sunday, March 04, 2018
Thought Of The Day
If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth
that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and
those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing
parties.
Quote:
Quote:
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf HitlerSomeone on the Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one in the usual leftist audience or the Main Stream Media would call them out on it.
(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)
Saturday, March 03, 2018
What Difference Does It Make?
From the collectivist view a person is simply a thing to be used, a
tool, the fact that a person has a complete life outside of the alleged
goals of the collective is completely blanked out. To the collectivist
the full human life is completely meaningless.
And because a person is seen as simply a tool it does not matter if it
breaks as a result of being misused. The tool can simply be disposed of
and replaced.
Friday, March 02, 2018
Thursday, March 01, 2018
On The Democratic Party
Throughout its history the fundamental value of the Democratic Party was power. As with the Communists and National Socialists in Eurasia they had sought absolute power over everyone in their domain, the United
States of America. And as with the predecessors the power over their
victims was exercised without any restraint whatsoever. As a result it
has become absolutely necessary to remove the Democratic Party from power
and permanently eliminate the basic structure and the intellectual
infrastructure (Mainstream Media) that supported it.
Have I said that the Democratic Party is dumb?
Have I said that the Democratic Party is dumb?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)