Let's talk about Socialism.
We must understand that Socialism is
essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting the
First Trustifarian, "from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the
antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much
greater than the needs of the slaves.
The socialist master class,
both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves
being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully
theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What
should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist
master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions
of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.
who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and
slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical
violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet
as the attire of choice.
If you will pardon me for the use of
shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the
chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a
bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are
treating us as such.
If we want to go on the ideological
offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out
the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.
you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his
ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of
a slave labor economic system.
It is invariably the full
socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the
various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on
full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to
It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist
nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's
thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to
some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat,
etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the
true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.
(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)
socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the
essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and
instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from
reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if
the goods and services created by others were something naturally found
Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals.
Perhaps we should start treating them as such.
Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?