I do have a disagreement with President Trump. (Yes, Lefties
won't believe it but it's the truth.) Hillary Clinton must held
accountable for her actions in public office. There's no way around it.
Wednesday, April 09, 2025
Thought For The Day
Tuesday, April 08, 2025
Murderer
Monday, April 07, 2025
On Totalitarianism
The doctrine of Totalitarianism holds Human life in absolute contempt and sees people as things to be used or destroyed. Over the last decades Totalitarians have enslaved numerous nations and murdered tens of millions of people. Surrender to such people, regardless of the circumstances is simply not an option.
Sunday, April 06, 2025
On Marxism
Civilized society can't tolerate predatory and destructive behavior by groups and individuals within it. There can't be any possible excuse for robbery, murder, or any other form of predatory behavior.
Saturday, April 05, 2025
On Racial Collectivism
Racial characteristics aren’t chosen and therefore should be irrelevant to human actions. What’s subject to choice is a person’s beliefs and the actions derived from those beliefs. For the record McVeigh himself was a Racial Collectivist who rejected human rights and human reason. As a result he rejected human reality. The actual Patriot Movement at that time fully rejected McVeigh, his beliefs, and his actions. This rejection was based on the actual moral values that were actually chosen.
Members of Black Lives Matter believe they're victims
and practice Racial Collectivism. Gee, Gosh, Wow, where have we've seen
this belief before? If Black Lives Matter wants to practice Racial
Collectivism. Let's treat them as Racial
Collectivists. In the Nuremberg fashion, hang them from the neck until
dead. Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead
canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough. Antisemitism is a
subset of Racial Collectivism. We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of
Racial Collectivism. We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial
Collectivist group that it actually is. We have to see that Antisemitism
is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem. So when someone attacks
Jews they're attacking all of us. Antisemitism is a clear sign that all
of Humanity is being attacked. Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't
be a radical idea.
Friday, April 04, 2025
On Statism
The Statist leader refuses to be subject to any legal restraints nor do they pay heed to any superior authority. Their victims, those persons who're to be subjected to their whims must be silenced and disarmed. This is nothing new the military arm, be it a sword, a pike or a firearm, is the symbol and instrument of political authority. The citizens of a free nation armed and ready to defend their lives and liberties have a commanding voice which a politician may ignore only at their peril. Augustus Caesar understood this when he depoliticized the citizen body of the Roman Republic by replacing the citizen militia based army of the republic with a mercenary force loyal to himself.
Thursday, April 03, 2025
Excuse For Tyranny
Democracy is the form of state that claims unlimited power from a
mandate from an unlimited mass.
For those who desire absolute power Democracy is an ideal form of the
state. But in Reality authority in any area is based on actual
knowledge in
that field. Thus political authority must be based on knowledge in the
field of politics. But in the democratic form of the state the voter
isn't required to know anything on the subject of ethics, or politics, or
in the case of Chicago to actually exist.
So why should we as Americans be subject to the will of Democrats?
WE SHOULD NOT.
Democrats in general have shown that they aren't at all concerned about
the actual facts of Reality. Nor are they concerned about the
consequences of their actions. That we'll suffer and die as a result
of their actions means absolutely nothing to them.
So why should we submit to them let alone allow them to exist?
WE SHOULD NOT AT ALL.
There's no such thing as a valid excuse.
This editorial was originally published in the Winter 1995 issue (Volume I, Number 3) of THE RESISTER.
This
editorial explains why I and a number of other rational citizens of the
American Republic will not quietly submit to the whims of the God-Kings foisted upon us by the mob of Depraved-Americans,
Corrupt-Americans, Stupid-Americans, Ignorant-Americans,
Deceased-Americans, and Imaginary-Americans.
----------
Democracy: The Politics of Tyranny
In a rational society founded of the moral principle of rights there can be no force or fraud in the relationship between sovereign individuals. When rights are properly exercised they take nothing from anyone, nor do they compel anyone to act in a manner detrimental to their own self-interest. Notice that the rational exercise of each right enumerated in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution by an individual takes nothing from, or compels, other individuals in their rational exercise of these rights.
Only individuals possess rights. Groups, being nothing more than a number of individuals can, in themselves, possess no rights other than those which are possessed and exercised individually by each member. Hence, a faction has no rights; nor does a gang, a mob, a tribe, a state or a nation. A group may hove interests but those interests do not assume the moral legitimacy of rights. To assert otherwise is to descend into abstract subjectivism, an evasion of reality, where a society is ruled by the-range-of-the-moment whims of its members, the majority gang of the moment, the current demagogue or dictator.
Government is force. No matter how benign or dictatorial, behind every law or regulation or act there is a gun. The authors of the United States Constitution were fully aware of this fact. They recognized that government in a rational society must derive its delegated powers by the consent of the governed and that these powers must be specifically defined by law--the Constitution; delimited by a law higher than government--the inalienable rights of man; and dispersed by permanent separation of powers. For these reasons they specifically and intentionally REJECTED democracy as a system of government. The system of government created by the Founding Fathers, men devoted to the primacy of the source of all rights, man's faculties (which means; reason), was the CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Democracy is the antithesis of the natural rights of man. The philosophical premise of democracy is egalitarianism; not political egalitarianism which holds all men equal before the law (justice), but METAPHYSICAL egalitarianism, the belief that all men are equal in all things. This last construct is such an obvious falsehood that it can carry only one meaning: the hatred of reason. Democracy, by its very definition - rule by majority - is the notion that" might makes right." The exercise of democracy reduces men to mere numbers, and the faction or gang which gathers the greater number of men to its fleeting cause wields the government gun against the minority.
From this view of the subject, it may be concluded, that a pure Democracy, by which I mean a society, consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will in almost every case, be felt by the majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property, and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
--Publius (James Madison), The Federalist X, 1787
Indeed, specific safeguards were designed into the Constitution to prevent the subversion of the constitutional republic and the natural rights of man by political party gang warfare and special interest factionalism inherent in a democracy: the Electoral College (Article II, Section 1) and the election of senators by State Legislatures (Article I, Section 3).
In the case of the former it was specifically intended that the head of the Executive branch of the federal government be elected by Electors chosen by each state legislature in equal proportion to its representation in Congress; NOT by popular vote. This ensured : "No faction or combination can bring about the election. It is probable, that the choice will always fall upon a man of experienced abilities and fidelity. In all human probability, no better method of election could have been devised." (James Iredell, North Carolina Ratification Cttee., 1788)
The latter provision ensured the logical effect of popular election of members to the House of Representatives (whim based legislation) was offset by representatives elected by state legislature to the Senate to guard against Executive and House encroachment on state sovereignty: "The election of one branch of the Federal, by the State Legislatures, secures an absolute dependence of the former on the latter. The biennial exclusion of one-third, will lesson the faculty of combination and may put a stop to intrigues." (James Madison, Virginia Ratification Cttee., June, 1788)
The United States has been descending into the sewer of democracy since the ratification of the 17th Amendment on May 31, 1913. Before every presidential election there are demands by special interest groups to void the Electoral College and resort to popular election of the President. This headlong rush into democracy is evident by the "value" placed on public opinion polls by politicians of both parties (a practice begun by the crypto-communist Franklin D. Roosevelt); as if the opinions and "feelings" of factions, gangs and tribes were a counterweight to the inalienable rights of a single rational man.
The irrationality of democracy was stated most eloquently by Auberon Herbert in his London address on March 9, 1880, before a meeting of the Vigilance Association for the Defense of Personal Rights, entitled; CHOICES BETWEEN FREEDOM AND PROTECTION: "How should it happen that the individual should be without rights, but the combination of individuals should possess unlimited rights?"
--Alexander Davidson
Wednesday, April 02, 2025
Proposal
If I've a complaint about The Republican Party it's that they've shown godlike patience with the behavior of The Democratic Party. Democrats can assault in public those who won't submit to them, destroy property, call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, the murder of elected officials who're carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and they'll not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a Democrat. I once told an editor that I worked for that we needn't rhetorically dehumanize our opponents all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they've by their own choice dehumanized themselves.
I've proposed starting a new political party.
If The Republican Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will
have no choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make
changes and restore a rational system of government. Revolutions (real
revolutions, not Marxist ones) happen because the government fails to
function. We in the United States are stuck with two political parties. The leadership of
one party is insane and the leadership of the other party simply doesn't
care. Rank and file members now call establishment members a bunch of Vichy Republicans.
Perhaps its time to start a new political party. Is a new political party possible?
The answer is, I don’t know.
The opponents of chattel slavery proceeded even with public opposition. We, as opponents of political power, have to. We
need to treat exercises of political power, such as censorship, as
crimes against Humanity. We need to treat bans on firearms and free
speech as the anti-Human acts that they actually are. Our political
elites have apparently forgotten the lesson taught by our original civil
war, that banning freedom doesn’t work. Our political elites tried to
ban the voluntary consumption of alcohol, it didn’t work. Our political
elites tried to ban the voluntary consumption of hard drugs, it doesn’t
work. Our political elites will try to ban the voluntary ownership of
firearms and freedom of speech, it will never work. Our politicians are supposed to do a specific job and they aren't doing
it. We have to start a new political party to go around them. We
don't have a choice.
Let's call our new party the Freedom Party.
Will the Freedom Party replace the Democratic Party?
I don't think so. What's more likely is that the Freedom Party will replace the Republican Party just like the Republicans replaced the Whigs.
Tuesday, April 01, 2025
It's Happening Again
Why did The Holocaust happen?
The actual author of the Book of
Genesis actually had a point: Evil often presents itself as Good. Evil
people often present themselves as good people.
The Holocaust
wasn't a
unique event. The Holocaust (and other
horrors) were the result of normal people acting normally. Why did a
particular horror happen? There's an answer but you may not like it. A
horror happened because the perpetrators believed they were good people
with their victims and opponents being evil. We've seen this before
with numerous horrors (such as The Holocaust) and it will happen again.
What we're dealing with
are people who believe they're good people. We have to deal with them
as such no matter how horrible the things they actually do. Many of the
people who’re loudly proclaiming “never again” at the top of their
lungs are going to do it
again. The
National Socialists and Soviets believed themselves to be good people,
we're
seeing the same phenomena with Anti-Fa. Anti-Fa claims to be opposed to
Fascism no matter what they actually do. Anti-Fa does the things that
Fascists actually do. Members of Anti-Fa (as well as common Democrats)
will
believe the lies they're told regardless of the consequences. Members
of Anti-Fa claim to oppose Fascism. In fact they're what Fascists are.
Most members of Anti-Fa don't know that they're following the dictators
handbook. Most self proclaimed proponents of tyranny, such as members
of Anti-Fa
(National Socialists, Soviet Communists, etc.) believe they're good
people and that their opponents are evil. If a dogma requires the
commission of a vile act then that act WILL be committed. When someone denies their own Humanity then they WILL commit crimes against Humanity. It's very easy to predict
what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will
say. Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the
word Jew with the word Fascist.
Those who don't remember history are a highly sought
after group of followers. We identify The Holocaust as the horrible act
it actually was. We should be horrified. But we're seeing
The Holocaust from an objective perspective. From the subjective
perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from
some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their
victims and opponents as being evil. We're seeing this again with the
Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa. They see themselves as
being good and their victims as being evil. I've said this before:
Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense. I
have a warning for members of Anti-Fa, when you Brownshirt someone,
don't be surprised that you're identified and treated as a Brownshirt. I've found
through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the
good guys. If a member of Anti-fa wants to see a Totalitarian all
they have to do is look in a mirror. Totalitarians are never hiding
under the bed, they're in plain view. For those who value power no act
is too vile. Killing a member of Anti-Fa isn't an act of murder, it's
an act of self defense. Members of Anti-fa should be engaged with
aircraft like the AC-130 and A-10. A Fascist isn't who the self styled opponents of the doctrine believe they are.
WE HAVE THE DUTY to see the self
described antifascist as they truly are, a Totalitarian piece
of shit who should be hanged from the neck until dead.
And WE HAVE THE DUTY to identify the Mainstream Media as a bunch of liars. Once a difference in opinion is criminalized a civil war is inevitable.
Voltaire said it: Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities.
I have a question for the members of Anti-Fa and BLM: what part of "Never Again" didn't you understand?

Monday, March 31, 2025
On Peace Activism
The unavoidable fact of reality is that the self-styled Peace Activist
isn't a morally superior being, he or she is a willing accomplice to
conquest, slavery, and mass murder. They're an active hazard to human
life. Or in an ancient tongue: hostis humani generis, an enemy of mankind in general. In
my view killing a so-called peace activist isn't an act of murder. It's a morally necessary homicide carried out in defense of self, of one's
family, of one's nation, and of Humanity in General.
Sunday, March 30, 2025
Whining
A Brownshirt in Tampa had this to say:
“The police just silence us, the Republicans just silence us. We are just getting silenced everywhere we go. It’s like no one wants to even hear what we have to say.”What's wrong with the noise emitted by this Brownshirt?
First, if the occupiers behave like a bunch of thugs then the police will treat them like a bunch of thugs. That's what they're paid for in a capitalist nation. Second, the occupiers really and truly have have nothing to say to anyone with a functioning mind. All the occupiers are really doing is to robotically repeat the same exact noise that tenured totalitarians have been emitting for the last century. We're fully well aware of they've been emitting. While a Piled Higher And Deeper degree in political science may not actually be necessary to obtain a significant rank and command in the political goon unit, along with a career of rape, robbery, and mass murder, it does help.
Saturday, March 29, 2025
History Lesson
Evil consumes itself. Unfortunately, it'll consume decent people
beforehand. The Third Reich was going to fall. But millions of decent
people were going to be destroyed beforehand.
Wednesday, March 26, 2025
On Polical Assassination
The fact's that the assassination of a significant political figure is essentially a suicide mission. The term assassin is derived from the Islamic cult of the Assassins. A group whose members were induced into performing suicide missions through the use of hashish. Even though more than sufficient grounds have been provided for a seizure of the Federal Government by force it won't happen because those who can do so understand that a false president isn't the cause of the problem. He or she's merely the symptom. The actual problem is the subculture holds the rights of individuals in contempt and is willing to use force to reach their goals. A single assassination won't solve this problem. Though there's no shortage of trained individuals who're able to carry out the mission it won't happen because those who have the necessary skills understand that it'd be futile.
Let's examine the JFK assassination.
The M38 Carcano rifle was
the worst weapon available. Italy was the poorest nation in Europe.
The Carcano rifle used a rounded round. Even the Russians used a spitzer
round. When NATO converted to the 7.62 x 51 cartridge Italy sent the
Garand rifles that were given to them by the American government to a
local firm to be converted to BM-59 rifles. No one who knew Oswald's
background would've hired him for a normal job. The assassin would've been permanently disposed of. A
realistic conclusion would be that Oswald was a very fortunate shooter.
Tuesday, March 25, 2025
Personal History
During a Science Fiction convention I wore a button that read GODLESS CAPITALIST. A woman made up like a Next Generation Klingon declared I was a Ferengi. I replied that I was an Objectivist and that I read the works of Ayn Rand. She was confused. Some people REALLY need to think outside their box.
Monday, March 24, 2025
Sunday, March 23, 2025
Another History Lesson
Eugenics was a great process until the allied armies entered the Third Reich.
Saturday, March 22, 2025
History Lesson
The Holocaust was a gradual process. Hitler didn't go into the genocide mode right away. The process began with the demonization of a specific population.
Friday, March 21, 2025
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
On Pacifism
A mere pacifist, one who disdains violence without engaging in political
action is simply a moral parasite in a free nation. On the other hand a
politically active pacifist, one who uses their vote or an elective
office to interfere with the prosecution of violent criminals and the
defense of a free nation. Is a traitor who cloaks their actions in the
shroud of righteousness. To those value power above all no act in the pursuit of power is too
depraved. Anyone who feels that they're automatically right is
automatically wrong. Those who carried out The Holocaust believed they
were victims fighting
evil. Those who'll carry out the next great mass murder will believe
themselves to be victims fighting evil.
Thus power must be dispersed, diminished, destroyed, or simply deleted
altogether. If it weren't for the capitalist system most of the
professional
opponents of capitalism wouldn't have made it out of the uterus at
birth. There's a proper term for those who deny your Right of Life, they're properly called mortal enemies.
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
On Sovereign Authority
The citizens ARE the sovereign authority of a nation. All attempts to disarm or restrict the arms of the citizens should be treated as nothing less than an act of Treason. An armed citizen CAN'T be ignored. A disarmed subject can be ignored. Gun Control is a sign of Tyranny. All ATF agents should be lined up against a wall and shot.
Monday, March 17, 2025
Suggestion
The Soviet Union has fallen. The Cold War is over. Why not disband NATO and replace it with a common European Union military. An European Defense Force as it were.
Sunday, March 16, 2025
Prediction
President Trump is doing everything he can to prevent the onset of a Second Civil War here in the United States of America. But it may still happen.
It breaks my heart to witness my nation descend into chaos.
Saturday, March 15, 2025
Anniversary
On this day in 709 ab urbe condita the
original perpetual dictator was disposed of. A well known Roman
politician had a run in with some pissed off members of the Senate.
Assassination sucks, doesn't it JC? What some people don't understand
is
that The State Julius Caesar overthrew was actually worse.
Friday, March 14, 2025
Opinion
Justice consists of getting what you deserve, not receiving what you want. The absolute last thing the other side wants is justice. Because that would result in their extinction.
Thursday, March 13, 2025
Birthday
Evil entered the world.
L. Ron Hubbard was born on this day in 1911. L. Ron Hubbard actually conned a rocket scientist. L. Ron Hubbard helped the Soviets during the Cold War. L. Ron Hubbard will eventually be remembered as the vile man he actually was. I'm on public record as calling L. Ron Hubbard a completely useless waste of mass and energy. When L. Ron Hubbard was receiving a penny a word writing for the pulps Ayn Rand was a world class author who had her work published in hardcover and adapted for motion pictures. All of Ayn Rand's work is still in print by the New American Library. Some of L. Ron Hubbard's later literary work is printed by Bridge Publications. Who owns the New American Library? The stockholders. Who owns Bridge Publications? Bridge Publications is a department of Scientology.
If you want to see a realm run by Scientologists all one has to do is look at The Third Reich. Scientology has to deny Reality because in reality Hubbard was wrong on many points.
In Objectivism an axiom is a statement that defines the base of knowledge and is a self evident truth. The three axioms of Objectivism are that Existence Exists, that Existence is Identity, and that Consciousness is Identification. The axioms of Objectivism flatly contradict Scientology in holding that the Universe existed prior to the evolution of consciousness. That things are what they are regardless of what one chooses to believe. And that to be conscious is to see things are they truly are without regard to the claims by an self-proclaimed authority figure. An Objectivist would clearly see that L. Ron Hubbard was putting out complete nonsense and therefore would be classed as a Suppressive Person in the doctrine of Scientology. Because it's a deliberate body of falsehoods created by a con artist Scientology must hold that the act of identification, which is to see things as they truly are as something that must be forbidden and punished. And in a world ruled by Scientologists the truly conscious must be be put down with lethal effect.
We must understand that Scientology isn't a religion. We must understand that Scientology is a con game invented by L. Ron Hubbard. We must understand that outside of the Collectivist movement L. Ron Hubbard was one of most vile men who ever lived. Bad people often believe they're good people. We saw this with the harassment of Paulette Cooper. If the United States had a real government Scientology would be treated as the criminal organization it actually is.
Scientology will eventually become extinct. L. Ron Hubbard didn't design Scientology to outlast him. L. Ron Hubbard was wrong about a lot of things. My first paying job in the private sector was a part time janitorial position at two candy shops in downtown Minneapolis. Both candy shops had picture windows, Hubbard's method of cleaning windows was NEVER used.
The false prophet L. Ron Hubbard was a piece of excrement (yes, I know I'm insulting excrement) that took advantage of the First Amendment of our Constitution.
I made a proposal on this blog to amend The Constitution:
All religions which deny the validity of the Constitution shall not claim protection under it.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The obvious question that's been raised in the past is why I don't
call for a ban on Scientology by name?
A name is only a mental label for the concept. Even though it appears
to be internally forbidden to change the doctrines of Scientology, the
doctrines
also commands the believer to deceive the victims where necessary.
Thus deception, such as a name change, by a Scientologist
will occur. It's by
identifying a specific toxic attribute of Scientology that we can
properly
exclude it from protection under the First Amendment. A fundamental
attribute of the doctrine of Scientology is the denial of real
laws. The real acts of legislation by real governments that protect the
real rights of the people. In declaring actual laws to be invalid
Hubbard opened the door to the commission of a multitude of
crimes that would be carried out by Hubbard and other Scientologists
for their own personal benefit.
This action's absolutely intolerable in a civil society, in reality the
people are the sovereign authority and the sole source of
legislation. In reality Scientology has to go. In order
for us to live a
properly Human life we must allow our government to take a proactive
role in defending our rights.
Although Scientology is a vexatious litigant and won many civil suits. Scientology will eventually lose in the court of public opinion.
Wednesday, March 12, 2025
Suggestion
If a Leftist wants to see a potential Totalitarian all that person has to do is look in a mirror.
Tuesday, March 11, 2025
Opinions
I'm surrounded by people who constantly make mistakes.
Evil people always posture as good.
There are evil people in my building. I don't want to live in Parker Skyview anymore.
Monday, March 10, 2025
Anniversary
Conscience is the expression of the ego in the moral realm. To make a moral judgment and to act on it are basically selfish acts. It's the self that sees through its own eyes and acts on its own knowledge of right and wrong. You couldn't be selfish if you can't live with yourself. Rational Selfishness as defined and advocated by Ayn Rand was limited to acts which benefited one's self but caused no harm or inflicted a cost on another person. The narcissist, especially in the political realm, isn't concerned with the injuries and burdens inflicted on other people. In fact, the more destructive the consequences of obedience to those who obey the narcissist, the better. Human sacrifice with beating hearts cut out and victims flayed alive, that's great. Millions worked to death in slave labor camps in Siberia, as far as the narcissist is concerned that's better. In order for me to say, "I, Leslie Bates, do solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America..." I have to say "I". That was my ego speaking when I took the oath of enlistment.
As a combat riflemen (MOS 11 B) I opposed conscription. I did so in 1982 and I'm doing so now. Some people have a problem with persons acting on their conscience. I don't. When I was enlisted in the United States Army the Army was going though several transitions. The Army was transitioning from the M1 steel pot to the first generation of the K-pot helmet. The Army was transitioning from the M60A3 tank to the first generation of the M1 Abrams tank with the 105mm rifled gun. The Army was transitioning from the M113A1 APC to the first generation of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. The Army was transitioning from the Huey helicopter to the first generation of the Blackhawk helicopter.
Sunday, March 09, 2025
More On Leftism
A sudden loss of status and influence is a profound shock to most people who have spent their lives aimed at the acquisition and enjoyment of socio-political standing. Relieved of the ability to shape the consciousness and behavior of others, a certain number unburden themselves of the inner restraints which kept them from openly voicing the condescension and scorn they have for those whom they regard as their social, intellectual, and moral inferiors.
-- Thomas Lifson
Leftists as a general rule are material and/or spiritual parasites. Because of this they need to feel that they're in control of the hosts
that they feed from. For Leftists, control is life.
Without the apparent certainty that they're in control of the productive
population the Left's fear of their own perishing kicks in.
Not that there's anything wrong about that... (Evil Grin)
Saturday, March 08, 2025
Quote Of The Day
I knew I'd been living in Berkeley too long when I saw a sign that said
'Free firewood" and my first thought was "Who was Firewood and what did
he do?'
-- John Berger
Friday, March 07, 2025
Thursday, March 06, 2025
Reform Proposal
Fiscal discipline ended in the Federal Government with the establishment
of the Federal Reserve system and the income tax. The first necessary
step in restoring fiscal discipline is to shut down the Federal Reserve
System, return to the issuance of a fully gold backed Dollar, and repeal
the income tax. In short the return to the Gold Standard and clearly
limited taxation. This will in turn will halt the inflation of prices
for goods and services paid by the both the private sector and all
levels of government.
Through this the inevitable increases in the Federal budget can be brought to a halt.
In addition to the practical issues that I've just addressed there is the
moral issue. A promise was made to young men and women to put their
lives at mortal risk during the healthiest and most productive years of
their lives. We as a nation have an unbreakable obligation to keep that
promise.
There's simply no excuse to violate this promise made in our name.
Now one may ask if the solution to the problems of inflation and the budget deficit is so simple why wont it be implemented?
Because the Federal Reserve System and the income tax were established
to facilitate the transfer of wealth from the rightful owners to the
politically favored. The program of the so called Progressive Era is
essentially a sophisticated system of subjugation and plunder. The
barbarian mode of life.
The legalized process of plunder is used to enrich the political class
and their close supports and to buy the votes needed to empower them.
They need us to be under their control.
If we as a people are to restore command over our own lives then we must
begin by fully separating ourselves from the bipartisan ruling class.
Wednesday, March 05, 2025
Complaint
The Quarry Bus that I rely on to buy groceries didn't run this week. I have to rely on unreliable people.
Disagreement
I do have a disagreement with Presiden Trump. (Yes, Lefties
won't believe it, but it's the truth.) Hillary Clinton must held
accountable for her actions in public office. There's no way around it.
Tuesday, March 04, 2025
Opinions
Religion is the denial of Reality.
Faith and Force always go together.
Marxism is actually a form of faith.
Pro-Hamas people are pro-murder. Pro-Hamas people are accessories to murder.
Monday, March 03, 2025
Excuse For Tyranny
Democracy is the form of state that claims unlimited power from a
mandate from an unlimited mass.
For those who desire absolute power Democracy is an ideal form of the
state. But in Reality authority in any area is based on actual
knowledge in
that field. Thus political authority must be based on knowledge in the
field of politics. But in the democratic form of the state the voter
isn't required to know anything on the subject of ethics, or politics, or
in the case of Chicago to actually exist.
So why should we as Americans be subject to the will of Democrats?
WE SHOULD NOT.
Democrats in general have shown that they aren't at all concerned about
the actual facts of Reality. Nor are they concerned about the
consequences of their actions. That we'll suffer and die as a result
of their actions means absolutely nothing to them.
So why should we submit to them let alone allow them to exist?
WE SHOULD NOT AT ALL.
There's no such thing as a valid excuse.
This editorial was originally published in the Winter 1995 issue (Volume I, Number 3) of THE RESISTER.
This
editorial explains why I and a number of other rational citizens of the
American Republic will not quietly submit to the whims of the God-Kings foisted upon us by the mob of Depraved-Americans,
Corrupt-Americans, Stupid-Americans, Ignorant-Americans,
Deceased-Americans, and Imaginary-Americans.
----------
Democracy: The Politics of Tyranny
In a rational society founded of the moral principle of rights there can be no force or fraud in the relationship between sovereign individuals. When rights are properly exercised they take nothing from anyone, nor do they compel anyone to act in a manner detrimental to their own self-interest. Notice that the rational exercise of each right enumerated in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution by an individual takes nothing from, or compels, other individuals in their rational exercise of these rights.
Only individuals possess rights. Groups, being nothing more than a number of individuals can, in themselves, possess no rights other than those which are possessed and exercised individually by each member. Hence, a faction has no rights; nor does a gang, a mob, a tribe, a state or a nation. A group may hove interests but those interests do not assume the moral legitimacy of rights. To assert otherwise is to descend into abstract subjectivism, an evasion of reality, where a society is ruled by the-range-of-the-moment whims of its members, the majority gang of the moment, the current demagogue or dictator.
Government is force. No matter how benign or dictatorial, behind every law or regulation or act there is a gun. The authors of the United States Constitution were fully aware of this fact. They recognized that government in a rational society must derive its delegated powers by the consent of the governed and that these powers must be specifically defined by law--the Constitution; delimited by a law higher than government--the inalienable rights of man; and dispersed by permanent separation of powers. For these reasons they specifically and intentionally REJECTED democracy as a system of government. The system of government created by the Founding Fathers, men devoted to the primacy of the source of all rights, man's faculties (which means; reason), was the CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Democracy is the antithesis of the natural rights of man. The philosophical premise of democracy is egalitarianism; not political egalitarianism which holds all men equal before the law (justice), but METAPHYSICAL egalitarianism, the belief that all men are equal in all things. This last construct is such an obvious falsehood that it can carry only one meaning: the hatred of reason. Democracy, by its very definition - rule by majority - is the notion that" might makes right." The exercise of democracy reduces men to mere numbers, and the faction or gang which gathers the greater number of men to its fleeting cause wields the government gun against the minority.
From this view of the subject, it may be concluded, that a pure Democracy, by which I mean a society, consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will in almost every case, be felt by the majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property, and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
--Publius (James Madison), The Federalist X, 1787
Indeed, specific safeguards were designed into the Constitution to prevent the subversion of the constitutional republic and the natural rights of man by political party gang warfare and special interest factionalism inherent in a democracy: the Electoral College (Article II, Section 1) and the election of senators by State Legislatures (Article I, Section 3).
In the case of the former it was specifically intended that the head of the Executive branch of the federal government be elected by Electors chosen by each state legislature in equal proportion to its representation in Congress; NOT by popular vote. This ensured : "No faction or combination can bring about the election. It is probable, that the choice will always fall upon a man of experienced abilities and fidelity. In all human probability, no better method of election could have been devised." (James Iredell, North Carolina Ratification Cttee., 1788)
The latter provision ensured the logical effect of popular election of members to the House of Representatives (whim based legislation) was offset by representatives elected by state legislature to the Senate to guard against Executive and House encroachment on state sovereignty: "The election of one branch of the Federal, by the State Legislatures, secures an absolute dependence of the former on the latter. The biennial exclusion of one-third, will lesson the faculty of combination and may put a stop to intrigues." (James Madison, Virginia Ratification Cttee., June, 1788)
The United States has been descending into the sewer of democracy since the ratification of the 17th Amendment on May 31, 1913. Before every presidential election there are demands by special interest groups to void the Electoral College and resort to popular election of the President. This headlong rush into democracy is evident by the "value" placed on public opinion polls by politicians of both parties (a practice begun by the crypto-communist Franklin D. Roosevelt); as if the opinions and "feelings" of factions, gangs and tribes were a counterweight to the inalienable rights of a single rational man.
The irrationality of democracy was stated most eloquently by Auberon Herbert in his London address on March 9, 1880, before a meeting of the Vigilance Association for the Defense of Personal Rights, entitled; CHOICES BETWEEN FREEDOM AND PROTECTION: "How should it happen that the individual should be without rights, but the combination of individuals should possess unlimited rights?"
--Alexander Davidson
Sunday, March 02, 2025
Proposal
If I've a complaint about The Republican Party it's that they've shown godlike patience with the behavior of The Democratic Party. Democrats can assault in public those who won't submit to them, destroy property, call for the mutilation ("Lobotomies for Republicans") of opponents, the murder of elected officials who're carrying out their constitutionally mandated duties, and they'll not lift one finger to hurt a single hair on the otherwise useless head of a Democrat. I once told an editor that I worked for that we needn't rhetorically dehumanize our opponents all we have to do is accurately describe their ideology and behavior because they've by their own choice dehumanized themselves.
I've proposed starting a new political party.
If The Republican Party doesn't clean up its act then we as rational citizens will
have no choice but to start a new party if we want to peacefully make
changes and restore a rational system of government. Revolutions (real
revolutions, not Marxist ones) happen because the government fails to
function. We in the United States are stuck with two political parties. The leadership of
one party is insane and the leadership of the other party simply doesn't
care. Rank and file members now call establishment members a bunch of Vichy Republicans.
Perhaps its time to start a new political party. Is a new political party possible?
The answer is, I don’t know.
The opponents of chattel slavery proceeded even with public opposition. We, as opponents of political power, have to. We
need to treat exercises of political power, such as censorship, as
crimes against Humanity. We need to treat bans on firearms and free
speech as the anti-Human acts that they actually are. Our political
elites have apparently forgotten the lesson taught by our original civil
war, that banning freedom doesn’t work. Our political elites tried to
ban the voluntary consumption of alcohol, it didn’t work. Our political
elites tried to ban the voluntary consumption of hard drugs, it doesn’t
work. Our political elites will try to ban the voluntary ownership of
firearms and freedom of speech, it will never work. Our politicians are supposed to do a specific job and they aren't doing
it. We have to start a new political party to go around them. We
don't have a choice.
Let's call our new party the Freedom Party.
Will the Freedom Party replace the Democratic Party?
I don't think so. What's more likely is that the Freedom Party will replace the Republican Party just like the Republicans replaced the Whigs.
Saturday, March 01, 2025
It's Happening Again
Why did The Holocaust happen?
The actual author of the Book of
Genesis actually had a point: Evil often presents itself as Good. Evil
people often present themselves as good people.
The Holocaust
wasn't a
unique event. The Holocaust (and other
horrors) were the result of normal people acting normally. Why did a
particular horror happen? There's an answer but you may not like it. A
horror happened because the perpetrators believed they were good people
with their victims and opponents being evil. We've seen this before
with numerous horrors (such as The Holocaust) and it will happen again.
What we're dealing with
are people who believe they're good people. We have to deal with them
as such no matter how horrible the things they actually do. Many of the
people who’re loudly proclaiming “never again” at the top of their
lungs are going to do it
again. The
National Socialists and Soviets believed themselves to be good people,
we're
seeing the same phenomena with Anti-Fa. Anti-Fa claims to be opposed to
Fascism no matter what they actually do. Anti-Fa does the things that
Fascists actually do. Members of Anti-Fa (as well as common Democrats)
will
believe the lies they're told regardless of the consequences. Members
of Anti-Fa claim to oppose Fascism. In fact they're what Fascists are.
Most members of Anti-Fa don't know that they're following the dictators
handbook. Most self proclaimed proponents of tyranny, such as members
of Anti-Fa
(National Socialists, Soviet Communists, etc.) believe they're good
people and that their opponents are evil. If a dogma requires the
commission of a vile act then that act WILL be committed. When someone denies their own Humanity then they WILL commit crimes against Humanity. It's very easy to predict
what a self appointed opponent of Fascism will
say. Just take a mouth dropping of a National Socialist and replace the
word Jew with the word Fascist.
Those who don't remember history are a highly sought
after group of followers. We identify The Holocaust as the horrible act
it actually was. We should be horrified. But we're seeing
The Holocaust from an objective perspective. From the subjective
perspective the perpetrators of The Holocaust saw themselves (apart from
some psychopaths) as being good people doing good things with their
victims and opponents as being evil. We're seeing this again with the
Marxists who make up the membership of Anti-fa. They see themselves as
being good and their victims as being evil. I've said this before:
Killing a Marxist isn't an act of murder, it's an act of self defense. I
have a warning for members of Anti-Fa, when you Brownshirt someone,
don't be surprised that you're identified and treated as a Brownshirt. I've found
through direct experience that the opposition really believe they're the
good guys. If a member of Anti-fa wants to see a Totalitarian all
they have to do is look in a mirror. Totalitarians are never hiding
under the bed, they're in plain view. For those who value power no act
is too vile. Killing a member of Anti-Fa isn't an act of murder, it's
an act of self defense. Members of Anti-fa should be engaged with
aircraft like the AC-130 and A-10. A Fascist isn't who the self styled opponents of the doctrine believe they are.
WE HAVE THE DUTY to see the self
described antifascist as they truly are, a Totalitarian piece
of shit who should be hanged from the neck until dead.
And WE HAVE THE DUTY to identify the Mainstream Media as a bunch of liars. Once a difference in opinion is criminalized a civil war is inevitable.
Voltaire said it: Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities.
I have a question for the members of Anti-Fa and BLM: what part of "Never Again" didn't you understand?

Friday, February 28, 2025
A Repost
I'm reposting this rant.
The
Left, and the self styled intelligentsia in particular, stands by and
cheers as every new manifestation of barbarism rises and slaughters good
people and innocent children. The chattering classes willingly support
and serve the enemies of mankind and viciously slander and condemn those
who dare to raise a hand in defense of the defenseless. They sit on
their fat asses in avant-garde1 coffee2
houses cooking up paranoid conspiracy theories about how Christian
Conservatives are planning to exterminate their own particular and
pathetic social fringe group.3
But if the stupid conspiracy theories of the Left were true they would all be dead.
Let's
see...if we on the Right were to treat the Left the way that Great
Comrade Stalin treated anyone he suspected of being an opponent, let
alone someone who was an actual opponent, would any of these pathetic
lunatics still be breathing, let alone continuing to rant like a mob of
mentally disconnected lunatics who are off their meds?
I wouldn't think so.
If Conservatives dealt with the adherents of Libéralisme Moderne
the way the Left has dealt with humans in general whenever the Left has
obtained unrestrained power, there wouldn't be any Liberals left
standing. Of the universities and the urban centers of Liberalism there
would be nothing left but smoking ruins, and there would mass graves
from coast to coast.
We need to face the fact that the present
day Left, like the unschooled barbarians who plagued civilization before
them, are essentially parasites. If the Huns or the Mongols were to
take "no" for an answer to their demands for food and other material
goods they would die very quickly. Control of the productive population
is essential for their survival and well being. Compulsion, taking
things and persons by force, is inherently necessary to the parasite
manner of existence. Those who resisted had to be killed as an object
lesson for others.
The Left, our present-day literate
post-Marxist barbarians, not only need material support they also need
spiritual support as well. They need to feel that their victims are not
only submitting to them today but will do so tomorrow as well.
Barbarian
chieftains and tribal witch-doctors demanded degrading and often
dangerous acts of worship from their subjects, up to and including human
sacrifice, in order to assure themselves that they would still have a
roof (or a tent) over their heads and food to eat the next day. Those
refused to obey were worked over by the goon squad or simply killed.
In
the classrooms, editorial offices, and coffee shops of the Left the
demand is for unquestioned agreement without regard to the actual facts
of reality. The self-styled intellectuals of the Left are the first to
demand “speech codes” and other forms of censorship lest they be
identified as frauds and poseurs and subsequently bounced out of their
comfortable ivory towers, no longer insulated from a real world that
demands real thought and real labor.
The Left, being dependent
upon others for their sustenance, must stand in opposition to the
society of rational consent and openly support systems of compulsion, be
it various species of Socialism or the witch-doctor rule of Islam,
because to do otherwise is to condemn themselves to death.
Of course, in my view, if the Left would just die it would be nice.
Footnotes:
1. French for advance guard. A military term applied to a the work of Pablo Picasso by a French General.
2.
Back during the Cold War some Lefties posed as being morally superior
because they were drinking Nicaraguan coffee. Which in reality was grown
by forced labor on collective farms. I strongly suspect that there's
something equally as sleazy about the current fetish of consuming "fair
trade" coffee. Or perhaps they are merely being stupid.
3. For the record, I'm an atheist.
Thursday, February 27, 2025
On Revolution
It's damn good thing the would be assassins missed. We'd be the middle of a Second American Revolution now.
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
Phenomena
I keep seeing the same phenomena over and over again. Those who proclaim themselves to be the good guys are actually the perpetrators of the greatest evils.
Tuesday, February 25, 2025
Monday, February 24, 2025
Opposition
Objectivism Versus Scientology:
In Objectivism an axiom is a statement that defines the base of
knowledge and is a self evident truth. The three axioms of Objectivism are that
Existence Exists, that Existence is Identity, and that Consciousness is
Identification. The axioms of Objectivism flatly contradict Scientology
in holding that the Universe existed prior to the evolution of
consciousness. That things are what they are regardless of what one
chooses to believe. And that to be conscious is to see things are they
truly are without regard to the claims by an self proclaimed authority
figure. An Objectivist would clearly see that L. Ron Hubbard was putting out
complete nonsense and therefore would be classed as a Suppressive Person in the doctrine of Scientology.
Because it's a deliberate body of falsehoods created by a con artist
Scientology must hold that the act of identification--which is to see
things as they truly are--as something that must be forbidden and
punished. And in a world ruled by Scientologists the truly conscious
must be be put down with lethal effect.
Sunday, February 23, 2025
Rant
I have to constantly interact with incompetent people.
Saturday, February 22, 2025
History
Why are there no black samurai?
Japan was isolated for several centuries and imported no Africans as slaves.
Friday, February 21, 2025
Another Rant On Islam
If the Big Mo (the false prophet Mohammed) showed up in the United States he would be confined to a mental hospital with a lifetime supply of happy pills. Given a life sentence. Or in states with a death penalty given a death sentence.
Thursday, February 20, 2025
Proposed Constitutional Amendment
I propose a Constitutional amendment:
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority, shall not be disarmed. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Another Rant On Gun Control
Some advocates of Gun Control believe that the American nation would be better off if American citizens were disarmed. There was a national leader who believed his nation was better off when the citizens were disarmed. His name was Adolf Hitler.
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
On Marxism
The process of civilization is the removal of force from social relations. To advocate Marxism is to advocate slavery. Marxists want to be masters. That's why Marxists won't emigrate to already Marxist states. They won't be masters if they do so.
There's only one to deal with a Marxist. Execute them.
Monday, February 17, 2025
Sunday, February 16, 2025
An Article
by J.F.A. Davidson
In the wake of publicity surrounding The RESISTER after the Oklahoma City bombing, Togo West, Secretary of the Army, and GEN Sullivan, former Army Chief of Staff, sent official message traffic to all Army activities warning of the dangers of service members participating in or belonging to "extremist" organizations. Their messages were little more than reinterations of AR 600-20, Army Command Policy, Paragraph 4-12, Extremist Organizations. While never mentioning The RESISTER by name, everyone understood the underlying intent. Their motive was clearly designed to smear The RESISTER with the same sloppy rhetoric used by the media to smear patriots and constitutionalists.
The term "extremism" defines exactly nothing. It is a term used to connote an issue no one dare denote. It is a term used by devotees of the cult of moral greyness to 'define' that which they fear the most--principled adherence to truth, morality, and ethics. It is a term used by political moderates to discredit constitutionalists who believe in unalienable individual rights exercised in rational self-interest, the liberty to exercise those rights, and capitalism, which makes possible the acquisition of property--the source of all unalienable rights.
Funk and Wagnalls New Practical Standard Dictionary (1947) defines the word extreme thus: "Ex-treme adj. 1. Being of the highest degree, at best, worst, greatest, etc...." Extreme, then, is a measure of degree. When the word "extreme" is used by political and media smear artists, it is intended to mean an extreme of any degree regardless of its nature. This implication is inherently evil. It means that extreme morality and immorality are equally undesirable; extreme honesty and dishonesty are equally immoral, and extreme virtue and extreme depravity are equally evil.
Defining oneself as a moderate is an admission of being a compromiser and an appeaser. Philosophically, what, then, is the implication of compromise between the truth and a lie? What is the implication of compromise between morality and immorality? What is the ethical implication of compromise between principled action and unprincipled action? The implications are advocacy of lies, immorality, and unprincipled action.
Politically, what is the implication of compromise between unalienable individual rights and collectivism? What is the implication of compromise between liberty and slavery? What is the implication of compromise between capitalism and socialism? The answer is, the same result as the compromise between food and poison--death: the death of unalienable individual rights, the death of liberty, and the death of property. The implications are the advocacy of collectivism, slavery, and socialism.
The term "extremism" is nothing other than a smear; a smear used by self-proclaimed moderates, who have no principles, to defile those who adhere to principled thought and action. It is a terror phrase intended to instill a sense of guilt and uncertainty in the irrational mob by reference to undefined and constantly fluctuating ideological package-deals.
One such package-deal is so-called "white-supremacy." Although racism is implied, the true target of this smear is western culture, (meaning specifically, of course, Anglo-Saxon culture). The deprecation of western culture by moderates notwithstanding, the simple fact they attempt to deny is that if the cumulative impact of minority contributions to western culture were suddenly eliminated from the whole, the advance of western culture would have not been delayed one single day.
Minorities who recognize this fact, those whose rational actions logically embrace the principle of reasoned individual effort as the source of success do, in fact, succeed. Note well that self-appointed minority spokesmen immediately attack those minorities who succeed as traitors to their race! Here, the principle under attack by moderates using the smear "white-supremacy," is reasoned action.
We maintain that race is irrelevant. Rational men are rational men--their skin color is trivia. Irrational men end up exactly where they deserve to be--on the trash-heap.
Another deprecating package-deal term is "isolationism." It is a term used by United Nations one-world socialists, and altruists, to connote lack of selfless concern for the rest of the world. Although no isolationist ever maintained that the rest of the world is of no concern, the smear term "isolationist" is nothing more than a straw man used to misrepresent the principle of patriotism and national self-interest.
The connotation of those who smear others as "isolationists" is that patriotism and national self-interest are evil. Their altruistic goal is to loot the wealth and capital of America and redistribute it to peasants and savages across the world. Their persistent shrieks demanding acceptance of multiculturalism denote nothing less than a demand that a mud hut be viewed as the technological equal of a Skyscraper, a Voodoo priest be given equal status to that of a neurosurgeon, and a story teller be given the same recognition as a literary genius.
We maintain that the premises of one-world socialists, altruists and multiculturalists are unspeakably evil. Productive genius is productive genius--its origin is trivia. Incompetent men deserve exactly what happens to them--failure.
The connotation of those who smear others as "cultists" is that the voluntary freedom of association by individuals is evil. This filthy smear is a direct attack on individual choice, whether that individual choice is rational or irrational.
Philosophically, this smear deliberately sets up the notion that only collective associations are acceptable. All collective associations are, by definition, coercive. They necessarily involve the use of force; either force by fraud, or force at the point of a gun. Politically, this smear is the rationalization of unlimited democracy; the belief that might makes right. This smear is a deliberate assault on the philosophical framework of the First Amendment--uncoerced, voluntary individual choice. The uncoerced voluntary choices of individuals are their own individual responsibility. Collectivists deserve exactly what they advocate--slavery.
Pleas for "moderation" are nothing less than pleas for compromise and appeasement; in other words, the primacy of untruth, immorality, and unethical action. "Moderation" is the abrogation of rights, liberty, and property. "Compromise" is the war cry of evil.
The RESISTER has been smeared by moderates, compromisers and appeasers within the chain of command as an extremist publication. We agree with their assessment-- but not their underlying smear. We admire truth, morality, ethical action, unalienable individual rights, liberty to exercise those rights, and acquisition of the origin of rights and liberty-- -property; meaning, capitalism. In today's political climate our admiration of these philosophical and political values means we hold extreme views. There is no alternative.
There is only one reasonable answer to the question invariably posed by smear artists: "Surely, you don't believe in good and bad, and think in terms of black and white?" The answer is: "You're damn right I do!"
Saturday, February 15, 2025
Friday, February 14, 2025
Purpose
The purpose of Republican Party when it was founded in 1854 was to oppose slavery. When slavery was outlawed with the end of the Civil War the Republican Party ceased to have a purpose.
Thursday, February 13, 2025
Quote
"Do not use foreign words in narrative
to show your erudition. Phonies like to stud their conversation with
foreign words. If you do that in narrative, you, the author, will sound
like a phony."
-- Ayn Rand, The Art of Fiction.
Wednesday, February 12, 2025
On Political Correctness
Political Correctness isn't correct. "Get Woke, Go Broke," isn't just a slogan, it's a fact of reality. Political Correctness is easy to correct. Some people (like myself) call it the Saigon Special.
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
On Falling
It was once estimated that nations and empires last about 260 years. By this standard the United States Of America would expected to fall at about 2036 AD.
Monday, February 10, 2025
Opinions
There's no excuse for bad behavior.
The simple unevadable fact of reality in my own personal view is that
Environmentalists are nothing less than Enemies of Mankind. And it's about
time that they're dealt with as such,
Tyrants ALWAYS have popular support.
When I was in the Army I used to tell other people that I was from the Soviet Socialist Republic of Minnesota.
Voting Republican is at best a rear guard action.
Atheists must separate themselves from Karl Marx and the doctrine of Marxism.
Sunday, February 09, 2025
Gun Control And History
There was once an attempt to prohibit the consumption of alcohol. Prohibition didn't work and had to be repealed. Gun Control will NEVER work. Unfortunately many Americans will die in the attempt.
Saturday, February 08, 2025
Friday, February 07, 2025
On Authority
Authority is an intellectual shortcut. The Donner Party followed a path that an authority claimed was shorter than the standard path. The path they followed was in fact longer. The Donner Party was caught by a snowfall and had resort to cannibalism. Questioning Authority can save your life.
Thursday, February 06, 2025
Wednesday, February 05, 2025
Quotes Of The Day
Tuesday, February 04, 2025
On Racial Collectivism
Members of Black Lives Matter believe they're victims and practice Racial Collectivism. Gee, Gosh, Wow, where have we've seen this belief before? If Black Lives Matter wants to practice Racial Collectivism, let's treat them as Racial Collectivists. In the Nuremberg fashion, hang them from the neck until they're dead. Antisemitism in politics is the practical equivalent of a dead canary in a coal mine, I can't say this often enough. Antisemitism is a subset of Racial Collectivism. We (Humanity) have to condemn all forms of Racial Collectivism. We have to identify Black Lives Matter as the Racial Collectivist group that it actually is. We have to see that Antisemitism is a symptom of a deeper philosophical problem. So when someone attacks Jews they're attacking all of us. Antisemitism is a clear sign that all of Humanity is being attacked. Rejection of Racial Collectivism shouldn't be a radical idea.
Monday, February 03, 2025
Excuse For Tyranny
Democracy is the form of state that claims unlimited power from a
mandate from an unlimited mass.
For those who desire absolute power Democracy is an ideal form of the
state. But in Reality authority in any area is based on actual
knowledge in
that field. Thus political authority must be based on knowledge in the
field of politics. But in the democratic form of the state the voter
isn't required to know anything on the subject of ethics, or politics, or
in the case of Chicago to actually exist.
So why should we as Americans be subject to the will of Democrats?
WE SHOULD NOT.
Democrats in general have shown that they aren't at all concerned about
the actual facts of Reality. Nor are they concerned about the
consequences of their actions. That we'll suffer and die as a result
of their actions means absolutely nothing to them.
So why should we submit to them let alone allow them to exist?
WE SHOULD NOT AT ALL.
There's no such thing as a valid excuse.
This editorial was originally published in the Winter 1995 issue (Volume I, Number 3) of THE RESISTER.
This
editorial explains why I and a number of other rational citizens of the
American Republic will not quietly submit to the whims of the God-Kings foisted upon us by the mob of Depraved-Americans,
Corrupt-Americans, Stupid-Americans, Ignorant-Americans,
Deceased-Americans, and Imaginary-Americans.
----------
Democracy: The Politics of Tyranny
In a rational society founded of the moral principle of rights there can be no force or fraud in the relationship between sovereign individuals. When rights are properly exercised they take nothing from anyone, nor do they compel anyone to act in a manner detrimental to their own self-interest. Notice that the rational exercise of each right enumerated in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution by an individual takes nothing from, or compels, other individuals in their rational exercise of these rights.
Only individuals possess rights. Groups, being nothing more than a number of individuals can, in themselves, possess no rights other than those which are possessed and exercised individually by each member. Hence, a faction has no rights; nor does a gang, a mob, a tribe, a state or a nation. A group may hove interests but those interests do not assume the moral legitimacy of rights. To assert otherwise is to descend into abstract subjectivism, an evasion of reality, where a society is ruled by the-range-of-the-moment whims of its members, the majority gang of the moment, the current demagogue or dictator.
Government is force. No matter how benign or dictatorial, behind every law or regulation or act there is a gun. The authors of the United States Constitution were fully aware of this fact. They recognized that government in a rational society must derive its delegated powers by the consent of the governed and that these powers must be specifically defined by law--the Constitution; delimited by a law higher than government--the inalienable rights of man; and dispersed by permanent separation of powers. For these reasons they specifically and intentionally REJECTED democracy as a system of government. The system of government created by the Founding Fathers, men devoted to the primacy of the source of all rights, man's faculties (which means; reason), was the CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Democracy is the antithesis of the natural rights of man. The philosophical premise of democracy is egalitarianism; not political egalitarianism which holds all men equal before the law (justice), but METAPHYSICAL egalitarianism, the belief that all men are equal in all things. This last construct is such an obvious falsehood that it can carry only one meaning: the hatred of reason. Democracy, by its very definition - rule by majority - is the notion that" might makes right." The exercise of democracy reduces men to mere numbers, and the faction or gang which gathers the greater number of men to its fleeting cause wields the government gun against the minority.
From this view of the subject, it may be concluded, that a pure Democracy, by which I mean a society, consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will in almost every case, be felt by the majority of the whole; a communication and concert results from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property, and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.
--Publius (James Madison), The Federalist X, 1787
Indeed, specific safeguards were designed into the Constitution to prevent the subversion of the constitutional republic and the natural rights of man by political party gang warfare and special interest factionalism inherent in a democracy: the Electoral College (Article II, Section 1) and the election of senators by State Legislatures (Article I, Section 3).
In the case of the former it was specifically intended that the head of the Executive branch of the federal government be elected by Electors chosen by each state legislature in equal proportion to its representation in Congress; NOT by popular vote. This ensured : "No faction or combination can bring about the election. It is probable, that the choice will always fall upon a man of experienced abilities and fidelity. In all human probability, no better method of election could have been devised." (James Iredell, North Carolina Ratification Cttee., 1788)
The latter provision ensured the logical effect of popular election of members to the House of Representatives (whim based legislation) was offset by representatives elected by state legislature to the Senate to guard against Executive and House encroachment on state sovereignty: "The election of one branch of the Federal, by the State Legislatures, secures an absolute dependence of the former on the latter. The biennial exclusion of one-third, will lesson the faculty of combination and may put a stop to intrigues." (James Madison, Virginia Ratification Cttee., June, 1788)
The United States has been descending into the sewer of democracy since the ratification of the 17th Amendment on May 31, 1913. Before every presidential election there are demands by special interest groups to void the Electoral College and resort to popular election of the President. This headlong rush into democracy is evident by the "value" placed on public opinion polls by politicians of both parties (a practice begun by the crypto-communist Franklin D. Roosevelt); as if the opinions and "feelings" of factions, gangs and tribes were a counterweight to the inalienable rights of a single rational man.
The irrationality of democracy was stated most eloquently by Auberon Herbert in his London address on March 9, 1880, before a meeting of the Vigilance Association for the Defense of Personal Rights, entitled; CHOICES BETWEEN FREEDOM AND PROTECTION: "How should it happen that the individual should be without rights, but the combination of individuals should possess unlimited rights?"
--Alexander Davidson