Friday, November 28, 2014
Thursday, November 27, 2014
A Proposal
I now propose the following amendment to the United States Constitution:
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.
What are your questions on this proposal?
The People of the United States, being the sovereign authority of the nation, shall not be disarmed. To petition for, to enact, or to enforce legislation to disarm the People shall be a capital offense.
What are your questions on this proposal?
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Saturday, November 22, 2014
Thought For The Day
If we treated the NSDAP--and especially the SS--like we treat the Jihadists then National Socialism would be the largest growing ideology today. And it would not be essentially extinct today.
http://nomosshere.tumblr.com/post/103330957261/jihadists-hijack-bus-in-kenya-single-out-non-muslims
http://nomosshere.tumblr.com/post/103330957261/jihadists-hijack-bus-in-kenya-single-out-non-muslims
Friday, November 21, 2014
Step Back - Part 36
Upon his return to Moscow Mikhail Gorbachev began the initial
handwritten draft of his report to the Politburo. As it was to be
factual be did not expect it to be well received. Although Boatman
meant to be helpful in providing a written transcript of the meeting in
Russian the last thing the Politburo wanted to read was the truth.
As additional commentary Boatman wrote:
The science of spaceflight works because those who practice it have actually made the effort to discover and apply the relevant facts of reality to their endeavor. The mishaps that do occur are usually the result of someone not paying attention to the relevant facts.
The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking the products of their thought and labor. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. I basically think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to essentially behave as predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings it is clear that they should be hunted down and killed.
To the true believer a 100 million innocent human lives snuffed out in the pursuit of an invalid ideology is just not enough. Would they stop after killing 200 million or 300 million? Of course not.
The parasite mentalities of the Master Class as a rule see themselves as superior beings and that all other people, the productive population of a nation, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not seen as an act of murder. In the minds of the Master Class is it simply the disposal of garbage.
I practical effect a Communist is a mortal enemy of Mankind. And killing a Communist is as necessary as putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.
This wasn’t about to be accepted by the Politburo at all. And Gorbachev expected their collective response to be very ugly.
Richard Charles March sat in the den of his home in the Kenwood section of Minneapolis and was reading the Friday edition of the Minneapolis Star, the local evening newspaper. The Star had published an editorial that denounced the Uptimers for their clear adherence to Capitalism.
An Uptimer named Jane March had responded to the editorial.
Your sneer is a clear indication that you may be part of a problem. Positive confirmation of this would of course require further observation and research for which I neither the time, patience, nor a research grant to perform. That would be a task that is ideally suited to an actual intellectual. As you may notice I will not condemn all intellectuals in my reply, I only condemn the false ones.
Intellectuals actually can be useful when they are honest or when they are actually paying attention to the facts of reality. The problem arises when someone assumes the position of authority in order to scam their way to survival and well being, or to further an adverse ideological agenda. As there is only one reality, which is commonly perceived by all individuals, the fraud is ultimately discovered, but all too often the disclosure occurs after innocent lives are lost.
One of the obvious indications that one is a false intellectual is their apparent blindness to the distinction between the states of Civilization and Barbarism. The State of Civilization is not only the collection of structures that people live and work in, and the tools that they use, it is also the moral condition that they live in. The foundation of the social order has a clear impact on the survival and well being of the people who live in it.
In the State of Civilization consent is the preferred basis of social, economic, and political relationships, and force is reserved as a response to the violent predatory behavior from such persons as common criminals and Communists. The barbaric social paradigm is dominated by those persons who, by tribal membership or by adherence to an ideology, assume the role of a superior being that forcibly uses other people as a means to assure their own survival and well being.
Obviously not all civilizations are perfect, which was clearly demonstrated by the Self Appointed Superior Beings who forcibly imposed the Prohibition of Alcohol on the United States in the early Twentieth Century.
To see the distinction between Civilization and Barbarism and act to on that knowledge does have an impact on the survival and well being of a person. Anyone who cannot see, refuses to see, or who actively obliterates, the distinction between Civilization and Barbarism in their work is either not doing their job properly or is part of the problem, and in either case has absolutely zero claim to being an intellectual. Though that doesn't stop them from trying.
But I'm just the commander of our surface base, so what do I know?
Richard Charles March clearly was angry. How dare this cunt in a military uniform call him and his fellow Progressives a band of savages?
As March read the evening paper and made hostile noises his youngest son watched from a position on concealment. John Andrew March had only recently begun kindergarten classes but he already knew that his father should not be spoken to as he read any newspaper.
On the morning of Saturday Evelyn Boatman had been released from hospitalization and was taking the shuttle down from the Eagle to the surface base.
Back to work. He thought.
As additional commentary Boatman wrote:
The science of spaceflight works because those who practice it have actually made the effort to discover and apply the relevant facts of reality to their endeavor. The mishaps that do occur are usually the result of someone not paying attention to the relevant facts.
The theory of Communism was invented by a group of professional parasites in order to give the appearance of modernity and moral legitimacy to the stone-age practice of beating-up and killing productive people and taking the products of their thought and labor. Of course that is about the nicest description I could give to it. I basically think of the practice of Communism as being the behavior of those who chose to essentially behave as predatory animals. And as with any other predatory animal that attacks human beings it is clear that they should be hunted down and killed.
To the true believer a 100 million innocent human lives snuffed out in the pursuit of an invalid ideology is just not enough. Would they stop after killing 200 million or 300 million? Of course not.
The parasite mentalities of the Master Class as a rule see themselves as superior beings and that all other people, the productive population of a nation, exist solely as either tools that they can use to pursue their goals or as trash to be disposed of. Killing those who rightfully refuse to be the slaves of the self-appointed superior beings is not seen as an act of murder. In the minds of the Master Class is it simply the disposal of garbage.
I practical effect a Communist is a mortal enemy of Mankind. And killing a Communist is as necessary as putting down a rabid animal or destroying any other active hazard to human life.
This wasn’t about to be accepted by the Politburo at all. And Gorbachev expected their collective response to be very ugly.
Richard Charles March sat in the den of his home in the Kenwood section of Minneapolis and was reading the Friday edition of the Minneapolis Star, the local evening newspaper. The Star had published an editorial that denounced the Uptimers for their clear adherence to Capitalism.
An Uptimer named Jane March had responded to the editorial.
Your sneer is a clear indication that you may be part of a problem. Positive confirmation of this would of course require further observation and research for which I neither the time, patience, nor a research grant to perform. That would be a task that is ideally suited to an actual intellectual. As you may notice I will not condemn all intellectuals in my reply, I only condemn the false ones.
Intellectuals actually can be useful when they are honest or when they are actually paying attention to the facts of reality. The problem arises when someone assumes the position of authority in order to scam their way to survival and well being, or to further an adverse ideological agenda. As there is only one reality, which is commonly perceived by all individuals, the fraud is ultimately discovered, but all too often the disclosure occurs after innocent lives are lost.
One of the obvious indications that one is a false intellectual is their apparent blindness to the distinction between the states of Civilization and Barbarism. The State of Civilization is not only the collection of structures that people live and work in, and the tools that they use, it is also the moral condition that they live in. The foundation of the social order has a clear impact on the survival and well being of the people who live in it.
In the State of Civilization consent is the preferred basis of social, economic, and political relationships, and force is reserved as a response to the violent predatory behavior from such persons as common criminals and Communists. The barbaric social paradigm is dominated by those persons who, by tribal membership or by adherence to an ideology, assume the role of a superior being that forcibly uses other people as a means to assure their own survival and well being.
Obviously not all civilizations are perfect, which was clearly demonstrated by the Self Appointed Superior Beings who forcibly imposed the Prohibition of Alcohol on the United States in the early Twentieth Century.
To see the distinction between Civilization and Barbarism and act to on that knowledge does have an impact on the survival and well being of a person. Anyone who cannot see, refuses to see, or who actively obliterates, the distinction between Civilization and Barbarism in their work is either not doing their job properly or is part of the problem, and in either case has absolutely zero claim to being an intellectual. Though that doesn't stop them from trying.
But I'm just the commander of our surface base, so what do I know?
Richard Charles March clearly was angry. How dare this cunt in a military uniform call him and his fellow Progressives a band of savages?
As March read the evening paper and made hostile noises his youngest son watched from a position on concealment. John Andrew March had only recently begun kindergarten classes but he already knew that his father should not be spoken to as he read any newspaper.
On the morning of Saturday Evelyn Boatman had been released from hospitalization and was taking the shuttle down from the Eagle to the surface base.
Back to work. He thought.
Thursday, November 20, 2014
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Reality Now!
Multiple cold weather records are being broken across the United States.
How could anyone still believe in the nonsense of Global Warming?
How could anyone still believe in the nonsense of Global Warming?
No Surprise
That the present administration in Washington holds the
citizens in contempt and would resort to fraud to promote its programs
is not s surprise. I made the following prediction during the election
six years ago:
My theory is that many self styled authorities defend their doctrines, often more deliberate than erroneous, as if they were defending their lives because they are defending their lives.
The false authority is dependent on the work of other people for their survival and well being. Without the blind obedience of productive people the false authority would wither away and die. To the parasite power over the productive is life.
These self appointed intellectuals, whom Ayn Rand had labeled as Witch Doctors, claim the position of authority in a division of labor economy through the claim of being in possession of superior knowledge. Such so called superior knowledge must by necessity contradict the knowledge gained by direct perception of objective (commonly perceived) reality.
Against the entirely valid charge of fraud the intellectual con artist will claim that his perception of reality differs from that of the common man.
One practice, which began with the original aboriginal witch doctors, is to claim that self appointed authority is perceiving or is otherwise in contact with a higher or spiritual level of reality. This practice continues to this day in the scam religions of Islam and Scientology.
The materialist version of the false authority con operates on the practice of polylogism, the claim that members of different groups perceive differently. What is true for one group is false for another group. Thus what is true for Jews is claimed to be false for Aryans. The practice of polylogism is not confined to issues of race (such as Africans versus "Crackers"), it can be applied to conflicts of class (Proletarians versus the Bourgeoisie), gender ("Womyn" versus "Sperm Donors"), and national culture (The French versus everyone else*).
But since Man is an entity of both spirit and body the most effective, and thus destructive, version of the different knowledge con will combine both the claim of spiritual wisdom and material polylogism. This occurs in the notion that a group has a distinct consciousness whose will is embodied in a leader. Thus the claim that Adolf Hitler embodied the will of the Volk, Josef Stalin embodied the will of the Proletariat, Hillary Clinton embodied the will of all Womyn, and that Barack Obama embodies the will of the functionally dumb.**
And if this wasn't bad enough there are now false authorities who claim to represent something other than a human population, such as the Gaianist witch doctor Al Gore.
It is essential for the survival of human society that false authorities be identified and rendered unable to cause further harm to us.
Of course if they are also buried that would be fine with me.
* I'm really serious here. The French as a nation have a long history of insisting on being different and claiming it's a superior practice. A case in point is that at the beginning of the First World War is that while all other nations had adopted earth toned uniforms for their soldiers the French politicians INSISTED that their soldiers go into combat with the traditional dark blue coats and bright red trousers. As you can imagine this didn't work out well for the French Army. The French also had the best bayonets mounted on the worst rifle, but that's another story.
** There is simply no other way that anyone could support a Harvard indoctrinated Marxist empty suit from the Chicago Democratic Machine.
My theory is that many self styled authorities defend their doctrines, often more deliberate than erroneous, as if they were defending their lives because they are defending their lives.
The false authority is dependent on the work of other people for their survival and well being. Without the blind obedience of productive people the false authority would wither away and die. To the parasite power over the productive is life.
These self appointed intellectuals, whom Ayn Rand had labeled as Witch Doctors, claim the position of authority in a division of labor economy through the claim of being in possession of superior knowledge. Such so called superior knowledge must by necessity contradict the knowledge gained by direct perception of objective (commonly perceived) reality.
Against the entirely valid charge of fraud the intellectual con artist will claim that his perception of reality differs from that of the common man.
One practice, which began with the original aboriginal witch doctors, is to claim that self appointed authority is perceiving or is otherwise in contact with a higher or spiritual level of reality. This practice continues to this day in the scam religions of Islam and Scientology.
The materialist version of the false authority con operates on the practice of polylogism, the claim that members of different groups perceive differently. What is true for one group is false for another group. Thus what is true for Jews is claimed to be false for Aryans. The practice of polylogism is not confined to issues of race (such as Africans versus "Crackers"), it can be applied to conflicts of class (Proletarians versus the Bourgeoisie), gender ("Womyn" versus "Sperm Donors"), and national culture (The French versus everyone else*).
But since Man is an entity of both spirit and body the most effective, and thus destructive, version of the different knowledge con will combine both the claim of spiritual wisdom and material polylogism. This occurs in the notion that a group has a distinct consciousness whose will is embodied in a leader. Thus the claim that Adolf Hitler embodied the will of the Volk, Josef Stalin embodied the will of the Proletariat, Hillary Clinton embodied the will of all Womyn, and that Barack Obama embodies the will of the functionally dumb.**
And if this wasn't bad enough there are now false authorities who claim to represent something other than a human population, such as the Gaianist witch doctor Al Gore.
It is essential for the survival of human society that false authorities be identified and rendered unable to cause further harm to us.
Of course if they are also buried that would be fine with me.
* I'm really serious here. The French as a nation have a long history of insisting on being different and claiming it's a superior practice. A case in point is that at the beginning of the First World War is that while all other nations had adopted earth toned uniforms for their soldiers the French politicians INSISTED that their soldiers go into combat with the traditional dark blue coats and bright red trousers. As you can imagine this didn't work out well for the French Army. The French also had the best bayonets mounted on the worst rifle, but that's another story.
** There is simply no other way that anyone could support a Harvard indoctrinated Marxist empty suit from the Chicago Democratic Machine.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Step Back - Part 35
Friday October 17, 1969
Evelyn Boatman was sitting back at the work station in his quarters and had just finished updating the report on the visit of the Soviet delegation when there was an old fashioned knock on his cabin door.
“Come in!” He shouted.
The door opened and Judith Grant stepped in. As a proper gentleman Evelyn stood up.
“Is there a problem?” He said.
“I’m not sure,” she replied, “maybe.”
Evelyn made the gesture to Judith to take a seat near the work station in his cabin. Once they were seated he then asked the next question.
“So what happened?”
“I just finished reading Time Enough For Love by Robert Heinlein.”
Oh bugger. He thought. Of course when jumping to a conclusion I can be wrong.
“And?” He said.
“And I read the part of it titled The Tale Of The Adopted Daughter.”
He nodded.
Of course being right isn’t always a good thing, either. He thought.
“And what conclusion did you come to?”
“That I may have a problem.” She said.
Evelyn nodded and then asked the next question.
“Which is?”
“I want to be with you.” She said. “I want to marry you and live with you.”
He thought for a moment before responding.
“Apart from the issue of maturity I really can’t think of a reason to say no.”
She blinked. He continued his answer.
“Obviously no rational man will take advantage of a child, but once you’ve hit adulthood there shouldn’t be a problem. Do you understand?
“I think I do.” Judith replied. “I basically have to grow up?”
“On the psychological level, yes.” He said.
She nodded and then her face brightened.
“Yes.” She said.
“Was there anything else?” Evelyn asked.
“Um, no.” She said.
With the end of the discussion Judith would return to her cabin and Evelyn went directly to see Alice about the issue.
At Baikonur both Gorbachev and Leonov would go through a long debriefing on the mission. More than once the KGB Colonel had to suggest to a party member sitting in on the session that he should take a break. Three times he had to make the suggestion to a member more than once.
When Gorbachev mentioned that Boatman had dismissed Lenin as a psychopath the senior party member lit up and had to be physically removed from the room.
With the party man removed the Colonel shook his head.
“And how are we to do our jobs?” He said. “Our mission is to discover and record the facts but we are not to actually pass them on to our superiors?. And Boatman is not unique in this respect, when Lenin’s behavior is described to someone in the medical field without mentioning any clue as to his identity the doctor always comes to the conclusion that he is a psychopath. Every single time!”
Gorbachev was completely speechless at this point.
Aboard the Eagle Evelyn and Alice were having a discussion.
“So basically,” said Alice, “you just told her to grow up?”
“Yes.”
“And that’s all? No other grounds for rejection?”
“Why should there be?’
Alice was struck speechless.
Evelyn continued.
“Judith has essentially embraced reason and apart from the maturity issue why should I reject her? And in the intervening time she could find someone else to marry.”
“Not bloody likely.” Alice replied. “She won’t be looking for someone else, and neither will you. Face it Dad, you have this thing about diving in and solving problems, and this one just screamed and leaped at you.”
Evelyn knew that was an old science fiction metaphor but he couldn’t recall from what work.
Alice now continued.
“I remember the arrival of the Integral. And I remember how you and mom responded when I...”
Alice couldn’t continue, Evelyn spoke up.
“When you had no idea how to live a real human life and assumed that nothing would have changed once you were on the ground at Eden. The first lecture to correct that error was a long one.”
“The whole process of correcting the damage was a long one.” Alice replied. “You and Mom had a lot of work to do on it.”
Evelyn could only nod in response.
“So what now?” He said.
“Well, it’s a bit early to send out the wedding invitations.” Alice replied.
“Yes, but it shouldn’t be too much trouble, we’ll be inviting Rand, the Heinleins, the Azimovs, Arthur Clarke and whoever he’s partnered with...”
“Dad, this will be the biggest social event of the century.”
“No it won’t, this will not be major event like a royal wedding.”
“No, I suppose not.” Said Alice.
And then she had another thought.
“And speaking of an actual royal wedding, can we warn Diana Spencer about what happened to her counterpart on the original timeline?”
“Sure, she clearly doesn’t deserve to be hooked up with that inbred moron the Prince of Wales.” Said Evelyn. “I wrote the letter warning LRH about that dickhead Miscavage, and you can write the letter to Diana about that dickhead Prince Charles and his mistress, what was her name?”
“Camilla. Yes I think it was Camilla.” Said Alice. “Okay, I’ll do that.”
It was time for lunch.
The Boatman’s had stepped right up behind Judith Grant in the mess line. And then Evelyn had a thought.
And no, it didn’t hurt.
He spoke to her.
“Judith?”
“Yes?”
Evelyn stepped up, took her in his arms, and kissed her. It was a deep and very adult kiss. And Judith felt like she was melting in his arms.
And when he stopped he spoke again.
“The answer is yes, I wanted to be clear on that.”
Suddenly everyone on the mess deck stood up and applauded.
Evelyn Boatman was sitting back at the work station in his quarters and had just finished updating the report on the visit of the Soviet delegation when there was an old fashioned knock on his cabin door.
“Come in!” He shouted.
The door opened and Judith Grant stepped in. As a proper gentleman Evelyn stood up.
“Is there a problem?” He said.
“I’m not sure,” she replied, “maybe.”
Evelyn made the gesture to Judith to take a seat near the work station in his cabin. Once they were seated he then asked the next question.
“So what happened?”
“I just finished reading Time Enough For Love by Robert Heinlein.”
Oh bugger. He thought. Of course when jumping to a conclusion I can be wrong.
“And?” He said.
“And I read the part of it titled The Tale Of The Adopted Daughter.”
He nodded.
Of course being right isn’t always a good thing, either. He thought.
“And what conclusion did you come to?”
“That I may have a problem.” She said.
Evelyn nodded and then asked the next question.
“Which is?”
“I want to be with you.” She said. “I want to marry you and live with you.”
He thought for a moment before responding.
“Apart from the issue of maturity I really can’t think of a reason to say no.”
She blinked. He continued his answer.
“Obviously no rational man will take advantage of a child, but once you’ve hit adulthood there shouldn’t be a problem. Do you understand?
“I think I do.” Judith replied. “I basically have to grow up?”
“On the psychological level, yes.” He said.
She nodded and then her face brightened.
“Yes.” She said.
“Was there anything else?” Evelyn asked.
“Um, no.” She said.
With the end of the discussion Judith would return to her cabin and Evelyn went directly to see Alice about the issue.
At Baikonur both Gorbachev and Leonov would go through a long debriefing on the mission. More than once the KGB Colonel had to suggest to a party member sitting in on the session that he should take a break. Three times he had to make the suggestion to a member more than once.
When Gorbachev mentioned that Boatman had dismissed Lenin as a psychopath the senior party member lit up and had to be physically removed from the room.
With the party man removed the Colonel shook his head.
“And how are we to do our jobs?” He said. “Our mission is to discover and record the facts but we are not to actually pass them on to our superiors?. And Boatman is not unique in this respect, when Lenin’s behavior is described to someone in the medical field without mentioning any clue as to his identity the doctor always comes to the conclusion that he is a psychopath. Every single time!”
Gorbachev was completely speechless at this point.
Aboard the Eagle Evelyn and Alice were having a discussion.
“So basically,” said Alice, “you just told her to grow up?”
“Yes.”
“And that’s all? No other grounds for rejection?”
“Why should there be?’
Alice was struck speechless.
Evelyn continued.
“Judith has essentially embraced reason and apart from the maturity issue why should I reject her? And in the intervening time she could find someone else to marry.”
“Not bloody likely.” Alice replied. “She won’t be looking for someone else, and neither will you. Face it Dad, you have this thing about diving in and solving problems, and this one just screamed and leaped at you.”
Evelyn knew that was an old science fiction metaphor but he couldn’t recall from what work.
Alice now continued.
“I remember the arrival of the Integral. And I remember how you and mom responded when I...”
Alice couldn’t continue, Evelyn spoke up.
“When you had no idea how to live a real human life and assumed that nothing would have changed once you were on the ground at Eden. The first lecture to correct that error was a long one.”
“The whole process of correcting the damage was a long one.” Alice replied. “You and Mom had a lot of work to do on it.”
Evelyn could only nod in response.
“So what now?” He said.
“Well, it’s a bit early to send out the wedding invitations.” Alice replied.
“Yes, but it shouldn’t be too much trouble, we’ll be inviting Rand, the Heinleins, the Azimovs, Arthur Clarke and whoever he’s partnered with...”
“Dad, this will be the biggest social event of the century.”
“No it won’t, this will not be major event like a royal wedding.”
“No, I suppose not.” Said Alice.
And then she had another thought.
“And speaking of an actual royal wedding, can we warn Diana Spencer about what happened to her counterpart on the original timeline?”
“Sure, she clearly doesn’t deserve to be hooked up with that inbred moron the Prince of Wales.” Said Evelyn. “I wrote the letter warning LRH about that dickhead Miscavage, and you can write the letter to Diana about that dickhead Prince Charles and his mistress, what was her name?”
“Camilla. Yes I think it was Camilla.” Said Alice. “Okay, I’ll do that.”
It was time for lunch.
The Boatman’s had stepped right up behind Judith Grant in the mess line. And then Evelyn had a thought.
And no, it didn’t hurt.
He spoke to her.
“Judith?”
“Yes?”
Evelyn stepped up, took her in his arms, and kissed her. It was a deep and very adult kiss. And Judith felt like she was melting in his arms.
And when he stopped he spoke again.
“The answer is yes, I wanted to be clear on that.”
Suddenly everyone on the mess deck stood up and applauded.
Saturday, November 15, 2014
Opinion
Barack Obama should be strongly encouraged to resign the office of the President of the United States.
Yes, we all know that Joe Biden is an idiot, but quite frankly we're all tired of Obama's infallible god-king attitude. And Biden very likely will have sense enough to not provoke a military coup to restore the Constitution.
Yes, we all know that Joe Biden is an idiot, but quite frankly we're all tired of Obama's infallible god-king attitude. And Biden very likely will have sense enough to not provoke a military coup to restore the Constitution.
What The Hell?
I will begin by thanking Mark Urbin for posting this image on his tumblr site:
Of course comparing the the Republican party to the NSDAP is complete nonsense. Especially as the general doctrine of the Donks is essentially National Socialism without what could be called the Aryan frills.
Central to the depicted nonsense--and in particular the the final line--is the myth of the collective reality. In collective reality there is only the alleged view of the group and the specific person is denied the right to examine the facts for himself and to reach his own conclusion on the basis of those facts.
And as with all variants of collectivism the person is seen as a thing to be used for the alleged benefit of the collective. In this case the gay man is denied the right to identify himself as a Citizen of the United States and to rationally cast a ballot as an individual American Citizen.
And of course there is the implicit death penalty for the betrayal of the alleged homosexual collective. This was the case in history when individuals were executed for race treason under National Socialism and for class treason under Communism.
So what are your questions on this block of instruction?
Of course comparing the the Republican party to the NSDAP is complete nonsense. Especially as the general doctrine of the Donks is essentially National Socialism without what could be called the Aryan frills.
Central to the depicted nonsense--and in particular the the final line--is the myth of the collective reality. In collective reality there is only the alleged view of the group and the specific person is denied the right to examine the facts for himself and to reach his own conclusion on the basis of those facts.
And as with all variants of collectivism the person is seen as a thing to be used for the alleged benefit of the collective. In this case the gay man is denied the right to identify himself as a Citizen of the United States and to rationally cast a ballot as an individual American Citizen.
And of course there is the implicit death penalty for the betrayal of the alleged homosexual collective. This was the case in history when individuals were executed for race treason under National Socialism and for class treason under Communism.
So what are your questions on this block of instruction?
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Thought For The Day
The fact is that the self styled Progressives haven't had an original idea since the Old Stone Age, and that was the notion of assaulting or killing other people and taking their stuff. The fact is that the self styled Progressives are absolutely the worst kind of reactionaries.
And here is something I wrote five years ago:
The first violent crime was committed before the recording of history when some now nameless thug turned his spear, a tool created to feed and protect human beings, against another human being to take by violence something from that now nameless victim.
The fundamental crime of the Democratic Party is to turn the apparatus of government--at all levels, local, state, and federal--against the people that governments were created to protect, the productive citizens of a free and civilized nation.
The Democrats have rejected the principle of consent as the basis of the social and political order and have sought to materially and spiritually benefit from the coercion of the productive population. Their preferred method of obtaining power, the simple majority vote (or the claim of same) with no constitutional restraints on power obtained, is simply the exercise of brute force given a happy face.
They have appointed themselves a class of masters and condemned us, the citizens of the United States, to servitude to them. This is morally intolerable.
If our families and our nation are to have a future then the Democratic Party, and their bipartisan country club collaborators, must be permanently removed from office and rendered permanently impotent in the political sphere of action. And if this means that some of their dead bodies have to be dropped into the nearest convenient landfill with the rest of the garbage, then let us do it.
Yes, I know that cancer surgery and chemotherapy is rough, but the alternative is simply unacceptable. I believe that we should be no less ruthless in the effort to destroy the tyranny of the looters and to create a new rational political order for ourselves and our own children.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
And here is something I wrote five years ago:
The first violent crime was committed before the recording of history when some now nameless thug turned his spear, a tool created to feed and protect human beings, against another human being to take by violence something from that now nameless victim.
The fundamental crime of the Democratic Party is to turn the apparatus of government--at all levels, local, state, and federal--against the people that governments were created to protect, the productive citizens of a free and civilized nation.
The Democrats have rejected the principle of consent as the basis of the social and political order and have sought to materially and spiritually benefit from the coercion of the productive population. Their preferred method of obtaining power, the simple majority vote (or the claim of same) with no constitutional restraints on power obtained, is simply the exercise of brute force given a happy face.
They have appointed themselves a class of masters and condemned us, the citizens of the United States, to servitude to them. This is morally intolerable.
If our families and our nation are to have a future then the Democratic Party, and their bipartisan country club collaborators, must be permanently removed from office and rendered permanently impotent in the political sphere of action. And if this means that some of their dead bodies have to be dropped into the nearest convenient landfill with the rest of the garbage, then let us do it.
Yes, I know that cancer surgery and chemotherapy is rough, but the alternative is simply unacceptable. I believe that we should be no less ruthless in the effort to destroy the tyranny of the looters and to create a new rational political order for ourselves and our own children.
What are your questions on this block of instruction?
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Starship Troopers
STARSHIP TROOPERS by Robert A. Heinlein (1959)
This is the subject of a paper I should have written in high school. Although if I had submitted it to the English teacher who taught the class on Science Fiction I very likely would have been crucified had I done so at the time.
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
Although the descent into statism can be dated back to the expansion of the franchise it was the common acceptance of the notion of the unrestrained state that has brought about the current crisis.
Heinlein had an interesting notion but it was ultimately wrong.
This is the subject of a paper I should have written in high school. Although if I had submitted it to the English teacher who taught the class on Science Fiction I very likely would have been crucified had I done so at the time.
Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.
Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from influencing government.
The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
Although the descent into statism can be dated back to the expansion of the franchise it was the common acceptance of the notion of the unrestrained state that has brought about the current crisis.
Heinlein had an interesting notion but it was ultimately wrong.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Thought For The Day
It was once said that the Emperor Nero fiddled as Rome burned.
What will be said about Barrack Obama?
What will be said about Barrack Obama?
Friday, November 07, 2014
Step Back - Part 34
Wednesday October 15, 1969
Low Earth Orbit
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev sat back and waited for the retro-rockets of the Soyuz spacecraft to fire.
What was he going to tell the Politburo? From their perspective this mission was a complete failure.
“The basic problem,” said Evelyn Boatman, “is that the doctrine of Communism is based on a clearly false concept of human life and of reality in general, and as such is absolutely doomed to failure. There is absolutely no other conclusion possible.”
“But what about all the lives sacrificed in the pursuit of the Communist ideal?”
“The fact is that all the suffering and deaths inflicted in the cause of Communism were completely pointless.” Boatman replied. “And in the long run the Communist state, in all manifestations, has to end.”
At this point in time it appeared that burning up on reentry wouldn’t seem to be a bad thing.
The Eagle was back under spin as she coasted back to geosynchronous altitude in the transfer orbit. In his role as the mission commander Boatman sat back at the work station in his quarters and read the various reports from the staff on the ground. That jackass of a county commissioner, a Democrat of course, didn’t get the message the first time and had to properly dealt with. And it appeared that the way things in general were going in the United States the idea of moving out to Ganymede and establishing a permanent base was looking better and better.
Why?
As with the Reds, the self-styled progressives and liberals in the United States believed they had an excuse to use force to obtain their goals on the ground. The idea that their victims had the right to live by their own rational judgement as well as the right to the products of their own thought and labor was simply irrelevant to them. As with the Reds, the Democrats and Progressives in general simply saw common people as things to be used. The control and usage of common people was to be brought about through fraud if possible and by force if necessary.
In The Reformation the practice of using people and otherwise profiting through political force was brought to an abrupt end. From coast to coast in the United States there were mass graves filled with the dead bodies of the Users. There was simply no other option at that time.
In the primary timeline The Reformation was brought about in part because the virtual monopoly on the mass media held by the Users had been broken by the Internet. But at the present time even the military communications system that was constructed for nuclear warfighting which served as the foundation of the Internet simply didn’t exist.
Could the Users be brought down now?
Boatman simply had no idea, but it was now time for dinner.
It was late in the night when Senator Kennedy personally answered the door of his Washington residence. The man he let in was a long standing supporter of the Kennedy Family in the publishing business from decades back.
Geoffrey Warren spoke softly.
“So Ted, what’s the big hush-hush about?”
Kennedy answered.
“Geoff, I’ve just been given a copy of a book that was originally published in the future, and the story that it tells is nothing less than appalling.”
He handed Warren the copy of The Concept Of Government. Warren opened it as Kennedy continued to speak.
“This is the unexpurgated version.” He said. “It covers the extermination of our party in the future and those responsible for it.”
Warren looked up with shock.
“Yes.” Said Kennedy. “Our party will be wiped out and that book names those who will do it.”
“So what do you want me to do?” Said Warren.
“What I want,” said Kennedy, “is for copies of that book to be printed and distributed to our people, and it must be done secretly, can you do it?”
Geoffrey Warren nodded.
“Yes, I can do it.”
“And it must be an exact copy,” said Kennedy, “even the typos must be included.”
Warren open the book to the inside cover and pointed to the number stamped inside.
“Does that include this number?”
“Yes,” Kennedy replied, “it has to mean something.”
“Okay,” said Warren, “I’ll do it.”
In the White House President Nixon read the report on the visit on the Soviet visit to the Eagle. It had essentially gone off without any problems. The mission commander gave his guests a tour of the ship, including the main drive room, along with a brief explanation of the technologies. The Russians even got to view the quantum singularity that was the heart of the ship.
Or at least the visual effects of the gravitational distortion it generated by its very existence.
And then there was the dinner. It was as close to a formal meal that could be served in free fall as the Soyuz spacecraft had been brought aboard and the ship could not be spun for internal gravity as a result.
And at the end the Soviet delegation was told that the Uptimers could do nothing for a invalid social order. Absolutely nothing at all.
What Brezhnev and the rest of the Politburo would think about this could only be guessed.
And then there was the latest incident in Nevada. A dumbass politician, a Democrat of course, tried to put the legal squeeze on the Uptimers. And the Uptimers responded with their usual exercise of deadly force.
One would think that the folks on the other side of the aisle would notice that the Uptimers had a standard response to their nonsense. But then the folks on the other side really weren’t in the habit of actual thought.
Or so it would appear.
Low Earth Orbit
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev sat back and waited for the retro-rockets of the Soyuz spacecraft to fire.
What was he going to tell the Politburo? From their perspective this mission was a complete failure.
“The basic problem,” said Evelyn Boatman, “is that the doctrine of Communism is based on a clearly false concept of human life and of reality in general, and as such is absolutely doomed to failure. There is absolutely no other conclusion possible.”
“But what about all the lives sacrificed in the pursuit of the Communist ideal?”
“The fact is that all the suffering and deaths inflicted in the cause of Communism were completely pointless.” Boatman replied. “And in the long run the Communist state, in all manifestations, has to end.”
At this point in time it appeared that burning up on reentry wouldn’t seem to be a bad thing.
The Eagle was back under spin as she coasted back to geosynchronous altitude in the transfer orbit. In his role as the mission commander Boatman sat back at the work station in his quarters and read the various reports from the staff on the ground. That jackass of a county commissioner, a Democrat of course, didn’t get the message the first time and had to properly dealt with. And it appeared that the way things in general were going in the United States the idea of moving out to Ganymede and establishing a permanent base was looking better and better.
Why?
As with the Reds, the self-styled progressives and liberals in the United States believed they had an excuse to use force to obtain their goals on the ground. The idea that their victims had the right to live by their own rational judgement as well as the right to the products of their own thought and labor was simply irrelevant to them. As with the Reds, the Democrats and Progressives in general simply saw common people as things to be used. The control and usage of common people was to be brought about through fraud if possible and by force if necessary.
In The Reformation the practice of using people and otherwise profiting through political force was brought to an abrupt end. From coast to coast in the United States there were mass graves filled with the dead bodies of the Users. There was simply no other option at that time.
In the primary timeline The Reformation was brought about in part because the virtual monopoly on the mass media held by the Users had been broken by the Internet. But at the present time even the military communications system that was constructed for nuclear warfighting which served as the foundation of the Internet simply didn’t exist.
Could the Users be brought down now?
Boatman simply had no idea, but it was now time for dinner.
It was late in the night when Senator Kennedy personally answered the door of his Washington residence. The man he let in was a long standing supporter of the Kennedy Family in the publishing business from decades back.
Geoffrey Warren spoke softly.
“So Ted, what’s the big hush-hush about?”
Kennedy answered.
“Geoff, I’ve just been given a copy of a book that was originally published in the future, and the story that it tells is nothing less than appalling.”
He handed Warren the copy of The Concept Of Government. Warren opened it as Kennedy continued to speak.
“This is the unexpurgated version.” He said. “It covers the extermination of our party in the future and those responsible for it.”
Warren looked up with shock.
“Yes.” Said Kennedy. “Our party will be wiped out and that book names those who will do it.”
“So what do you want me to do?” Said Warren.
“What I want,” said Kennedy, “is for copies of that book to be printed and distributed to our people, and it must be done secretly, can you do it?”
Geoffrey Warren nodded.
“Yes, I can do it.”
“And it must be an exact copy,” said Kennedy, “even the typos must be included.”
Warren open the book to the inside cover and pointed to the number stamped inside.
“Does that include this number?”
“Yes,” Kennedy replied, “it has to mean something.”
“Okay,” said Warren, “I’ll do it.”
In the White House President Nixon read the report on the visit on the Soviet visit to the Eagle. It had essentially gone off without any problems. The mission commander gave his guests a tour of the ship, including the main drive room, along with a brief explanation of the technologies. The Russians even got to view the quantum singularity that was the heart of the ship.
Or at least the visual effects of the gravitational distortion it generated by its very existence.
And then there was the dinner. It was as close to a formal meal that could be served in free fall as the Soyuz spacecraft had been brought aboard and the ship could not be spun for internal gravity as a result.
And at the end the Soviet delegation was told that the Uptimers could do nothing for a invalid social order. Absolutely nothing at all.
What Brezhnev and the rest of the Politburo would think about this could only be guessed.
And then there was the latest incident in Nevada. A dumbass politician, a Democrat of course, tried to put the legal squeeze on the Uptimers. And the Uptimers responded with their usual exercise of deadly force.
One would think that the folks on the other side of the aisle would notice that the Uptimers had a standard response to their nonsense. But then the folks on the other side really weren’t in the habit of actual thought.
Or so it would appear.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)